Abstract
We present results from laboratory and computational experiments on the turbulent flow over an array of rectangular blocks modelling a typical, asymmetric urban canopy at various orientations to the approach flow. The work forms part of a larger study on dispersion within such arrays (project DIPLOS) and concentrates on the nature of the mean flow and turbulence fields within the canopy region, recognising that unless the flow field is adequately represented in computational models there is no reason to expect realistic simulations of the nature of the dispersion of pollutants emitted within the canopy. Comparisons between the experimental data and those obtained from both large-eddy simulation (LES) and direct numerical simulation (DNS) are shown and it is concluded that careful use of LES can produce generally excellent agreement with laboratory and DNS results, lending further confidence in the use of LES for such situations. Various crucial issues are discussed and advice offered to both experimentalists and those seeking to compute canopy flows with turbulence resolving models.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balogun AA, Tomlin AS, Wood CR, Barlow JF, Belcher SE, Smalley RJ, Lingard JJN, Arnold SJ, Dobre A, Robins AG, Martin D, Shallcross DE (2010) In-street wind direction variability in the vicinity of a busy intersection in Central London. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 136:489–513
Belcher S, Coceal O, Goulart EV, Rudd AC, Robins AG (2015) Processes controlling atmospheric dispersion through city centres. J Fluid Mech 763:51–81
Belcher SE, Coceal O, Hunt JCR, Carruthers DJ, Robins AG (2013) A review of urban dispersion modelling. Atmospheric dispersion modelling liaison committee, Report ADMLC-87, Annex 8, p 94
Carpentieri M, Robins AG (2010) Tracer flux balance at an urban canyon intersection. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 135:229–242
Carpentieri M, Robins AG, Baldi S (2009) Three-dimensional mapping of air flow at an urban canyon intersection. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 133:277–296
Cheng H, Castro IP (2002) Near-wall flow over urban-type roughness. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 104:229–259
Cionco RM (1965) Mathematical model for air-flow in a vegetative canopy. J Appl Meteorol 4:517–522
Claus J, Coceal O, Thomas TG, Branford S, Belcher SE, Castro IP (2012) Wind direction effects on urban flows. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 142:265–287
Coceal O, Thomas TG, Castro IP, Belcher SE (2006) Mean flow and turbulence statistics over groups of urban-like cubical obstacles. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 121:491–519
Coceal O, Dobre A, Thomas TG, Belcher SE (2007) Structure of turbulent flow over regular arrays of cubical roughness. J Fluid Mech 589:375–409
Deardorff JW (1970) A numerical study of three-dimensional turbulent channel flow at large Reynolds numbers. J Fluid Mech 41:453–480
Fishpool GM, Lardeau S, Leschziner MA (2009) Persistent non-homogeneous features in periodic channel-flow simulations. Flow Turbul Combust 83:323–342
Hanna SR, Tehranian S, Carissimo B, MacDonald RW, Lohner R (2002) Comparisons of model simulations with observations of mean flow and turbulence within simple obstacle arrays. Atmos Environ 36:5067–5079
Inagaki M, Kondoh T, Nagano Y (2005) A mixed-time-scale SGS model with fixed model parameters for practical LES. J Fluids Eng 127:1–13
Jackson PS (1981) On the displacement height in the logarithmic velocity profile. J Fluid Mech 111:15–25
Kanda M, Moriwaki R, Kasamatsu F (2004) Large-Eddy simulation of turbulent organised structures within and above explicitly resolved cube arrays. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 112:343–368
Klein P, Young DT (2011) Concentration fluctuations in a downtown urban area. Part I: analysis of Joint Urban 2003 full-scale fast-response measurements. Environ Fluid Mech 11:23–43
Leonardi S, Castro IP (2010) Channel flow over large roughness: a direct numerical simulation study. J Fluid Mech 651:519–539
MacDonald R (2000) Modelling the mean velocity profile in the urban canopy layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 97:25–45
Marusic I, Monty JP, Hultmark M, Smits AJ (2013) On the logarithmic region in wall turbulence. J Fluid Mech 713:R3–1–R3–10
Moonen P, Gromke C, Dorer V (2013) Performance assessment of large eddy simulation (LES) for modelling dispersion in an urban street canyon with tree planting. Atmos Environ 75:66–76
Schatzmann M, Leitl B (2011) Issues with validation of urban flow and dispersion CFD models. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 99:169–186
Smolarkiewicz PK, Sharman R, Weil J, Perry SG, Heijst D, Bowker G (2007) Building resolving large-eddy simulations and comparison with wind tunnel experiments. J Comput Phys 227:633–653
Soulhac L, Salizzoni P, Cierco FX, Perkins R (2011) The model SIRANE for atmospheric urban pollutant dispersion; Part 1. presentation of the model. Atmos Environ 45:7379–7395
Tominaga Y, Stathopoulos T (2013) CFD dimulations of near-field pollutant dispersion in the urban environment: a review of current modelling techniques. Atmos Environ 79:716–730
Wood C, Arnold SJ, Balogan AA, Barlow JF, Belcher SE, Britter RE, Cheng H, Dobre A, Lingard JN, Martin D, Neophytou MK, Petersson FK, Robins AG, Shallcross DE, Smalley RJ, Tate JE, Tomlin AS, White IR (2009) Dispersion experiments in central London; the 2007 Dapple project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 90:955–969
Xie ZT, Castro IP (2006) LES and RANS for turbulent flow over arrays of wall-mounted cubes. Flow Turb Combust 76:293–312
Xie ZT, Castro IP (2009) Large-Eddy Simulation for flow and dispersion in urban streets. Atmos Environ 43(13):2174–2185
Yang XIA, Sadique J, Mittal R, Meneveau C (2016) Exponential roughness layer and analytical model for turbulent boundary layer flow over rectangular-prism roughness elements. J Fluid Mech 789:127–165
Yao YF, Thomas TG, Sandham ND, Williams JJR (2001) Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over a rectangular trailing edge. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn 14:337–358
Yassin MF, Kato S, Ooka R, Takahashi T, Kouna R (2005) Field and wind-tunnel study of pullutant dispersion in a built-up area under various meteorological conditions. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 93:361–382
Acknowledgments
The DIPLOS project is funded by the UK’s Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council—Grants EP/K04060X/1 (Southampton), EP/K040731/1 (Surrey) and EP/K040707/1 (Reading) and is coordinated by one of us (OC). The EnFlo wind tunnel is an NCAS facility and we gratefully acknowledge ongoing NCAS support. We are also grateful for comments and ongoing discussions with other colleagues at Reading, Surrey, and elsewhere. The authors confirm that all wind-tunnel data are fully available without restriction. Details of the data and how to request access are available from the University of Surrey: http://dx.doi.org/10.15126/surreydata.00809438. The LES and DNS data are, likewise, available from the University of Southampton, http://dx.doi.org/10.5258/SOTON/396364 and the University of Reading, http://dx.doi.org/10.17864/1947.71, respectively. We also wish to thank Dr Bharathi Boppana for some initial scoping LES computations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Castro, I.P., Xie, ZT., Fuka, V. et al. Measurements and Computations of Flow in an Urban Street System. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 162, 207–230 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-016-0200-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-016-0200-7