Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The invasiveness of an introduced species does not predict its impact

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inconsistent use of terminology plagues the study and management of biological invasions. The term “invasive” has been used to describe inter alia (1) any introduced non-indigenous species; (2) introduced species that spread rapidly in a new region; and (3) introduced species that have harmful environmental impacts, particularly on native species. The second definition in various forms is more commonly used by ecologists, while the third definition is pervasive in policy papers and legislation. We tested the relationship between the invasiveness of an introduced species and its impact on native biodiversity. We quantified a species’ invasiveness by both its rate of establishment and its rate of spread, while its impact was assigned a categorical ranking based on the documented effects of the invader on native species populations. We found no correlations between these variables for introduced plants, mammals, fishes, invertebrates, amphibians and reptiles, suggesting that the mechanisms of invasion and impact are not strongly linked. Our results support the view that the term “invasive” should not be used to connote negative environmental impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andow DA, Kareiva PM, Levin SA, Okubo A (1990) Spread of invading organisms. Landscape Ecol 4:177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudouresque CF, Verlaque M (2002) Biological pollution in the Mediterranean Sea: invasive versus introduced macrophytes. Mar Pollut Bull 44: 32–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers JE (2002) Impact of non-indigenous species on natives enhanced by anthropogenic alteration of selection regimes. Oikos 97:449–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM, Ridenour WM (2003) Novel weapons: invasive success and the evolution of increased competitive ability. Front Ecol Environ 2:436–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM, Thelen GC, Rodriguez A, Holben WE (2004) Soil biota and exotic plant invasion. Nature 427:731–733

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CBD (2006) Invasive Alien Species. Convention on biological diversity. Retrieved from http://www.bio div.org/programmes/cross-cutting/alien/ on 10 May 2006

  • Clinton WJ (1999) Executive order 13112. Invasive species. The White House, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Colautti RI, MacIsaac HJ (2004) A neutral terminology to define ‘invasive’ species. Divers Distribut 10:135–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronk QCB, Fuller JL (2001) Plant invaders: the threat to natural ecosystems. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis MA, Thompson K (2001) Eight ways to be a colonizer, two ways to be an invader: a proposed nomenclature scheme for invasion ecology. Bull Ecol Soc Am 81:226–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Environment Canada (2004) An invasive alien species strategy for Canada. Government of Canada, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk-Petersen J, Bohn T, Sandlund OT (2006) On the numerous concepts in invasion biology. Biol Invasions 8 (in press)

  • Fuller P (2006) Non-indigenous Aquatic Species (NAS) Database. Retrieved from http://nas.er.usgs.gov/ on 10 May 2006

  • Goodwin BJ, McAllister AJ, Fahrig L (1999) Predicting invasiveness of plant species based on biological information. Conserv Biol 13:422–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosholz ED (1996) Contrasting rates of spread for introduced species in terrestrial and marine systems. Ecology 77:1680–1686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes KR, McEnnulty FR, Sliwa C (2002) Identifying potential marine pests – an inductive approach. Final report for Environment Australia, June 2002. Center for Research on Introduced Marine Pests, CSIRO Marine Research

  • Heutte T, Bella E (2003) Invasive plants and exotic weeds of Southeast Alaska. USDA Forest Service, Anchorage, Alaska. Retrieved from http://akweeds.uaa. alaska.edu/pdfs/literature/se_inv_plnt_guide.pdf on 10 May 2006

  • Kimmerer WJ, Gartside E, Orsi JJ (1994) Predation by an introduced clam as the likely cause of substantial declines in zooplankton of San Francisco Bay. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 113:81–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Klironomos J (2002) Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature 417:67–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler CC (1992) Environmental risk management of introduced aquatic organisms in aquaculture. ICES Mar Sci Symposia 194:15–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2001) Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol Evol 16:199–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2002) Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science 298:1233–1236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lever C (1996) Naturalized fishes of the world. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Lever C (2003) Naturalized amphibians and reptiles of the world. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine JM, Vilà M, D’Antonio CM, Dukes JS, Grigulis K, Lavorel S (2003) Mechanisms underlying the impacts of exotic plant invasions. Proc R Soc London B 270:775–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long JL (2003) Introduced mammals of the world. CSIRO Publishers, Collingwood

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIsaac HJ, Grigorovich IA, Ricciardi A (2001) Reassessment of species invasions concepts: the Great Lakes basin as a model. Biol Invasions 3:405–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack RN, D’Antonio CM (1998) Impacts of biological invasions on disturbance regimes. Trends Ecol Evol 13:195–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NAISA (2003) National Aquatic Invasive Species Act. 109th U.S. Congress. Retrieved from http://www.theorator.com/bills109/hr1591.html on 10 May 2006

  • Occhipinti-Ambrogi A, Galil BS (2004) A uniform terminology on bioinvasions: a chimera or an operative tool? Mar Pollut Bull 49:688–694

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega YK, Pearson DE (2005) Weak vs. strong invaders of natural plant communities: assessing invasibility and impact. Ecol Appl 15:651–661

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker IM, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Goodell K, Wonham M, Kareiva PM, Williamson MH, Von Holle B, Moyle PB, Byers JE, Goldwasser L (1999) Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biol Invasions 1:3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potvin F, Beaupré P, Laprise G (2003) The eradication of balsam fir stands by white-tailed deer on Anticosti Island, Quebec: a 150-year process. Ecoscience 10:487–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejmanek M, Richardson DM (1996) What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77:1655–1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi A (2003) Predicting the impacts of an introduced species from its invasion history: an empirical approach applied to zebra mussel invasions. Freshw Biol 48:972–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi A, Atkinson SK (2004) Distinctiveness magnifies the impact of biological invaders in aquatic ecosystems. Ecol Lett 7:781–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi A, Whoriskey FG, Rasmussen JB (1996) Impact of the Dreissena invasion on native unionid bivalves in the upper St. Lawrence River. Can J Fish Aquatic Sci 53:1434–1444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmánek M, Barbour MG, Panetta FD, West CJ (2000) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers Distributions 6:93–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rilov G, Benayahu Y, Gasith A (2004) Prolonged lag in population outbreak of an invasive mussel: a shifting-habitat model. Biol Invasions 6:347–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1999) SAS/STAT user’s guide, release 8 edn. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanks AL, Grantham BA, Carr MH (2003) Propagule dispersal distance and the size and spacing of marine reserves. Ecol Appl 13:S159–S169

    Google Scholar 

  • Spadinger R, Maier G (1999) Prey selection and diel feeding of the freshwater jellyfish, Craspedacusta sowerbyi. Freshw Biol 41:567–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss SY, Webb CO, Salamin N (2006) Exotic taxa less related to native species are more invasive. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:5841–5845

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Talley TS, Levin LA (2001) Modification of sediments and macrofauna by an invasive marsh plant. Biol Invasions 3:51–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UCS (2006) Invasive Species. Union of Concerned Scientists of the USA. Retrieved from http://www.uc susa.org/invasive_species/invasive-species-index.html on 10 May 2006

  • Von Holle B, Simberloff D (2005) Ecological resistance to biological invasion overwhelmed by propagule pressure. Ecology 86:3212–3218

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson M, Fitter A (1996) The varying success of invaders. Ecology 77:1661–1666

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Lisa Jones for commenting on the manuscript. Funding was provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Redpath Museum, McGill University, 859 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2K6, Canada

    Anthony Ricciardi & Jill Cohen

Authors
  1. Anthony Ricciardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jill Cohen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony Ricciardi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ricciardi, A., Cohen, J. The invasiveness of an introduced species does not predict its impact. Biol Invasions 9, 309–315 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-006-9034-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-006-9034-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation