nach oben

Journal of Business Ethics

Erschienen in:

01.12.2014

How Does the Stock Market Value Corporate Social Performance? When Behavioral Theories Interact with Stakeholder Theory

verfasst von: Ming Jia, Zhe Zhang

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 3/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This study examines how the reference-point effect and sunk-cost fallacy interact with stakeholder theory and influence how investors evaluate corporate social performance. We propose that ex-ante (pre-IPO) corporate social performance influences ex-post (post-IPO) perceived riskiness and that this relationship is U-shaped. We also evaluate how CEO duality and company age moderate this U-shaped relationship. Using young and newly public entrepreneurial firms in China, and focusing on stock returns in the secondary market, empirical results and robustness tests provide strong support for our hypotheses.

Vorheriger Artikel Painting with the Same Brush? Surveying Unethical Behavior in the Workplace Using Self-Reports and Observer-Reports

Nächster Artikel Civil Regulation, the Environment and the Compliance Orientations of SMEs

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Chinese Growth Enterprises Market, part of the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE) in Shenzhen, is China's NASDAQ.

Although the CSRC does not set an explicit quiet period for the underwriters, Chinese underwriters tend to range from 5 to 40 days.

We recognize that corporate philanthropic donations peaked after the Chinese Wenchuan earthquake on May 12, 2008. Our sample period begins 1 year after the earthquake, and the social pressure due to this natural disaster does not seriously influence corporate donation practices of our firms. Many newly listed firms went public in 2010 and 2011, far before the earthquake. Only 36 firms (13.5 %) listed in 2009. However, we still control for year-level effect by introducing a control variable of IPO year.

In response to reviewer’s comment, we introduce the employee benefits as another measure of CSP. Please refer to the section of robustness tests.

The samples are distributed across various industries (one or two-digit SIC) and includes 30 of C4, 31 of C5, 76 of C7, and 47 of G. Industries such as software manufacturing (G), chemical manufacturing (C4), and electrical manufacturing (C5) are highly competitive without heavy regulatory restrictions.

Due to missing data, we eliminate two samples.

Because our models include linear and squared terms and there are high correlations between these terms, we apply the residual centering procedure (Jong et al. 2005; Lance 1988) to handle multicollinearity between the linear term (e.g., X) and its squared parts (e.g., X ²). This procedure has two stages: first regress the squared term on its components, then use the residuals instead of the original squared terms in the data analyses (Jong et al. 2005; Lance 1988).

To simplify the moderating effect of newness, we separate the sample into two categories: firms 8 years old or younger at their IPO date (new firms), and firms older than 8 years at their IPO date (mature firms). We regress the firms on ratio of giving to profits. For the mature firms, the linear (β = 0.669, P < 0.01) and square terms (β = 2.563, P < 0.01) of ratio of giving to profits are significant; however, for new firms, the linear term is not significant but the square term is significant (β = 2.794, P < 0.01). We then draw a figure based on these regression results; it shows a pattern very consistent with Fig. 2. Due to page limits, we do not provide the regression table here. However, it is available on request.

Due to page limits, we do not provide the result table. It is available on request.

Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management. doi:10.1177/0149206311436079.

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regressions: Testing and interpreting interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35(1), 124–140.CrossRef

Arkes, H. R., & Hutzel, L. (2000). The role of probability of success estimates in the sunk costs effect. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(3), 295–306.CrossRef

Arthurs, J. D., Hoskisson, R. E., Busenitz, L. W., & Johnson, R. A. (2008). Managerial agents watching other agents: multiple agency conflicts regarding underpricing in IPO firms. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 277–294.CrossRef

Atuahene-Gima, K., & Li, H. (2004). Strategic decision comprehensiveness and new product development outcomes in new technology ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 583–597.CrossRef

Baker, M., & Gompers, P. A. (2003). The determinants of board structure at the initial public offering. Journal of Law and Economics, 46(2), 569–598.CrossRef

Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197–218.CrossRef

Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794–816.CrossRef

Barnett, M., & Salomon, M. (2006). The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27(11), 1101–1122.CrossRef

Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal. doi:10.1002/Smj.1980.

Bednar, M. K. (2011). Watchdog or lapdog? A behavioral view of the media as a corporate governance mechanism. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 131–150.CrossRef

Brammer, S., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2009). The stock performance of America’s 100 best corporate citizens. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 49(3), 1065–1080.CrossRef

Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2008). Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(12), 1325–1343.CrossRef

Brown, W., Helland, E., & Smith, J. K. (2006). Corporate philanthropic practices. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(5), 855–877.CrossRef

Certo, S. T., Holcomb, T. R., & Holmes, R. M. (2009). IPO research in management and entrepreneurship: moving the agenda forward. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1340–1378.CrossRef

Chen, C. R., & Mohan, N. (2000). Underwriter spread, underwriter reputation, and IPO underpricing: A simultaneous equation analysis. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 29(3), 521–540.

Core, J. E., Guay, W., & Larcker, D. F. (2008). The power of the pen and executive compensation. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(1), 1–25.CrossRef

Darnall, N., & Edwards, D. (2006). Predicting the cost of environmental management system adoption: The role of capabilities, resources and ownership structure. Strategic Management Journal, 27(4), 301–320.CrossRef

Derfus, P. J., Maggitti, P. G., Grimm, C. M., & Smith, K. G. (2008). The Red Queen effect: Competitive actions and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 61–80.CrossRef

Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100.CrossRef

Dyck, A., Volchkova, N., & Zingales, L. (2008). The corporate governance role of the media: Evidence from Russia. Journal of Finance, 63(3), 1093–1135.CrossRef

Faccio, M. (2007). Politically connected firms. American Economic Review, 96(1), 369–386.CrossRef

Fan, J., Wong, P. H., & Zhang, T. J. (2007). Politically-connected CEOs, corporate governance and post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(2), 330–357.CrossRef

Finkelstein, S., & D’Aveni, R. (1994). CEO duality as a double-edged sword: How boards of directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1079–1108.CrossRef

Frank, R. H., & Bernanke, B. (2006). Principles of microeconomics (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Garland, H., & Newport, S. (1991). Effects of absolute and relative sunk costs on the decision to persist with a course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 48(1), 55–69.CrossRef

Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777–798.CrossRef

Godos-Díez, J.-L., Fernández-Gago, R., & Martínez-Campillo, A. (2011). How important are CEOs to CSR practices? An analysis of the mediating effect of the perceived role of ethics and social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 531–548.CrossRef

Harjoto, M., & Jo, H. (2009). CEO power and firm performance: A test of the life-cycle theory. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 38(1), 35–66.CrossRef

Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–162.CrossRef

Ibbotson, R. G., & Ritter, J. R. (1995). Initial public offerings. In R. A. Jarrow, V. A. Maksimovic, & W. T. Ziemba (Eds.), North-Holland handbooks of operations research and management science (pp. 993–1016). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Jia, M., & Zhang, Z. (2012). The CEO’s representation of demands and the corporations’ response to external pressures: Do politically affiliated firms donate more? Management and Organization Review,. doi:10.1111/J.1740-8784.2012.00297.X.

Jong, A., Ruyter, K., & Wetzels, M. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of group potency: A study of self-managing service teams. Management Science, 51(11), 1610–1625.CrossRef

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.CrossRef

Khan, B. A., Salter, S. B., & Sharp, D. J. (2000). Throwing good money after bad: A comparison of Asian and developed country managerial decision-making in sunk cost situations. Asian Pacific Development Journal, 7, 105–120.

Kroll, M., Walters, B. A., & Le, S. A. (2007). The impact of board composition and top management team ownership structure on post-IPO performance in young entrepreneurial firms. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1198–1216.CrossRef

Lance, C. E. (1988). Residual centering, exploratory and confirmatory moderator analysis, and decomposition of effects in path models containing interactions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12(2), 163–175.CrossRef

Lee, H., & Liebenau, J. (1999). Time in organizational studies: Towards a new research direction. Organization Studies, 20(6), 1035–1058.CrossRef

Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. (2009). Does it pay to be good… And does it matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Unpublished Manuscript.

Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.CrossRef

Mattingly, J. E., & Berman, S. L. (2006). Measurement of corporate social action: Discovering taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenberg Domini ratings data. Business & Society, 45(1), 20–46.CrossRef

Mcafee, P. R., Mialon, H. M., & Mialon, S. H. (2010). Do sunk costs matter? Economic Inquiry, 48(2), 323–336.CrossRef

McGinnis, A., Pellegrin, J., Shum, Y., Teo, J., & Wu, J. (2010). The Sichuan earthquake and the changing land of CSR in China. Knowledge@Wharton. http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=2213.

Mishina, Y., Dykes, B. J., Block, E. S., & Pollock, T. G. (2012). Why “good” firms do bad things: The effects of high aspirations, high expectations, and prominence on the incidence of corporate illegality. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 701–722.CrossRef

Mosakowski, E., & Earley, P. C. (2000). A selective review of time assumptions in strategy research. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 796–812.

Moser, D. V., & Martin, P. R. (2012). A broader perspective on corporate social responsibility research in accounting. Accounting Review, 87(3), 797–806.CrossRef

Pollock, T. G., & Rindova, V. P. (2003). Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 631–642.CrossRef

Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56–68.

Rechner, P. L., & Dalton, D. R. (1991). CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 12(2), 155–160.CrossRef

Renneboog, L., Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008). Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(9), 1723–1742.CrossRef

Ritter, J. R. (1991). The long-run performance of initial public offerings. Journal of Finance, 46(1), 3–27.CrossRef

Ritter, J. R., & Welch, I. (2002). A review of IPO activity, pricing, and allocations. Journal of Finance, 57(4), 1795–1828.CrossRef

Ryan, T. Y. (1997). Modern regression analysis. New York: Wiley.

Sharfman, M. P., & Fernando, C. S. (2008). Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic Management Journal, 29(6), 569–592.CrossRef

Slawinski, N., & Bansal, P. (2009). Short on time: The role of time in business sustainability. In Proceedings of the 69th annual meeting of the academy of management, Chicago, IL.

Staw, B. M. (1976). Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(1), 27–44.CrossRef

Staw, B. M. (1981). The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 577–587.

Tang, Z., Hull, C. E., & Rothenberg, S. (2012). How corporate social responsibility engagement strategy moderates the CSR–financial performance Relationship. Journal of Management Studies,. doi:10.1111/J.1467-6486.2012.01068.X.

Tetlock, P. C. (2007). Giving content to investor sentiment: The role of media in the stock market. Journal of Finance, 62(3), 1139–1168.CrossRef

Tian, L. (2011). Regulatory underpricing: Determinants of Chinese extreme IPO returns. Journal of Empirical Finance, 18(1), 78–90.CrossRef

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039–1061.CrossRef

Walters, B. A., & Wright, P. (2010). The impact of TMT board member control and environment on post-IPO performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 572–595.CrossRef

Wang, Y. (2009). Wanglaoji in top list for first time. China Daily. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2009-06/26/content_8325225.htm.

Wang, T., & Bansal, P. (2012). Social responsibility in new ventures: Profiting from a long-term orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 33(10), 1135–1153.CrossRef

Wang, H., Choi, J., & Li, J. (2008). Too little or too much? Untangling the relationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance. Organization Science, 19(1), 143–159.CrossRef

Wang, H., & Qian, C. (2011). Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: The roles of stakeholders response and political access. Academy of Management Journal, 54(8), 1159–1181.CrossRef

Wang, M., Qiu, C., & Kong, D. (2011). Corporate social responsibility, investor behaviors, and stock market returns: Evidence from a natural experiment in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 127–141.CrossRef

Zahra, S. A. (1996). Technology strategy and new venture performance: A study of corporate-sponsored and independent biotechnology ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(4), 289–321.CrossRef

Zahra, S. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. (2000). International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 925–950.CrossRef

Titel: How Does the Stock Market Value Corporate Social Performance? When Behavioral Theories Interact with Stakeholder Theory
verfasst von: Ming Jia
Zhe Zhang
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2014
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1924-7

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2014

Civil Regulation, the Environment and the Compliance Orientations of SMEs

Painting with the Same Brush? Surveying Unethical Behavior in the Workplace Using Self-Reports and Observer-Reports

Perceived Reasonableness and Morals in Service Encounters

Board Age and Gender Diversity: A Test of Competing Linear and Curvilinear Predictions

Erratum to: Do Property Rights Presuppose Scarcity?

Vive la Différence: Social Banks and Reciprocity in the Credit Market