Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating the Dimensionality of Pornography

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pornography may be a construct with a single trait or one with many traits. Research in the past was inconsistent in this regard with most researchers assuming that pornography was unidimensional (with one single trait of pornography). However, the considerable amounts of residual variation found in these studies beyond that explained by the single trait hints at what might be a multidimensional construct (with multiple traits such as sensitization and differentiation). Consequently, in this study, we intended to address the question of whether pornography consisted of a single trait or if it was multidimensional. Using MTurk, 2173 participants from the United States and the Commonwealth of Nations (in which pornography is not strictly illegal) were recruited and asked to rate how pornographic they thought a list of different depictions were. The data were analyzed utilizing the cross-validation procedure in which two subsamples were created from the main sample and one was used to establish the model building and the other to validate the model. Various models, including first-order and higher-order exploratory and confirmatory factor models, were tested. Results indicated that a bi-factor (multidimensional) model generated the best model fit, and that it was most appropriate to consider pornography multidimensional. The final model contained two dimensions (“Sensitization” and “Differentiation”). While sensitization revealed the participants’ general tendency to rate all items to be more or less pornographic, differentiation revealed the participants’ tendency to differentiate highly pornographic items from less pornographic items. Based on the findings of this study, we suggest that future research on the usage and effects of pornography be conducted while taking into consideration the multidimensional nature of pornography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amoroso, D. M., Brown, M., Pruesse, M., Ware, E. E., & Pilkey, D. W. (1972). The effects of physiological measurement and presence of others on ratings of erotic stimuli. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 4, 191–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C., Anderson, J., Burggraf, L., & Thompson, N. (1978). Community standards, conservatism, and judgments of pornography. Journal of Sex Research, 14, 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. F., West, S. G., & Sousa, K. H. (2006). A comparison of bifactor and second-order models of quality of life. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 189–225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D’Abreu, L. C. F., & Krahé, B. (2014). Predicting sexual aggression in male college students in Brazil. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 15, 152–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalecki, M. G., & Price, J. (1994). Dimensions of pornography. Sociological Spectrum, 14, 205–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrov, D. M. (2012). Statistical methods for validation of assessment scale data in counseling and related fields. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. A., & Barak, A. (1991). Pornography, erotica, and behavior: More questions than answers. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 14, 65–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hald, G. M., & Mulya, T. W. (2013). Pornography consumption and non-marital sexual behavior in a sample of young Indonesian university students. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 15, 981–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hald, G. M., Seaman, C., & Linz, D. (2014). Sexuality and pornography. In D. L. Tolman & L. M. Diamond (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 3–35). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartig, J., & Höhler, J. (2008). Representation of competencies in multidimensional IRT models with within-item and between-item multidimensionality. Journal of Psychology, 216, 89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumpal, I. (2013). Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: A literature review. Quality & Quantity, 47, 2025–2047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malamuth, N. M., Addison, T., & Koss, M. (2000). Pornography and sexual aggression: Are there reliable effects and can we understand them? Annual Review of Sex Research, 11, 26–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, J. C. (2006). The impact of internet pornography on marriage and the family: A review of the research. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 13, 131–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulsen, F. O., Busby, D. M., & Galovan, A. M. (2013). Pornography use: Who uses it and how it is associated with couple outcomes. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 72–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Price, J., & Dalecki, M. G. (1998). The social basis of homophobia: An empirical illustration. Sociological Spectrum, 18, 143–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richman, W. L., Kiesler, S., Weisband, S., & Drasgow, F. (1999). A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 754–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, M. B., Black, L., Smith, A. H., Wetterneck, C. T., & Wells, D. E. (2012). A review of Internet pornography use research: Methodology and content from the past 10 years. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinković, M., Štulhofer, A., & Božić, J. (2013). Revisiting the association between pornography use and risky sexual behaviors: The role of early exposure to pornography and sexual sensation seeking. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 633–641.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Subero, G. (2010). Gay Mexican pornography at the intersection of ethnic and national identity in Jorge Diestra’s La Putiza. Sexuality and Culture, 14, 217–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsaliki, L. (2011). Playing with porn: Greek children’s explorations in pornography. Sex Education, 11, 293–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, D., & Brown, M. (1977). Attitudes towards homosexuality and male and female reactions to homosexual and heterosexual slides. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 9, 68–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tylka, T. L. (2015). No harm in looking, right? Men’s pornography consumption, body image, and well-being. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 16, 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willoughby, B. J., & Busby, D. M. (2016). In the eye of the beholder: Exploring variations in the perceptions of pornography. Journal of Sex Research, 53, 678–688.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. J. (2013). U.S. males and pornography, 1973–2010: Consumption, predictors, correlates. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 60–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. J., Tokunaga, R. S., & Bae, S. (2014). More than a dalliance? Pornography consumption and extramarital sex attitudes among married U.S. adults. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 3, 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, C. K. (2013). Lust, pornography, and erotic dreams. Dreaming, 3, 175–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dean M. Busby.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There were no conflicts of interest for any of the authors of this manuscript.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Appendix: Perceptions Regarding Definition of Pornography

Appendix: Perceptions Regarding Definition of Pornography

Consider the statements below and indicate if you believe they describe what you would consider pornography.

  1. 1.

    A picture of a couple having sex, the women’s breasts are shown but neither partner’s genitalia are shown.

  2. 2.

    A swimsuit issue of a magazine showing models in skimpy swimsuits or strategically covered topless views in a variety of provocative poses.

  3. 3.

    A video showing a woman having sexual intercourse with an animal.

  4. 4.

    A television program showing the filming of a swimsuit edition of a magazine that shows models being filmed in a variety of provocative poses but no full nudity of breasts or genitalia.

  5. 5.

    An image of a woman alone posing in a suggestive way with underwear on.

  6. 6.

    A video showing two naked women or men manually stimulating each other.

  7. 7.

    A novel that includes one graphic depiction of sexual intercourse.

  8. 8.

    An image of a woman alone posing in a suggestive way with exposed breasts and panties on.

  9. 9.

    An image of a woman alone posing in a suggestive way without any clothing on.

  10. 10.

    A short video depicting a couple having consensual sex. The women’s breasts are shown but neither partner’s genitalia are shown.

  11. 11.

    An image of a man alone posing in a suggestive way with only underwear on.

  12. 12.

    An image of a heterosexual couple having sex which shows the man’s penis penetrating the woman.

  13. 13.

    A detailed description in writing of a couple passionately kissing and touching each other’s clothed bodies and describing their arousal.

  14. 14.

    A video showing two naked women or men kissing each other.

  15. 15.

    A major Hollywood film or movie that includes one graphic sexual encounter.

  16. 16.

    An image of a man alone posing in a suggestive way without any clothing on.

  17. 17.

    A detailed description in writing of a couple engaging in foreplay and sex that includes mention of specific sexual body parts that are touched and aroused as sexual acts are performed.

  18. 18.

    A television show focused on strippers that includes multiple instances of blurred nudity.

  19. 19.

    A video of a woman or man alone masturbating.

  20. 20.

    A video that graphically depicts a three-way sexual encounter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Busby, D.M., Chiu, HY., Olsen, J.A. et al. Evaluating the Dimensionality of Pornography. Arch Sex Behav 46, 1723–1731 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0983-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0983-8

Keywords

Navigation