Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Performance of Ethical Mutual Funds in Spain: Sacrifice or Premium?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is currently much debate in the economic literature about whether ethical investment involves a financial sacrifice or premium. One of the most common methods of testing this compares the financial performance of ethical investment funds with that of other funds not considered “socially responsible” or ethical. The majority of these research studies evaluate the performance of the ethical funds according to classic measures, whereby different financial markets, in different countries and for different periods of time serve as reference for evaluation. The ultimate conclusion of all of these studies is that there are no significant differences between the performance results of one type of funds and the other. In Spain, ethical investment funds are still an incipient sector of investment. To date, the Spanish market has not been included in any type of analysis of these characteristics. Therefore the main objective of this article is to compare the financial performance of ethical investment funds to that of other funds in the Spanish retail market. We propose the aggregate type of analysis as the Spanish ethical investment funds have experienced a weaker development in comparison to those of other developed countries. In the first step we suggest the financial performance to be compared by style analysis since the asset distribution of the Spanish Social Return Investment (SRI) funds differs from the European trend. In particular, we use the multifactor regression model with style benchmarks. We found that their financial performance is in all cases superior or similar to that achieved by the rest of the funds. In the second step, to achieve a more robust and homogeneous comparison, we used the bootstrap method, comparing ethical and non-ethical fund subsamples by homogeneous groups. No significant differences between these two types of funds have been found. Thus, if we assume the positive o neutral effect of ethical investment on investor utility in the retail Spanish market the financial and social performance (FSP) of ethical funds will be, in aggregate, superior to the FSP achieved by conventional funds. In conclusion, the financial performance of ethical mutual funds in Spain is no sacrifice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler M., Dumas B. (1983) International Portfolio Choice and Corporation Finance: A Synthesis. Journal of Finance 38(3):1471–1487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiello S., Chieffe N. (1999) International Index Funds and the Investment Portfolio. Financial Services Review 8(1):27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer R., Derwall J., Otten R. (2007) The Ethical Mutual Fund Performance Debate: New Evidence from Canada. Journal of Business Ethics 70:111–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, R., K. Koedijk and R. Otten: 2002, ‹International Evidence on Ethical Mutual Fund Performance and Investment Style’, Life working paper, No. 02.59 University of Maastricht.

  • Becchetti I., Fucito L. (2000) La finanza etica: consideración teoriche e simulación empiriche. Rivista di Política Economica 1:29–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown S., Goetzmann W. (1997) Mutual Fund Styles. Journal of Financial Economics 43(3):373–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camino, D. and J. López: 1995, ‹Un análisis de la inversión ética en España’, Boletín de Estudios Económicos 50(156), diciembre, 519–540.

  • CNMV (Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores): 1999, ‹Carta de 28 de junio dirigida a los Presidentes de las Sociedades Gestoras de Instituciones de Inversión Colectiva’, Madrid.

  • Daniel K., Grinblatt M., Titman S., Wermers R. (1997) Measuring Mutual Fund Performance with Characteristic-Based Benchmarks. Journal of Finance 52(3):1035–1058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B.: 1999, ‹Profits from Principle, Five Forces Redefining Business’, The Futurist March, 28–33

  • Detzler M., Wiggins J. (1997) The Performance of Actively Managed International Mutual Funds. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 8(3):291–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domini A. L. (1989) The Social Investment Almanac. Henry Holt, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton E., Gruber M., Das J., Hlavka M. (1993) Efficiency with Costly Information: A Reinterpretation of Evidence for Managed Portfolios. Review of Financial Studies 6(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engström, S.: 2001, ‹Costly Information, Diversification, and International Mutual Fund Performance’, non-indexed working paper, Stockholm School of Economics.

  • Ferson W., Schadt R. (1996) Measuring Fund Strategy and Performance in Changing Economic Conditions. Journal of Finance 51(2):425–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M. (1962) Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinblatt M., Titman S. (1993) Performance Measurement Without Benchmarks: An Examination of Mutual Fund Returns. Journal of Business 66(1):47–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, S., H. Jo and M. Statman: 1993, ‹Doing Well While Doing Good? The Investment Performance of Socially Responsibility Mutual Funds’, Financial Analysts Journal, November/December, 62–66.

  • Horst, J., T. Nijman and F. Roon: 1998a, ‹Style Analysis and Performance Evaluation of Dutch Mutual Funds, Center for Economic Research’, Tilburg University, Discussion paper 9850.

  • Horst, J., T. Nijman and F. Roon: 1998b, ‹Performance Analysis of International Mutual Funds Incorporating Market Frictions, Center for Economic Research’, Tilburg University, Discussion paper 9851.

  • IPES: 2002, ‹Observatorio de los fondos de inversión éticos, ecológicos y solidarios en España’, Esade.

  • Jensen M. (1968) The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945–1964. Journal of Finance 23(2):389–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreander N., Gray R. H., Power D. M., Sinclair C. D. (2005) Evaluating the Performance of Ethical and Non-Ethical Funds: A Matched Pair Analysis. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 32(7–8):1465–1493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, D.: 1991, ‹Morals and Money’, Money Management September, 39–46.

  • Lozano J. M., Albareda L., Balaguer M. R. (2006) Socially Responsible Investment in the Spanish Financial Market. Journal of Business Ethics 69:305–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luther, R., J. Matatko and D. C. Coerner: 1992, ‹The␣Investment Performance of UK Ethical Unit Trusts’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 5, 57–70.

  • Martínez M. (2003) Legal Constraints, Transaction Costs and the Evaluation of Mutual Funds. The European Journal of Finance 9(3):199–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matallín, J. C. and M. A. Fernández: 2002, Estudio de la gestión de fondos de inversión en el ámbito de las Entidades Financieras de carácter cooperativo. Fundación Ruralcaja.

  • Mill G. A. (2006) The financial Performance of a Socially Responsible Investment Over Time and a Possible Link with Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 63:131–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munnell, A.: 1983, ‹The Pitfalls of Social Investing’, New England Economic Review September, 20–37.

  • Muñoz, M. J., M. A. Fernandez and M. R. Balaguer: 2004, ‹The Social Responsibility Performance of Ethical and Solidarity Fund: An Approach to the Case of Spain’, Business Ethics: A European Review 2/3, April/June, 200–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pástor L., Stambaugh R. (2002) Mutual Fund Performance and Seemingly Unrelated Assets. Journal of Financial Economics 63(3):315–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read, T.: 1999, ‹Ethics for Pleasure and Profit’, Euromoney, 12–14.

  • Reilly F., Akhtar R. (1995) The Benchmark Error Problem with Global Capital Markets. The Journal of Portfolio Management 22(1):33–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubio, G.: 1992, ‹La evaluación de los fondos de inversión: El análisis de la composición mensual de la cartera’, Revista Española de Economía, monográfico: Mercados Financieros Españoles, 7–32.

  • Rubio G. (1993) Performance Measurement of Managed Portfolios: A Survey. Investigaciones Económicas 17(1):3–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. (1999) Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe W. (1966) Mutual Fund Performance. Journal of Business 39(1):119–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W.: 1988, ‹Determining a Fund’s Effective Asset Mix’, Investment Management Review December, 59–69.

  • Sharpe W. (1991) The Arithmetic of Active Management. Financial Analysts Journal 47(1):7–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe W. (1992) Asset Allocation: Management Style and Performance Measurement. The Journal of Portfolio Management 18(1):7–19 winter

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siri Group: 2004, Green, social and ethical funds in Europe 2003. Avanzi SRI Research/SiRi group. http://www.sirigroup.org

  • Solnik B. (1974) An Equilibrium Model of the International Capital Market. Journal of Economic Theory 8:500–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statman M. (2000) Socially Responsible Mutual Funds. Financial Analysts Journal 56: 30–39 May/June

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tickell, O.: 2000, ‹How Green is Your Future’? Geographical, February.

  • Waddock S. A., Graves S. B. (1997) The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal 18:303–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White M. A. (1995) The Performance of Environmental Mutual Funds in the United States and Germany: Is there Economic Hope for Green Investors? Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy supplement 1:323–344

    Google Scholar 

  • WWW.CNMV.ES

  • WWW.EIRIS.ORG

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study is part of the research projects SEC2003-07899 of the Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia and P1-1B2006-16 by Universitat Jaumel-Fundación Bancaixa-Castelló and GV/2007/097 by Generalitat Valencia. The authors wish to thank the editors of the magazine as well as two anonymous reviewers for the comments and suggestions on the manuscript. Our thanks are due to the Public Relations department of the CNMV (Spanish Securities and Markets Commission), AFI (International Financial Analysts) and MSCI (Morgan Stanley Capital International) for making their data available.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dpto. de Finanzas y Contabilidad, Universitat Jaume I, Campus de Riu Sec, Castellón, 12071, Spain

    Angeles Fernandez-Izquierdo & Juan Carlos Matallin-Saez

Authors
  1. Angeles Fernandez-Izquierdo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juan Carlos Matallin-Saez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angeles Fernandez-Izquierdo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fernandez-Izquierdo, A., Matallin-Saez, J.C. Performance of Ethical Mutual Funds in Spain: Sacrifice or Premium?. J Bus Ethics 81, 247–260 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9492-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9492-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation