Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics 4/2015

01.09.2015

The Normativity and Legitimacy of CSR Disclosure: Evidence from France

verfasst von: Jean-Noël Chauvey, Sophie Giordano-Spring, Charles H. Cho, Dennis M. Patten

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 4/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In 2001, France became one of the few countries to require corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting through its Nouvelles Régulations Économiques #2001-420 (NRE). However, initial compliance with the statute was low, a factor implying the law lacked normativity. In this exploratory study, we attempt to determine whether there is movement toward normativity by examining the change in CSR disclosure from 2004 in comparison to 2010 for a sample of 81 publicly traded French firms. We measure both the space and the quality of CSR disclosures, including in the latter a measure based on informational quality attributes as discussed by the International Accounting Standards Board, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, and the Global Reporting Initiative. We find significant increases in the space allocated to CSR disclosure, as well as some evidence of increased quality; although the informational quality of the disclosures remains quite low and fewer firms are including negative performance information in their reports. Finally, we document that differences in disclosure space and quality in 2004 appeared to be associated with legitimacy-based variables and that those relations remain largely unchanged in 2010. As such, it appears that the NRE’s goals of increased transparency remain unmet.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
With the exception of Damak-Ayadi (2010), who provides a descriptive study on the type of CSR information (breadth/content) disclosed by French firms after the NRE, no studies appear to have examined the impact of the NRE requirements on corporate CSR disclosure practices by French firms.
 
2
The percentage of pages is computed as the number of pages (or fractions of pages) dedicated to discussions about social and environmental issues over the total number of pages of the report analyzed. Similarly, the percentage of total disclosures is determined by the total amount of social and environmental disclosures (on a line-by-line or sentence-by-sentence basis) over the total amount of discussions on all issues.
 
3
There are also hybrid combinations of these two basic approaches. For example, Ernst & Ernst (1978) identify the amount of space devoted to each of the various areas of CSR disclosure examined.
 
4
Energy disclosures are sometimes listed as an area separate from environment (see, Ernst & Ernst 1978). However, in our review we found that the two categories are difficult to distinguish and as such, merge them for our analysis.
 
5
Content analysis schemes are often presented as a measure of quality (see, Brammer and Pavelin 2006; Clarkson et al. 2008). While we agree that disclosure that addresses more areas of CSR interest exhibits higher quality than disclosures that are more limited in scope, traditional content analysis schemes do not usually take into account the qualitative aspects of the information being presented.
 
6
While some major differences exist across the conceptual framesworks of the IASB and the FASB (see, McGregor and Street 2007), they are very consistent with respect to discussions of desired quality attributes of information.
 
7
Solomon (2000) limits his discussion to the environmental reporting domain. The extension to the broader CSR arena is our extension.
 
8
Patten (2000) documents that mandated increases in U.S. firm disclosure of hazardous waste remediation exposures were accompanied by significant increases in the voluntary disclosure of positive environmental information items.
 
9
These consisted primarily of firms no longer in existence due to mergers and acquisitions.
 
10
Brown and Deegan (1998) note that media coverage can also lead to increased social pressures for corporations, and several recent studies (Aerts and Cormier 2009; Aerts et al. 2008; Brown and Deegan 1998; Deegan et al. 2000; Patten 2002a) document a positive association between media exposure and the extent of social and/or environmental disclosure. In non-tabulated sensitivity tests we included a media exposure measure identified as the number of articles identified in the Europresse database for each company in the year of disclosure, adjusted for firm size. This variable was statistically insignificant in all models.
 
11
Our results are robust to estimation using Tobit analysis.
 
12
In order to control for the effect of economic factors other than legitimacy variables on CSR disclosure, we re-estimated all models including financial variables used in prior research (i.e., profitability, leverage, asset newness, and capital intensity). We find only asset newness and capital intensity to exhibit statistical significance and, in all cases, all of our primary findings remain unchanged.
 
13
We exclude one outlier firm that had 423 pages of disclosure in 2010, more than six standard deviations from the mean for that year. Inclusion does not alter the statistical significance of the comparisons.
 
14
Tests of differences in the pages of disclosure across firms issuing stand-alone reports as opposed to only financial reports indicate that the former companies exhibit statistically higher page counts than the latter for both 2004 and 2010.
 
15
These page counts exclude the 2004 and 2010 observations for one sample firm issuing stand-alone reports both years, but whose 2010 space measure was deemed as an outlier (see note 8).
 
16
Owen et al. (2000, p. 85) refer to managerial capture as “the concept that management takes control of the whole reporting process (including the degree of stakeholder inclusion) by strategically collecting and disseminating only the information it deems appropriate to advance the corporate image, rather being truly transparent and accountable to the society it serves.”
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Aerts, W., & Cormier, D. (2009). Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(1), 1–27.CrossRef Aerts, W., & Cormier, D. (2009). Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(1), 1–27.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Aerts, W., Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (2008). Corporate environmental disclosure, financial markets, and the media: An international perspective. Ecological Economics, 64(3), 643–659.CrossRef Aerts, W., Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (2008). Corporate environmental disclosure, financial markets, and the media: An international perspective. Ecological Economics, 64(3), 643–659.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Tuwaijri, S. A., Christensen, T., & Hughes, K. E. (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: A simultaneous approach. Accounting. Organizations and Society, 29(5/6), 447–471.CrossRef Al-Tuwaijri, S. A., Christensen, T., & Hughes, K. E. (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: A simultaneous approach. Accounting. Organizations and Society, 29(5/6), 447–471.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ballou, B., Heitger, D. L., & Landes, C. E. (2006). The future of corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Accountancy, 200(6), 65–74. Ballou, B., Heitger, D. L., & Landes, C. E. (2006). The future of corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Accountancy, 200(6), 65–74.
Zurück zum Zitat Barth, M., McNichols, M., & Wilson, P. (1997). Factors influencing firms’ disclosures about environmental liabilities. Review of Accounting Studies, 2, 35–64.CrossRef Barth, M., McNichols, M., & Wilson, P. (1997). Factors influencing firms’ disclosures about environmental liabilities. Review of Accounting Studies, 2, 35–64.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bebbington, J., Kirk, E. A., & Larrinaga, C. (2012). The production of normativity: A comparison of reporting regimes in Spain and the UK. Accounting. Organizations and Society, 37(2), 78–94.CrossRef Bebbington, J., Kirk, E. A., & Larrinaga, C. (2012). The production of normativity: A comparison of reporting regimes in Spain and the UK. Accounting. Organizations and Society, 37(2), 78–94.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Blacconiere, W. G., & Patten, D. M. (1994). Environmental disclosure, regulatory costs, and changes in firm value. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 18, 357–377.CrossRef Blacconiere, W. G., & Patten, D. M. (1994). Environmental disclosure, regulatory costs, and changes in firm value. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 18, 357–377.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2005). Corporate reputation and philanthropy: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(1), 29–44.CrossRef Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2005). Corporate reputation and philanthropy: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(1), 29–44.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Voluntary environmental disclosures by large UK companies. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 33(7), 1168–1188.CrossRef Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Voluntary environmental disclosures by large UK companies. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 33(7), 1168–1188.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brown, N., & Deegan, C. (1998). The public disclosure of environmental performance information—a dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research, 29(1), 21–41.CrossRef Brown, N., & Deegan, C. (1998). The public disclosure of environmental performance information—a dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research, 29(1), 21–41.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Buhr, N. (1998). Environmental performance, legislation and annual report disclosure: The case of acid rain and Falconbridge. Accounting. Auditing and Accountability Journal, 11(2), 163–190.CrossRef Buhr, N. (1998). Environmental performance, legislation and annual report disclosure: The case of acid rain and Falconbridge. Accounting. Auditing and Accountability Journal, 11(2), 163–190.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Capron, M., & Quairel, F. (2004). Mythes et Réalités de l’Entreprise Responsable. Paris: La Découverte. Capron, M., & Quairel, F. (2004). Mythes et Réalités de l’Entreprise Responsable. Paris: La Découverte.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho, C. H. (2009). Legitimation strategies used in response to environmental disaster: A French case study of Total SA’s Erika and AZF incidents. European Accounting Review, 18(1), 33–62.CrossRef Cho, C. H. (2009). Legitimation strategies used in response to environmental disaster: A French case study of Total SA’s Erika and AZF incidents. European Accounting Review, 18(1), 33–62.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2007). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting. Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 639–647.CrossRef Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2007). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting. Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 639–647.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cho, C. H., Patten, D. M., & Roberts, R. W. (2006). Corporate political strategy: An examination of the relation between political expenditures, environmental performance, and environmental disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(2), 139–154.CrossRef Cho, C. H., Patten, D. M., & Roberts, R. W. (2006). Corporate political strategy: An examination of the relation between political expenditures, environmental performance, and environmental disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(2), 139–154.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Choi, J. (1999). An investigation of the initial voluntary environmental disclosures made in Korean semi-annual financial reports. Pacific Accounting Review, 11(1), 75–102.CrossRef Choi, J. (1999). An investigation of the initial voluntary environmental disclosures made in Korean semi-annual financial reports. Pacific Accounting Review, 11(1), 75–102.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, 303–327.CrossRef Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, 303–327.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (2003). Environmental reporting management: A European perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22(1), 43–62.CrossRef Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (2003). Environmental reporting management: A European perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22(1), 43–62.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cormier, D., Magnan, M., & van Velthoven, B. (2005). Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: Economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions? European Accounting Review, 14(1), 3–39.CrossRef Cormier, D., Magnan, M., & van Velthoven, B. (2005). Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: Economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions? European Accounting Review, 14(1), 3–39.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cowen, S. S., Ferreri, L. B., & Parker, L. D. (1987). The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(2), 111–122.CrossRef Cowen, S. S., Ferreri, L. B., & Parker, L. D. (1987). The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(2), 111–122.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Damak-Ayadi, S. (2010). Le reporting social et environnemental suite à l’application de la loi NRE en France. Comptabilité Contrôle Audit, 16(1), 53–81.CrossRef Damak-Ayadi, S. (2010). Le reporting social et environnemental suite à l’application de la loi NRE en France. Comptabilité Contrôle Audit, 16(1), 53–81.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Deegan, C. (2002). The legitimizing effect of social and environmental disclosures—a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311.CrossRef Deegan, C. (2002). The legitimizing effect of social and environmental disclosures—a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Deegan, C. (2007). Organizational legitimacy as a motive for sustainability reporting. In J. Unerman, J. Bebbington, & B. O’Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability (pp. 127–149). UK: Routledge.CrossRef Deegan, C. (2007). Organizational legitimacy as a motive for sustainability reporting. In J. Unerman, J. Bebbington, & B. O’Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability (pp. 127–149). UK: Routledge.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Deegan, C., & Rankin, M. (1996). Do Australian companies report environmental news objectively? An analysis of environmental disclosures by firms prosecuted successfully the Environmental Protection Authority. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 9(2), 50–67.CrossRef Deegan, C., & Rankin, M. (1996). Do Australian companies report environmental news objectively? An analysis of environmental disclosures by firms prosecuted successfully the Environmental Protection Authority. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 9(2), 50–67.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Deegan, C., Rankin, M., & Voght, P. (2000). Firms’ disclosure reactions to major social incidents: Australian evidence. Accounting Forum, 24(1), 101–130.CrossRef Deegan, C., Rankin, M., & Voght, P. (2000). Firms’ disclosure reactions to major social incidents: Australian evidence. Accounting Forum, 24(1), 101–130.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Déjean, F., & Martinez, I. (2009). Communication environnementale des entreprises du SBF 120: Déterminants et conséquences sur le coût du capital actions. Comptabilité Contrôle Audit, 15(1), 55–78.CrossRef Déjean, F., & Martinez, I. (2009). Communication environnementale des entreprises du SBF 120: Déterminants et conséquences sur le coût du capital actions. Comptabilité Contrôle Audit, 15(1), 55–78.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Déjean, R., & Oxibar, B. (2010). Légitimation et communication sociétale: Le cas Péchiney. Management International, 14(2), 69–82.CrossRef Déjean, R., & Oxibar, B. (2010). Légitimation et communication sociétale: Le cas Péchiney. Management International, 14(2), 69–82.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Delbard, O. (2008). CSR legislation in France and the European regulatory paradox: An analysis of EU CSR policy and sustainability reporting practice. Corporate Governance, 8(4), 397–405.CrossRef Delbard, O. (2008). CSR legislation in France and the European regulatory paradox: An analysis of EU CSR policy and sustainability reporting practice. Corporate Governance, 8(4), 397–405.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ernst & Ernst. (1978). Social responsibility disclosure. Survey. Cleveland, OH: Ernst & Ernst. Ernst & Ernst. (1978). Social responsibility disclosure. Survey. Cleveland, OH: Ernst & Ernst.
Zurück zum Zitat Financial Accounting Standards Board. (1980). Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 2: Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information. Stamford, CT: FASB. Financial Accounting Standards Board. (1980). Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 2: Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information. Stamford, CT: FASB.
Zurück zum Zitat Financial Accounting Standards Board. (2010). Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 8: Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. Stamford, CT: FASB. Financial Accounting Standards Board. (2010). Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 8: Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. Stamford, CT: FASB.
Zurück zum Zitat Giordano-Spring, S., & Rivière-Giordano, G. (2008). Reporting sociétal et IFRS: Quelle cohérence? Revue Française De Gestion, 34, 19–34.CrossRef Giordano-Spring, S., & Rivière-Giordano, G. (2008). Reporting sociétal et IFRS: Quelle cohérence? Revue Française De Gestion, 34, 19–34.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gray, R. H. (2006). Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organizational value creation? Whose value? Whose Creation? Accounting. Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19(6), 793–819.CrossRef Gray, R. H. (2006). Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organizational value creation? Whose value? Whose Creation? Accounting. Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19(6), 793–819.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gray, R. H., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995a). Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77.CrossRef Gray, R. H., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995a). Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gray, R. H., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995b). Methodological themes: Constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8(2), 78–101.CrossRef Gray, R. H., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995b). Methodological themes: Constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8(2), 78–101.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gray, R., Owen, D., & Adams, C. (1996). Accounting and accountability: Changes and challenges in corporate and social reporting. London: Prentice Hall. Gray, R., Owen, D., & Adams, C. (1996). Accounting and accountability: Changes and challenges in corporate and social reporting. London: Prentice Hall.
Zurück zum Zitat Guidry, R. P., & Patten, D. M. (2010). Market reactions to the first-time issuance of corporate sustainability reports: Evidence that quality matters. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 1(1), 33–50.CrossRef Guidry, R. P., & Patten, D. M. (2010). Market reactions to the first-time issuance of corporate sustainability reports: Evidence that quality matters. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 1(1), 33–50.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Guthrie, J., & Parker, L. D. (1989). Corporate social reporting: A rebuttal of legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research, 19(76), 342–356.CrossRef Guthrie, J., & Parker, L. D. (1989). Corporate social reporting: A rebuttal of legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research, 19(76), 342–356.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hackston, D., & Milne, M. J. (1996). Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 9(1), 77–108.CrossRef Hackston, D., & Milne, M. J. (1996). Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 9(1), 77–108.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hughes, S. B., Anderson, A., & Golden, S. (2001). Corporate environmental disclosures: Are they useful in determining environmental performance? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 20(3), 217–240.CrossRef Hughes, S. B., Anderson, A., & Golden, S. (2001). Corporate environmental disclosures: Are they useful in determining environmental performance? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 20(3), 217–240.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Igalens, J. (2007). L’analyse du discours de la responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise à travers les rapports annuels de développement durable d’entreprises françaises du CAC 40. Finance Contrôle Stratégie, 10(2), 129–155. Igalens, J. (2007). L’analyse du discours de la responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise à travers les rapports annuels de développement durable d’entreprises françaises du CAC 40. Finance Contrôle Stratégie, 10(2), 129–155.
Zurück zum Zitat Ingram, R. W., & Frazier, K. B. (1980). Environmental performance and corporate disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(2), 614–622.CrossRef Ingram, R. W., & Frazier, K. B. (1980). Environmental performance and corporate disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(2), 614–622.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jeffrey, C., & Perkins, J. (2011). Developing accounting standards in the public interest: should corporate social responsibility disclosure be integrated with financial reporting? Working paper, Iowa State University. Jeffrey, C., & Perkins, J. (2011). Developing accounting standards in the public interest: should corporate social responsibility disclosure be integrated with financial reporting? Working paper, Iowa State University.
Zurück zum Zitat Larrinaga, C., Carrasco, F., Correa, C., Llena, F., & Moneva, J. M. (2002). Accountability and accounting regulation: The case of the Spanish Disclosure Standard. European Accounting Review, 11(4), 723–740.CrossRef Larrinaga, C., Carrasco, F., Correa, C., Llena, F., & Moneva, J. M. (2002). Accountability and accounting regulation: The case of the Spanish Disclosure Standard. European Accounting Review, 11(4), 723–740.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Thornton, D. B. (1997). Corporate disclosure of environmental liability information: Theory and evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 14(3), 435–474.CrossRef Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Thornton, D. B. (1997). Corporate disclosure of environmental liability information: Theory and evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 14(3), 435–474.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McGregor, W., & Street, D. L. (2007). IASB and FASB face challenges in pursuit of joint conceptual framework. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 18(1), 39–51.CrossRef McGregor, W., & Street, D. L. (2007). IASB and FASB face challenges in pursuit of joint conceptual framework. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 18(1), 39–51.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Milne, M. J., & Adler, R. W. (1999). Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 12(2), 237–256.CrossRef Milne, M. J., & Adler, R. W. (1999). Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 12(2), 237–256.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Neu, D., Warsame, H., & Pedwell, K. (1998). Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(3), 265–282.CrossRef Neu, D., Warsame, H., & Pedwell, K. (1998). Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(3), 265–282.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat O’Dwyer, B. (2003). Conceptions of corporate social responsibility: The nature of managerial capture. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 16(4), 523–557.CrossRef O’Dwyer, B. (2003). Conceptions of corporate social responsibility: The nature of managerial capture. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 16(4), 523–557.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat O’Dwyer, B., & Gray, R. H. (1998). Corporate social reporting in the Republic of Ireland: A longitudinal study. Irish Accounting Review, 5(2), 1–34. O’Dwyer, B., & Gray, R. H. (1998). Corporate social reporting in the Republic of Ireland: A longitudinal study. Irish Accounting Review, 5(2), 1–34.
Zurück zum Zitat Owen, D. L., Swift, T. A., Humphrey, C., & Bowerman, M. (2000). The new social audits: Accountability, managerial capture or the agenda of social champions? European Accounting Review, 9(1), 81–98.CrossRef Owen, D. L., Swift, T. A., Humphrey, C., & Bowerman, M. (2000). The new social audits: Accountability, managerial capture or the agenda of social champions? European Accounting Review, 9(1), 81–98.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Patten, D. M. (1991). Exposure, legitimacy and social disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 10(4), 297–308.CrossRef Patten, D. M. (1991). Exposure, legitimacy and social disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 10(4), 297–308.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Patten, D. M. (1992). Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(5), 471–475.CrossRef Patten, D. M. (1992). Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(5), 471–475.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Patten, D. M. (1995). Variability in social disclosure: A legitimacy-based analysis. Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 6, 273–285. Patten, D. M. (1995). Variability in social disclosure: A legitimacy-based analysis. Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 6, 273–285.
Zurück zum Zitat Patten, D. M. (2000). Changing Superfund disclosure and its relation to the provision of other environmental information. Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management, 1, 101–121.CrossRef Patten, D. M. (2000). Changing Superfund disclosure and its relation to the provision of other environmental information. Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management, 1, 101–121.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Patten, D. M. (2002a). Media exposure, public policy pressure, and environmental disclosure: an examination of the impact of TRI data availability. Accounting Forum, 26(2), 152–171.CrossRef Patten, D. M. (2002a). Media exposure, public policy pressure, and environmental disclosure: an examination of the impact of TRI data availability. Accounting Forum, 26(2), 152–171.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Patten, D. M. (2002b). The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: a research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(8), 763–773.CrossRef Patten, D. M. (2002b). The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: a research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(8), 763–773.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Patten, D. M., & Trompeter, G. (2003). Corporate responses to political costs: An examination of the relation between environmental disclosure and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22(1), 83–94.CrossRef Patten, D. M., & Trompeter, G. (2003). Corporate responses to political costs: An examination of the relation between environmental disclosure and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22(1), 83–94.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Quairel, F. (2004). Responsable mais pas comptable: Analyse de la normalisation des rapports environnementaux et sociaux. Comptabilité Contrôle Audit, 10(1), 7–36.CrossRef Quairel, F. (2004). Responsable mais pas comptable: Analyse de la normalisation des rapports environnementaux et sociaux. Comptabilité Contrôle Audit, 10(1), 7–36.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rivière-Giordano, G. (2007). Comment crédibiliser le reporting sociétal. Comptabilité Contrôle Audit, 13(2), 127–148.CrossRef Rivière-Giordano, G. (2007). Comment crédibiliser le reporting sociétal. Comptabilité Contrôle Audit, 13(2), 127–148.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, M., & Taffler, R. (2000). The chairman’s statement: A content analysis of discretionary narrative disclosures. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 13(5), 624–646.CrossRef Smith, M., & Taffler, R. (2000). The chairman’s statement: A content analysis of discretionary narrative disclosures. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 13(5), 624–646.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Solomon, A. (2000). Could corporate environmental reporting shadow financial reporting? Accounting Forum, 24(1), 30–55.CrossRef Solomon, A. (2000). Could corporate environmental reporting shadow financial reporting? Accounting Forum, 24(1), 30–55.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Trotman, K. T., & Bradley, G. W. (1981). Associations between social responsibility disclosure and characteristics of companies. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 6(4), 355–362.CrossRef Trotman, K. T., & Bradley, G. W. (1981). Associations between social responsibility disclosure and characteristics of companies. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 6(4), 355–362.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tsang, E. W. K. (1998). A longitudinal study of corporate social reporting in Singapore: The case of the banking, food and beverages and hotel industries. Accounting. Auditing and Accountability Journal, 11(5), 624–635.CrossRef Tsang, E. W. K. (1998). A longitudinal study of corporate social reporting in Singapore: The case of the banking, food and beverages and hotel industries. Accounting. Auditing and Accountability Journal, 11(5), 624–635.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wiseman, J. (1982). An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 7(1), 53–63.CrossRef Wiseman, J. (1982). An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 7(1), 53–63.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Normativity and Legitimacy of CSR Disclosure: Evidence from France
verfasst von
Jean-Noël Chauvey
Sophie Giordano-Spring
Charles H. Cho
Dennis M. Patten
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2015
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2114-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2015

Journal of Business Ethics 4/2015 Zur Ausgabe