Skip to main content
Log in

Damage Mechanics of Porcine Flexor Tendon: Mechanical Evaluation and Modeling

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Porcine flexor tendons underwent cyclic and stress relaxation testing before and after strain exceeding elastic limit (“overstretch”) to examine which mechanical parameters undergo changes following subfailure damage. From these data, we developed an “effective strain” damage model (in which the tendon is modeled as if being pulled to a lower strain). Damage was induced at three strain levels to determine the extent to which post-damage parameter changes were affected by overstretch strain level. We found that diffuse damage induced by overstretch decreased elastic and viscoelastic parameters obtained during testing. The stress response of tendon to strain is therefore altered following damage. We next compared the strain-dependent parameter behavior to damage-dependent behavior to determine the effective strain for each parameter. Effects of damage became more pronounced as strain during overstretch increased; following overstretch to 6.5, 9, or 13% strain, effective strain was 2.43 ± 0.33, 1.98 ± 0.3, or 0.88 ± 0.43% strain, respectively. By determining the effective strain and using it to calculate predicted values of post-damage mechanical parameters, it was possible to predict the stress relaxation behavior of tendons with Schapery’s nonlinear viscoelastic model. Using this approach, a single parameter predicts both elastic and viscoelastic compromise from known, strain-dependent behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Duenwald, S. E., R. Vanderby, and R. S. Lakes. Viscoelastic relaxation and recovery of tendon. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 37(6):1131–1140, 2009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Duenwald, S. E., R. Vanderby, and R. S. Lakes. Stress relaxation and recovery in tendon and ligament: experiment and modeling. Biorheology 47(1):1–14, 2010.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gardiner, J. C., J. A. Weiss, and T. D. Rosenberg. Strain in the human medial collateral ligament during valgus loading of the knee. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 391:266–274, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hokanson, J., and S. Yazdani. A constitutive model of the artery with damage. Mech. Res. Commun. 24(2):151–159, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson, G. A., D. M. Tramaglini, R. E. Levine, K. Ohno, N. Y. Choi, and S. L. Woo. Tensile and viscoelastic properties of human patellar tendon. J. Orthop. Res. 12(6):796–803, 1994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lemaitre, J. How to use damage mechanics. Nucl. Eng. Des. 80(2):233–245, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lochner, F. K., D. W. Milne, E. J. Mills, and J. J. Groom. In vivo and in vitro measurement of tendon strain in the horse. Am. J. Vet. Res. 41(12):1929–1937, 1980.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Natali, A. N., P. G. Pavan, E. L. Carniel, M. E. Lucisano, and G. Taglialavoro. Anisotropic elasto-damage constitutive model for the biomechanical analysis of tendons. Med. Eng. Phys. 27(3):209–214, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Perry, S. M., C. L. Getz, and L. J. Soslowsky. After rotator cuff tears, the remaining (intact) tendons are mechanically altered. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 18(1):52–57, 2009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Provenzano, P. P., D. Heisey, K. Hayashi, R. Lakes, and R. Vanderby. Subfailure damage in ligament: a structural and cellular evaluation. J. Appl. Physiol. 92(1):362–371, 2002.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schapery, R. A. On the characterization of nonlinear viscoelastic materials. Polym. Eng. Sci. 9(4):295–310, 1969.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shadwick, R. E. Elastic energy storage in tendons: mechanical differences related to function and age. J. Appl. Physiol. 68(3):1033–1040, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Simo, J. C. On a fully three-dimensional finite-strain viscoelastic damage model: formulation and computational aspects. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 60(2):153–173, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by NSF award 0553016. The authors would like to thank Ron McCabe for his technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ray Vanderby Jr..

Additional information

Associate Editor Michael R. Torry oversaw the review of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duenwald-Kuehl, S., Kondratko, J., Lakes, R.S. et al. Damage Mechanics of Porcine Flexor Tendon: Mechanical Evaluation and Modeling. Ann Biomed Eng 40, 1692–1707 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-012-0538-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-012-0538-z

Keywords

Navigation