Abstract
Sexting was originally made public by dramatic consequences involving youths with contents that were disseminated and then used as a base for harassment. Despite a growing public and research interest, there is no consensus regarding its definition and measurements. As part of a larger qualitative study on sexting, we aimed to gather and compare opinions and perceptions of 32 youths (16–21 years) and 29 adults (11 parents and 18 teachers) on how sexting can be defined. Different constituent elements were discussed in terms of knowledge, mediums (text-only, photographs, videos, etc.), characteristics, actions (receiving, sending, disseminating, etc.) and contexts. The knowledge and the use of the term sexting was approximate for several participants. Youths used more suggestive elements in their definition and the vast majority of them defined sexting as an activity that could be positive and respectful between two consenting persons. It is necessary to develop a precise and consensual definition of sexting by separating different dimensions and by using a specific vocabulary according to youth perceptions as their main definition of sexting seems to be different from the one of most adults. Prevention messages should aim to reduce the risks by targeting the problems linked to sexting rather than prohibiting sexting per se. This exploratory study could pave the way for a clearer definition and measurement of sexting.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albury, K., & Crawford, K. (2012). Sexting, consent and young people’s ethics: Beyond Megan’s Story. Continuum,26, 463–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2012.665840.
Barrense-Dias, Y., Berchtold, A., Surís, J.-C., & Akre, C. (2017). Sexting and the definition issue. Journal of Adolescent Health,61, 544–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.05.009.
Baumgartner, S. E., Sumter, S. R., Peter, J., Valkenburg, P. M., & Livingstone, S. (2014). Does country context matter? Investigating the predictors of teen sexting across Europe. Computers in Human Behavior,34, 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.041.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology,3, 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Celizic, M. (2009). Her teen committed suicide over ‘sexting’. Today. Retrieved March 1, 2018 from https://www.today.com/parents/her-teen-committed-suicide-over-sexting-2D80555048.
Chalfen, R. (2010). Commentary sexting as adolescent social communication. Journal of Children and Media,4, 350–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2010.486144.
Child Focus. (2015). Sexting. Retrieved March 1, 2018 from http://www.childfocus.be/fr/prevention/securite-en-ligne/professionnels/sexualite/sexting.
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2014). Thematic analysis. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology (pp. 1947–1952). New York, NY: Springer.
Collingridge, D. S., & Gantt, E. E. (2008). The quality of qualitative research. American Journal of Medical Quality,23, 389–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860608320646.
Crimmins, D. M., & Seigfried-Spellar, K. C. (2014). Peer attachment, sexual experiences, and risky online behaviors as predictors of sexting behaviors among undergraduate students. Computers in Human Behavior,32, 268–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.012.
Davis, K. (2013). Young people’s digital lives: The impact of interpersonal relationships and digital media use on adolescents’ sense of identity. Computers in Human Behavior,29, 2281–2293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.022.
Döring, N. (2014). Consensual sexting among adolescents: Risk prevention through abstinence education or safer sexting? Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace,8, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2014-1-9.
e-Enfance. (2017). Supports de prévention [prevention supports]. Retrieved March 1, 2018 from https://www.e-enfance.org/supports-de-prevention.
Eraker, E. C. (2010). Stemming sexting: sensible legal approaches to teenagers’ exchange of self-produced pornography. Berkeley Technology Law Journal,25, 555–596. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38870F.
Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4th ed.). London: Sage.
Fox, J., & Bridget, P. (2014). Technology and culture: Sociocultural explanations for sexting. In T. C. Heistand & W. J. Weins (Eds.), Sexting and youth: A multidisciplinary examination of research, theory, and law (pp. 95–122). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
Frith, H. (2000). Focusing on sex: Using focus groups in sex research. Sexualities,3, 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/136346000003003001.
Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: Interviews and focus groups. British Dental Journal,204, 291–295. https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2008.192.
Gómez, L. C., & Ayala, E. S. (2014). Psychological aspects, attitudes and behaviour related to the practice of sexting: A systematic review of the existent literature. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,132, 114–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.286.
Heary, C. M., & Hennessy, E. (2002). The use of focus group interviews in pediatric health care research. Journal of Pediatric Psychology,27, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/27.1.47.
Holoyda, B., Landess, J., Sorrentino, R., & Friedman, S. H. (2018). Trouble at teens’ fingertips: Youth sexting and the law. Behavioral Sciences & the Law,36, 170–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2335.
Houck, C. D., Barker, D., Rizzo, C., Hancock, E., Norton, A., & Brown, L. K. (2014). Sexting and sexual behavior in at-risk adolescents. Pediatrics,133, e276–e282. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-1157.
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research,15, 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.
Hyde, A., Howlett, E., Brady, D., & Drennan, J. (2005). The focus group method: Insights from focus group interviews on sexual health with adolescents. Social Science and Medicine,61, 2588–2599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.040.
Jørgensen, C. R., Weckesser, A., Turner, J., & Wade, A. (2019). Young people’s views on sexting education and support needs: Findings and recommendations from a UK-based study. Sex Education, 19, 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2018.1475283.
Kaye, R. (2010). How a cell phone picture led to girl’s suicide. CNN. Retrieved March 1, 2018 from http://edition.cnn.com/2010/LIVING/10/07/hope.witsells.story/index.html.
Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research: Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal,311, 299–302.
Klettke, B., Hallford, D. J., & Mellor, D. J. (2014). Sexting prevalence and correlates: A systematic literature review. Clinical Psychology Review,34, 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.10.007.
Kopecký, K. (2015). Sexting among slovak pubescents and adolescent children. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,203, 244–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.289.
Levine, D. (2013). Sexting: A terrifying health risk…or the new normal for young adults? Journal of Adolescent Health,52, 257–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.01.003.
Lievens, E. (2014). Bullying and sexting in social networks: Protecting minors from criminal acts or empowering minors to cope with risky behaviour? International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice,42, 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2014.02.001.
Lim, S. (2013). On mobile communication and youth “deviance”: Beyond moral, media and mobile panics. Mobile Media & Communication,1, 96–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157912459503.
Lippman, J. R., & Campbell, S. W. (2014). Damned if you do, damned if you don’t…if you’re a girl: Relational and normative contexts of adolescent sexting in the United States. Journal of Children and Media,8, 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2014.923009.
Livingstone, S., & Görzig, A. (2014). When adolescents receive sexual messages on the internet: Explaining experiences of risk and harm. Computers in Human Behavior,33, 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.021.
Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Ólafsson, K. (2011). Risks and safety on the internet: The perspective of European children: Full findings and policy implications from the EU Kids Online survey of 9–16 year olds and their parents in 25 countries. Retrieved March 1, 2018 from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/33731/.
Lounsbury, K., Mitchell, K. J., & Finkelhor, D. (Producer). (2011). The true prevalence of “sexting”. Retrieved March 1, 2018 from http://unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/Sexting%20Fact%20Sheet%204_29_11.pdf.
Mascheroni, G., & Cuman, A. (2014). Net children go mobile: Final report. Retrieved March 1, 2018 from http://netchildrengomobile.eu/reports/.
Ministère de la Culture. (2013). FranceTerme. Retrieved March 1, 2018 from http://www.culture.fr/franceterme/result?francetermeSearchTerme=sexting&francetermeSearchDomaine=0&francetermeSearchSubmit=rechercher&action=search.
Pro Juventute. (2013). Campagne de sensibilisation “Sexting” [Awareness campaign “Sexting”]. Retrieved March 1, 2018 from https://www.projuventute.ch/Sexting-2013-2014.2477.0.html?&L=1.
Rich, M., & Ginsburg, K. R. (1999). The reason and rhyme of qualitative research: Why, when, and how to use qualitative methods in the study of adolescent health. Journal of Adolescent Health,25, 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(99)00068-3.
Ringrose, J., Gill, R., Livingstone, S., & Harvey, L. (2012). A qualitative study of children, young people and ‘sexting’: A report prepared for the NSPCC. Retrieved March 1, 2018 from https://www.nspcc.org.uk/services-and-resources/research-and-resources/pre-2013/qualitative-study-sexting/.
Ringrose, J., Harvey, L., Gill, R., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Teen girls, sexual double standards and ‘sexting’: Gendered value in digital image exchange. Feminist Theory,14, 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700113499853.
Temple, J. R., & Choi, H. (2014). Longitudinal association between teen sexting and sexual behavior. Pediatrics,134, e1287–e1292. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-1974.
Van Ouytsel, J., Walrave, M., & Ponnet, K. (2018). Adolescent sexting research: The challenges ahead. JAMA Pediatrics,172, 405–406. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.0013.
Walker, S., Sanci, L., & Temple-Smith, M. (2013). Sexting: young women’s and men’s views on its nature and origins. Journal of Adolescent Health,52, 697–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.01.026.
Waller, G., Willemse, I., Genner, S., Suter, L., & Süss, D. (2016). JAMES—Jeunes, activités, médias—enquête Suisse: Rapport sur les résultats de l’étude JAMES 2016 [JAMES—Youths, activities, media—Swiss survey: report on results of the 2016 JAMES study]. Retrieved March 1, 2018 from https://www.swisscom.ch/fr/about/entreprise/durabilite/objectifs-cr-et-resultats/james.html.
Walrave, M., Ponnet, K., Van Ouytsel, J., Van Gool, E., Heirman, W., & Verbeek, A. (2015). Whether or not to engage in sexting: Explaining adolescent sexting behaviour by applying the prototype willingness model. Telematics and Informatics,32, 796–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.03.008.
Wilkinson, S. (2004). Focus group research. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (pp. 177–199). London: Sage.
Willemse, I., Waller, G., Genner, S., Suter, L., Oppliger, S., Huber, A.-L., & Süss, D. (2014). JAMES—Jeunes, activités, médias—enquête Suisse: Rapport sur les résultats de l’étude JAMES 2014 [JAMES—Youths, activities, media—Swiss survey: report on results of the 2014 JAMES study]. Retrieved March 1, 2018 from https://www.swisscom.ch/fr/about/entreprise/durabilite/objectifs-cr-et-resultats/james.html.
Wolak, J., & Finkelhor, D. (Producer). (2011). Sexting: A typology. Retrieved March 1, 2018 from http://unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/CV231_Sexting%20Typology%20Bulletin_4-6-11_revised.pdf.
Acknowledgements
We thank all focus group participants. We also thank Belinda Forny and Pierre-Olivier Gaudard for their suggestions for the interview guide.
Funding
This work was supported by the Service of Public Health of the Canton de Vaud. The sponsor source had no role in the study design, collection of data, data analysis and interpretation of results, the writing of the manuscript and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barrense-Dias, Y., Surís, JC. & Akre, C. “When It Deviates It Becomes Harassment, Doesn’t It?” A Qualitative Study on the Definition of Sexting According to Adolescents and Young Adults, Parents, and Teachers. Arch Sex Behav 48, 2357–2366 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1358-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1358-5