Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics 2/2013

01.12.2013

Corporate Social Responsibility and Its Impact on Firms’ Investment Policy, Organizational Structure, and Performance

verfasst von: Otgontsetseg Erhemjamts, Qian Li, Anand Venkateswaran

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 2/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This study examines the determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and its implications on firms’ investment policy, organizational strategy, and performance. First, we find that firms with better performance, higher R&D intensity, better financial health, and firms in new economy industries are more likely to engage in CSR activities, while riskier firms are less likely to do so. We also find U-shaped relation between firm size and CSR, indicating that either very small or very large firms exhibit high levels of CSR strengths and concerns. Next, we find that firms’ CSR strengths relate favorably with their investments, organizational strategy, and performance, whereas CSR concerns and firm attributes are by and large negatively related. Using a 2SLS procedure, we verify that the CSR–performance relation is robust to corrections for endogeneity through reverse causation and/or biases introduced by time varying omitted variables. Finally, we find that the CSR–firm attributes relation is strengthened when the CEO’s incentives are below the sample median, suggesting that CSR participation is especially important when monetary incentives are lower than benchmark levels.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
Bertrand and Schoar (2003) note that there are considerable disagreements as to the roots of wide variation in financial policies across firms. Therefore, without arguing that corporate decisions are solely based on firms’ CSR commitment, we present evidence showing that CSR involvement can in part account for the unexplained heterogeneity in corporate practices.
 
2
Recent research shows that by investing in CSR, companies can enjoy lower cost of capital and attract more institutional investors and greater analyst coverage (e.g., El Ghoul et al. 2011; Dhaliwal et al. 2011), which increases stakeholder demand for CSR even further. In addition, lower cost of capital enables companies to accept more investment proposals during investment screening process, pleasing investors (shareholders).
 
3
KLD was acquired by RiskMetrics Group in 2009, and RiskMetrics Group was later acquired by MSCI in 2010.
 
4
Approximate number of companies covered by the database was 3,100 as of 2007. For more current statistics, visit http://​web.​kld.​com/​.
 
5
Here, examples of firms with more than ten strengths and concerns that have an overall KLD score of 0 include firms such as Pfizer, Bank of America, and Dow Chemical. On the other hand, firms with one strength and one concern that have an overall KLD score of 0 include firms such as Ecollege.com and Alexion Pharmaceuticals.
 
6
For instance, the extent to which firms are subject to external scrutiny on their methods and practices may vary by industry. Industries such as food, textiles, and apparel, receive greater external scrutiny for product-related concerns, while others such as refining, rubber, plastic, or utilities, invite attention for their environmental and energy practices (Rehbein et al. 2004). Similarly, Siegel and Vitaliano (2007) find that firms selling experience or credence goods (e.g., food, automobiles, entertainment, and health care) are more likely to be socially responsible than firms in the business of search goods (e.g., furniture, clothing, and footwear).
 
7
Following Murphy (2003), new economy firms are those belonging to industries with the following SIC codes: 3570, 3571, 3572, 3576, 3577, 3661, 3674, 4812, 4813, 5045, 5961, 7370, 7371, 7372, and 7373.
 
8
Firms’ ability to make investments either in the form of capital expenditures or in acquisitions as well as ability to incur costs related to socially responsible activities depends on their financial performance.
 
9
Anecdotal examples may provide an explanation for this result. In particular, companies with high levels of CSR concerns may face protests from various groups for their use of advertising. For example, regulations imposed on tobacco advertising limit its reach in the traditional media. Tobacco companies agreed to restrictions outlawing Joe Camel and other cartoon animals, banning outdoor advertisements everywhere and banning ads in magazines that are aimed at younger readers. See http://​www.​nytimes.​com/​2006/​03/​10/​business/​media/​10adco.​html.
 
10
We follow Murphy (1999) and determine an average exercise price for all previously granted options based on their year-end intrinsic value. We treat all option holdings as a single grant with a 5-year time to maturity and obtain the risk-free rate from the 5-year treasury bills constant maturity series. We compute the average delta of prior option grants using the modified Black–Scholes formula.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.CrossRef Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and the firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 488–506.CrossRef Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and the firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 488–506.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bertrand, M., & Schoar, A. (2003). Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1169–1208.CrossRef Bertrand, M., & Schoar, A. (2003). Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1169–1208.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cowen, S. S., Ferreri, L. B., & Parker, L. D. (1987). The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(2), 111–122.CrossRef Cowen, S. S., Ferreri, L. B., & Parker, L. D. (1987). The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(2), 111–122.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100.CrossRef Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.
Zurück zum Zitat El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C., & Mishra, D. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388–2406.CrossRef El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C., & Mishra, D. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388–2406.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fich, E., Garcia, D., Robinson, T., & Yore, A. (2009). Corporate philanthropy, agency problems, and shareholder wealth, Working paper. Fich, E., Garcia, D., Robinson, T., & Yore, A. (2009). Corporate philanthropy, agency problems, and shareholder wealth, Working paper.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, R. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Freeman, R. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times, September 13. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times, September 13.
Zurück zum Zitat Garcia-Castro, R., Ariño, M. A., & Canela, M. A. (2010). Does social performance really lead to financial performance? Accounting for endogeneity. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(1), 107–126.CrossRef Garcia-Castro, R., Ariño, M. A., & Canela, M. A. (2010). Does social performance really lead to financial performance? Accounting for endogeneity. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(1), 107–126.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gompers, P. A., Ishii, J. L., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 1007–1155.CrossRef Gompers, P. A., Ishii, J. L., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 1007–1155.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Graham, J. R. (1996). Debt and the marginal tax rate. Journal of Financial Economics, 41(1), 41–73.CrossRef Graham, J. R. (1996). Debt and the marginal tax rate. Journal of Financial Economics, 41(1), 41–73.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. (1994). Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1034–1046.CrossRef Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. (1994). Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1034–1046.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. (2000). Beyond built to last…Stakeholder relations in built to last companies. Business and Society Review, 105, 393–418.CrossRef Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. (2000). Beyond built to last…Stakeholder relations in built to last companies. Business and Society Review, 105, 393–418.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014. Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.
Zurück zum Zitat Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139.CrossRef Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427.CrossRef Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235–256.CrossRef Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235–256.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 564–576.CrossRef Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 564–576.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jones, T. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 404–437. Jones, T. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 404–437.
Zurück zum Zitat Levitt, T. (1958). The dangers of social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 36, 41–50. Levitt, T. (1958). The dangers of social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 36, 41–50.
Zurück zum Zitat Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.CrossRef Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872.CrossRef McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and finance performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603–609.CrossRef McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and finance performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603–609.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117–127. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117–127.
Zurück zum Zitat McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1–18.CrossRef McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1–18.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moskowitz, M. (1972). Choosing socially responsible stocks. Business and Society Review, 1, 71–75. Moskowitz, M. (1972). Choosing socially responsible stocks. Business and Society Review, 1, 71–75.
Zurück zum Zitat Murphy, K. J. (1999). Executive compensation. In Orley. Ashenfelter & David. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 3, pp. 2485–2563). Amsterdam: North-Holland. Murphy, K. J. (1999). Executive compensation. In Orley. Ashenfelter & David. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 3, pp. 2485–2563). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Zurück zum Zitat Murphy, K. J. (2003). Stock-based pay in new economy firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 34, 129–147.CrossRef Murphy, K. J. (2003). Stock-based pay in new economy firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 34, 129–147.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nelling, E., & Webb, E. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The “virtuous circle” revisited. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 32, 197–209.CrossRef Nelling, E., & Webb, E. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The “virtuous circle” revisited. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 32, 197–209.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435–480.CrossRef Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435–480.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
Zurück zum Zitat Rehbein, K., Waddock, S., & Graves, S. B. (2004). Understanding shareholder activism: Which corporations are targeted? Business & Society, 43(3), 239–267.CrossRef Rehbein, K., Waddock, S., & Graves, S. B. (2004). Understanding shareholder activism: Which corporations are targeted? Business & Society, 43(3), 239–267.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 534–559.CrossRef Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 534–559.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Saville, D., & Wood, G. R. (1991). Statistical methods: The geometric approach. New York: Springer.CrossRef Saville, D., & Wood, G. R. (1991). Statistical methods: The geometric approach. New York: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel, D. S., & Vitaliano, D. F. (2007). An empirical analysis of the strategic use of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16(3), 773–792.CrossRef Siegel, D. S., & Vitaliano, D. F. (2007). An empirical analysis of the strategic use of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16(3), 773–792.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 463–490. Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 463–490.
Zurück zum Zitat Udayasankar, K. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and firm size. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 167–175.CrossRef Udayasankar, K. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and firm size. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 167–175.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.CrossRef Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (2000). Performance characteristics of social and traditional investments. Journal of Investing, 9(2), 27–38.CrossRef Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (2000). Performance characteristics of social and traditional investments. Journal of Investing, 9(2), 27–38.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, J., & Coffey, B. S. (1992). Board composition and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(10), 771–778.CrossRef Wang, J., & Coffey, B. S. (1992). Board composition and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(10), 771–778.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.CrossRef Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Corporate Social Responsibility and Its Impact on Firms’ Investment Policy, Organizational Structure, and Performance
verfasst von
Otgontsetseg Erhemjamts
Qian Li
Anand Venkateswaran
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2013
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1594-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2013

Journal of Business Ethics 2/2013 Zur Ausgabe