Abstract
The conflicting views about the impact of organizational slack on firm performance call for more powerful theoretic lens to explore this link. This study finds that institutional theory is insightful to add a deeper and finer-grained understanding on what is behind the relationship between organizational slack and firm performance during institutional transitions. As a replication with extension of the research of Tan and Peng (Strategic Management Journal, 24: 1249–1263, 2003), this study not only replicates the impact of organizational slack on firm performance in a broader and more recent context, but also extends previous work by advocating and enriching the impact of institutional transitions on this link. Using a large sample of Chinese listed firms, we find that unabsorbed slack is critical for firms to sustain their competitive advantages. Further, such a positive impact is especially likely to be profound for firms confronting resource scarcity and environmental dynamism caused by institutional transitions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Arnold, H. J. 1982. Moderator variables: A clarification of conceptual, analytic, and psychometric issues. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29: 143–174.
Boyd, B. K. 1995. CEO duality and firm performance: A contingency model. Strategic Management Journal, 16: 301–312.
Bromiley, P. 1991. Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 37–59.
Cheng, J., & Kesner, I. 1997. Organizational slack and response to environmental shifts: The impact of resource allocation patterns. Journal of Management, 23: 1–18.
Cyert, R., & March, J. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Davis, G., & Stout, S. 1992. Organization theory and the market for corporate control: A dynamic analysis of large takeover targets, 1980–1990. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 605–633.
Dess, G., & Beard, D. 1984. Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 52–73.
Fan, J. P. H., Wong, T. J., & Zhang, T. 2007. Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 84: 330–357.
George, G. 2005. Organizational slacks and the performance of privately held firms. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 661–676.
Greening, D. W., & Gray, B. 1994. Testing a model of organizational response to social and political issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 467–498.
Guillen, M. 2000. Business groups in emerging economies: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 362–80.
Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305–360.
Kessler, E. H., & Bierly, P. E. 2002. Is faster really better? An empirical test of the implications of innovation speed. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49: 2–12.
Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 2000. Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. Journal of Finance, 55: 867–892.
Kraatz, M. S., & Zajac, E. J. 2001. How organizational resources affect strategic change and performance in turbulent environments: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12: 632–657.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1998. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106: 1113–1155.
Leonard-Barton, D. 1992. Core competencies and core rigidities: A paradox in new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 111–125.
Li, H., & Atuahene-Gima, K. 2001. Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 1123–1134.
Li, Y., & Peng, M. W. 2008. Developing theory from strategic management research in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25: 563–575.
Li, Y., Sun, Y. F., & Liu, Y. 2006. An empirical study of SOEs’ market orientation in transitional China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23: 93–113.
Lieberman, M. B., & Montgomery, D. B. 1988. First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, 9: 41–58.
Luo, Y., & Peng, M. W. 1999. Learning to compete in a transition economy: Experience, environment, and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 30: 269–296.
Makino, S., Lau, C. M., & Yeh, R. S. 2002. Asset-exploitation versus asset-seeking: Implications for location choice of foreign direct investment from newly industrialized economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 33: 403–421.
Mathews, J. A. 2002. Competitive advantages of the latecomer firms: A resource-based account of industrial catch up strategies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19: 467–488.
Meyer, K. E. 2006. Asian management research needs more self-confidence. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23: 119–137.
Meyer, K. E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S., & Peng, M. W. 2008. Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strategic Management Journal, in press.
Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. H. 1985. Applied linear statistical models: Regression, analysis of variance, and experimental design. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. 1996. Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1245–1264.
Peng, M. W. 2000. Business strategies in transition economies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Peng, M. W. 2003. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28: 275–296.
Peng, M. W. 2004. Outside directors and firm performance during institutional transitions. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 453–471.
Peng, M. W., & Heath, P. 1996. The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Academy of Management Review, 21: 492–528.
Peng, M. W., Tan, J., & Tong, T. W. 2004. Ownership types and strategic groups in an emerging economy. Journal of Management Studies, 41: 1105–1129.
Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y. L., & Jiang, Y. 2008. An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39: 920–936.
Peng, M. W., Zhou, Y., & York, A. 2006. Behind make or buy decisions in export strategy: A replication and extension of Trabold. Journal of World Business, 41: 289–300.
Peng, M. W., Zhang, S., & Li, X. 2007. CEO duality and firm performance during institutional transitions. Management and Organization Review, 3: 205–225.
Quer, D., Claver, E., & Rienda, L. 2007. Business and management in China: A review of empirical research in leading international journals. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24: 359–384.
Singh, J. V. 1986. Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 29: 562–585.
Tan, J., & Peng, M. W. 2003. Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: Two studies from an emerging economy. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 1249–1263.
Tsang, E. W. K., & Kwan, K. 1999. Replication and theory development in organizational science: A critical realist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24: 759–780.
Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42: 1–33.
Young, M., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G., & Jiang, Y. 2008. Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal–principal perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45: 196–220.
Zhang, Y. 2006. The presence of a separate COO/president and its impact on strategic change and CEO dismissal. Strategic Management Journal, 27: 283–300.
Zhou, C., Delios, A., & Yang, J. Y. 2002. Locational determinants of Japanese foreign direct investment in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19: 63–86.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (70741420172, 70671082, 70802048). We thank Mike W. Peng (Editor-in-Chief) and the reviewers for their helpful suggestions, and Anne S. Tsui and Yadong Luo for discussion.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Su, Z., Xie, E. & Li, Y. Organizational slack and firm performance during institutional transitions. Asia Pac J Manag 26, 75–91 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-008-9101-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-008-9101-8