Skip to main content
Log in

Future management of spectrum

  • Published:
BT Technology Journal

Abstract

As the heterogeneity of wireless access technologies increases, dynamic allocation and utilisation of spectrum become ever more important. The traditional rigid allocation of spectrum for technology-specific usage is not suitable for the increasingly dynamic demand driven by the continuous emergence of technologies providing new services with different quality of service requirements. New spectrum management techniques and increasingly flexible spectrum usage rights are therefore called for. We discuss the limitations of present spectrum management techniques and explore some new alternatives including spectrum trading and opportunistic spectrum access.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Analysis: ’Spectrum demand for non-government services’, (September 2005) — http://www.spectrumaudit.org.uk/pdf/spectrum_demand.pdf

  2. Federal Communications Commission — http://www.fcc.gov

  3. The Office of Communications — http://www.ofcom.org.uk

  4. Ofcom: ’Spectrum Framework Review’, (November 2003) — http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/sfr

  5. The Shared Spectrum Company: ’Spectrum Occupancy Measurements’, National Science Foundation (NSF) (August 2005) — http://www.sharedspectrum.com/?section=nsf_summary

  6. CEPT: ’Final report from CEPT in response to the EC Mandate on the review of the frequency band 169.4–169.8 MHz’, (November 1994) — http://europa.eu.int/information_society/policy/radio_spectrum/docs/current/mandates/rsc04_69_ermes.pdf

  7. CEPT: ’Final CEPT report in response to EC Mandate on TFTS bands’, (September 2005) — http://forum.europa.eu.int/Public/irc/infso/radiospectrum/library?I=/public_documents_2005/rsc13_october_2005/rscom05-46-tftspdf/_EN_1.0_&a=d

  8. Kawade S and Hodgkinson T: ’Licence-exempt wireless communication systems’, BT Technol J, 25, No 2, pp 64–75 (April 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Olafsson S: ’Sufficient Conditions for Convergent Power Dynamics in ad hoc Networks’, Proc Spring IEEE VTC, Melbourne (May 2006).

  10. Olafsson S and Chin E: ’Integrating Adaptive Power Control and Channel Selection in ad hoc Networks’, Proc Spring IEEE VTC, Dublin (April 2007).

  11. Faulhaber G R and Farber D: ’Spectrum Management: Property Rights, Markets, and the Commons’, (2003) — http://assets.wharton.upenn.edu/~faulhabe

  12. ETNO Reflection Document Commenting on Auctions and Beauty Contests: ‘ETNO Reflection Document RD203’, (December 2004).

  13. Ofcom (Radio Communications Agency): ’3G Spectrum Auction Result’, (April 2000) — http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/archive/spectrumauctions/3gindex.htm

  14. Hewitt T: ’Ensuring the correct timing of transition to liberalised markets’, European Spectrum Management Conference, Brussels (March 2006).

  15. Responses to Ofcom Consultation on Spectrum Usage Rights (June 2006) — http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/sur/responses

  16. Ofcom: ’Spectrum Usage Rights’, (April 2006) — http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/sur/spur.pdf

  17. Mitola J: ’Cognitive radio for flexible mobile multimedia communications’, in Sixth International Workshop on Mobile Multimedia Communications, San Diego, CA (1999).

  18. Federal Communication Commission: ’Facilitating opportunities for flexible, efficient and reliable spectrum use employing cognitive radio technologies’, ET Docket 03-108, Notice of Inquiry and Proposed Rulemaking and Order (May 2003).

  19. Nekovee M: ’Dynamic spectrum access with cognitive radios: Research challenges and future architectures’, Proc of the 1st International Conference on Cognitive Radio Oriented Networks (CROWNCOM 2006), Mykonos, Greece (June 2006).

  20. Ofcom: ’Cognitive Radio’, (December 2006) — http://www.ofcom.org.uk/research/technology/overview/emer_tech/cograd

  21. IEEE 802 LAN/MAN Standards Committee — http://www.ieee802.org/22

  22. Granelli F, Zhang H, Zhou X and Marano S: ’Research advances in cognitive ultra wide band radio and their application to sensor networks’, Mobile Netw Appl, 11, pp 487–499 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gu X and Taylor L: ’Ultra-Wideband and its Capabilities’, in Smyth P (Ed): ‘Mobile and Wireless Communications: Key Technologies and Future Applications’, The Institution of Electrical Engineers (2004).

  24. Federal Communication Commission: ’Revision of Part 15 of the commission’s rules regarding ultra-wideband transmission systems’, FCC 02-48 (February 2002).

  25. Nekovee M: ’Dynamic spectrum access — concepts and future architectures’, BT Technol J, 24, No 2, pp 111–116 (April 2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Glover W and Nekovee M: ’Dynamic spectrum: Going the full circle’, Proc of IEEE DySpan 2007, Dublin, Ireland (April 2007).

  27. Olafsson S: ’Managing Risk in Network Capacity Investments’, CRG Report (January 2000).

  28. Burns J, Marks P, LeBorgne F and Rudd R: ’Implications of digital switchover for spectrum management’, Technical Report, EC (June 2005).

  29. Ofcom: ’The Ofcom Digital Dividend Review’, Press Release (November 2005).

  30. Haykin S: ’Cognitive Radio: Brain-Empowered Wireless Communications’, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 23, No 2 (February 2005).

Download references

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Olafsson, S., Glover, B. & Nekovee, M. Future management of spectrum. BT Technol J 25, 52–63 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10550-007-0028-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10550-007-0028-2

Keywords

Navigation