Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Process of Responsibility, Decoupling Point, and Disengagement of Moral and Social Responsibility in Supply Chains: Empirical Findings and Prescriptive Thoughts

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to explore and assess the process of responsibility, decoupling point, and disengagement of moral responsibility, in combination with business sustainability (BSus) in supply chains. The research is based on a qualitative approach consisting of two multifaceted case studies, each including multiple case companies and different empirical research characteristics, and a review of BSus in supply chain literature. The case studies apply moral disengagement (MDis) to propose how moral responsibility can deteriorate in supply chains, and the literature review identifies elements of BSus in supply chain management (SCM). The contribution of this paper is to compare these two research streams and evaluate the efficacy of the concepts proposed in the case studies. Through this study, BSus gains an entirely different and complementary toolkit which should facilitate further and more effective research in SCM. The theory of MDis also provides a foundation for reinforcing explanatory and prescriptive aspects of ‘best practices’ in the SCM literature. The findings also establish a basis for organizing and monitoring supply chains so as to improve BSus efforts. Considering moral responsibility as a flow this research explains why and how certain practices may impede BSus efforts in supply chains. Original and/or innovative outcomes include explanatory and prescriptive insights that emerge from a combination of empirical findings from two case studies, including seven companies and a framework for improving BSus management in supply chains, based on a typology of moral disengagement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aastrup, J., & Halldórsson, Á. (2008). Epistemological role of case studies in logistics—A critical realist perspective. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(10), 746–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbasi, M., & Nilsson, F. (2012). Themes and challenges in making supply chains environmentally sustainable. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(5), 517–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkaya, E., & Demirer, G. N. (2014). Sustainable textile production: A case study from a woven fabric mill in Turkey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 595–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, A., Leat, M., & Hudson-Smith, M. (2012). Making connections: A review of supply chain management and sustainability literature. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(5), 497–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auger, P., & Devinney, T. M. (2007). Do what consumers say matter? The misalignment of preferences with unconstrained ethical intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(4), 361–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awaysheh, A., & Klassen, R. D. (2010). The impact of supply chain structure on the use of supplier socially responsible practices. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 30(12), 1246–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azzone, G., & Noci, G. (1998). Identifying effective PMSs for the deployment of “green” manufacturing strategies. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 18(4), 308–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P., & DesJardine, M. R. (2014). Business sustainability: It is about time. Strategic Organization, 12(1), 70–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsky, A. (2011). Investigating the effects of moral disengagement and participation on unethical work behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(1), 59–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björklund, M., Martinsen, U., & Abrahamsson, M. (2012). Performance measurements in the greening of supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(1), 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blacksell, G. (2011). How green is your coffee? Retrieved December 19, 2013 from http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2011/oct/04/green-coffee/.

  • Burgess, K., Singh, P. J., & Koroglu, R. (2006). Supply chain management: A structured literature review and implications for future research. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(7), 703–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrigan, M., & Attalla, A. (2001). The myth of the ethical consumer—Do ethics matter in purchase behavior? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 560–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2010). Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward a new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciliberti, F., de Groot, G., de Haan, J., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2009). Codes to coordinate supply chain: SMEs’ experiences with SA8000. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(2), 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Côte, R. P., Lopez, J., Marche, S., Perron, G. M., & Wright, R. (2008). Influences, practices and opportunities for environmental supply chain management in Nova Scotia SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1561–1570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousins, P. D. (2005). The alignment of appropriate firm and supply strategies for competitive advantage. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(5), 403–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespin-Mazet, F., & Dontenwill, E. (2012). Sustainable procurement: Building legitimacy in the supply network. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 18(4), 207–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, J. M. (2013). Modeling the relationship of globalized supply chains and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily, B. F., & Huang, S. (2001). Achieving sustainability through attention to human resource factors in environmental management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(12), 1539–1552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danermark, B., Ekström, M., Jakobsen, L., & Karlsson, J. (2003). Att förklara samhället. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delavallade, C. (2006). Corruption and distribution of public spending in developing countries. Journal of Economics and Finance, 30(2), 222–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dos Santos, M. A. O., Svensson, G., & Padin, C. (2013). Indicators of sustainable business practices: Woolworths in South Africa. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 18(1), 104–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, A., & Gadde, L.-E. (2002). Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55(7), 553–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, A., & Gadde, L.-E. (2014). “Systematic combining”—A decade later. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1277–1284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckerd, S., & Hill, J. A. (2012). The buyer–supplier social contract: Information sharing as a deterrent to unethical behaviors. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(2), 238–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egels-Zandén, N. (2007). Suppliers’ compliance with MNCs’ codes of conduct: Behind the scenes at Chinese toy suppliers. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(1), 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elg, U., & Hultman, J. (2011). Retailers’ management of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in their supplier relationships—Does practice follow best practice? The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 21(5), 445–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Stony Creek, CT: New Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, D., Hilletofth, P., & Hilmola, O.-P. (2012). Two sides of a token: Coordinating demand and supply at furniture wholesaler. International Journal of Manufacturing Research, 7(2), 101–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, D., Hilletofth, P., & Hilmola, O.-P. (2013a). Supply chain configuration and moral disengagement. International Journal of Procurement Management, 6(6), 718–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, D., Hilletofth, P., & Hilmola, O.-P. (2013b). Linking moral disengagement to supply chain practices. World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research, 4(2/3), 207–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, D., & Svensson, G. (2014). Assessment and compilation of business sustainability elements in supply chains and beyond—A framework and managerial implications. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal (submitted for review).

  • Fang, T., Gunterberg, C., & Larsson, E. (2010). Sourcing in an increasingly expensive China: Four Swedish cases. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 119–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faruk, A. C., Lamming, R. C., Cousins, P. D., & Bowen, F. E. (2002). Analyzing, mapping and managing environmental impacts along supply chains. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5(2), 13–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, Y., & van Rossem, A. (2009). Corporate governance in the debate on CSR and ethics: Sensemaking of social issues in management by authorities and CEOs. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(5), 573–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, P. M., & Vasquez-Parraga, A. Z. (2013). Consumer social responses to CSR initiatives versus corporate abilities. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 30(2), 100–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foerstl, K., Reuter, C., Hartmann, E., & Blome, C. (2010). Managing supplier sustainability risks in a dynamically changing environment—Sustainable supplier management in the chemical industry. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 16(2), 118–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1958). Industrial dynamics: A major breakthrough for decision makers. Harvard Business Review, 36(4), 118–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, S., & Do, T. (2013). Getting real about big data: Applying critical realism to analyse big data hype. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 6(4), 739–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gimenez, C., & Tachizawa, E. M. (2012). Extending sustainability to suppliers: A systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(5), 531–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handfield, R. B., Melnyk, S. A., Calantone, R. J., & Curkovic, S. (2001). Integrating environmental concerns into the design process: The gap between theory and practice. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(2), 189–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoejmose, S. U., & Adrien-Kirby, A. J. (2012). Socially and environmentally responsible procurement: A literature review and future research agenda of a managerial issue in the 21st century. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 18(4), 232–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoejmose, S., Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2013). An empirical examination of the relationship between business strategy and socially responsible supply chain management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 33(5), 589–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollos, D., Blome, C., & Foerstl, K. (2012). Does sustainable supplier co-operation affect performance? Examining implications for the triple bottom line. International Journal of Production Research, 50(11), 2968–2986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1777). An enquiry concerning the principles of morals. Retrieved December 9, 2012 from http://www.gutenberg.org/files/4320/4320.txt.

  • Jenkins, R. (2001). Codes of conduct: Self regulation in a global economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University ILR School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karjalainen, K., & Moxham, C. (2013). Focus on Fairtrade: Propositions for integrating Fairtrade and supply chain management research. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(2), 267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, L., & Denk, N. (2011). How to demonstrate rigor when presenting grounded theory research in the supply chain management literature. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(4), 64–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating, B., Quazi, A., Kriz, A., & Coltman, T. (2008). In pursuit of a sustainable supply chain: Insights from Westpac Banking Corporation. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(3), 175–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovács, G., & Spens, K. M. (2005). Abductive reasoning in logistics research. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 35(2), 132–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraljic, P. (1983). Purchasing must become supply management. Harvard Business Review, 61(5), 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, D. R., Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. D. (2009). Social topic forum on sustainable supply chain management: Introduction and reflections on the role of purchasing management. Sustainable Supply Chain Management, 45(4), 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamberti, L., & Lettieri, E. (2009). CSR practices and corporate strategy: Evidence from a longitudinal case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(2), 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K.-H., & Kim, J.-W. (2009). Current status of CSR in the realm of supply management: The case of the Korean electronics industry. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(2), 138–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquity. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamic, I. (2005). Managing global supply chain: The sports footwear, apparel and retail sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(1–2), 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mares, R. (2010). The limits of supply chain responsibility: A critical analysis of corporate responsibility instruments. Nordic Journal of International Law, 79(2), 193–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miemczyk, J., Johnsen, T. E., & Macquet, M. (2012). Sustainable purchasing and supply management: A structured literature review of definitions and measures at the dyad, chain and network levels. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(5), 478–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öberseder, M., Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Gruber, V. (2011). “Why don’t consumers care about CSR?” A qualitative study exploring the role of CSR in consumption decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(4), 449–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagell, M., & Wu, Z. (2009). Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of 10 exemplars. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(2), 37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plumer, B. (2013). We’ve covered the world in pesticides. Is that a problem? Retrieved December 19, 2013 from http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/08/18/the-world-uses-billions-of-pounds-of-pesticides-each-year-is-that-a-problem/.

  • Rahbek Pedersen, E. (2009). The many and the few: Rounding up the SMEs that manage CSR in the supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(2), 109–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainforest Alliance (2011). Pineapple producers reap the benefits of sustainable farming. Retrieved 19 December, 2013 from http://www.rainforest-alliance.org/sites/default/files/publication/pdf/pineapple_fact_sheet_en_hz_jun11.pdf.

  • Ramanathan, U., Bentley, Y., & Pang, G. (2014). The role of collaboration in the UK green supply chains: An exploratory study of the perspectives of suppliers, logistics and retailers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 70, 231–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuter, C., Goebel, P., & Foerstl, K. (2012). The impact of stakeholder orientation on sustainability and cost prevalence in supplier selection decisions. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 18(4), 270–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotaru, K., Churilov, L., & Flitman, A. (2014). Can critical realism enable a journey from description to understanding in operations and supply chain management? Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(2), 117–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. (1992). Method in social science—A realist approach (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routhledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepski, L. (2013). Going the (ethical) distance. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(2), 393–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, D., Power, D., & Samson, D. (2007). Greening the automotive supply chain: A relationship perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(1), 28–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L., & Bourlakis, M. (2009). The evolution from corporate social responsibility to supply chain responsibility: The case of Waitrose. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(4), 291–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starik, M., & Rands, G. P. (1995). Weaving an integrated web: Multilevel and multisystem perspectives of ecologically sustainable organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 908–935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strand, R. (2009). Corporate responsibility in Scandinavian supply chains. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(51), 179–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby, R. (2006). What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 633–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, G. (2009). The transparency of SCM ethics: Conceptual framework and empirical illustrations. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(4), 259–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, G. (2013). Processes of substantiations and contributions through theory building towards theory in business research. European Business Review, 25(5), 466–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, G., & Bååth, H. (2008). Supply chain management ethics: Conceptual framework and illustration. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(6), 398–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, G., & Wagner, B. (2012a). Business sustainability and E-footprints on Earth’s life and ecosystems: Generic models. European Business Review, 24(6), 543–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, G., & Wagner, B. (2012b). Implementation of a sustainable business cycle: The case of a Swedish dairy producer. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(1), 93–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornberg, R., & Jungert, T. (2013). Bystander behavior in bullying situations: Basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy. Journal of Adolescence, 36(3), 475–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulstrup Hoejmose, S., Grosvold, J., & Millington, A. (2013). Socially responsible supply chains: Power asymmetries and joint dependence. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 18(3), 277–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verghese, K., & Lewis, H. (2007). Environmental innovation in industrial packaging: A supply chain approach. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18/19), 4381–4401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, W. J. V., & Seuring, S. (2009). Sustainability through the market—The impacts of sustainable supply chain management: INTRODUCTION. Sustainable Development, 17(5), 269–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, H., & Brammer, S. (2009). Sustainable procurement in the United Kingdom public sector. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(2), 128–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCED, World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, M., & Knemeyer, A. M. (2013). Exploring the integration of sustainability and supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 43(1), 18–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisner, J. D., & Tan, K. C. (2000). Supply chain management and its impact on purchasing. The Journal of Supply Chain Management: A Global Review of Purchasing and Supply, 36(4), 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, J. (2011). sustainable supply chain management integration: A qualitative analysis of the German manufacturing industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 221–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, I., Ram, M., Boyal, H., & Shah, M. (2008). Researching the drivers of socially responsible purchasing: A cross-national study of supplier diversity initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(3), 319–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. London, UK: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Borås, Borås, Sweden

    David Eriksson

  2. Oslo School of Management, Oslo, Norway

    Göran Svensson

Authors
  1. David Eriksson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Göran Svensson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Eriksson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eriksson, D., Svensson, G. The Process of Responsibility, Decoupling Point, and Disengagement of Moral and Social Responsibility in Supply Chains: Empirical Findings and Prescriptive Thoughts. J Bus Ethics 134, 281–298 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2429-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2429-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation