Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The sustainability promise of alternative food networks: an examination through “alternative” characteristics

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Concerns about the unsustainability of the conventional food system have brought attention to so called alternative food networks (AFNs), which are widely thought to be more sustainable. However, claims made about AFNs’ sustainability have been subject to a range of criticisms. Some of them present counterevidence, while others have pointed to problematic underlying features in the academic literature and popular discourse that may hamper our understanding of AFNs’ sustainability. Considering these criticisms, together with the fact that the literature often addresses a specific type of AFN or a specific sustainability-related issue, it is hard to form a clear overall picture of the sustainability promise of AFNs. In this article, we seek to contribute to a clearer understanding of this promise through a structured review, focusing on links between AFN characteristics and sustainability. Through an analysis of AFN conceptualizations reflected in the literature, we identify and consolidate their key characteristics. We then synthesize claims of how these characteristics may translate into sustainability, finding a wide range of potential direct and indirect impacts. Examining these from different angles, we find that the sustainability promise of AFNs found in these claims is qualified by the presence of potentially unaddressed issues, by criticisms regarding for example the evidence base of the assumed impacts and their power in addressing sustainability, and by considerations of how these impacts might play out in actual, real-life food networks. Indirect impacts of learning and participation may be highly significant for sustainability. We conclude with recommendations for research and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, P., D. Van Dusen, J. Lundy, and S. Gliessman. 1991. Integrating social, environmental, and economic issues in sustainable agriculture. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 6(1): 34–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, P., and M. Kovach. 2000. The capitalist composition of organic: The potential of markets in fulfilling the promise of organic agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values 17(3): 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, P., M. FitzSimmons, M. Goodman, and K. Warner. 2003. Shifting plates in the agrifood landscape: The tectonics of alternative agrifood initiatives in California. Journal of Rural Studies 19(1): 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M.D. 2008. Rights-based food systems and the goals of food system reform. Agriculture and Human Values 25(4): 593–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, W. 1987. A defense of the family farm. In Is there a moral obligation to save the family farm?, ed. G. Comstock, 347–360. Ames: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Born, B., and M. Purcell. 2006. Avoiding the local trap. Scale and food systems in planning research. Journal of Planning Education and Research 26(2): 195–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, S., and K. De Master. 2011. New rural livelihoods or museums of production? Quality food initiatives in practice. Journal of Rural Studies 21(1): 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., and C. Getz. 2008. Towards domestic fair trade? Farm labor, food localism, and the “family scale” farm. GeoJournal 73(1): 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C., and S. Miller. 2008. The impacts of local markets: a review of research on farmers markets and Community Supported Agriculture (CSA). American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90(5): 1296–1302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. 1986. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In Power, action, and belief. A new sociology of knowledge?, ed. J. Law, 196–233. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coley, D., M. Howard, and M. Winter. 2009. Local food, food miles, and carbon emissions: A comparison of farm shop and mass distribution approaches. Food Policy 34(2): 150–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coley, D., M. Howard, and M. Winter. 2011. Food miles: Time for a re-think? British Food Journal 113(7): 919–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cone, C.A., and A. Myhre. 2000. Community-supported agriculture: A sustainable alternative to industrial agriculture? Human Organization 59(2): 187–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R., L. Holloway, L. Venn, L. Dowler, J.R. Hein, M. Kneafsey, and H. Tuomainen. 2008. Common ground? Motivations for participation in a community-supported agriculture scheme. Local Environment 13(3): 203–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DEFRA (Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs). 2002. The strategy for sustainable farming and food. Facing the future. DEFRA Publications. http://archive.defra.gov.uk/foodfarm/policy/sustainfarmfood/documents/sffs.pdf. Accessed 23 March 2014.

  • De Roest, K., and A. Menghi. 2000. Reconsidering “traditional” food: the case of Parmigiano Reggiano cheese. Sociologia Ruralis 40(4): 439–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards-Jones, G., L. Milà i Canals, N. Hounsome, M. Truninger, G. Koerber, B. Hounsome, P. Cross, E.H. York, A. Hospido, K. Plassman, I.M. Harris, R.T. Edwards, G.A.S. Day, A.D. Tomos, S.J. Cowell, and D.L. Jones. 2008. Testing the assertion that “local food is best”: the challenges of an evidence-based approach. Trends in Food Science & Technology 19(5): 265–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esquinas-Alcázar, J. 2005. Protecting crop genetic diversity for food security: Political, ethical, and technical challenges. Nature Reviews Genetics 6: 946–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2007. Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 of 28 June 2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:189:0001:0023:EN:PDF. Accessed 6 May 2014.

  • FARMA. 2010. Certification—abridged rules. http://www.farmersmarkets.net/certification2.htm. Accessed 6 May 2014.

  • Feagan, R., and A. Henderson. 2009. Devon Acres CSA: Local struggles in a global food system. Agriculture and Human Values 26(3): 203–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsman-Hugg, S., J.-M. Katajajuuri, I. Riipi, K. Järvelä, J. Mäkelä, and P. Timonen. 2013. Key CSR dimensions for the food chain. British Food Journal 115(1): 30–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, M.V. 2007. What is organic production? United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Library. http://www.nal.usda.gov/afsic/pubs/ofp/ofp.shtml. Accessed 24 January 2013.

  • Gomiero, T., D. Pimentel, and M.G. Paoletti. 2011. Environmental impact of different agricultural management practices: Conventional vs. organic agriculture. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 30(1–2): 95–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, D. 2004. Rural Europe redux? Reflections on alternative agro-food networks and paradigm change. Sociologia Ruralis 44(1): 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthman, J. 2004. The trouble with “organic lite” in California. A rejoinder to the conventionalization debate. Sociologia Ruralis 44(3): 301–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthman, J., A.W. Morris, and P. Allen. 2006. Squaring farm security and food security in two types of alternative food institutions. Rural Sociology 71(4): 662–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanein, N. 2003. Practicing food democracy: A pragmatic politics of transformation. Journal of Rural Studies 19(1): 77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, C.C. 2000. Embeddedness and local food systems: Notes on two types of direct agricultural market. Journal of Rural Studies 16(3): 295–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, L., M. Kneafsey, L. Venn, R. Cox, E. Dowler, and H. Tuomainen. 2007. Possible food economies: A methodological framework for exploring food production–consumption relationships. Sociologia Ruralis 47(1): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilbery, B., and D. Maye. 2005a. Alternative (shorter) food supply chains and specialist livestock products in the Scottish–English borders. Environment and Planning A 37(5): 823–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilbery, B., and D. Maye. 2005b. Food supply chains and sustainability: evidence from specialist food producers in the Scottish/English borders. Land Use Policy 22(4): 331–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffee, D., and P.H. Howard. 2010. Corporate co-optation of organic and fair trade standards. Agriculture and Human Values 27(4): 387–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarosz, L. 2008. The city in the country: Growing alternative food networks in Metropolitan areas. Journal of Rural Studies 24(3): 231–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, H., and M.K. Hendrickson. 2010. Are farmers of the middle distinctively “good stewards”? Evidence from the Missouri Farm Poll, 2006. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23(6): 571–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, R., and P. Martens. 2007. Sustainable development: how to manage something that is subjective and never can be achieved. Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy 3(2): 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan, J. 2004. Alternative strategies in the UK agro-food system: interrogating the alterity of farmers’ markets. Sociologia Ruralis 44(4): 395–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloppenburg, J., J. Hendrickson, and G.W. Stevenson. 1996. Coming into the foodshed. Agriculture and Human Values 13(3): 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamine, C. 2005. Settling shared uncertainties: Local partnerships between producers and consumers. Sociologia Ruralis 45(5): 324–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. 2000. Shelter from the storm? Geographies of regard in the worlds of horticultural consumption and production. Geoforum 31(2): 137–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobley, M., A. Butler, and M. Reed. 2009. The contribution of organic farming to rural development: An exploration of the socio-economic linkages of organic and non-organic farms in England. Land Use Policy 26(3): 723–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, S. 2006. Evaluating fair trade consumption: Politics, defetishization, and producer participation. International Journal of Consumer Studies 30(5): 452–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maloni, M.J., and M.E. Brown. 2006. Corporate social responsibility in the supply chain: An application in the food industry. Journal of Business Ethics 68(1): 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariola, M. 2008. The local industrial complex? Questioning the link between local foods and energy use. Agriculture and Human Values 25(2): 193–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, T., J. Banks, and G. Bristow. 2000. Food supply chain approaches: Exploring their role in rural development. Sociologia Ruralis 40(4): 424–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maye, D., and B. Ilbery. 2006. Regional economies of local food production: Tracing food chain links between “specialist” producers and intermediaries in the Scottish–English borders. European Urban and Regional Studies 13(4): 337–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxey, L. 2006. Can we sustain sustainable agriculture? Learning from small-scale producer-suppliers in Canada and the UK. The Geographical Journal 172(3): 230–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxey, L. 2007. From “alternative” to “sustainable” food. In Alternative food geographies: Concepts and debates, ed. D. Maye, L. Holloway, and M. Kneafsey, 55–75. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milestad, R., L. Westberg, U. Geber, and J. Björklund. 2010. Enhancing adaptive capacity in food systems: Learning at farmers’ markets in Sweden. Ecology and Society 15(3): 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, K., T. Marsden, and J. Murdoch. 2006. Worlds of food: Place, power and provenance in the food chain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C., and H. Buller. 2003. The local food sector: A preliminary assessment of its form and impact in Gloucestershire. British Food Journal 105(8): 559–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C., and J. Kirwan. 2006. Vegetarians: Uninvited, uncomfortable or special guests at the table of the alternative food economy? Sociologia Ruralis 46(3): 192–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norberg-Hodge, H., T. Merrifield, and S. Gorelick. 2002. Bringing the food economy home: Local alternatives to global agribusiness. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, S.U., and S. Stagl. 2001. Global food markets and their local alternatives: A socio-ecological economic perspective. Population and Environment: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 22(6): 533–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pole, A., and M. Gray. 2013. Farming alone? What’s up with the “C” in community supported agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values 30(1): 85–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redclift, M. 2002. Pathways to sustainability? Geography 87(3): 189–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisch, L., U. Eberle, and S. Lorek. 2013. Sustainable food consumption: An overview of contemporary issues and policies. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 9(2): 7–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renting, H., T.K. Marsden, and J. Banks. 2003. Understanding alternative food networks: exploring the role of short food supply chains in rural development. Environment and Planning A 35(3): 393–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. 2004. Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological Economics 48(4): 369–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sage, C. 2003. Social embeddedness and relations of regard: alternative “good food” networks in south-west Ireland. Journal of Rural Studies 19(1): 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schonhart, M., M. Penker, and E. Schmid. 2009. Sustainable local food production and consumption. Challenges for implementation and research. Outlook on Agriculture 38(2): 175–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selfa, T., and J. Qazi. 2005. Place, taste, or face-to-face? Understanding producer–consumer networks in “local” food systems in Washington State. Agriculture and Human Values 22(4): 451–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shreck, A. 2005. Resistance, redistribution, and power in the Fair Trade banana initiative. Agriculture and Human Values 22(1): 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnino, R., and T. Marsden. 2006. Beyond the divide: Rethinking relationships between alternative and conventional food networks in Europe. Journal of Economic Geography 6(2): 181–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starik, M., and P. Kanashiro. 2013. Toward a theory of sustainability management: Uncovering and integrating the nearly obvious. Organization and Environment 26(1): 7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundkvist, Å., R. Milestad, and A. Jansson. 2005. On the importance of tightening feedback loops for sustainable development of food systems. Food Policy 30(2): 224–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sustain. 2002. Sustainable food chains. Briefing paper 1. Local food; benefits, obstacles, and opportunities. Sustain: The Alliance for Better Food and Farming, London. http://www.sustainweb.org/pdf/briefing1.pdf. Accessed 28 March 2014.

  • Sustain. 2013. The sustain guide to good food. Sustain: The Alliance for Better Food and Farming, London.

  • Sustainable Development Commission. 2005. Sustainability implications for the Little Red Tractor Scheme. http://www.sd-commission.org.uk/publications.php?id=195. Accessed 28 March 2014.

  • Tavernier, E.M., and V. Tolomeo. 2004. Farm typology and sustainable agriculture: Does size matter? Journal of sustainable agriculture 24(2): 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P.L., D.L. Murray, and L.T. Raynolds. 2005. Keeping trade fair: Governance challenges in the fair trade coffee initiative. Sustainable Development 13(3): 199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terstappen, V., L. Hanson, and D. McLaughlin. 2013. Gender, health, labor, and inequities: A review of the fair and alternative trade literature. Agriculture and Human Values 30(1): 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thilmany, D., C.A. Bond, and J.K. Bond. 2008. Going local: Exploring consumer behavior and motivations for direct food purchases. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90(5): 1303–1309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tregear, A. 2011. Progressing knowledge in alternative and local food networks: Critical reflections and a research agenda. Journal of Rural Studies 27(4): 419–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virtanen, Y., S. Kurppa, M. Saarinen, J.-M. Katajajuuri, K. Usva, I. Mäenpää, J. Mäkelä, J. Grönroos, and A. Nissinen. 2011. Carbon footprint of food—approaches from national input–output statistics and a LCA of a food portion. Journal of Cleaner Production 19(16): 1849–1856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D.C.H., B. Ilbery, and D. Maye. 2005. Making reconnections in agro-food geography: Alternative systems of food provision. Progress in Human Geography 29(1): 22–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, C.L., and H.S. Matthews. 2008. Food-miles and the relative climate impacts of food choices in the United States. Environmental Science and Technology 42(10): 3508–3513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whatmore, S., P. Stassart, and H. Renting. 2003. What’s alternative about alternative food networks? Environment and Planning A 35: 389–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, M. 2003. Embeddedness, the new food economy, and defensive localism. Journal of Rural Studies 19(1): 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakovleva, N. 2007. Measuring the sustainability of the food supply chain: A case study of the UK. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 9(1): 75–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zepeda, L. 2009. Which little piggy goes to market? International Journal of Consumer Studies 33(3): 250–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the editor and the two anonymous reviewers for their insightful and constructive comments on this paper, as well as Anne Murcott who provided helpful commentary on an earlier version. Funding from the Finnish Cultural Foundation and the Foundation for Economic Education is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sini Forssell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Forssell, S., Lankoski, L. The sustainability promise of alternative food networks: an examination through “alternative” characteristics. Agric Hum Values 32, 63–75 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-014-9516-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-014-9516-4

Keywords

Navigation