Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

2008 National dry mill corn ethanol survey

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Biotechnology Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Emerging regulations require an examination of corn ethanol’s greenhouse gas emissions on a life cycle basis, including emissions from energy consumed at the plant level. However, comprehensive survey data of the industry’s average performance dates back to 2001, prior to the industry’s expansion phase. Responding to the need for updated data, we conducted a survey to collect energy and processing data for average dry mill ethanol produced during 2008. The study finds that the average liter of anhydrous corn ethanol produced during 2008 requires 28% less thermal energy than 2001 ethanol: 7.18 MJ/l compared to 10 MJ/l. Also, 2008 ethanol requires 32% less electricity: 0.195 kWh/l compared to 0.287 kWh/l, but anhydrous ethanol yields from corn are 5.3% higher and total 0.416 l/kg compared to 0.395 l/kg. Findings also suggest that older plants installed energy efficiency retrofits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Data provided by the Renewable Fuels Association for this study.

References

  • California Environmental Protection Agency (2009) Proposed regulation to implement the low carbon fuel standard, vol I, Staff report: initial statement of reasons. California Environmental Protection Agency

  • Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc (2006) An assessment of the potential for energy savings in dry mill ethanol plants from the use of combined heat and power (CHP). Prepared for the US Environmental Protection Agency Combined Heat and Power Partnership

  • Mueller S, Cuttica J (2006) Research investigation for the potential use of illinois coal in dry mill ethanol plants. University of Illinois at Chicago Energy Resources Center

  • Nilles D (2006) Process heat and steam alternatives rising. Ethanol Producer Magazine

  • Nilles D (2008) Corn oil, diversity on industry’s mind. Ethanol Producer Magazine

  • Rendleman M, Shapouri H (2007) New technologies in ethanol production. Agricultural economic report 842. United States Department of Agriculture

  • Shapouri H, Gallagher P (2005) USDA’s 2002 ethanol cost-of-production survey. Agricultural economic report 841

  • Shapouri H, Duffield J, Wang M (2002) The energy balance of corn ethanol: an update. Agricultural economic report 813. United States Department of Agriculture

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (2010) Renewable fuel standard program (RFS2) regulatory impact analysis. EPA-420-R-10-006

  • Wang M, Wu M, Huo H (2007) Life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission impacts of different corn ethanol plant types. Environ Res Lett 2:024001 (13 p)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steffen Mueller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mueller, S. 2008 National dry mill corn ethanol survey. Biotechnol Lett 32, 1261–1264 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-010-0296-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-010-0296-7

Keywords

Navigation