Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics 1/2014

01.01.2014

Embedding Corporate Social Responsibility in Corporate Governance: A Stakeholder Systems Approach

verfasst von: Chris Mason, John Simmons

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 1/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Current research on corporate social responsibility (CSR) illustrates the growing sense of discord surrounding the ‘business of doing good’ (Dobers and Springett, Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manage 17(2):63–69, 2010). Central to these concerns is that CSR risks becoming an over-simplified and peripheral part of corporate strategy. Rather than transforming the dominant corporate discourse, it is argued that CSR and related concepts are limited to “emancipatory rhetoric…defined by narrow business interests and serve to curtail interests of external stakeholders.” (Banerjee, Crit Sociol 34(1):52, 2008). The paper addresses gaps in the literature and challenges current thinking on corporate governance and CSR by offering a new conceptual framework that responds to the concerns of researchers and practitioners. The limited focus of existing analyses is extended by a holistic approach to corporate governance and social responsibility that integrates company, shareholder and wider stakeholder concerns. A defensive stance is avoided by delineating key stages of the governance process and aligning profit centred and social responsibility concerns to produce a business-based rationale for minimising risk and mainstreaming CSR.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmed, P. K., & Machold, S. (2004). The quality and ethics connection: Towards virtuous organisations. Total Quality Management, 15(4), 527–545. Ahmed, P. K., & Machold, S. (2004). The quality and ethics connection: Towards virtuous organisations. Total Quality Management, 15(4), 527–545.
Zurück zum Zitat Andriof, J., Waddock, S., Rahman, S. S., & Husted, B. (2002). Introduction: Stakeholder responsibility. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 6(Summer), 16–18. Andriof, J., Waddock, S., Rahman, S. S., & Husted, B. (2002). Introduction: Stakeholder responsibility. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 6(Summer), 16–18.
Zurück zum Zitat Archel, P., Husillos, J., & Spence, C. (2011). The institutionalisation of unaccountability: Loading the dice of corporate social responsibility discourse. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(6), 327–343. Archel, P., Husillos, J., & Spence, C. (2011). The institutionalisation of unaccountability: Loading the dice of corporate social responsibility discourse. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(6), 327–343.
Zurück zum Zitat Ballinger, C. (2011). HR’s role in embedding a responsible approach to business. Impact, Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, 37, 10–11. Ballinger, C. (2011). HR’s role in embedding a responsible approach to business. Impact, Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, 37, 10–11.
Zurück zum Zitat Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34(1), 51–79.CrossRef Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34(1), 51–79.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Becker-Olsen, K. L., Cudmore, B. A., & Hill, R. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on customer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59, 46–53.CrossRef Becker-Olsen, K. L., Cudmore, B. A., & Hill, R. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on customer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59, 46–53.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Beverungen, A., & Case, P. (2011). Editorial introduction: Where is business ethics? Business Ethics: A European Review, 20(3), 229–232.CrossRef Beverungen, A., & Case, P. (2011). Editorial introduction: Where is business ethics? Business Ethics: A European Review, 20(3), 229–232.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cegarra-Navarro, J.-G., & Martinez-Martinez, A. (2009). Linking corporate social responsibility with admiration through organisational outcomes. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(4), 499–511.CrossRef Cegarra-Navarro, J.-G., & Martinez-Martinez, A. (2009). Linking corporate social responsibility with admiration through organisational outcomes. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(4), 499–511.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng, W. L., & Ahmad, J. (2010). Incorporating stakeholder approach in corporate social responsibility: A case study at multinational corporations (MNCs) in Penang. Social Responsibility Journal, 6(4), 593–610.CrossRef Cheng, W. L., & Ahmad, J. (2010). Incorporating stakeholder approach in corporate social responsibility: A case study at multinational corporations (MNCs) in Penang. Social Responsibility Journal, 6(4), 593–610.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Collier, J., & Esteban, R. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and employee commitment. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16, 19–33.CrossRef Collier, J., & Esteban, R. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and employee commitment. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16, 19–33.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cuganesan, S. (2006). Reporting organisational performance in managing human resources: Intellectual capital or stakeholder perspectives? Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 10(3), 164–188.CrossRef Cuganesan, S. (2006). Reporting organisational performance in managing human resources: Intellectual capital or stakeholder perspectives? Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 10(3), 164–188.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Davies, G., & Chun, R. (2002). Gaps between the internal and external perceptions of the corporate brand. Corporate Reputation Review, 5, 144–158.CrossRef Davies, G., & Chun, R. (2002). Gaps between the internal and external perceptions of the corporate brand. Corporate Reputation Review, 5, 144–158.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat de Wit, M., Wade, M., & Schoutan, E. (2006). Hardwiring and softwiring CSR: A vital combination. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 491–505.CrossRef de Wit, M., Wade, M., & Schoutan, E. (2006). Hardwiring and softwiring CSR: A vital combination. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 491–505.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dobers, P., & Springett, D. (2010). Corporate social responsibility: Discourse, narratives and communication. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(2), 63–69.CrossRef Dobers, P., & Springett, D. (2010). Corporate social responsibility: Discourse, narratives and communication. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(2), 63–69.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.
Zurück zum Zitat Drews, M. (2010). Measuring the business and societal benefits of corporate responsibility. Corporate Governance, 10, 421–431.CrossRef Drews, M. (2010). Measuring the business and societal benefits of corporate responsibility. Corporate Governance, 10, 421–431.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Durden, C. (2008). Towards a socially responsible management control system. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(5), 671–694.CrossRef Durden, C. (2008). Towards a socially responsible management control system. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(5), 671–694.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Erdogan, B., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. (2001). Procedural justice as a two-dimensional construct an examination in the performance appraisal context. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 37(2), 205–222.CrossRef Erdogan, B., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. (2001). Procedural justice as a two-dimensional construct an examination in the performance appraisal context. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 37(2), 205–222.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fassin, Y. (2010). A dynamic perspective on Freeman’s stakeholder model. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 7–9.CrossRef Fassin, Y. (2010). A dynamic perspective on Freeman’s stakeholder model. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 7–9.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fassin, Y., & Buelens, M. (2011). The hypocrisy-sincerity continuum of corporate communication and decision making: A model of corporate social responsibility and business ethics practices. Management Decision, 49(4), 586–600.CrossRef Fassin, Y., & Buelens, M. (2011). The hypocrisy-sincerity continuum of corporate communication and decision making: A model of corporate social responsibility and business ethics practices. Management Decision, 49(4), 586–600.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ferreira, D. A., Avila, M. G., & de Faria, M. D. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and customers’ perception of price. Social Responsibility Journal, 6(2), 206–221.CrossRef Ferreira, D. A., Avila, M. G., & de Faria, M. D. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and customers’ perception of price. Social Responsibility Journal, 6(2), 206–221.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Flint, D. H. (1999). The role of organizational justice in multi-source performance appraisal: Theory-based applications and directions for research. Human Resource Management Review, 9(1), 1–20.CrossRef Flint, D. H. (1999). The role of organizational justice in multi-source performance appraisal: Theory-based applications and directions for research. Human Resource Management Review, 9(1), 1–20.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, R. E. (2010). Managing for stakeholders: Tradeoffs and value creation. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 7–9.CrossRef Freeman, R. E. (2010). Managing for stakeholders: Tradeoffs and value creation. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 7–9.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Greenwood, M. R. (2001). Community as stakeholder: Focusing on corporate social and environmental reporting. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 4(Winter), 31–45. Greenwood, M. R. (2001). Community as stakeholder: Focusing on corporate social and environmental reporting. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 4(Winter), 31–45.
Zurück zum Zitat Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 315–327.CrossRef Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 315–327.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Green, T., & Peloza, J. (2011). How does corporate social responsibility create value for consumers? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(1), 48–56. Green, T., & Peloza, J. (2011). How does corporate social responsibility create value for consumers? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(1), 48–56.
Zurück zum Zitat Hess, D., & Warren, D. E. (2008). The meaning and meaningfulness of corporate social initiatives. Business and Society Review, 113, 163–197.CrossRef Hess, D., & Warren, D. E. (2008). The meaning and meaningfulness of corporate social initiatives. Business and Society Review, 113, 163–197.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jones, D. (2012). Who cares wins: Why good business is better business. Financial Times Series. London: Financial Times. Jones, D. (2012). Who cares wins: Why good business is better business. Financial Times Series. London: Financial Times.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D, P. (1992). The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1),71–79. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D, P. (1992). The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1),71–79.
Zurück zum Zitat Katsoulakos, T., & Katsoulakos, Y. (2007). Integrating corporate responsibility principles and stakeholder approaches into mainstream strategy: A stakeholder orientated and integrative strategic management framework. Corporate Governance, 7(4), 355–369.CrossRef Katsoulakos, T., & Katsoulakos, Y. (2007). Integrating corporate responsibility principles and stakeholder approaches into mainstream strategy: A stakeholder orientated and integrative strategic management framework. Corporate Governance, 7(4), 355–369.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory. Chicago: Rand McNally. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Zurück zum Zitat Koslowski, P. (2000). The limits of shareholder value. Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 137–148.CrossRef Koslowski, P. (2000). The limits of shareholder value. Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 137–148.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Laudal, T. (2011). Drivers and barriers of CSR and the size and internationalization of firms. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(2), 234–256.CrossRef Laudal, T. (2011). Drivers and barriers of CSR and the size and internationalization of firms. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(2), 234–256.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Law, P. (2011). Audit regulatory reform with a refined stakeholder model to enhance corporate governance: Hong Kong evidence. Corporate Governance, 11(2), 123–135.CrossRef Law, P. (2011). Audit regulatory reform with a refined stakeholder model to enhance corporate governance: Hong Kong evidence. Corporate Governance, 11(2), 123–135.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lozano, J. M. (2005). Towards the relational corporation: From managing stakeholder relationships to building stakeholder relationships (waiting for Copernicus). Corporate Governance, 5(2), 60–77.CrossRef Lozano, J. M. (2005). Towards the relational corporation: From managing stakeholder relationships to building stakeholder relationships (waiting for Copernicus). Corporate Governance, 5(2), 60–77.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lozano, J. M. (2008). CSR or RSC? (Beyond the humpty dumpty syndrome). Society and Business Review, 3(3), 191–206.CrossRef Lozano, J. M. (2008). CSR or RSC? (Beyond the humpty dumpty syndrome). Society and Business Review, 3(3), 191–206.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Maclagan, P. (2007). Hierarchical control or individual’s moral autonomy? Addressing a fundamental tension in the management of business ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(1), 48–69.CrossRef Maclagan, P. (2007). Hierarchical control or individual’s moral autonomy? Addressing a fundamental tension in the management of business ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(1), 48–69.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mishra, S., & Suar, D. (2010). Do stakeholder management strategy and salience influence corporate social responsibility in Indian companies? Social Responsibility Journal, 6(2), 306–327.CrossRef Mishra, S., & Suar, D. (2010). Do stakeholder management strategy and salience influence corporate social responsibility in Indian companies? Social Responsibility Journal, 6(2), 306–327.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. (1997). Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. (1997). Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.
Zurück zum Zitat Mont, O., & Leire, C. (2009). Socially responsible purchasing in supply chains: Drivers and barriers in Sweden. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(3), 389–407.CrossRef Mont, O., & Leire, C. (2009). Socially responsible purchasing in supply chains: Drivers and barriers in Sweden. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(3), 389–407.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Niebuhr, H. R., & Gustafson, J. M. (1963). The responsible self. An essay in Christian moral philosophy. New York: Harper. Niebuhr, H. R., & Gustafson, J. M. (1963). The responsible self. An essay in Christian moral philosophy. New York: Harper.
Zurück zum Zitat Nijhof, A., & Jeurissen, R. (2006). Editorial: A sense making perspective on corporate social responsibility: Introduction to the special issue. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 316–322.CrossRef Nijhof, A., & Jeurissen, R. (2006). Editorial: A sense making perspective on corporate social responsibility: Introduction to the special issue. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 316–322.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Noland, J., & Phillips, R. (2010). Stakeholder engagement, discourse ethics and strategic management. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 39–49.CrossRef Noland, J., & Phillips, R. (2010). Stakeholder engagement, discourse ethics and strategic management. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 39–49.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Palaiologos, A., Papazekos, P., & Panayotopoulou, L. (2011). Organizational justice and employee satisfaction in performance appraisal. Journal of European Industrial Training, 35(8), 825–840.CrossRef Palaiologos, A., Papazekos, P., & Panayotopoulou, L. (2011). Organizational justice and employee satisfaction in performance appraisal. Journal of European Industrial Training, 35(8), 825–840.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Papasolomou, I., Papasolomou-Doukakis, M., Krambia-Kapardis, M., & Katsioloudes, C. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: The way forward? Maybe not!: A preliminary study in Cyprus. European Business Review, 17(3), 263–279.CrossRef Papasolomou, I., Papasolomou-Doukakis, M., Krambia-Kapardis, M., & Katsioloudes, C. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: The way forward? Maybe not!: A preliminary study in Cyprus. European Business Review, 17(3), 263–279.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Paulet, E. (2011). Banking ethics. Corporate Governance, 11(3), 293–300.CrossRef Paulet, E. (2011). Banking ethics. Corporate Governance, 11(3), 293–300.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pava, M. T. (2011). Corporate accountability. SAGE Brief Guide to Corporate Social Responsibility. London: Sage. Pava, M. T. (2011). Corporate accountability. SAGE Brief Guide to Corporate Social Responsibility. London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Petersen, H. L., & Vredenburg, H. (2009). Morals or economics? Institutional investor preferences for corporate social responsibility. Journal of business ethics, 90(1), 1–14. Petersen, H. L., & Vredenburg, H. (2009). Morals or economics? Institutional investor preferences for corporate social responsibility. Journal of business ethics, 90(1), 1–14.
Zurück zum Zitat Rake, M., & Grayson, D. (2009). Embedding corporate responsibility and sustainability—Everybody’s business. Corporate Governance, 9(4), 395–399.CrossRef Rake, M., & Grayson, D. (2009). Embedding corporate responsibility and sustainability—Everybody’s business. Corporate Governance, 9(4), 395–399.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rasche, A. (2010). Collaborative governance 2.0. Corporate Governance, 10(4), 500–511.CrossRef Rasche, A. (2010). Collaborative governance 2.0. Corporate Governance, 10(4), 500–511.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roberts, R. W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17, 595–612.CrossRef Roberts, R. W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17, 595–612.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roberts, J. (2001). Trust and control in Anglo–American systems of corporate governance: The individualizing and socializing effects of processes of accountability. Human Relations, 54, 1547–1572.CrossRef Roberts, J. (2001). Trust and control in Anglo–American systems of corporate governance: The individualizing and socializing effects of processes of accountability. Human Relations, 54, 1547–1572.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rodrigo, P., & Arenas, D. (2008). Do employees care about CSR programs? A typology of employees according to their attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 265–283.CrossRef Rodrigo, P., & Arenas, D. (2008). Do employees care about CSR programs? A typology of employees according to their attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 265–283.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rouse, P., & Putterill, M. (2003). An integral framework for performance measurement. Management Decision, 41(8), 791–805.CrossRef Rouse, P., & Putterill, M. (2003). An integral framework for performance measurement. Management Decision, 41(8), 791–805.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rousseau, D. M. (2001). Schema, promise and mutuality: The building blocks of the psychological contract. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 74(4), 511–541.CrossRef Rousseau, D. M. (2001). Schema, promise and mutuality: The building blocks of the psychological contract. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 74(4), 511–541.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rupp, D. E., Ganapathi, J., Aguilera, R. V., & Williams, C. A. (2006). Employee reactions to corporate social responsibility: an organizational justice framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 537–543.CrossRef Rupp, D. E., Ganapathi, J., Aguilera, R. V., & Williams, C. A. (2006). Employee reactions to corporate social responsibility: an organizational justice framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 537–543.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sachs, S., Maurer, M., Ruhli, E., & Hoffman, R. (2006). Corporate social responsibility from a “stakeholder view” perspective: CSR implementation by a Swiss mobile telecommunication provider. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 506–515.CrossRef Sachs, S., Maurer, M., Ruhli, E., & Hoffman, R. (2006). Corporate social responsibility from a “stakeholder view” perspective: CSR implementation by a Swiss mobile telecommunication provider. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 506–515.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.CrossRef Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sherwin, D. (1983). The ethical roots of the business system. Harvard Business Review, 61(6), 183–192. Sherwin, D. (1983). The ethical roots of the business system. Harvard Business Review, 61(6), 183–192.
Zurück zum Zitat Simmons, J. A. (2008). Ethics and morality in human resource management. Social Responsibility Journal, 4(1/2), 8–23.CrossRef Simmons, J. A. (2008). Ethics and morality in human resource management. Social Responsibility Journal, 4(1/2), 8–23.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Simmons, J. A. (2009). Both sides now: Aligning external and internal branding for a socially responsible era. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 27(5), 681–697.CrossRef Simmons, J. A. (2009). Both sides now: Aligning external and internal branding for a socially responsible era. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 27(5), 681–697.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Spitzeck, H., & Hansen, E. G. (2010). Stakeholder governance: How stakeholders influence corporate decision making. Corporate Governance, 10(4), 378–391.CrossRef Spitzeck, H., & Hansen, E. G. (2010). Stakeholder governance: How stakeholders influence corporate decision making. Corporate Governance, 10(4), 378–391.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Svensson, G., & Wood, G. (2011). A conceptual framework of corporate and business ethics across organisations, structures and processes. The Learning Organisation, 18(1), 21–35.CrossRef Svensson, G., & Wood, G. (2011). A conceptual framework of corporate and business ethics across organisations, structures and processes. The Learning Organisation, 18(1), 21–35.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tudgay, R., & Pascal, A.-M. (2006). Corporate governance, shareholder value and societal expectations. Corporate Governance, 6(3), 305–316.CrossRef Tudgay, R., & Pascal, A.-M. (2006). Corporate governance, shareholder value and societal expectations. Corporate Governance, 6(3), 305–316.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Waring, P. (2008). Rethinking directors’ duties in changing global markets. Corporate Governance, 8(2), 153–164.CrossRef Waring, P. (2008). Rethinking directors’ duties in changing global markets. Corporate Governance, 8(2), 153–164.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Embedding Corporate Social Responsibility in Corporate Governance: A Stakeholder Systems Approach
verfasst von
Chris Mason
John Simmons
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2014
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1615-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

Journal of Business Ethics 1/2014 Zur Ausgabe