Abstract
Gastric disorders are often associated with abnormal propagation of gastric electrical activity (GEA). The identification of clinically relevant parameters of GEA using noninvasive measures would therefore be highly beneficial for clinical diagnosis. While magnetogastrograms (MGG) are known to provide a noninvasive representation of GEA, standard methods for their analysis are limited. It has previously been shown in simplistic conditions that the surface current density (SCD) calculated from multichannel MGG measurements provides an estimate of the gastric source location and propagation velocity. We examine the accuracy of this technique using more realistic source models and an anatomically realistic volume conductor model. The results showed that the SCD method was able to resolve the GEA parameters more reliably when the dipole source was located within 100 mm of the sensor. Therefore, the theoretical accuracy of SCD method would be relatively diminished for patients with a larger body habitus, and particularly in those patients with significant truncal obesity. However, many patients with gastric motility disorders are relatively thin due to food intolerance, meaning that the majority of the population of gastric motility patients could benefit from the methods developed here. Large errors resulted when the source was located deep within the body due to the distorting effects of the secondary sources on the magnetic fields. Larger errors also resulted when the dipole was oriented normal to the sensor plane. This was believed to be due to the relatively small contribution of the dipole source when compared to the field produced by the volume conductor. The use of three orthogonal magnetic field components rather than just one component to calculate the SCD yielded marginally more accurate results when using a realistic dipole source. However, this slight increase in accuracy may not warrant the use of more complex vector channels in future superconducting quantum interference device designs. When multiple slow waves were present in the stomach, the SCD map contained only one maximum point corresponding to the more dominant source located in the distal stomach. Parameters corresponding to the slow wave in the proximal stomach were obtained once the dominant slow terminated at the antrum. Additional validation studies are warranted to address the utility of the SCD method to resolve parameters related to gastric slow waves in a clinical setting.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allescher, H. D., K. Abraham-Fuchs, R. E. Dunkel, and M. Classen. Biomagnetic 3-dimensional spatial and temporal characterization of electrical activity of human stomach. Dig. Dis. Sci. 43(4):683–693, 1998.
Austin, T. M., L. Li, A. J. Pullan, and L. K. Cheng. Effects of gastrointestinal tissue structure on computed dipole vectors. Biomed. Eng. Online 6:39, 2007.
Bradshaw, L. A., S. H. Allos, J. P. Wikswo, and W. O. Richards. Correlation and comparison of magnetic and electric detection of small intestinal electrical activity. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 272:1159–1167, 1997.
Bradshaw, L. A., L. K. Cheng, W. O. Richards, and A. J. Pullan. Surface current density mapping for identification of gastric slow wave propagation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 56(8):2131–2139, 2009.
Bradshaw, L. A., A. Irimia, J. A. Sims, M. R. Gallucci, R. L. Palmer, and W. O. Richards. Biomagnetic characterization of spatiotemporal parameters of the gastric slow wave. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 18(8):619–631, 2006.
Buist, M. L., L. K. Cheng, K. M. Sanders, and A. J. Pullan. Multiscale modelling of human gastric electric activity: can the electrogastrogram detect functional electrical uncoupling? Exp. Physiol. 91(2):383–390, 2006.
Chen, J. D., R. D. Richards, and R. W. McCallum. Identification of gastric contractions from the cutaneous electrogastrogram. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 89:79–85, 1994.
Chen, J., J. Vandewalle, W. Sansen, E. van Cutsem, G. Vantrappen, and J. Panssens. Observation of the propagation direction of human electrogastric activity from cutaneous recordings. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 27:538–542, 1995.
Chen, J. D. Z., X. Zou, X. Lin, S. Ouyang, and J. Liang. Detection of gastric slow wave propagation from the cutaneous electrogastrogram. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 277:424–430, 1999.
Cheng, L. K., M. L. Buist, and A. J. Pullan. Anatomically realistic torso model for studying the relative decay of gastric electrical and magnetic fields. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 1:3158–3161, 2006.
Cheng, L. K., M. L. Buist, W. O. Richards, L. A. Bradshaw, and A. J. Pullan. Noninvasive localization of gastric electrical activity. Int. J. Bioelectromagn. 7(1):1–4, 2005.
Cheng, L. K., M. L. Buist, R. Yassi, W. O. Richards, L. A. Bradshaw, and A. J. Pullan. A model of the electrical activity of the stomach: from cell to body surface. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 3:2761–2764, 2003.
Cheng, L. K., R. Komuro, T. M. Austin, M. L. Buist, and A. J. Pullan. Anatomically realistic multiscale models of normal and abnormal gastrointestinal electrical activity. World J. Gastroenterol. 13(9):1378–1383, 2007.
Cheng, L. K., G. O’Grady, P. Du, J. E. Egbuji, J. A. Windsor, and A. J. Pullan. Gastrointestinal system. Wiley Interdisc. Reviews: Syst. Biol. Med. 1:1–15, 2009 (in press). doi:10.1002/wsbm.19
Cheng, L. K., G. O’Grady, P. Du, J. U. Egbuji, J. A. Windsor, and A. J. Pullan. Detailed measurements of gastric electrical activity and their implications on inverse solutions. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 1:1302–1305, 2009.
Cohen, D., and H. Hosaka. Part II: magnetic field produced by a current dipole. J. Electrocardiol. 9(4):409–417, 1976.
Farrugia, G. Interstitial cells of Cajal in health and disease. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 20(Suppl 1):54–63, 2008.
Haberkorn, W., U. Steinhoff, M. Burghoff, O. Kosch, A. Morguet, and H. Koch. Pseudo current density maps of electrophysiological heart, nerve or brain function and their physical basis. Biomagn. Res. Technol. 4:5, 2006.
Hinder, R. A., and K. A. Kelly. Human gastric pacesetter potential. Site of origin, spread, and response to gastric transection and proximal gastric vagotomy. Am. J. Surg. 133(1):29–33, 1977.
Hosaka, H., and D. Cohen. Part IV: visual determination of generators of the magnetocardiogram. J. Electrocardiol. 9(4):426–432, 1976.
Irimia, A., W. O. Richards, and L. A. Bradshaw. Magnetogastrographic detection of gastric electrical response activity in humans. Phys. Med. Biol. 51:1347–1360, 2006.
Kandori, A., H. Oe, K. Miyashita, N. Date, N. Yamada, H. Naritomi, Y. Chiba, M. Murakami, T. Miyashita, and K. Tsukada. Visualisation method of spatial interictal discharges in temporal epilepsy patients using magneto-encephalogram. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 40(3):327–331, 2002.
Komuro, R., L. K. Cheng, and A. J. Pullan. Comparison and analysis of inter-subject variability of simulated magnetic activity generated from gastric electrical activity. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 36(6):1049–1059, 2008.
Lammers, W. J., A. el-Kays, G. W. Manefield, K. Arafat, and T. Y. el-Sharkawy. Disturbances in the propagation of the slow wave during acute local ischaemia in the feline small intestine. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 9(4):381–388, 1997.
Lammers, W. J., L. Ver Donck, B. Stephen, D. Smets, and J. A. Schuurkes. Origin and propagation of the slow wave in the canine stomach: the outlines of a gastric conduction system. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 296(6):G1200–G1210, 2009.
Mintchev, M. P., Y. J. Kingma, and K. L. Bowes. Accuracy of cutaneous recordings of gastrical activity. Gastroenterology 104:1273–1280, 1993.
Pullan, A., L. Cheng, R. Yassi, and M. Buist. Modelling gastrointestinal bioelectric activity. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 85(2–3):523–550, 2004.
Richards, W. O., C. L. Garrard, S. H. Allos, L. A. Bradshaw, D. J. Staton, and J. P. Wikswo, Jr. Noninvasive diagnosis of mesenteric ischemia using a SQUID magnetometer. Ann. Surg. 221(6):696–705, 1995.
Rose, D. F., E. Ducla-Soares, and S. Sato. Improved accuracy of MEG localization in the temporal region with inclusion of volume current effects. Brain Topogr. 1(3):175–181, 1989.
Sarvas, J. Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. Phys. Med. Biol. 32(1):11–22, 1987.
Sato, M., Y. Terado, T. Mitsui, T. Miyashita, A. Kandori, and K. Tsukada. Visualization of atrial excitation by magnetocardiogram. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 37:123–127, 2002.
Spitzer, V., M. J. Ackerman, A. L. Scherzinger, and D. Whitlock. The visible human male: a technical report. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 3(2):118–130, 1996.
Turnbull, G. K., S. P. Ritcey, G. Stroink, B. Brandts, and P. van Leeuwen. Spatial and temporal variations in the magnetic fields produced by human gastrointestinal activity. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 37:549–554, 1999.
Vittal, H., G. Farrugia, G. Gomez, and P. J. Pasricha. Mechanisms of disease: the pathological basis of gastroparesis—a review of experimental and clinical studies. Nat. Clin. Pract. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 4:336–346, 2007.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by NIH grants R01 DK 58197 and R01 DK 64775 and a University of Auckland Faculty Research Development Fund.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, J.H.K., Bradshaw, L.A., Pullan, A.J. et al. Characterization of Gastric Electrical Activity Using Magnetic Field Measurements: A Simulation Study. Ann Biomed Eng 38, 177–186 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-009-9804-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-009-9804-0