Abstract
Fraudulent financial reporting, financial statements with errors so material as to require restatement, and biased reporting marred by defects such as managed earnings have plagued financial reporting in many countries in recent years. All of those failures are ethics failures that represent breaches of fiduciary duties by individuals who accepted responsibilities but did not fulfill them. The financial reporting system practiced in America is viewed by the parties involved in it as generally satisfactory. However, according to another view, the interests of those primarily and secondarily responsible for those reports conflict with the interests of the intended beneficiaries, or users, of the corporate financial statements. A more realistic view of the actual operation of that reporting system shows that it is fundamentally flawed. Primary responsibility for failures rests with top management and financial management of the reporting corporation who are so strongly motivated to render favorable reports on their stewardship that they neglect their fiduciary responsibilities to investors. Secondary responsibility falls on ‘independent’ auditors who are so heavily influenced by enterprise management that they, too, fail in carrying out their responsibilities to users of the audited financial statements. Ethics compromises are also found in the performances of academic accountants and members of accounting standards-setting bodies. The conflict between management’s interest in reporting its performance in a favorable light and investors’ interest in decision-useful financial information will always exist and require regulation. However, changes in those regulations and in the basic governance arrangements involving shareholders, management, and auditors could reduce the opportunities and temptations for failures in carrying out fiduciary responsibilities. Most importantly, the close relationships between auditors and management must be loosened in favor of closer relationships between auditors and investors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. Ball P. Brown (1968) ‘An Empirical Evaluation of Accounting Income Numbers’ Journal of Accounting Research Autumn 159–178
A. Berenson (2003) The Number Random House New York
Economist: 2003, ‘Unresolved conflicts’, Economist 369(8346), Oct 18, 14.
A. Levitt (2003) Take on the Street Pantheon Books New York
B. Toffler (2003) Final Accounting Broadway Books New York
B. West (2003) Professionalism and Accounting Rules Routledge London and New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Staubus, G. Ethics Failures in Corporate Financial Reporting. J Bus Ethics 57, 5–15 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-3811-8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-3811-8