Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predicting Successful Learning of SMR Neurofeedback in Healthy Participants: Methodological Considerations

  • Published:
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neurofeedback (NF) is a tool that has proven helpful in the treatment of various disorders such as epilepsy or attention deficit disorder (ADHD). Depending on the respective application, a high number of training sessions might be necessary before participants can voluntarily modulate the electroencephalographic (EEG) rhythms as instructed. In addition, many individuals never learn to do so despite numerous training sessions. Thus, we are interested in determining whether or not performance during the early training sessions can be used to predict if a participant will learn to regulate the EEG rhythms. Here, we propose an easy to use, but accurate method for predicting the performance of individual participants. We used a sample set of sensorimotor rhythm (SMR 12–15 Hz) NF training sessions (experiment 1) to predict the performance of the participants of another study (experiment 2). We then used the data obtained in experiment 2 to predict the performance of participants in experiment 1. We correctly predicted the performance of 12 out of 13 participants in the first group and all 14 participants in the second group; however, we were not able to make these predictions before the end of the eleventh training session.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arns, M., de Ridder, S., Strehl, U., Breteler, M., & Coenen, A. (2009). Efficacy of Neurofeedback Treatment in ADHD: The Effects on Inattention, Impulsivity and Hyperactivity: A Meta-Analysis. EEG and Clinical Neuroscience, 40(3), 180–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, T., & Vernon, D. (2009). Identifying indices of learning for alpha neurofeedback training. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 34(4), 309–328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doehnert, M., Brandeis, D., Straub, M., Steinhausen, H. C., & Drechsler, R. (2008). Slow cortical potential neurofeedback in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Is there neurophysiological evidence for specific effects? Journal of Neural Transmission, 115(10), 1445–1456.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doppelmayr, M., Nosko, H., Pecherstorfer, T., & Fink, A. (2007). An attempt to increase cognitive performance after stroke with Neurofeedback. Biofeedback, 35(4), 126–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egner, T., & Gruzelier, J. H. (2003). Ecological validity of neurofeedback: Modulation of slow wave EEG enhances musical performance. Neuroreport, 14(9), 1221–1224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Egner, T., & Gruzelier, J. H. (2004). EEG Biofeedback of low beta band components: Frequency-specific effects on variables of attention and event-related brain potentials. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115(1), 131–139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Egner, T., Strawson, E., & Gruzelier, J. H. (2002). EEG signature and phenomenology of alpha/theta neurofeedback training versus mock feedback. Applied Psychophysiology Biofeedback, 27(4), 261–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruzelier, J., Hardman, E., Wild, J., & Zaman, R. (1999). Learned control of slow potential interhemispheric asymmetry in schizophrenia. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 34(3), 341–348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanslmayr, S., Sauseng, P., Doppelmayr, M., Schabus, M., & Klimesch, W. (2005). Increasing individual upper alpha power by neurofeedback improves cognitive performance in human subjects. Applied Psychophysiology Biofeedback, 30(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoedlmoser, K., Pecherstorfer, T., Gruber, G., Anderer, P., Doppelmayr, M., Klimesch, W., et al. (2008). Instrumental conditioning of human sensorimotor rhythm (12–15 Hz) and its impact on sleep as well as declarative learning. Sleep, 31(10), 1401–1408.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kotchoubey, B., Strehl, U., Uhlmann, C., Holzapfel, S., Koenig, M., Froescher, W., et al. (2001). Modification of slow cortical potentials in patients with refractory epilepsy: A controlled outcome study. Epilepsia, 42(3), 406–416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kouijzer, M. E. J., de Moor, J. M. H., Gerrits, B. J. L., Buitelaar, J. K., & van Schie, H. T. (in press). Long-term effects of neurofeedback treatment in autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3(2), 496–501.

  • Kouijzer, M. E. J., de Moor, J. M. H., Gerrits, B. J. L., Congedo, M., & van Schie, H. T. (2009). Neurofeedback improves executive functioning in children with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3(1), 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leins, U., Goth, G., Hinterberger, T., Klinger, Ch., Rumpf, N., & Strehl, U. (2007). Neurofeedback for Children with ADHD: A Comparison of SCP and Theta/Beta Protocols. Applied Psychophysiol Biofeedback, 32, 73–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linden, M., Habib, T., & Radojevic, V. (1996). A controlled study of the effects of EEG biofeedback on the cognition and behavior of children with attention deficit disorder and learning disabilities. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 21(1), 35–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfurtscheller, G., & Lopes da Silva, F. (2005). EEG event-related desynchronization (ERD) and event-related sychronization (ERS). Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 5, 1003–1016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, J., Sajid, I., Parkinson, L. A., & Gruzelier, J. H. (2005a). Biofeedback and dance performance: A preliminary investigation. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 30(1), 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, J., Varney, C., Parkinson, L. A., & Gruzelier, J. H. (2005b). The effects of alpha/theta neurofeedback on personality and mood. Cognitive Brain Research, 23(2–3), 287–292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rockstroh, B., Elbert, T., Birbaumer, N., Wolf, P., Duchting-Roth, A., Reker, M., et al. (1993). Cortical self-regulation in patients with epilepsies. Epilepsy Research, 14(1), 63–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schenk, S., Lamm, K., & Ladwig, K. H. (2003). Effects of a neurofeedback-based alpha training on chronic tinnitus. Verhaltenstherapie, 13(2), 115–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siniatchkin, M., Hierundar, A., Kropp, P., Kuhnert, R., Gerber, W. D., & Stephani, U. (2000). Self-regulation of slow cortical potentials in children with migraine: An exploratory study. Applied Psychophysiology Biofeedback, 25(1), 13–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, M. B., & Egner, T. (2006). Foundation and practice of neurofeedback for the treatment of epilepsy. Applied Psychophysiology Biofeedback, 31(1), 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, G., Thornby, J., Hammond, D. C., Strehl, U., Canady, B., Arnemann, K., et al. (2009). Meta-analysis of EEG biofeedback in treating epilepsy. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, 40(3), 173–179.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L., & Thompson, M. (2005). Neurofeedback intervention for adults with ADHD. Journal of Adult Development, 12(2–3), 123–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M., & Thompson, L. (2009). Asperger’s syndrome intervention: Combining neurofeedback, biofeedback and metacognition Introduction to Quantitative EEG and Neurofeedback (Second Edition) (pp. 365–415). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, D., Egner, T., Cooper, N., Compton, T., Neilands, C., Sheri, A., et al. (2003). The effect of training distinct neurofeedback protocols on aspects of cognitive performance. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 47(1), 75–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. E., & Kozlowski, G. P. (2005). Neurofeedback treatment of epilepsy. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 14(1), 163–176. doi:10.1016/j.chc.2004.07.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the OENB grant Jubiläumsfonds 12276.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Doppelmayr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weber, E., Köberl, A., Frank, S. et al. Predicting Successful Learning of SMR Neurofeedback in Healthy Participants: Methodological Considerations. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 36, 37–45 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-010-9142-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-010-9142-x

Keywords

Navigation