Skip to main content
Log in

DMTIOLA: decision making tool for identification of optimal location for aquaculture farming development

  • Published:
Aquaculture International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Decision making tool called Decision Making Tool for Identification of Optimal Location in Aqua farming development was developed using Visual Basic programming language for identification of optimal location for aquaculture farming development. Twenty-four input criteria to the tool were categorized into six broad heads of main-criteria namely: water (10 sub-criteria), soil (5 sub-criteria), support (2 sub-criteria), infrastructure (3 sub-criteria), input (1 sub-criterion), and risk factor (3 sub-criteria). In this tool, the optimal location was identified based on the objective function, which was derived from the combination of rank sum, pair-wise comparison, and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution methods. Based on the objective function values, alternatives (or aqua farms) were ranked in descending order in a table. In order to validate the developed tool, the same alternatives were ranked in descending order according to the observed average yield value per hectare (ha) for the last three crops. Spearman’s rank correlation was used to assess the correlation between ranks obtained by the tool and ranks obtained based on average yield. It showed with 99% confidence that a significant correlation exists between ranks obtained by the tool and ranks obtained based on average yield. Developed tool appeared to be confident and robust in proof-of-concept application for aquaculture farming development in Kalla mandal with reference to shrimp farms, West Godavari district, Andhra Pradesh, India.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anand P, Chellaram TC, Kumaran S, Shanthini CF (2011) Screening for antibiotic producing marine bacteria against fish pathogens. Int J Pharm Bio Sci 2:314–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Bansiya J, Davis CG (2002) A hierarchical model for object-oriented design quality assessment. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 28(1):4–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boguslauskas V, Adlyte R (2010) Evaluation of criteria for the classification of enterprises. Eng Econ 21:119–127

    Google Scholar 

  • George BA, Reddy BRS, Raghuwanshi NS, Wallender WW (2002) Decision support system for estimating reference evapotranspiration. J Irrig Drain Eng Div 128(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowda HH, Kumaranraju D, Padmavathy AS, Srinivasakumar T, Jayaraman V, Ramachandran S, Hegde VS (2000) Suitability assessment for brackish water aquaculture potential sites using remote sensing and GIS for coastal Tadri region. In: Ramachandran S (ed) Marine remote sensing application. Institute of Ocean Management, Chennai, p 332

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo RA (1982) Improving group decision under multiple variables. Springer, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang CL, Yoon LS (1981) Multiple attribute decision-making: methods and applications. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski P (1995) Integrating geographical information systems and multiple variables decision-making methods. Int J Geogr Syst 9:251–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kothari CR (2004) Research methodology: methods and techniques, 2nd revision edn. New Age International publishers, New Delhi

  • Mahalakshmi P, Ganesan K (2006) ASSS: aquaculture site selection system based on TOPSIS. In: Abstracts of international seminar on environmental biotechnology-ENVIROTECH, Chennai, 5–7 July 2006

  • Mahalakshmi P, Ganesan K (2009) Mahalanobis Taguchi System based variables selection for shrimp aquaculture development. Comput Electron Agric 65(2):192–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahalakshmi P, Ganesan K (2011) Decision making models for identification and classification of optimal location for aquaculture farming development. Unpublished PhD thesis, Vellore Institute of Technology, VIT University, Vellore, 221

  • Malczewski J (1999) GIS and multi variables decision analysis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nath SS, Bolte JP, Ross LG, Aguilar-Manjarez J (2000) Applications of geographical information systems (GIS) for spatial decision support in aquaculture. Aquac Eng 23:233–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neter J, Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Wasserman W (1996) Applied linear statistical models. Irwin Publishing, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh R, Rajkumar R (1996) Coastal aquaculture site selection and planning in Tamil Nadu using remote sensing and GIS. Asian Pac Remote Sens GIS J 9:39–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (2000) Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory. RWS publications, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Salam MA, Ross LG (2000) Optimising site selection for development of shrimp (Penaeus monodon) and mud crab (Scylla serrata) culture in South-western Bangladesh. In: Paper presented at the 14th annual conference on geographic information systems, Pan-Pacific Hotel, Vancouver, 13–16 March 2000

  • Sarangi A, Madramootoo CA, Cox C (2004) A decision support system for soil and water conservation measures on agricultural watersheds. Land Degrad & Dev 15:49–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stagnitti F, Austin C (1998) DESTA: a software tool for selecting sites for new aquaculture facilities. Aquac Eng 18:79–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi G, Jugulum R (2000) New trends in multivariate diagnosis. Sankhya Ser B 62:233–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi G, Jugulum R (2002) The Mahalanobis-Taguchi strategy. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi G, Chowdury S, Wu Y (2001) The Mahalanobis-Taguchi System. McGraw-Hill Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Triantaphyllou E (2000) Multi-criteria decision making methods: a comparative study. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Triantaphyllou E, Sanchez SN (1997) A sensitivity analysis approach for some deterministic multi-variables decision making methods. Decis Sci 28:151–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang T-C, Liou M-C, Hung H–H (2006) Selection by TOPSIS for surveyor of candidates in organizations. Int J Serv Oper Inform 1(4):332–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1972) Significance testing of the Spearman rank correlation. J Am Stat Assoc 67:578–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Mahalakshmi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahalakshmi, P., Ganesan, K. & Venkatasubramanian, V. DMTIOLA: decision making tool for identification of optimal location for aquaculture farming development. Aquacult Int 20, 911–925 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-012-9516-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-012-9516-6

Keywords

Navigation