Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-view Laplacian twin support vector machines

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Twin support vector machines are a recently proposed learning method for pattern classification. They learn two hyperplanes rather than one as in usual support vector machines and often bring performance improvements. Semi-supervised learning has attracted great attention in machine learning in the last decade. Laplacian support vector machines and Laplacian twin support vector machines have been proposed in the semi-supervised learning framework. In this paper, inspired by the recent success of multi-view learning we propose multi-view Laplacian twin support vector machines, whose dual optimization problems are quadratic programming problems. We further extend them to kernel multi-view Laplacian twin support vector machines. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed methods are effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Ionosphere

  2. We do not detail the MvTSVMs here. They are supervised extensions of TSVMs to multi-view learning.

  3. https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Multiple+Features

  4. http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Internet+Advertisements

References

  1. Shawe-Taylor J, Sun S (2011) A review of optimization methodologies in support vector machines. Neurocomputing 74(17):3609–3618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vapnik V (1995) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Christianini N (2002) An introduction to ssupport vector machines. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  4. Scholkopf B, Smola A (2003) Learning with kernels. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fung G, Mangasarian O (2001) Proximal support vector machines. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference knowledge discovery and data mining, pp 77–86

  6. Mangasarian O, Wild E (2006) Multisurface proximal support vector machine classification via generalized eigenvalues. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 28(1):69–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jayadeva K, Khemchandani R, Chandra S (2007) Twin support vector machines for pattern classification. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 29(5):905–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghorai S, Mukherjee A, Dutta P (2009) Nonparallel plane proximal classifier. Signal Process 89(4):510–522

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Shao Y, Chen W, Deng N (2013) Nonparallel hyperplane support vector machine for binary classification problems. Information sciences. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2013.11.003

  10. Shao Y, Wang Z, Chen W, Deng N (2013) Least squares twin parametric-margin support vector machines for classification. Appl Intell 39(3):451–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu Y, Guo R (2014) An improved ν-twin support vector machine. Appled intelligence. doi:10.1007/s10489-013-0500-2

  12. Chen W, Shao Y, Xu D, Fu Y (2013) Manifold proximal support vector machine for semi-supervised classification. Applied intelligence. doi:10.1007/s10489-013-0491-z

  13. Yang Z (2013) Nonparallel hyperplanes proximal classifiers based on manifold regularization for labeled and unlabeled examples. Int J Pattern Recogn Artif Intell 27(5):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shao Y, Deng N (2012) A coordinate descent margin based-twin support vector machine for classification. Neural Netw 25:114–121

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Chapelle O, Scholkopf B, Zien A (2010) Semi-supervised Learning. MIT Press, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhu X (2008) Semi-supervised learning literature survey. Technical report 1530, Department of Computer Sciences University of Wisconsin Madison

  17. Zhu X, Ghahramani Z, Lafferty J (2006) Semi-supervised learning using Gaussian fields and harmonic functions. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference machine learning, pp 912– 919

  18. Zhou Z, Zhan D, Yang Q (2007) Semi-supervised learning with very few labeled training example. In: Proceedings of the 22nd AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, pp 675–680

  19. Joachims T (1999) Transductive inference for text classification using support vector machines. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on machine learning, pp 200–209

  20. Bennett K, Demiriz A (1999) Semi-supervised support vector machines. Adv Neural Info Proc Syst 11:368–374

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fung G, Mangasarian O (2001) Semi-supervised support vector machines for unlabeled data classification. Optim Method Soft 15:29–44

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Belkin M, Niyogi P, Sindhwani V (2006) Manifold regularization: a geometric framework for learning from labeled and unlabeled examples. J Mach Learn Res 7:2399–2434

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Melacci S, Beklin M (2011) Laplacian support vector machines trained in the primal. J Mach Learn Res 12:1149–1184

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Qi Z, Tian Y, Shi Y (2012) Laplacian twin support vector machine for semi-supervised classification. Neural Netw 35:46–53

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Shao Y, Zhang C, Wang X, Deng N (2011) Improvements on twin support vector machines. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 22(6):962–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ding S, Zhao Y, Qi B, Huang H (2012) An overview on twin support vector machines. Artificial intelligence review. doi:10.1007/s10462-012-9336-0

  27. Sun S (2013) A survey of multi-view machine learning. Neural Comput Appl 23:2031–2038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Blum A, Mitchell T (1998) Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training. In: Proceedings of the 11th annual conference on computational learning theory, pp 92–100

  29. Sindhwani V, Rosenberg D (2008) An RKHS for multi-view learning and manifold co-regularization. In: Proceedings of the 25th international conference on machine learning, pp 976–983

  30. Sindhwani V, Niyogi P, Belkin M (2005) A co-regularization approach to semi-supervised learning with multiple views. In: Proceedings of the workshop on learning with multiple views, 22nd ICML, pp 824–831

  31. Farquhar J, Hardoon D, Shawe-Taylor J, Szedmak S (2006) Two view learning: SVM-2K, theory and practice. Adv Neural Info Proc Syst 18:355–362

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sun S, Shawe-Taylor J (2010) Sparse semi-supervised learning using conjugate functions. J Mach Learn Res 11:2423–2455

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Sun S (2011) Multi-view Laplacian support vector machines. Lect Notes Comput Sci 7121:209–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bartlett P, Mendelson S (2002) Rademacher and Gaussian complexities: risk bounds and structural results. J Mach Learn Res 3:463–482

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Kushmerick N (1999) Learning to remove internet advertisement. In: Proceedings of the 3rd annual conference on autonomous agents, pp 175–181

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Projects 61370175 and 61075005, and Shanghai Knowledge Service Platform Project (No. ZF1213).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shiliang Sun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, X., Sun, S. Multi-view Laplacian twin support vector machines. Appl Intell 41, 1059–1068 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-014-0563-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-014-0563-8

Keywords

Navigation