Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics 4/2017

04.04.2016

What Corporate Governance Can Learn from Catholic Social Teaching

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This reflection focuses on what insights Catholic Social Teaching (CST) can provide for corporate governance. I argue that the ‘standard’ agency theory is overly reductionist and insufficiently incorporates important economic limitations (such as asymmetric information, incomplete contracts, and the need for coordination) as well as human frailty. As a result, such agency theory insufficiently distinguishes firms from markets, which can easily relativize how we treat others and facilitate rationalization of unethical behavior. I then explore how three pillars of CST—human dignity, solidarity, and subsidiarity—can help overcome these limitations. CST proposes a vision of the business corporation as a community of persons, working together in cooperative business relationships toward the shared purpose of contributing to human flourishing.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
See also Easterbrook and Fischel (1991) and Macey (1991), who combine these assumptions with the argument that shareholders as residual claimants have most at stake (and thus have the appropriate incentives to make corporate decisions on behalf of all stakeholders) to argue for shareholder control of the firm.
 
2
See Cremers and Sepe 2016, especially Sect. 3.
 
3
See e.g., the Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church by the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace (2004), especially chapter 3 on ‘The Human Person and Human Rights.’
 
4
See also John Paul II (1991, p. 31): “The original source of all that is good is the very act of God, who created both the earth and man, and who gave the earth to man so that he might have dominion over it by his work and enjoy its fruits (Gen 1:28). God gave the earth to the whole human race for the sustenance of all its members, without excluding or favoring anyone.”
 
5
The first part is from Williamson (1988) on page 569, the second from footnote 3 at the bottom of page 569.
 
6
(Centesimus Annus #46) “Nor does the Church close her eyes to the danger of fanaticism or fundamentalism who, in the name of an ideology which purports to be scientific or religious, claim the right to impose on others their own concept of what is true and good. Christian truth is not of this kind. [I]t is not an ideology… the Christian faith does not presume to imprison changing socio-political realities in a rigid schema, and it recognizes that human life is realized in history in conditions that are diverse and imperfect. … [I]n constantly reaffirming the transcendent dignity of the person, the Church's method is always that of respect for freedom.”
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Abela, A. V. (2001). Profit and more: Catholic Social Teaching and the purpose of the firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 31, 107–116.CrossRef Abela, A. V. (2001). Profit and more: Catholic Social Teaching and the purpose of the firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 31, 107–116.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2003). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Review of Economic Studies, 70, 489–520.CrossRef Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2003). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Review of Economic Studies, 70, 489–520.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2006). Belief in a just world and redistributive politics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 699–746.CrossRef Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2006). Belief in a just world and redistributive politics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 699–746.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2010). Individual and corporate social responsibility (Coase lecture). Economica, 77, 1–19.CrossRef Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2010). Individual and corporate social responsibility (Coase lecture). Economica, 77, 1–19.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2011). Identity, morals and taboos: Beliefs as assets. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(2), 805–855.CrossRef Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2011). Identity, morals and taboos: Beliefs as assets. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(2), 805–855.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Benedictus, XVI. (2009). Encyclical letter ‘Caritas in Veritate’. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana. Benedictus, XVI. (2009). Encyclical letter ‘Caritas in Veritate’. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.
Zurück zum Zitat Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. New York: Macmillan. Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. New York: Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4, 386–404.CrossRef Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4, 386–404.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cortright, S. A., & Naughton, M. J. (Eds.). (2002). Rethinking the purpose of business—Interdisciplinary Essays from the Catholic Social Tradition. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. Cortright, S. A., & Naughton, M. J. (Eds.). (2002). Rethinking the purpose of business—Interdisciplinary Essays from the Catholic Social Tradition. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Cremers, M., Litov, L., & Sepe, S. (2015). Staggered boards and firm value, revisited. Working Paper, University of Notre Dame. Cremers, M., Litov, L., & Sepe, S. (2015). Staggered boards and firm value, revisited. Working Paper, University of Notre Dame.
Zurück zum Zitat Cremers, M., Masconale, S., & Sepe, S. (2016). Commitment and Entrenchment in Corporate Governance? Northwestern Law Review, 110 (forthcoming). Cremers, M., Masconale, S., & Sepe, S. (2016). Commitment and Entrenchment in Corporate Governance? Northwestern Law Review, 110 (forthcoming).
Zurück zum Zitat Cremers, M., Nair, V., & Peyer, U. (2008). Takeover defenses and competition: The role of stakeholders. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 5(4), 791–818.CrossRef Cremers, M., Nair, V., & Peyer, U. (2008). Takeover defenses and competition: The role of stakeholders. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 5(4), 791–818.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cremers, M., & Sepe, S. (2016). The shareholder value of empowered boards. Stanford Law Review, 68(1), 67–148. Cremers, M., & Sepe, S. (2016). The shareholder value of empowered boards. Stanford Law Review, 68(1), 67–148.
Zurück zum Zitat Dierksmeier, C., & Celano, A. (2012). Thomas Aquinas on justice as a global virtue in business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 247–272.CrossRef Dierksmeier, C., & Celano, A. (2012). Thomas Aquinas on justice as a global virtue in business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 247–272.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dobson, J. (1999). Is shareholder wealth maximization immoral? Financial Analyst Journal, 55(5), 69–75.CrossRef Dobson, J. (1999). Is shareholder wealth maximization immoral? Financial Analyst Journal, 55(5), 69–75.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Easterbrook, F. H., & Fischel, D. R. (1991). Voting in corporate law. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 395–427.CrossRef Easterbrook, F. H., & Fischel, D. R. (1991). Voting in corporate law. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 395–427.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fama, E. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88, 288–307.CrossRef Fama, E. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88, 288–307.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Follett, M. P. (1942). Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett (Henry C. Metcalf & L. Urwick, eds.), New York: Harper & Brothers. Follett, M. P. (1942). Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett (Henry C. Metcalf & L. Urwick, eds.), New York: Harper & Brothers.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine. Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine.
Zurück zum Zitat Garvey, G. E. (2003). The theory of the fir, managerial responsibility, and catholic social teaching. Journal of Markets and Morality, 6(2), 525–540. Garvey, G. E. (2003). The theory of the fir, managerial responsibility, and catholic social teaching. Journal of Markets and Morality, 6(2), 525–540.
Zurück zum Zitat Glendon, M. A. (2011). The bearable lightness of dignity. First Things, 213, 41–45. Glendon, M. A. (2011). The bearable lightness of dignity. First Things, 213, 41–45.
Zurück zum Zitat Guitián, G. (2015). Service as a bridge between ethical principles and business practice: A Catholic Social Teaching perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 128, 59–72.CrossRef Guitián, G. (2015). Service as a bridge between ethical principles and business practice: A Catholic Social Teaching perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 128, 59–72.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.CrossRef Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat John Paul II. (1981). Encyclical letter ‘Laborem Exercens’. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana. John Paul II. (1981). Encyclical letter ‘Laborem Exercens’. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.
Zurück zum Zitat John Paul II. (1987). Encyclical letter ‘Sollicitudo Rei Socialis’. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana. John Paul II. (1987). Encyclical letter ‘Sollicitudo Rei Socialis’. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.
Zurück zum Zitat John Paul II. (1991). Encyclical letter ‘Centesimus Annus’. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana. John Paul II. (1991). Encyclical letter ‘Centesimus Annus’. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson, W. C., Karpoff, J. M., & Yi, S. (2015). The bonding hypothesis of takeover defenses: Evidence from IPO firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(2), 307–332. Johnson, W. C., Karpoff, J. M., & Yi, S. (2015). The bonding hypothesis of takeover defenses: Evidence from IPO firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(2), 307–332.
Zurück zum Zitat Klein, A., & Zur, E. (2011). The impact of hedge fund activism on the target firm’s existing bondholders. Review of Financial Studies, 24(5), 1735–1771.CrossRef Klein, A., & Zur, E. (2011). The impact of hedge fund activism on the target firm’s existing bondholders. Review of Financial Studies, 24(5), 1735–1771.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Leo XIII. (1891). Encyclical letter ‘Rerum Novarum’. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana. Leo XIII. (1891). Encyclical letter ‘Rerum Novarum’. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.
Zurück zum Zitat Macey, J. R. (1991). An economic analysis of the various rationales for making shareholders the exclusive beneficiairies of corporate fiduciary duties. Stenson Law Review, 21, 57–90. Macey, J. R. (1991). An economic analysis of the various rationales for making shareholders the exclusive beneficiairies of corporate fiduciary duties. Stenson Law Review, 21, 57–90.
Zurück zum Zitat Malinvaud, E., & Glendon, M. A. (Eds.) (2006). Conceptualization of the person in social sciences. The proceedings of the eleventh plenary session of the pontifical academy of social sciences. Vatican City: Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences. Malinvaud, E., & Glendon, M. A. (Eds.) (2006). Conceptualization of the person in social sciences. The proceedings of the eleventh plenary session of the pontifical academy of social sciences. Vatican City: Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences.
Zurück zum Zitat Mayer, C. (2013). Firm commitment: Why the corporation is failing us and how to restore trust in it. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Mayer, C. (2013). Firm commitment: Why the corporation is failing us and how to restore trust in it. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Melé, D. (2011). The firm as a ‘community of persons’: A pillar of humanistic business ethos. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 89–101.CrossRef Melé, D. (2011). The firm as a ‘community of persons’: A pillar of humanistic business ethos. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 89–101.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Melé, D., & Dierksmeier, C. (Eds.). (2012). Human development in business. Values and Humanistic management in the in the encyclical ‘‘caritas in veritate’’. New York: Palgrave-MacMillan. Melé, D., & Dierksmeier, C. (Eds.). (2012). Human development in business. Values and Humanistic management in the in the encyclical ‘‘caritas in veritate’’. New York: Palgrave-MacMillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Melé, D., & Naughton, M. (2011). The encyclical-letter ‘Caritas in Veritate’: Ethical challenges for business. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 1–7.CrossRef Melé, D., & Naughton, M. (2011). The encyclical-letter ‘Caritas in Veritate’: Ethical challenges for business. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 1–7.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Naughton, M. (1995). Participation in the organization: An ethical analysis from The Papal Social Tradition. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 923–935.CrossRef Naughton, M. (1995). Participation in the organization: An ethical analysis from The Papal Social Tradition. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 923–935.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pieper, J. (1966). The four cardinal virtues. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. Pieper, J. (1966). The four cardinal virtues. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Pieper, J. (1997). Faith, hope, love. San Francisco: Ignatius Press. Pieper, J. (1997). Faith, hope, love. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Pius XI. (1931). Encyclical letter ‘Quadragesimo Anno’. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana. Pius XI. (1931). Encyclical letter ‘Quadragesimo Anno’. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.
Zurück zum Zitat Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011, January–February) Creating shared value—How to reinvent capitalism—and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, pp. 1–17. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011, January–February) Creating shared value—How to reinvent capitalism—and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, pp. 1–17.
Zurück zum Zitat Rajan, R., & Zingales, L. (1998, May). Power in a theory of the firm. Quarterly Journal of Economics, pp. 387–432. Rajan, R., & Zingales, L. (1998, May). Power in a theory of the firm. Quarterly Journal of Economics, pp. 387–432.
Zurück zum Zitat Ross, S. (1987). The interrelations of finance and economics: Theoretical perspectives. American Economic Review, 77, 29–34. Ross, S. (1987). The interrelations of finance and economics: Theoretical perspectives. American Economic Review, 77, 29–34.
Zurück zum Zitat Rossouw, G. (1994). Business ethics: Where have all the Christians gone? Journal of Business Ethics, 13(7), 557–570.CrossRef Rossouw, G. (1994). Business ethics: Where have all the Christians gone? Journal of Business Ethics, 13(7), 557–570.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sandelands, L. E. (2009). The business of business is the human person: Lessons from the Catholic Social Tradition. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 93–101.CrossRef Sandelands, L. E. (2009). The business of business is the human person: Lessons from the Catholic Social Tradition. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 93–101.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sandelands, L. E. (2010). Why the center holds: On the nuptial foundations of the corporation. Catholic Social Science Review, 15, 193–209.CrossRef Sandelands, L. E. (2010). Why the center holds: On the nuptial foundations of the corporation. Catholic Social Science Review, 15, 193–209.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schlag, M., & Mercado, J. (Eds.). (2012). Free markets and the culture of the common good. Berlin: Springer-Heildeger. Schlag, M., & Mercado, J. (Eds.). (2012). Free markets and the culture of the common good. Berlin: Springer-Heildeger.
Zurück zum Zitat Sison, A. J. G., & Fontrodona, J. (2012). The common good of the firm in the Aristotelian-Thomistic tradition. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 211–246.CrossRef Sison, A. J. G., & Fontrodona, J. (2012). The common good of the firm in the Aristotelian-Thomistic tradition. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 211–246.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tirole, J. (2009). Cognition and incomplete contracts. American Economic Review, 99(1), 265–294.CrossRef Tirole, J. (2009). Cognition and incomplete contracts. American Economic Review, 99(1), 265–294.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Williamson, O. (1988). Corporate finance and corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 43(3), 567–591.CrossRef Williamson, O. (1988). Corporate finance and corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 43(3), 567–591.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Williamson, O. (2000). The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38–3, 595–613.CrossRef Williamson, O. (2000). The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38–3, 595–613.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zingales, L. (2000). In search of new foundations. Journal of Finance, 55, 1623–1653.CrossRef Zingales, L. (2000). In search of new foundations. Journal of Finance, 55, 1623–1653.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zingales, L. (2015a). The ‘cultural revolution’ in finance. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(1), 1–4.CrossRef Zingales, L. (2015a). The ‘cultural revolution’ in finance. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(1), 1–4.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zingales, L. (2015b). Does finance benefit society? Journal of Finance, 70(4), 1327–1363.CrossRef Zingales, L. (2015b). Does finance benefit society? Journal of Finance, 70(4), 1327–1363.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
What Corporate Governance Can Learn from Catholic Social Teaching
Publikationsdatum
04.04.2016
Erschienen in
Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3127-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Journal of Business Ethics 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe