Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics 2/2014

01.12.2014

The Heterogeneous Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Activities That Target Different Stakeholders

verfasst von: Kiyoung Chang, Incheol Kim, Ying Li

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 2/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We aggregate different dimensions of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities following the stakeholder framework proposed in Clarkson (Acad Manag Rev 20(1), 92–117, 1995) and present consistent evidence that CSR strengths targeting different stakeholders have their unique impact on firm risk and financial performance. Institutional CSR activities that target secondary stakeholders are negatively associated with firm risk, measured by total risk and systematic risk. Technical CSR that target primary stakeholders are positively associated with firm financial performance, measured by Tobin’s Q, ROA, and cash flow returns. Our results, based on a sample of S&P 500 component firms over the period of 1995–2009, are consistent with the risk management view of “altruistic” CSR activities and with the stakeholder salience theory. We also show that the impact of CSR activities on risk varies with the ethical climate, as proved in our subsample analyses on pre- and post-Sarbanes–Oxley periods. Our empirical analyses mitigate possible omitted variables and endogeneity concerns that are often overlooked in previous research. Our findings are robust to alternative CSR measures, to alternative risk and performance measures, and to alternative estimation methods.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
“In the Internet era, even a 64-year-old retired math teacher can become a threat to a large company.” Wall Street Journal (C1, Feb 19, 2013).
 
2
Financial (SIC 6000-6999) and regulated utility firms (SIC 4900-4999) are not included in our sample.
 
3
KLD used ticker as identifier for the firms it covered prior to 1995 and switched to CUSIP as firm identifiers since 1995. To minimize the possibility of misidentified firms when combining data with Compustat, which uses CUSIP as firm identifiers, we work with data starting from 1995.
 
4
Godfrey et al. (2009) include corporate governance dimension for TCSR as well. We construct an alternative measure for TCSR strengths and concerns following their approach and find qualitatively the same results, which are available upon request.
 
5
In unreported results, we show that our results on the relation of ICSR/TCSR with risk and performance still hold in a smaller sample when firms with missing R&D information are excluded. Results are available upon request.
 
6
We lose a number of observations due to the lagging. The sample size for regressions in Tables 3 and 4 drops to 4,599 firm-year observations.
 
7
ROA is included as independent variables when dependent variables are ROA_E or EBITDA/TA. Q is not included as independent variables when dependent variable is Tobin’s Q.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Abel, A. B. (1999). Risk premia and term premia in general equilibrium. Journal of Monetary Economics, 43(1), 3–33.CrossRef Abel, A. B. (1999). Risk premia and term premia in general equilibrium. Journal of Monetary Economics, 43(1), 3–33.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 93–103.CrossRef Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 93–103.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Barnett, T., & Vaicys, C. (2000). The moderating effect of individuals’ perceptions of ethical work climate on ethical judgments and behavioral intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(4), 351–362.CrossRef Barnett, T., & Vaicys, C. (2000). The moderating effect of individuals’ perceptions of ethical work climate on ethical judgments and behavioral intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(4), 351–362.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bloom, M., & Milkovich, G. T. (1998). Relationships among risk, incentive pay, and organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 41(3), 283–297.CrossRef Bloom, M., & Milkovich, G. T. (1998). Relationships among risk, incentive pay, and organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 41(3), 283–297.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2008). Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(12), 1325–1343.CrossRef Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2008). Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(12), 1325–1343.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brigham, E. F., & Gapenski, L. C. (1996). Intermediate financial management (5th ed.). Orlando, FL: Dryde. Brigham, E. F., & Gapenski, L. C. (1996). Intermediate financial management (5th ed.). Orlando, FL: Dryde.
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell, J. Y., & Cochrane, J. H. (2000). Explaining the poor performance of consumption-based asset pricing models. The Journal of Finance, 55(6), 2863–2878.CrossRef Campbell, J. Y., & Cochrane, J. H. (2000). Explaining the poor performance of consumption-based asset pricing models. The Journal of Finance, 55(6), 2863–2878.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117. Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.
Zurück zum Zitat Constantinides, G. M. (1990). Habit formation: A resolution of the equity premium puzzle. Journal of Political Economy, 98(3), 519–543.CrossRef Constantinides, G. M. (1990). Habit formation: A resolution of the equity premium puzzle. Journal of Political Economy, 98(3), 519–543.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Donaldson, L. (1999). Performance-driven organizational change: The organizational portfolio. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Donaldson, L. (1999). Performance-driven organizational change: The organizational portfolio. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Entine, J. (2003). The myth of social investing: A critique of its practice and consequences for corporate social performance research. Organization & Environment, 16(3), 352–368.CrossRef Entine, J. (2003). The myth of social investing: A critique of its practice and consequences for corporate social performance research. Organization & Environment, 16(3), 352–368.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. (2008). Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. (2008). Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat G&A Governance & Accountability Institute, Inc. (2012) 2012 corporate ESG/sustainability/responsibility reporting—Does it matter? G&A Governance & Accountability Institute, Inc. (2012) 2012 corporate ESG/sustainability/responsibility reporting—Does it matter?
Zurück zum Zitat Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777–798.CrossRef Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777–798.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Godfrey, P. C., & Hatch, N. W. (2007). Researching corporate social responsibility: an agenda for the 21st century. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 87–98.CrossRef Godfrey, P. C., & Hatch, N. W. (2007). Researching corporate social responsibility: an agenda for the 21st century. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 87–98.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 425–445.CrossRef Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 425–445.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Husted, B. W. (2005). Risk management, real options, and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(2), 175–183.CrossRef Husted, B. W. (2005). Risk management, real options, and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(2), 175–183.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 351–383.CrossRef Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 351–383.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. (2012). The causal effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 53–72.CrossRef Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. (2012). The causal effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 53–72.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jo, H., & Na, H. (2012). Does CSR reduce firm risk? Evidence from controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(4), 441–456.CrossRef Jo, H., & Na, H. (2012). Does CSR reduce firm risk? Evidence from controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(4), 441–456.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kabongo, J., Chang, K., & Li, Y. (2013). The impact of operational diversity on corporate philanthropy: An empirical study of U.S. companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(1), 49–65. Kabongo, J., Chang, K., & Li, Y. (2013). The impact of operational diversity on corporate philanthropy: An empirical study of U.S. companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(1), 49–65.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalwarski, T. (2008, July 14). Do-good investments are holding up better, Business Week, p. 15. Kalwarski, T. (2008, July 14). Do-good investments are holding up better, Business Week, p. 15.
Zurück zum Zitat Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2009). The debate over doing good: Corporate social performance, strategic marketing levers, and firm-idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 198–213.CrossRef Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2009). The debate over doing good: Corporate social performance, strategic marketing levers, and firm-idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 198–213.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.CrossRef Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Martin, K. D., & Cullen, J. B. (2006). Continuities and extensions of ethical climate theory: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 175–194.CrossRef Martin, K. D., & Cullen, J. B. (2006). Continuities and extensions of ethical climate theory: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 175–194.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mattingly, J. E., & Berman, S. L. (2006). Measurement of corporate social action: Discovering taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg Domini ratings data. Business & Society, 45(1), 20–46.CrossRef Mattingly, J. E., & Berman, S. L. (2006). Measurement of corporate social action: Discovering taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg Domini ratings data. Business & Society, 45(1), 20–46.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mcguire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872.CrossRef Mcguire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McWilliams, A., & Siegel, (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603–609.CrossRef McWilliams, A., & Siegel, (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603–609.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mitchell, R., Agle, B., & Wood, D. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853–886. Mitchell, R., Agle, B., & Wood, D. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853–886.
Zurück zum Zitat Oikonomou, I., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2012). The impact of corporate social performance on financial risk and utility: A longitudinal analysis. Financial Management, 41(2), 483–515.CrossRef Oikonomou, I., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2012). The impact of corporate social performance on financial risk and utility: A longitudinal analysis. Financial Management, 41(2), 483–515.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Orlitzky, M., & Benjamin, J. D. (2001). Corporate social performance and firm risk: A meta-analytic review. Business & Society, 40(4), 369–396.CrossRef Orlitzky, M., & Benjamin, J. D. (2001). Corporate social performance and firm risk: A meta-analytic review. Business & Society, 40(4), 369–396.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization studies, 24(3), 403–441.CrossRef Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization studies, 24(3), 403–441.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Paine, L., Deshpandé, R., Margolis, J. D., & Bettcher, K. E. (2005). Up to Code: Does your company’s conduct meet world-class standards? Harvard Business Review, 38(12), 122–133. Paine, L., Deshpandé, R., Margolis, J. D., & Bettcher, K. E. (2005). Up to Code: Does your company’s conduct meet world-class standards? Harvard Business Review, 38(12), 122–133.
Zurück zum Zitat Peloza, J. (2009). The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1518–1541.CrossRef Peloza, J. (2009). The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1518–1541.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22, 435–480.CrossRef Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22, 435–480.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson, S. B. (2011). Simple formulas for standard errors that cluster by both firm and time. Journal of Financial Economics, 99, 1–10.CrossRef Thompson, S. B. (2011). Simple formulas for standard errors that cluster by both firm and time. Journal of Financial Economics, 99, 1–10.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Udayasankar, K. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and firm size. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 167–175.CrossRef Udayasankar, K. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and firm size. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 167–175.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vaidyanathan, B. (2008). Corporate giving: A literature review. Working paper, Center for the Study of Religion and Society, University of Notre Dame. Vaidyanathan, B. (2008). Corporate giving: A literature review. Working paper, Center for the Study of Religion and Society, University of Notre Dame.
Zurück zum Zitat Zyglidopoulos, S. C., Georgiadis, A. P., Carroll, C. E., & Siegel, D. S. (2012). Does media attention drive corporate social responsibility? Journal of Business Research, 65, 1622–1627.CrossRef Zyglidopoulos, S. C., Georgiadis, A. P., Carroll, C. E., & Siegel, D. S. (2012). Does media attention drive corporate social responsibility? Journal of Business Research, 65, 1622–1627.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Heterogeneous Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Activities That Target Different Stakeholders
verfasst von
Kiyoung Chang
Incheol Kim
Ying Li
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2014
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1895-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2014

Journal of Business Ethics 2/2014 Zur Ausgabe