Skip to main content
Log in

Style of management and the relevance for workplace health promotion in small and medium sized enterprises

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a small company, the whole company culture, including the management style, is dominated by the owner. The management culture in small companies and above all the management style of the owner determine the chances of successfully introducing workplace health promotion (WHP). For this reason a typology was developed that describes the management personalities who affect the company culture in small enterprises. This provides a guide to the possible success of WHP in connection with the management style. Although a summary of the management and corporate culture of small companies in a few categories cannot show the variety of social reality, it can provide orientation. The typical categories of company social order (a mixture of ownership and leadership) in small and medium-sized enterprises are given below. Furthermore, there is an assessment of what the chances of realising workplace health promotion are in each type of company. Small and medium-sized companies (SME) have a number of organisational characteristics which are just ideal for the introduction and implementation of workplace health promotion. The work of the employer and employees is often the same. Information in the company is generally comprehensive and easily available. The lack of information which employees often complain about in large companies is not a problem. There is a good flow of communication. Small companies have a flat hierarchy that enables participation, the essential requirement for WHP. There is a close social relationship between the company head and the workforce, although it must be said that this closeness can be dangerous, particularly if it is misused as complete social control. The readiness to implement Workplace Health Promotion (WHP) in SME and the degree of success depends largely on the personality of the company manager and the style of leadership. Considering the importance of a manager’s personality for WHP in SME, modules and instruments to assist company owners and managers in SME are to be developed. On behalf of and in co-operation with the Austrian Network for Workplace Health Promotion several modules have been introduced to assist owners and managers of SMEs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Badura B, Hehlmann T (2003) Betriebliche Gesundheitspolitik. Der Weg zur gesunden Organisation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker R, Erlemann H-P (1992) Zehn Führungsgebote für Manager. HARVARD BUSINESSmanager 14:35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis W (1993) An Invented Life. Reflections on Leadership and Change. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchegger-Traxler A (2003) Machen führungskräfte krank? Führungsverhalten und Gesundheit. WISO 26:65–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Champy J (1995) Reengineering Management. The Mandate for New Leadership. Harper Collins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • European Network Workplace Health Promotion (1998) The Luxembourg declaration on workplace health promotion in the European union. WHP-Net-News 4:2–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas ChM, Wetlaufer S (1996) The ways chief executive officers lead. Harvard Bus Rev May-June:110–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonds Gesundes Österreich (2005) WEG - Wirtschaftlicher Erfolgsfaktor Gesundheit. Hilfsmittel, Anleitungen und Materialen für den Weg zu einem gesunden Unternehmen. Österreichische Kontaktstelle für Betriebliche Gesundheitsförderung, Linz

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F (1995) Trust. The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaugler E, Weber A (1995) Perspektiven des human resource management. Personal 1:4–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann R (1998) Gesundheit durch Projekte fördern. In: Österreichische Kontaktstelle für Betriebliche Gesundheitsförderung (ed) Projektmanagement in der Betrieblichen Gesundheitsförderung. Institut für Gesellschafts- und Sozialpolitik, Linz, pp 19–33

  • Hamel G, Prahalad CK (1994) Competing for the Future. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer M, Champy J (1993) Reengineering the Corporation. A Manifesto for Business Revolution. Harper Collins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurrelmann K (2000) Gesundheitssoziologie. Eine Einführung in sozialwissenschaftliche Theorien von Krankheitsprävention und Gesundheitsförderung. Juventa, Weinheim München

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothoff H, Reindl J (1990) Die soziale Welt kleiner Betriebe. Wirtschaften, Arbeiten und Leben im mittelständischen Industriebetrieb. Otto Schwartz & Co., Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Lux W, Stadelmann M (1995) Aktuelle Management-Konzepte: Merkmale, Vorteile, Nachteile. IO Management Zeitschrift 64:72–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayrhofer W (1999) Manager tun nichts, sie reden nur!? Zur Bedeutung (zukünftiger) Manager aus systemtheoretisch-konstruktivistischer Perspektive. In: Eckardstein D et al (eds) Management. Theorien - Führung - Veränderung. Schäffer-Poeschl, Stuttgart pp 257–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Meggeneder O (2005) Krankenstände vermeiden - Fehlzeiten reduzieren. Ein Leitfaden für Betriebe. Linde, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Meggeneder O (2006) Das Linzer Gesundheitszirkelmodell. In: Meggeneder O, Hirtenlehner H (eds) Zehn Jahre Betriebliche Gesundheitsförderung in Österreich. Forschungsstand - Strukturen - Entwicklungen. Mabuse, Frankfurt/Main, pp 191–200

  • Meggeneder O, Sochert R (1999) WHP interventions and work organisation: the health circle approach. Promot Educ 3:14–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo J, Wills J (2003) Lehrbuch der Gesundheitsförderung. Verlag für Gesundheitsförderung, Cologne

    Google Scholar 

  • Nothnagel A (1998) Mitarbeiter beurteilen ihre Vorgesetzten, In: HARVARD BUSINESSmanager 20:97–105

  • Österreichisches Netzwerk BGF (2003) Qualität in der Betrieblichen Gesundheitsförderung. Conference Report, Tuesday, 28th January 2003. Linz

  • Senge P et al (1999) The Dance of Change. The Challenges of Sustaining Momentum in Learning Organizations. Nicholas Breally Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters D (2002) Working safely in small enterprises in Europe. Towards a sustainable system for worker participation and representation. ETUC, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest statement

There is no conflict of interest in reference to the manuscript submitted.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oskar Meggeneder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meggeneder, O. Style of management and the relevance for workplace health promotion in small and medium sized enterprises. J Public Health 15, 101–107 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-006-0088-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-006-0088-7

Keywords

Navigation