Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of instream habitat enhancement options using fish habitat simulations: case-studies in the river Pas (Spain)

  • Published:
Aquatic Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the northern coast of Spain there are rivers with Atlantic salmon populations. In the upper reaches of one of these streams, river Pas, the effectiveness of habitat enhancement measures was evaluated, under different instream flow conditions. By means of the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology and using a two dimensional hydraulic model (River2D, Steffler P (2000) Software River2D. Two Dimensional Depth Averaged Finite Element Hydrodynamic Model. University of Alberta, Canada), the potential value of stream habitat for different salmon development stages requirements was measured by Weighted Useable Area (WUA). This habitat evaluation was carried out for the unmodified stream reach, which represent the control or natural conditions. Habitat improvement measures (alternate deflectors and low dams) were simulated in the original riverbed topography. Over this modified base, habitat was estimated running River2D again. By comparing the salmon habitat evaluations in the control conditions with those obtained under those improvement conditions we have been able to assess the effectiveness of each one, and the instream flow environment at which maximum improvement is reached. The maximum habitat improvement was obtained around 10 m3/s for the adult salmon, and for the fry and parr it was around 6 m3/s. However, the habitat simulation results show that with both improvement measures, under a natural flow regime the mean annual habitat increases around 1% of the WUA in relation to the control conditions, which is not a significant improvement. A similar small WUA increase was obtained when changing the bed topography, considering geomorphological adjustments due to the new erosion and sedimentation areas caused by the presence of these structures. Therefore, these types of habitat improvement measures are not recommended in these stream reaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bovee K.D. 1982. A guide to stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology. Instream Flow Information Paper 12. USDI Fish and Wildlife Service. Washington, 248 pp

  • Bovee K.D., Lamb B.L., Bartholow J.M., Stalnaker C.B., Taylor J. and Henriksen J. 1998. Stream habitat analysis using the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology. US Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division Information and Technology Report, US Department of the Interior, USGS/BRD-1998–0004, viii+131 pp

  • Cairns J. Jr., Dickson K.L., Herricks E.E. (eds), (1977) Recovery and Restoration of Damaged Ecosystems. University of Virginia Press, Charlottesville Virginia, pp. 531

    Google Scholar 

  • Caletková J., Komínková D. (2004) PHABSIM as an instrument for identification a range of the ecological discharges for bentic community. In: García de Jalón D., Vizcaíno P. (eds), Proceedings of Fifth International Symposium on Ecohydraulics Aquatic Habitats: Analysis & Restoration. IAHR, Madrid, pp. 449–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowder D.W. and Diplas P. (2000) Using two-dimensional hydrodynamic models at scales of ecological importance. J. Hydrol. 230: 172–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowder D.W. and Diplas P. (2002) Assessing changes in watershed flow regimes with spatially explicit hydraulic models. J. Amer. Water Res. Assoc. 38(2): 397–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García de Jalón D. (1995) Management of physical habitat for fish stocks. In: Harper D.M., Ferguson A.J.D. (eds), The Ecological Basis for River Management. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 363–374

    Google Scholar 

  • García de Jalón D. (1997) Estado de conservación de los salmónidos españoles. In: Granado-Lorencio C. (eds), Conservación, recuperación y gestión de la ictiofauna continental ibérica. Publicaciones de la Estación de Ecología Acuática, Sevilla, pp. 77–100

    Google Scholar 

  • García de Jalón D., Mayo M., Hervella F., Barcelo E., Fernandez T. (1993) Principios y técnicas de gestión de la pesca en aguas continentales. Ediciones Mundi-Prensa, Madrid, pp. 247

    Google Scholar 

  • García de Leániz C. and Verspoor E. (1989) Natural hybridization between Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and brown trout (Salmo trutta) in northern Spain. J. Fish Biol. 34: 41–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner R.W. (1991) Scottish grayling: history and biology of the populations. Proc. Inst. Fish. Manag. Annu. Study Course 22: 171–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghanem A., Steffler P.M., Hicks F.E. and Katopodis C. 1995. Two dimensional finite element model for aquatic habitats. Water Resources Engineering Report 95-S1. Department of Civil Engineering. University of Alberta, 189 pp

  • Ghanem A., Steffler P., Hicks F. and Katopodis C. (1996) Two-dimensional hydraulic simulation of physical habitat conditions in flowing streams. Regul. Rivers-Res. Manag. 12(2–3): 185–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González del Tánago M. and García de Jalón D. (2001) Restauración de Ríos y Riberas. Fundación Conde del Valle de Salazar. Mundi-Prensa, Madrid, pp. 319

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore J.A., (eds), (1985) The Restoration of Rivers and Streams: Theories and Experience. Butterworth Publishers, Boston, pp. 280

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale J.G. (1965) An evaluation of trout stream habitat improvement in a North Shore tributary of Lake Superior. Minnesota Fish. Invest. 5: 37–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Heede B.H. and Rinne J.N. (1990) Hydrodynamic and fluvial morphologic processes: implications for fisheries management and research. North Amer. J. Fish. Manag. 10: 249–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heggenes J. 1990. Habitat utilization and preferences in brown trout (Salmo trutta) and juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in streams. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Nature Conservation, Agricultural University of Norway, AS and Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries Laboratory, Zoological Museum, University of Oslo. pp. 291–319

  • Hey R.D. (1994) Environmentally sensitive river engineering. In: Callow P., Petts G.E. (eds), The Rivers Handbook, Vol 2. Petts. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp. 337–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Leclerc M, Boudreault A, Bechara JA, Corfa G (1995) 2-Dimensional hydrodynamic modeling – a neglected tool in the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 124(5): 645–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orsborn J.F. and Anderson J.W. (1986) Stream improvements and fish response. A bio-engineering assessment. Water Resour. Bull. 22: 381–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves G.H., Hall J.D., Roelofs T.D., Hickman T.L. and Baker C.O. (1991) Rehabilitation and modifying stream habitats. In: Meehan W.R. (eds), Influences of Forest and Rangeland Management on Salmonid Fishes and Their Habitats. American Fisheries Society Special Publication No 19, Bethesda, pp. 519–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Reice S.R., Wissmar R.C. and Naiman R.J. (1990) Disturbance regimes, resilience and recovery of animal communities and habitats in lotic ecosystems. Environ. Manag. 14(5): 647–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosgen D (1996) Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology. Pagosa Springs, Colorado, 380 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt G. and Otaola-Urrutxi M. (2000) Manual práctico para la aplicación de técnicas de bioingeniería en la restauración de ríos y riberas. CEDEX, Madrid, 79 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamloo H., Rajaratnam N. and Katopodis C. (2001) Hydraulics of simple habitat structures. J. Hydr. Res. 39(4): 351–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker C., Lamb B.L., Henriksen J., Bovee K.D. and Bartholow J.M. (1995) The instream flow incremental methodology: a primer for IFIM, Biological Report 29, National Biological Service, US Department of the Interior, 45 pp

  • Steffler P. (2000) Software River2D. Two Dimensional Depth Averaged Finite Element Hydrodynamic Model. University of Alberta, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffler P., Waddle T., Ghanem A., Katopodis C. and Locke A. (2000) Comparison of one and two-dimensional open channel flow models for a small habitat stream. Rivers, 7(3): 205–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Vehanen T., Huusko A., Yrjänä T., Lathi M. and Mäki-Petäys A. (2003) Habitat preference by grayling (Thymallus thymallus) in an artificially modified, hydropeaking riverbed: a contribution to understand the effectiveness of habitat enhancement measures. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 19: 15–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wesche T.A. (1985) Stream channel modifications and reclamation structures to enhance fish habitat. In: Gore J.A. (eds), The Restoration of Rivers and Streams. Butterworth Publishers, London, pp. 103–163

    Google Scholar 

  • White R.I. and Brynildson O.M. (1967) Guidelines for Management of Trout Stream Habitat in Wisconsin. Technical Bulletin No. 39. Department of Natural Resources. Madison, Wisconsin, 63 pp

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Forestry Engineering, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Montes, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, C/ Ramiro de Maeztu s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain

    Diego García de Jalón & Javier Gortázar

Authors
  1. Diego García de Jalón
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Javier Gortázar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diego García de Jalón.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

García de Jalón, D., Gortázar, J. Evaluation of instream habitat enhancement options using fish habitat simulations: case-studies in the river Pas (Spain). Aquat Ecol 41, 461–474 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-006-9030-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-006-9030-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation