Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transgender Women’s Concerns and Preferences on Potential Future Long-Acting Biomedical HIV Prevention Strategies: The Case of Injections and Implanted Medication Delivery Devices (IMDDs)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are several long-acting biomedical HIV prevention products in the development pipeline, including injections and implanted medication delivery devices (IMDDs). It is critical to understand concerns and preferences on the use of these products in populations that shoulder a disproportionate burden of the HIV epidemic, such as transgender women. This will allow researchers and public health professionals to construct interventions tailored to the needs of these women to promote optimal use of these tools. In studies of other biomedical HIV prevention products (e.g., oral PrEP) it is clear that transgender women have unique concerns related to the use of these strategies. This may have an impact on this group’s uptake and sustained use of longacting HIV prevention products. This study conducted four focus groups with N = 18 transgender women in New York City to understand their concerns and preferences on long-acting PrEP injections and IMDDs. Findings showed that participants were overwhelmingly positive about long-acting HIV prevention strategies, though they had some apprehensions. Overall, participants felt that injections and IMDDs could help address adherence challenges, and that transgender-specific needs should be addressed during clinical trials. Also, there were concerns related to injection or IMDD logistics, concerns about injections’ or IMDDs’ presence in the body, and familiarity with these products affected participants’ opinions on them. Findings from this work can be used to inform protocols, measures, materials, and adherence interventions in future initiatives for transgender women using PrEP injections or IMDDs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Margolis DA, Stellbrink HJ, Eron JJ, Yazdanpanah Y, Griffith S, Dorey D, et al. Cabotegravir + Rilpivirine as long-acting maintenance therapy: LATTE-2 week 32 results. In: Margolis D, editor. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI); Boston2016.

  2. Trezza C, Ford SL, Spreen W, Pan R, Piscitelli S. Formulation and pharmacology of long-acting cabotegravir. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2015;10(4):239–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Murray M, Markowitz M, Frank I, Grant RM, Mayer KH, Margolis DA, et al. Tolerability and acceptability of cabotegravir LA injection: Results from the ECLAIR study. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI); February 22-25; Boston, MA2016.

  4. Andrews CD, Heneine W. Cabotegravir long-acting for HIV-1 prevention. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2015;10(4):258–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pickett J. Presentation: Exploring the pipeline: Lubes, rings, films, fibers, and shots 4 HIV prevention. AIDS Foundation of Chicago. 2014;Accessed on 1/27/2017(http://www.slideshare.net/JimPickett/exploring-the-pipeline-lubes-rings-films-fibers-and-shots-4-hiv-prevention.).

  6. Nyaku AN, Kelly SG, Taiwo BO. Long-acting antiretrovirals: Where are we now. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2017;Epub ahead of print.

  7. Hope TJ, Marrazzo JM. A Shot in the Arm for HIV Prevention? Recent Successes and Critical Thresholds. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2015;31(11):1055-9 PMC4651048.

  8. Gunawardana M, Remedios-Chan M, Miller CS, Fanter R, Yang F, Marzinke MA, et al. Pharmacokinetics of long-acting tenofovir alafenamide (GS-7340) subdermal implant for HIV prophylaxis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(7):3913-9 PMC4468692.

  9. Schlesinger E, Johengen D, Luecke E, Rothrock G, McGowan I, van der Straten A, et al. A tunable, biodegradable, thin-film polymer device as a long-acting implant delivering tenofovir alafenamide furmarate for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis. Pharm Res. 2016;33(7):1649-56 PMC4892981.

  10. Kippax S, Stephenson N. Beyond the distinction between biomedical and social dimensions of HIV: Prevention through the lens of a social public health. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(5):789-99 PMC3483918.

  11. Koblin BA, Andrasik M, Austin J. Preparing for the unexpected: The pivotal role of social and behavioral sciences in trials of biomedical HIV prevention interventions. J Acquire Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;63(0 2):S183-S6 PMC3737568.

  12. van der Straten A, Van Damme L, Haberer JE, Bangsberg DR. Unraveling the divergent results of preexposure prophylaxis trials for HIV prevention. AIDS. 2012;26(7):F13–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rotheram-Borus MJ, Swendeman D, Chovnick G. The past, present, and future of HIV prevention: integrating behavioral, biomedical, and structural intervention strategies for the next generation of HIV prevention. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2009;5:143–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nuttbrock L, Hwahng S, Bockting WO, Rosenblum A, Mason M, Macri M, et al. Lifetime risk factors for HIV/STI infections among male-to-female transgender persons. J Acquire Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;53(3):417-21 PMC2784264.

  15. Shulden JD, Song B, Barros A, Mares-DelGrasso A, Martin CW, Ramirez R, et al. Rapid HIV resting in transgender communities by community-based organizations in three cities. Public Health Rep. 2008;123(Suppl 3):101–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sevelius JM, Deutsch MB, Grant R. The future of PrEP among transgender women: the critical role of gender affirmation in research and clinical practices. J Int AIDS Soc. 2016;19(7(Suppl 6)):21105 PMC5071750.

  17. Escudero DJ, Kerr T, Operario D, Socias ME, Sued O, Marshall BD. Inclusion of trans women in pre-exposure prophylaxis trials: a review. AIDS Care. 2015;27(5):637-41 PMC4336598.

  18. Baral SD, Poteat T, Stromdahl S, Wirtz AL, Guadamuz TE, Beyrer C. Worldwide burden of HIV in transgender women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13(3):214–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sevelius JM, Keatley J, Calma N, Arnold E. ‘I am not a man’: Trans-specific barriers and facilitators to PrEP acceptability among transgender women. Glob Public Health. 2016;11(7–8):1060–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rael CT, Martinez M, Giguere R, Bockting WO, MacCrate C, Mellman W, et al. Barriers and facilitators to oral PrEP use among transgender women in New York City. AIDS and Behavior. 2018;Epub Ahead of Print.

  21. UCSF. The TRIUMPH Collaborative (Trans Research-Informed communites United in Mobilization for the Prevention of HIV). 2017;Date Accessed: April 2, 2017:http://transhealth.ucsf.edu/trans?page=programs-triumph.

  22. Deutsch MB, Glidden DV, Sevelius J, Keatley J, McMahan V, Guanira J, et al. HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in transgender women: a subgroup analysis of the iPrEx trial. The Lancet HIV. 2015;2(12):e512-e9 PMC5111857 PMC.

  23. Johnson J. The HIV PrEP and Microbicides Pipeline. 2018.

  24. McGowan I. What’s in the biomedical prevention pipeline. HIV Endgame: Closing Gaps in the Care Cascade; Toronto, Canada; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mascoini M, editor GSK long-acting ART integrase inhibitor – cabotegravir injected every 1, 2, or 3 months yields adequate troughs in simulation. 54th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2015; Washington D.C.

  26. Landovitz RJ, Kofron R, McCauley M. The promise and pitfalls of long-acting injectable agents for HIV prevention. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2016;11(1):122-8 PMC4747082.

  27. Mascolini M. ECLAIR: Phase 2A safety and PK study of cabotegravir LA in HIV-uninfected men: Long-acting cabotegravir data suggest PrEP injections every 8 weeks. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI); 22-25 February; Boston, MA2016.

  28. HIV prevention trials network launches HPTN 083: First study to test efficacy and safety of injectable cabotegravir for PrEP [press release]. Durham, NC, 20 December 2016.

  29. HPTN-083. A Phase 2b/3 Double Blind Safety and Efficacy Study of Injectable Cabotegravir Compared to Daily Oral Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate/Emtricitabine (TDF/FTC), for Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in HIV-Uninfected Cisgender Men and Transgender Women who have Sex with Men. 2017;Date Accessed: April 2, 2017:https://www.hptn.org/research/studies/hptn083.

  30. Delany-Moretlwe S, Hosseinipour M. A phase 3 double blind safety and efficacy study of long-acting injectable cabotegravir compared to daily oral TDF/FTC for pre-exposure prophylaxis in HIV-uninfected women. HIV Prevention Trials Network; 2017.

  31. EDCTP. EDCTP’s strategy for funding research on HIV 2017 [.

  32. Karim SSA, Gengiah TN, Karim QA. Protocol: CAPRISA 018 - A Phase I/II trial to assess the safety, acceptability, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of a sustained-release tenofovir alafenamide sub-dermal implant for HIV prevention in women. 2018.

  33. Hope TJ, Kiser P. Next generation drugs and delivery for PrEP: Sustained Long-Acting Protection from HIV (SLAP-HIV). 9th IAS Conference on HIV Science; July 23-26; Paris, France2017.

  34. Hope TJ. Sustained Long-Acting Prevention against HIV (SLAP-HIV) 2015.

  35. Deutsch MB. Overview of feminizing hormone therapy San Francisco, USA: UCSF Transgender Care; 2016 [Available from: https://transcare.ucsf.edu/guidelines/feminizing-hormone-therapy.

  36. Landovitz RJ, Grinsztejn B. Protocol: HPTN-083 A phase 2b/3 double blind safety and efficacy study of injectable cabotegravir compared to daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC), for pre-exposure prophylaxis in HIV-uninfected cisgender men and transgender women who have sex with men. HIV Prevention Trials Network. 2018.

  37. Palomba S, Falbo A, Di Cello A, Materazzo C, Zullo F. Nexplanon: the new implant for long-term contraception. A comprehensive descriptive review. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2012;28(9):710–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Rotondi NK, Bauer GR, Scanlon K, Kaay M, Travers R, Travers A. Nonprescribed hormone use and self-performed surgeries: “do-it-yourself” transitions in transgender communities in Ontario. Canada. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(10):1830–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sedbon E, Wainer R, Perves C. Quality of life of patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with injecable drugs in relation to medical practice in France. Reproductive BioMedicine. 2006;12(3):298–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cox D, Stone J. Managing self-injection difficulties in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. J Neurosci Nurs. 2006;38(3):167–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Landovitz RJ, Grinsztejn B. HPTN-083: A phase 2b/3 double blind safety and efficacy study of injectable cabotegravir compared to daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC), for pre-exposure prophylaxis in HIV- uninfected cisgender men and transgender women who have sex with men. HIV Prevention Trials Network; 2016.

  42. Daniels K, Mosher WD, Jones J. Contraceptive methods women have ever used: United States, 1982-2010. US Department of Health aand Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2013.

  43. Frost JJ, Darroch JE. Factors associated with contraceptive choice and inconsistent method use, United States, 2004. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2008;40(2):94–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. ASA. American Sexual Health Association Birth Control Method Comparison Chart 2013 [Available from: http://www.ashasexualhealth.org/pdfs/ContraceptiveOptions.pdf.

  45. PlannedParenthood. Planned Parenthood: Birth Control 2019 [Available from: https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/birth-control.

  46. The Royal Women’s Hospital Victoria Australia: Contraceptive Implants 2019 [Available from: https://www.thewomens.org.au/health-information/contraception/contraceptive-implants.

  47. Torres R, Mendes N, Machado AI, Marques C. In situ breakage of Implanon(R)–two cases of a rare occurrence. Contraception. 2013;88(1):189–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Agrawal A, Robinson C. Spontaneous snapping of an Implanon® in two halves in situ. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care. 2003;29(4):238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Heudes PM, Laigle Querat V, Darnis E, Defrance C, Douane F, Frampas E. Migration of a contraceptive subcutaneous device into the pulmonary artery. Report of a case. Case Rep Womens Health. 2015;8:6-8.

  50. Gallon A, Fontarensky M, Chauffour C, Boyer L, Chabrot P. Looking for a lost subdermal contraceptive implant? Think about the pulmonary artery. Contraception. 2017;95(2):215–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ismail H, Mansour D, Singh M. Migration of Implanon. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2006;32(3):157–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Fischer MA. Implanon: a new contraceptive implant. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2008;37(3):361–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ancker JS, Senathirajah Y, Kukafka R, Starren JB. Design features of graphs in health risk communication: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13(6):608–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Garcia-Retamero R, Galesic M. Communicating treatment risk reduction to people with low numeracy skills: a cross-cultural comparison. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(12):2196–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Brache V, Faundes A, Alvarez F, Cochon L. Nonmenstrual adverse events during the use of implantable contraceptives for women: data from clinical trials. Contraception. 2002;65(1):63–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Rowlands S, Searle S. Contraceptive implants: current perspectives. Open Access Journal of Contraception. 2014.

  57. Satoskar RS, Rege N, Bhandarkar SD. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics. 24th ed. New Delhi: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  58. FDA-approved patient labeling: Nexplanon (etonogestrel implant): Package insert; 2018. https://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/n/nexplanon/nexplanon_ppi.pdf.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Data collection support was provided by Project AFFIRM (R01 HD079603; Principal Investigator, Walter Bockting, Ph.D.) and a generous grant from the Mac AIDS Fund (MAF CU13-3233; Principal Investigator: Walter Bockting, Ph.D.). The first author is supported by a K01 Award from the National Institute of Mental Health (K01 MH115785; Principal Investigator: Christine Tagliaferri Rael, Ph.D.) from the National Institute of Mental Health at the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies at the NY State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University (P30 MH43520; Center Principal Investigator: Robert Remien, Ph.D.). Additionally, research was supported by SLAP-HIV (UM1 AI120184; Principal Investigator, Tomas Hope, Ph.D.) and the Third Coast Center for AIDS Research (P30 AI117943; Principal Investigator, Richard D’Aquila, M.D.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Mental Health or the National Institutes of Health. The research team would like to thank all participants for their time, hard work, and critical insight.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Tagliaferri Rael.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rael, C.T., Martinez, M., Giguere, R. et al. Transgender Women’s Concerns and Preferences on Potential Future Long-Acting Biomedical HIV Prevention Strategies: The Case of Injections and Implanted Medication Delivery Devices (IMDDs). AIDS Behav 24, 1452–1462 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-019-02703-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-019-02703-5

Keywords

Navigation