Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Biodiversity and Conservation 7/2018

26.07.2016 | Original Paper

Catchment management in England and Wales: the role of arguments for ecosystems and their services

verfasst von: Laurence Mathieu, Rob Tinch, Allan Provins

Erschienen in: Biodiversity and Conservation | Ausgabe 7/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This study uses document analysis and interviews to explore how the use of arguments for biodiversity and ecosystem services has evolved in recent years in the water industry in England and Wales, with a focus on investments in catchment management programmes. Changes to land management practices within catchment areas can lead to improved water quality and lower treatment costs, and also ancillary benefits to the natural environment and various stakeholders. Our analysis reveals the increasing effectiveness of arguments associated with ecosystem service values in enabling the industry regulator (Ofwat) to support water industry investments in catchment-level conservation projects. Ofwat has adopted a much more flexible approach to regulation, moving from initial resistance to ecosystem service framings and a dominant focus on financial benefits to customers, to acceptance that customers have a legitimate interest in environmental quality and a willingness to accept some ‘beneficiary pays’ solutions. Companies are now required by Ofwat to include environmental impacts in cost-benefit analysis of investments, alongside assessment of customer preferences and support. This has facilitated investments in catchment management with positive results for water companies, customers, farmers and the natural environment. The shift in arguments in this industry matches a broader shift at European and UK levels towards greater use of economic evidence and payment instruments. The challenge now is to stabilise a secure regulatory environment in which companies are encouraged to pursue innovative methods to benefit the wider interest of customers and the natural environment, today and in the future. Arguments based on the value of water quality improvements and of the wider associated ecosystem services benefits have been, and remain, a key tool for achieving the environmental improvements and economic efficiency gains associated with successful catchment management initiatives.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
“Our main duties are to protect the interests of consumers, wherever appropriate by promoting effective competition, to enable efficient water and sewerage companies to carry out and finance their functions and secure that companies with water supply licences properly carry out their functions” (Ofwat 2007, p. 2).
 
3
Stakeholders contacted were from: Ofwat, the Environment Agency (EA), Natural England (NE), four major water companies (Anglian Water, South West Water, United Utilities, and Wessex Water), a policy adviser for the UK water industry, and a consultant specialised in the UK water industry.
 
8
Water companies are required by Ofwat to submit an Asset Management Plan (AMP) or Business Plan at each price review (Ofwat, Glossary of terms, http://​www.​ofwat.​gov.​uk/​aboutofwat/​gud_​pro_​ofwatglossary.​pdf).
 
10
Customer engagement is defined in Littlechild (2011) as “understanding what customers want and responding to that in plans and ongoing delivery”.
 
11
Ofwat’s regulatory approach for PR19 continues this theme, stating that, “At the heart of our regulatory framework for water and wastewater services is the desire to strengthen the approach to customer engagement and outcomes to ensure a continued focus on current and future customers” (Ofwat 2016, p. 4).
 
12
This measure provides an indication of the return achieved by the company (Ofgem 2014).
 
19
With the exception of any differences in the transactions costs involved in different negotiated or imposed solutions.
 
20
Terminology used by an anonymous interviewee.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Deasy C, Quinton JN, Silgram M, Bailey AP, Jackson B, Stevens CJ (2010) Contributing understanding of mitigation options for phosphorus and sediment to a review of the efficacy of contemporary agricultural stewardship measures. Agric Syst 103(2):105–109CrossRef Deasy C, Quinton JN, Silgram M, Bailey AP, Jackson B, Stevens CJ (2010) Contributing understanding of mitigation options for phosphorus and sediment to a review of the efficacy of contemporary agricultural stewardship measures. Agric Syst 103(2):105–109CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Everard M (2011) Common ground: the sharing of land and landscapes for sustainability. Zed Books, London Everard M (2011) Common ground: the sharing of land and landscapes for sustainability. Zed Books, London
Zurück zum Zitat Everard M, Kenmir W, Walters C, Holt E (2004) Upland hill farming for water, wildlife and food. Freshw Forum 21:48–73 Everard M, Kenmir W, Walters C, Holt E (2004) Upland hill farming for water, wildlife and food. Freshw Forum 21:48–73
Zurück zum Zitat Glaves DJ, Morecroft M, Fitzgibbon C, Lepitt P, Owen M, Phillips S (2013) The effects of managed burning on upland peatland biodiversity, carbon and water. Natural England Evidence Review, Peterborough Glaves DJ, Morecroft M, Fitzgibbon C, Lepitt P, Owen M, Phillips S (2013) The effects of managed burning on upland peatland biodiversity, carbon and water. Natural England Evidence Review, Peterborough
Zurück zum Zitat Gooday R, Anthony S, Durrant C, Harris D, Lee D, Metcalfe P, Newell-Price P, Turner A (2015) Developing the farmscoper decision support tool. Final report for Defra project SCF0104 Gooday R, Anthony S, Durrant C, Harris D, Lee D, Metcalfe P, Newell-Price P, Turner A (2015) Developing the farmscoper decision support tool. Final report for Defra project SCF0104
Zurück zum Zitat Kurz I, Coxon C, Tunney H, Ryan D (2005) Effects of grassland management practices and environmental conditions on nutrient concentrations in overland flow. J Hydrol 304(35):50 Kurz I, Coxon C, Tunney H, Ryan D (2005) Effects of grassland management practices and environmental conditions on nutrient concentrations in overland flow. J Hydrol 304(35):50
Zurück zum Zitat Line DE (2003) Changes in a stream’s physical and biological conditions following livestock exclusion. Trans ASAE 46(2):287 Line DE (2003) Changes in a stream’s physical and biological conditions following livestock exclusion. Trans ASAE 46(2):287
Zurück zum Zitat OECD (2013) Providing agri-environmental public goods through collective action. joint working party on agriculture and the environment, trade and agriculture directorate, environment directorate OECD (2013) Providing agri-environmental public goods through collective action. joint working party on agriculture and the environment, trade and agriculture directorate, environment directorate
Zurück zum Zitat Parkyn S, Davies-Colley R (2003) Riparian management: how well are we doing? Water Atmos 11:15–17 Parkyn S, Davies-Colley R (2003) Riparian management: how well are we doing? Water Atmos 11:15–17
Zurück zum Zitat Pezzey J (1992) The symmetry between controlling pollution by price and controlling it by quantity. Can J Econ 25:983–991CrossRef Pezzey J (1992) The symmetry between controlling pollution by price and controlling it by quantity. Can J Econ 25:983–991CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat UKWIR (2007) The role and application of cost benefit analysis: Volume 1 generic guidance. report 07/RG/07/9 UKWIR (2007) The role and application of cost benefit analysis: Volume 1 generic guidance. report 07/RG/07/9
Zurück zum Zitat UKWIR (2010) Review of cost-benefit analysis and benefit valuation. Final report 10/RG/07/18 UKWIR (2010) Review of cost-benefit analysis and benefit valuation. Final report 10/RG/07/18
Zurück zum Zitat UKWIR (2011) carrying out willingness to pay surveys, final report and practitioners guide, 11/RG/07/22 UKWIR (2011) carrying out willingness to pay surveys, final report and practitioners guide, 11/RG/07/22
Metadaten
Titel
Catchment management in England and Wales: the role of arguments for ecosystems and their services
verfasst von
Laurence Mathieu
Rob Tinch
Allan Provins
Publikationsdatum
26.07.2016
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Biodiversity and Conservation / Ausgabe 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0960-3115
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9710
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1176-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2018

Biodiversity and Conservation 7/2018 Zur Ausgabe