Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The potential value of agroforestry to dung beetle diversity in the wet tropical forests of the Pacific lowlands of Colombia

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

In tropical regions where agricultural activities are limited, agroforestry is an alternative for both economic development and for the management and conservation of biodiversity. The potential role of different types of land use as reservoirs of dung beetle diversity in the wet tropical forest of the Pacific lowlands of Colombia is evaluated in three agroforestry systems that differ in canopy cover and the sowing density of Borojoa patinoi crops associated with timber forest. Although total species richness was similar among land use types, differences related to the decrease in the abundance and biomass of the species were remarkable, and reflected in turn by the diversity and structure of the guilds. The general pattern observed was one in which the structure of the dung beetle assemblage of B. patinoi growing below a diversified and permanent tree cover was similar to that of the primary and secondary forest. Beetle diversity in management systems with less tree cover or a high sowing density of B. patinoi was lower and very similar to that of abandoned agricultural fields. This suggests that B. patinoi agroforestry systems can be viewed as valuable instruments for biodiversity management and conservation in the wet tropical forests of the Pacific lowlands and not just as substitutes for forest, though we must be aware that structural changes in the beetle community may in turn affect the ecological processes regulated by these insects in the agrosystems under study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andresen E, Laurance SG (2007) Possible indirect effects of mammal hunting on dung beetle assemblages in Panama. Biotropica 39:141–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwat SA, Willis KJ, Birks HJB, Whittaker RJ (2008) Agroforestry: a refuge for tropical biodiversity? Trends Ecol Evol 23:261–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borghesio L (1999) Interactions between dung, plants and the dung fauna in a heathland in northern Italy. Pedobiologia 43:97–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell RK (2010) EstimateS, version 8.2.0: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples, software and user’s guide. ©2006, University of Connecticut, Mansfield, Connecticut http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates

  • Colwell RK, Coddington JA (1994) Estimating the extent of terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philos Trans Biol Sci 345:101–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cuatrecasas J (1948) Borojoa, un nuevo género de Rubiáceas. Rev Acad Colomb Cienc 28:474–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar F (2004) Diversity and composition of dung beetle (Scarabaeinae) assemblages in heterogeneous Andean landscape, Colombia. Trop Zool 17:123–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar F, Halffter G, Arellano L (2007) From forest to pasture: an evaluation of the influence of environment and biogeography on the structure of dung beetle (Scarabaeinae) assemblages along three altitudinal gradients in the Neotropical region. Ecography 30:193–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Espinal S (1977) Zonas de vida y formaciones vegetales de Colombia. Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi, IGAC, vol XIII No 11. Bogotá–Colombia

  • Gentry AH (1982) Patterns of Neotropical plant species diversity. Evol Biol 15:1–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giraldo C, Escobar F, Chará J, Calle Z (2011) The adoption of silvopastoral systems promotes the recovery of ecological processes regulated by dung beetles in the Colombian Andes. Insect Conserv Diver 4:115–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Cambefort Y (eds) (1991) Dung beetle ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey CA, Gonzalez J, Somarriba E (2006) Dung beetle and terrestrial mammal diversity in forests, indigenous agroforestry systems and plantain monocultures in Talamanca, Costa Rica. Biodivers Conserv 15:555–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez AM, Ramos YA, García F, Ríos A, Asprilla J (2005) El Chocó: Una fuente de oportunidades comerciales, a partir del conocimiento, valoración y manejo de su biodiversidad. Rev Inst Univ Tec Chocó 22:3–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Jose S (2009) Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agrofor Syst 76:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kryger U (2009) Dung beetles as bio–indicators. In: Scholtz CH, Davis ALV, Kryger U (eds) Evolutionary biology and conservation of dung beetles. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia and Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely JA, Schroth G (2006) Agroforestry and biodiversity conservation: traditional practices, present dynamics and lessons for the future. Biodivers Conserv 15:549–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal IC (1993) Natural manuring and soil conditioning by dung beetles. Trop Ecol 34:150–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols E, Larsen T, Spector S, Davis AL, Escobar F, Favila M, Vuline K (2007) Global dung beetle response to tropical forest modification and fragmentation: a quantitative literature review and meta‐analysis. Biol Conserv 137:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols E, Spector S, Louzada J, Larsen T, Amezquita S, Favila ME (2008) Ecological functions and ecosystem services provided by Scarabaeinae dung beetles. Biol Conserv 141:1461–1474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols E, Gardner TA, Peres CA, Spector S (2009) Co-declining mammals and dung beetles: an impending ecological cascade. Oikos 118:481–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardo–Locarno LC (2007) Escarabajos coprófagos (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) de Lloró, Departamento del Chocó, Colombia. Bol Cient Mus Hist Nat Univ Caldas 11:377–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Patiño VM (1950) Noticia sobre el borojo, una nueva especie frutal de la costa colombiana del pacífico. Rev Acad Colombiana Cienc Exac Fís Nat 7:478–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Pineda E, Moreno C, Escobar F, Halffter G (2005) Biodiversity in cloud forest and shade coffee: analysis of three indicator groups. Conserv Biol 19:400–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team. (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna Available from http://www.R-project.org

  • Ricker M, Heinrich J, Daly DC (1997) The case for Borojoa patinoi (Rubiaceae) in the Chocó region, Colombia. Econ Bot 51:39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahabuddin PH, Manuwoto S, Noerdjito WA, Tscharntke T, Schulze CH (2010) Diversity and body size of dung beetles attracted to different dung types along a tropical land-use gradient in Sulawesi, Indonesia. J Trop Ecol 26:53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slade EM, Mann DJ, Villanueva JF, Lewis OT (2007) Experimental evidence for the effects of dung beetle functional group richness and composition on ecosystem function in a tropical forest. J Anim Ecol 76:1094–1104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slade EM, Mann DJ, Lewis OT (2011) Biodiversity and ecosystem function of tropical forest dung beetles under contrasting logging regimes. Biol Conserv 144:166–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viljanen H, Escobar F, Hanski I (2010) Low alpha but high beta diversity in forest dung beetles in Madagascar. Global Ecol Biogeogr 19:886–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall Press Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Helbert Olaya and Mario Mosquera for assistance during fieldwork, and Francisco Serna and Erika Vergara for help processing samples in the laboratory. Keith MacMillan translated and revised a first English version of the manuscript. Comments by two anonymous reviewers greatly improved the manuscript. Bianca Delfosse revised the final version of the manuscript. JCN is grateful to the Organización de Estados Americanos (OEA) for supporting his research and for the award of a fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federico Escobar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neita, J.C., Escobar, F. The potential value of agroforestry to dung beetle diversity in the wet tropical forests of the Pacific lowlands of Colombia. Agroforest Syst 85, 121–131 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9445-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9445-9

Keywords

Navigation