Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Intent Recognition in a Powered Lower Limb Prosthesis Using Time History Information

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New computerized and powered lower limb prostheses are being developed that enable amputees to perform multiple locomotion modes. However, current lower limb prosthesis controllers are not capable of transitioning these devices automatically and seamlessly between locomotion modes such as level-ground walking, stairs and slopes. The focus of this study was to evaluate different intent recognition interfaces, which if configured properly, may be capable of providing more natural transitions between locomotion modes. Intent recognition can be accomplished using a multitude of different signals from mechanical sensors on the prosthesis. Since these signals are non-stationary over any given stride, and gait is cyclical, time history information may improve locomotion mode recognition. The authors propose a dynamic Bayesian network classification strategy to incorporate prior sensor information over the gait cycle with current sensor information. Six transfemoral amputees performed locomotion circuits comprising level-ground walking and ascending/descending stairs and ramps using a powered knee and ankle prosthesis. Using time history reduced steady-state misclassifications by over half (p < 0.01), when compared to strategies that did not use time history, without reducing intent recognition performance during transitions. These results suggest that including time history information across the gait cycle can enhance locomotion mode intent recognition performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Au, S. K., J. Weber, and H. Herr. Biomechanical design of a powered ankle-foot prosthesis. In: Proceedings of 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2007, pp. 298–303.

  2. Au, S., J. Weber, and H. Herr. Powered ankle-foot prosthesis improves walking metabolic energy. IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 25:51–66, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ceseracciu, E., M. Reggiani, Z. Sawacha, M. Sartori, F. Spolaor, C. Cobelli, and E. Pagello, SVM Classification of Locomotion Modes Using Surface Electromyography for Applications in Rehabilitation Robotics, Presented at the RO-MAN, Viareggio, Italy, 2010.

  4. Davies, B., and A. Datta. Mobility outcome following unilateral lower limb amputation. Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 27:186–190, 2003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Farrell, M. T., and H. Herr. A method to determine the optimal features for control of a powered lower-limb prostheses. In: IEEE EMBC Annual International Conference, 2011, pp. 6041–6046.

  6. Fite, K. B., J. Mitchell, F. C. Sup, and M. Goldfarb. Design and control of an electrically powered knee prosthesis. In: Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE 10th IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2007, pp. 902–905.

  7. Flowers, W. C., and R. W. Mann. Electrohydraulic knee-torque controller for a prosthesis simulator. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 99:3–8, 1977.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gales, M., and S. Young. The application of hidden Markov models in speech recognition. Found. Trends Signal Process. 1:195–304, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hargrove, L., K. Englehart, and B. Hudgins. A comparison of surface and intramuscular myoelectric signal classification. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 54:847–853, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huang, H., T. Kuiken, and R. Lipschutz. A strategy for identifying locomotion modes using surface electromyography. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 56:65–73, 2009.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang, H., F. Zhang, L. J. Hargrove, D. Zhi, D. R. Rogers, and K. B. Englehart. Continuous locomotion-mode identification for prosthetic legs based on neuromuscular mechanical fusion. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 58:2867–2875, 2011.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Joseph, K. H., G. S. Thomas, H. Matthew, and B. Ryan. An active foot-ankle prosthesis with biomechanical energy regeneration. J. Med. Devices. 4:011003.

  13. Kuiken, T. A., G. Li, B. A. Lock, R. D. Lipschutz, L. A. Miller, K. A. Stubblefield, and K. B. Englehart. Targeted muscle reinnervation for real-time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms. JAMA 301:619–628, 2009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lawson, B. E., H. A. Varol, A. Huff, E. Erdemir, and M. Goldfarb. Control of stair ascent and descent with a powered transfemoral prosthesis. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 21:466–473, 2013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nefian, A., L. Liang, X. Pi, X. Liu, and K. Murphy. Dynamics Bayesian networks for audio-visual speech recognition. J. Appl. Signal Process. 11:1–15, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  16. OSSUR, The POWER KNEE. http://bionics.ossur.com/Products/POWER-KNEE/SENSE.

  17. Otto Bock Orthopedic Industry, I. (Date Assessed: Dec 5, 2012). Instruction Materials—Training with Genium. Available: http://www.ottobockknees.com/for-professionals/instructional-materials/.

  18. Otto Bock Orthopedic Industry, I., Manual for the 3c100 Otto Bock C-LEG. Duderstadt, Germany, 1998.

  19. Rabiner, L. R. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc. IEEE 77:257–286, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Segal, A. D., M. S. Orendurff, G. K. Klute, M. L. McDowell, J. A. Pecoraro, J. Shofer, and J. Czerniecki. Kinematic and kinetic comparisons of transfemoral amputee gait using C-Leg and Mauch SNS prosthetic knees. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 43:857–870, 2006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sup, F., A. Bohara, and M. Goldfarb. Design and control of a powered transfemoral prosthesis. Int. J. Robot. Res. 27:263–273, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sup, F., A. Bohara, and M. Goldfarb. Design and control of a powered knee and ankle prosthesis. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Roma, Italy, 2007.

  23. Sup, F., H. A. Varol, J. Mitchell, T. Withrow, and M. Goldfarb. Design and control of an active electrical knee and ankle prosthesis. In: IEEE international conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics, Scottsdale, U.S.A., 2008, pp. 523–528.

  24. Sup, F., H. A. Varol, J. Mitchell, T. Withrow, and M. Goldfarb. Preliminary evaluations of a self-contained anthropomorphic transfemoral prosthesis. IEEE ASME Trans. Mechatron. 14:667–676, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sup, F., H. A. Varol, and M. Goldfarb. Upslope walking with a powered knee and ankle prosthesis: initial results with an amputee subject. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 19:71–78, 2011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Varol, H. A., F. Sup, and M. Goldfarb. Multiclass real-time intent recognition of a powered lower limb prosthesis. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 57:542–551, 2010.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wilkenfeld, A. J. Biologically inspired autoadaptive control of a knee prosthesis. Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 2000.

  28. Winter, D. A. Biomechanical motor patterns in normal walking. J. Mot. Behav. 15:302–330, 1983.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Winter, D. A. The Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Gait: Normal, Elderly and Pathological. Univeristy of Waterloo Press, 1991.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Tom Idstein and the electronics team at the Center for Bionic Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago for their support. Additional acknowledgements include Todd Kuiken for his scientific and clinical advise, Robert Lipschutz and Beth Halsne for prosthetic fitting support, Suzanne Finucane for patient physical therapy support, and Kim Ingraham for data collection. This work was supported in part by the US Army’s Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center under Grant Number 81XWH-09-2-0020. A.J. Young was supported by a National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Bionic Medicine, The Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, 345 E Superior St., Suite 1309, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA

    Aaron J. Young, Ann M. Simon, Nicholas P. Fey & Levi J. Hargrove

  2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA

    Aaron J. Young

  3. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA

    Ann M. Simon, Nicholas P. Fey & Levi J. Hargrove

Authors
  1. Aaron J. Young
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ann M. Simon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nicholas P. Fey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Levi J. Hargrove
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aaron J. Young.

Additional information

Associate Editor Thurmon E. Lockhart oversaw the review of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Young, A.J., Simon, A.M., Fey, N.P. et al. Intent Recognition in a Powered Lower Limb Prosthesis Using Time History Information. Ann Biomed Eng 42, 631–641 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-013-0909-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-013-0909-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation