Skip to main content
Log in

An approach to the valuation and decision of ERP investment projects based on real options

Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The risks and uncertainties inherent in most enterprise resources planning (ERP) investment projects are vast. Decision making in multistage ERP projects investment is also complex, due mainly to the uncertainties involved and the various managerial and/or physical constraints to be enforced. This paper tackles the problem using a real-option analysis framework, and applies multistage stochastic integer programming in formulating an analytical model whose solution will yield optimum or near-optimum investment decisions for ERP projects. Traditionally, such decision problems were tackled using lattice simulation or finite difference methods to compute the value of simple real options. However, these approaches are incapable of dealing with the more complex compound real options, and their use is thus limited to simple real-option analysis. Multistage stochastic integer programming is particularly suitable for sequential decision making under uncertainty, and is used in this paper and to find near-optimal strategies for complex decision problems. Compared with the traditional approaches, multistage stochastic integer programming is a much more powerful tool in evaluating such compound real options. This paper describes the proposed real-option analysis model and uses an example case study to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alesii, G. (2005). VaR in real options analysis. Review of Financial Economics, 14(3–4), 189–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, L. H. R., & Stenbacka, R. (2001). Adoption of uncertain multi-stage technology projects: a real options approach. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 35(1), 71–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benaroch, M., & Kauffman, R. J. (1999). A case for using real options pricing analysis to evaluate information technology project investments. Information Systems Research, 10(2), 70–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benaroch, M., & Kauffman, R. J. (2000). Justifying electronic banking network expansion using real options analysis. MIS Quarterly, 24(2), 197–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benaroch, M. (2001). Option-based management of technology investment risk. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(4), 428–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benaroch, M. (2002). Managing information technology investment risk: a real options perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(2), 43–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birge, J. R. (1985). Decomposition and partitioning methods for multistage stochastic linear programs. Operations Research, 33(5), 989–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birge, J. R. (1997). Stochastic programming computation and applications. Journal on Computing, 9(2), 111–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. The Journal of Political Economy, 81(2), 637–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandão, L. E., & Dyer, J. S. (2005). Decision analysis and real options: a discrete time approach to real option valuation. Annals of Operations Research, 135(1), 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, M. A. H., & Ye, J. J. (1996). Generalized Bellman-Hamilton-Jacobi optimality conditions for a control problem with a boundary condition. Applied Mathematics and Optimization, 33(3), 211–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, M. A. H., & Thompson, R. T. (1999). EVPI-based importance sampling solution procedures for multistage stochastic linear programmes on parallel MIMD architectures. Annals of Operations Research, 90(0), 161–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duku-Kaakyire, A., & Nanang, D. M. (2004). Application of real options theory to forestry investment analysis. Forest Policy and Economics, 6(6), 539–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escudero, L. F., Garín, A., Merino, M., & Pérez, G. (2007). A two-stage stochastic integer programming approach as a mixture of branch-and-fix coordination and benders decomposition schemes. Annals of Operations Research, 152(1), 395–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grenadier, S. R., & Wang, N. (2005). Investment timing, agency and information. Journal of Financial Economics, 75(3), 493–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grenadier, S. R., & Weiss, A. M. (1997). Investment in technological innovations: an option pricing approach. Journal of Financial Economics, 44(3), 397–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochstrasser, B. (1990). Evaluating IT investments—matching techniques to projects. Journal of Information Technology, 5(4), 215–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ifinedo, P., & Nahar, N. (2007). ERP systems success: an empirical analysis of how two organizational stakeholder groups prioritize and evaluate relevant measures. Enterprise Information Systems, 1(1), 25–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalafut, P. C., & Low, J. (2001). The value creation index: quantifying intangible value. Strategy and Leadership, 29(5), 9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R. L. (1995). An options view of investments in expansion-flexible manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 38(2), 281–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R. L. (1996). A note on project risk and option values of investments in information technologies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(1), 187–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R. L. (2002). Managing risks in IT projects: an options perspective. Information & Management, 40(1), 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLean, L., Zhao, Y., & Ziemba, W. (2003). A process control approach to investment risk. In IEEE international conference on computational intelligence for financial engineering, Hong Kong.

  • Martzoukos, S. H. (2000). Real options with random controls and the value of learning. Annals of Operations Research, 99(1–4), 305–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minasny, B., & McBratney, A. B. (2006). A conditioned Latin hypercube method for sampling in the presence of ancillary information. Computers & Geosciences, 32(9), 1378–1388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. L., & Zhao, F. (2007). CIOs perspectives of critical success factors in ERP upgrade projects. Enterprise Information Systems, 1(1), 129–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palomino, M. A., & Whitley, E. A. (2007). The effects of national culture on ERP implementation: a study of Colombia and Switzerland. Enterprise Information Systems, 1(3), 301–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pflug, G. C. (2001). Scenario tree generation for multiperiod financial optimization by optimal discretization. Mathematical Programming, 89(2), 251–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Premkumar, G., Ramamurthy, K., & Nilakanta, S. (1994). Implementation of electronic data interchange: an innovation diffusion perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(2), 157–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, P., & Kassapoglou, C. (2001). An ROI-based Strategy for implementation of existing and emerging technologies in helicopter manufacturing. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48, 414–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S. (2003). The effect of mean reversion on investment under uncertainty. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 28(2), 377–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, E. S., & Zozaya-Gorostiza, C. (2003). Investment under uncertainty in information technology: acquisition and development projects. Management Science, 49(1), 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taudes, A. (1998). Software growth options. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(1), 165–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taudes, A., Feurstein, M., & Mild, A. (2000). Options analysis of software platform decisions: a case study. MIS Quarterly, 24(2), 227–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigeorgis, L. (1993). The nature of option interactions and the valuation of investments with multiple real options. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 28(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeo, K. T., & Qiu, F. (2003). The value of management flexibility-a real option approach to investment evaluation. International Journal of Project Management, 21(4), 243–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, F., Li, H.Z., Chu, L.K. et al. An approach to the valuation and decision of ERP investment projects based on real options. Ann Oper Res 168, 181–203 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-008-0365-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-008-0365-7

Keywords

Navigation