Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Stochastic programming and the option of doing it differently

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Option theory and stochastic programming are tightly linked. Most options can be analyzed in both frameworks, and the two approaches support each other in many slightly more complex situations. But this similarity hides some central differences in perspective. This short note tries to focus on one of these, namely the fact that option theory can be applied only to options already identified, while stochastic programming is able to help us find options in contexts where it is not at all clear what they are, and where finding might be more important than valuing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borison, A. (2005). Real options analysis: Where are the emperor’s clothes? Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 17(2), 17–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crainic, T. G. (2003). Long haul freight transportation. In R. W. Hall (Ed.), Handbook of transportation science (2nd edn., pp. 451–516). Norwell: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higle, J. L., & Wallace, S. W. (2003). Sensitivity analysis and uncertainty in linear programming. Interfaces, 33, 53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kall, P., & Wallace, S. W. (1994). Stochastic programming. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A. J. (2002). Duality and martingales: a stochastic programming perspective on contingent claims. Mathematical Programming, 91(3), 543–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lium, A.-G., Crainic, T. G., & Wallace, S. W. (2009). A study of demand stochasticity in service network design. Transportation Science, 43(2), 144–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. E., & Nau, R. F. (1995). Valuing risky projects: Option pricing theory and decision analysis. Management Science, 41(5), 795–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigeorgis, L. (1996). Real options: Managerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, S. W. (2000). Decision making under uncertainty: Is sensitivity analysis of any use? Operations Research, 48, 20–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T., & de Neufville, R. (2004). Building real options into physical systems with stochastic mixed-integer programming. Article prepared for the 8th real options annual international conference in Montreal. Canada, June 2004.

  • Zhao, Y., & Ziemba, W. T. (2008). Calculating risk neutral probabilities and optimal portfolio policies in a dynamic investment model with downside risk control. European Journal of Operational Research, 185(3), 1525–1540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziemba, W. T., & Mulvey, J. M. (1998). Worldwide asset and liability modeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management Science, Lancaster University Management School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YX, UK

    Stein W. Wallace

Authors
  1. Stein W. Wallace
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stein W. Wallace.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wallace, S.W. Stochastic programming and the option of doing it differently. Ann Oper Res 177, 3–8 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-009-0600-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-009-0600-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation