Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics 2/2018

Open Access 29.05.2017 | Original Paper

Managing Corporate Sustainability with a Paradoxical Lens: Lessons from Strategic Agility

verfasst von: Sarah Birrell Ivory, Simon Bentley Brooks

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Corporate sustainability introduces multiple tensions or paradoxes into organisations which defy traditional approaches such as trading-off contrasting options. We examine an alternative approach: to manage corporate sustainability with a paradoxical lens where contradictory elements are managed concurrently. Drawing on paradox theory, we focus on two specific pathways: to the organisation-wide acceptance of paradox and to paradoxical resolution. Introducing the concept of strategic agility, we argue that strategically agile organisations are better placed to navigate these paradox pathways. Strategic agility comprises three organisational meta-capabilities: strategic sensitivity, collective commitment, and resource fluidity. We propose that strategically agile organisations draw on strategic sensitivity and collective commitment to achieve organisation-wide acceptance of paradox, and collective commitment and resource fluidity to achieve paradoxical resolution. For each of these meta-capabilities, we identify three organisational practices and processes specifically related to corporate sustainability that organisations can leverage in pursuit of strategic agility. We offer a conceptual framework depicting the strategic agility meta-capabilities, and associated practices and processes, which organisations draw on to successfully manage corporate sustainability with a paradoxical lens.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
It is worth noting that our argument should not be taken as a rejection of the valuable work linking aggregated organisational outputs to the degradation of planetary ecosystems (see, for example, Whiteman and Cooper 2011; Whiteman et al. 2013). Indeed, our paper incorporates such issues by emphasising an open-system approach. However, here we focus on the management of corporate sustainability with a paradoxical lens. An output-based understanding of corporate sustainability would be unhelpful given such outputs are likely to have already ignored, traded-off, or resolved the very paradoxes central to our focus.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate strategy: An analytic approach to business policy for growth and expansion. New York: McGraw-Hill. Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate strategy: An analytic approach to business policy for growth and expansion. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Zurück zum Zitat Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2008). Governance and sustainability: An investigation into the relationship between corporate governance and corporate sustainability. Management Decision, 46(3), 433–448.CrossRef Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2008). Governance and sustainability: An investigation into the relationship between corporate governance and corporate sustainability. Management Decision, 46(3), 433–448.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Banerjee, S. B. (2003). Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development and the reinvention of nature. Organization Studies, 24(1), 143–189.CrossRef Banerjee, S. B. (2003). Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development and the reinvention of nature. Organization Studies, 24(1), 143–189.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management, 26(3), 197–218.CrossRef Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management, 26(3), 197–218.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bednarek, R., Paroutis, S., & Sillince, J. A. A. (2017). Transcendence through rhetorical practices: Responding to paradox in the science sector. Organization Studies, 38(1), 77–101.CrossRef Bednarek, R., Paroutis, S., & Sillince, J. A. A. (2017). Transcendence through rhetorical practices: Responding to paradox in the science sector. Organization Studies, 38(1), 77–101.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Beech, N., Burns, H., de Caestecker, L., MacIntosh, R., & MacLean, D. (2004). Paradox as invitation to act in problematic change situations. Human Relations, 57, 1313–1332.CrossRef Beech, N., Burns, H., de Caestecker, L., MacIntosh, R., & MacLean, D. (2004). Paradox as invitation to act in problematic change situations. Human Relations, 57, 1313–1332.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Benn, S., Dunphy, D., & Griffiths, A. (2014). Organizational change for corporate sustainability (3rd ed.). UK: Routledge. Benn, S., Dunphy, D., & Griffiths, A. (2014). Organizational change for corporate sustainability (3rd ed.). UK: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Bishop, P., Hines, A., & Collins, T. (2007). The current state of scenario development: An overview of techniques. Foresight, 9(1), 5–25.CrossRef Bishop, P., Hines, A., & Collins, T. (2007). The current state of scenario development: An overview of techniques. Foresight, 9(1), 5–25.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bourgeois, L. J. (1981). On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, 6, 29–39. Bourgeois, L. J. (1981). On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, 6, 29–39.
Zurück zum Zitat Bowen, F. E. (1999). Does organizational slack stimulate the implementation of environmental initiatives? In D. Wood & D. Windsor (Eds.), Proceedings of the tenth annual meeting of the international association of business and society (pp. 244–234). Bowen, F. E. (1999). Does organizational slack stimulate the implementation of environmental initiatives? In D. Wood & D. Windsor (Eds.), Proceedings of the tenth annual meeting of the international association of business and society (pp. 244–234).
Zurück zum Zitat Bowen, F. E. (2002). Organizational slack and corporate greening: Broadening the debate. British Journal of Management, 13, 305–316.CrossRef Bowen, F. E. (2002). Organizational slack and corporate greening: Broadening the debate. British Journal of Management, 13, 305–316.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brannen, M. Y., & Doz, Y. (2012). Corporate languages and strategic agility: Trapped in your jargon or lost in translation? California Management Review, 54, 77–97.CrossRef Brannen, M. Y., & Doz, Y. (2012). Corporate languages and strategic agility: Trapped in your jargon or lost in translation? California Management Review, 54, 77–97.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brueller, N. N., Carmeli, A., & Drori, I. (2014). How do different types of mergers and acquisitions facilitate strategic agility? California Management Review, 56(3), 39–57.CrossRef Brueller, N. N., Carmeli, A., & Drori, I. (2014). How do different types of mergers and acquisitions facilitate strategic agility? California Management Review, 56(3), 39–57.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Burton, R. M., Obel, B., & De Sanctis, G. (2011). Organizational design: A step-by-step approach. UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Burton, R. M., Obel, B., & De Sanctis, G. (2011). Organizational design: A step-by-step approach. UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Byrch, C., Milne, M. J., Morgan, R., & Kearins, K. (2015). Seeds of hope? Exploring business actors’ diverse understandings of sustainable development. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(5), 671–705.CrossRef Byrch, C., Milne, M. J., Morgan, R., & Kearins, K. (2015). Seeds of hope? Exploring business actors’ diverse understandings of sustainable development. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(5), 671–705.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cameron, K. (1986). Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Management Science, 32, 539–553.CrossRef Cameron, K. (1986). Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Management Science, 32, 539–553.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cascio, W. F. (2006). Decency means more than “always low prices”: A comparison of Costco to Wal-Mart’s Sam’s club. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20, 26–37.CrossRef Cascio, W. F. (2006). Decency means more than “always low prices”: A comparison of Costco to Wal-Mart’s Sam’s club. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20, 26–37.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Checker, M. (2011). Wiped out by the “Greenwave”: Environmental gentrification and the paradoxical politics of urban sustainability. City & Society, 23, 210–229.CrossRef Checker, M. (2011). Wiped out by the “Greenwave”: Environmental gentrification and the paradoxical politics of urban sustainability. City & Society, 23, 210–229.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Clegg, S. R., da Cunha, J. V., & Cunha, M. P. (2002). Management paradoxes: A relational view. Human Relations, 55, 483–503.CrossRef Clegg, S. R., da Cunha, J. V., & Cunha, M. P. (2002). Management paradoxes: A relational view. Human Relations, 55, 483–503.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioural theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioural theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Aveni, R. A. (1995). Coping with hypercompetition: Utilizing the new 7-S’s framework. Academy of Management Executive, 9, 45–57. D’Aveni, R. A. (1995). Coping with hypercompetition: Utilizing the new 7-S’s framework. Academy of Management Executive, 9, 45–57.
Zurück zum Zitat Doz, Y., & Kosonen, M. (2008a). The dynamics of strategic agility: Nokia’s rollercoaster experience. California Management Review, 50(3), 95–118.CrossRef Doz, Y., & Kosonen, M. (2008a). The dynamics of strategic agility: Nokia’s rollercoaster experience. California Management Review, 50(3), 95–118.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Doz, Y., & Kosonen, M. (2008b). Fast strategy: How strategic agility will help you stay ahead of the game. London: Wharton School Press. Doz, Y., & Kosonen, M. (2008b). Fast strategy: How strategic agility will help you stay ahead of the game. London: Wharton School Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Doz, Y., & Kosonen, M. (2010). Embedding strategic agility. A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long Range Planning, 43, 370–382.CrossRef Doz, Y., & Kosonen, M. (2010). Embedding strategic agility. A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long Range Planning, 43, 370–382.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Doz, Y., & Kosonen, M. (2011). Nokia and strategic agility: A postscript. California Management Review, 53(4), 154–156.CrossRef Doz, Y., & Kosonen, M. (2011). Nokia and strategic agility: A postscript. California Management Review, 53(4), 154–156.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. N. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130–141.CrossRef Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. N. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130–141.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks. The triple bottom-line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks. The triple bottom-line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing.
Zurück zum Zitat Elkington, J. (2004). Enter the triple bottom line. In A. Henriques & J. Richardson (Eds.), The triple bottom line: Does it all add up?. UK: Earthscan. Elkington, J. (2004). Enter the triple bottom line. In A. Henriques & J. Richardson (Eds.), The triple bottom line: Does it all add up?. UK: Earthscan.
Zurück zum Zitat Elkington, J., Emerson, J., & Beloe, S. (2006). The value palette: A tool for full spectrum strategy. California Management Review, 48(2), 6–28.CrossRef Elkington, J., Emerson, J., & Beloe, S. (2006). The value palette: A tool for full spectrum strategy. California Management Review, 48(2), 6–28.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ely, R. J., & Thomas, D. A. (2001). Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 229–273.CrossRef Ely, R. J., & Thomas, D. A. (2001). Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 229–273.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein, M., Buhovac, A. R., & Yuthas, K. (2015). Managing social, environmental and financial performance simultaneously. Long Range Planning, 48, 35–45.CrossRef Epstein, M., Buhovac, A. R., & Yuthas, K. (2015). Managing social, environmental and financial performance simultaneously. Long Range Planning, 48, 35–45.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. MA: Pitman. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. MA: Pitman.
Zurück zum Zitat Galbraith, J. R. (1982). Designing the innovating organization. Organizational Dynamics, 10(3), 3–24.CrossRef Galbraith, J. R. (1982). Designing the innovating organization. Organizational Dynamics, 10(3), 3–24.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gallopin, G. (2003). A systems approach to sustainability and sustainable development (p. 64). CEPAL—SERIE Medio ambiente y desarrollo, No: United Nations. Gallopin, G. (2003). A systems approach to sustainability and sustainable development (p. 64). CEPAL—SERIE Medio ambiente y desarrollo, No: United Nations.
Zurück zum Zitat Gao, J., & Bansal, P. (2013). Instrumental and integrative logics in business sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 241–255.CrossRef Gao, J., & Bansal, P. (2013). Instrumental and integrative logics in business sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 241–255.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gladwin, T. N., Kennelly, J. J., & Krause, T. S. (1995). Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 874–907. Gladwin, T. N., Kennelly, J. J., & Krause, T. S. (1995). Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 874–907.
Zurück zum Zitat Griffiths, A., & Petrick, J. A. (2001). Corporate architectures for sustainability. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21, 1573–1585.CrossRef Griffiths, A., & Petrick, J. A. (2001). Corporate architectures for sustainability. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21, 1573–1585.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hahn, T., & Aragon-Correa, J. A. (2015). Toward cognitive plurality on corporate sustainability in organizations: The role of organizational factors. Organization & Environment, 28(3), 255–263.CrossRef Hahn, T., & Aragon-Correa, J. A. (2015). Toward cognitive plurality on corporate sustainability in organizations: The role of organizational factors. Organization & Environment, 28(3), 255–263.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hahn, T., & Figge, F. (2011). Beyond the bounded instrumentality in current corporate sustainability research: Toward an inclusive notion of profitability. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 325–345.CrossRef Hahn, T., & Figge, F. (2011). Beyond the bounded instrumentality in current corporate sustainability research: Toward an inclusive notion of profitability. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 325–345.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinkse, J., & Preuss, L. (2010). Trade-offs in corporate sustainability: You can’t have your cake and eat it. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(4), 217–229.CrossRef Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinkse, J., & Preuss, L. (2010). Trade-offs in corporate sustainability: You can’t have your cake and eat it. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(4), 217–229.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L., & Figge, F. (2015). Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 297–316.CrossRef Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L., & Figge, F. (2015). Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 297–316.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L., & Figge, F. (2016). Ambidexterity for corporate social performance. Organization Studies, 37(2), 213–235.CrossRef Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L., & Figge, F. (2016). Ambidexterity for corporate social performance. Organization Studies, 37(2), 213–235.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J., & Figge, F. (2014). Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 463–487.CrossRef Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J., & Figge, F. (2014). Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 463–487.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hambrick, D. C., & Snow, C. C. (1977). A contextual model of strategic decision-making in organizations. In Academy of management proceedings (pp. 109–112). Hambrick, D. C., & Snow, C. C. (1977). A contextual model of strategic decision-making in organizations. In Academy of management proceedings (pp. 109–112).
Zurück zum Zitat Hoffman, N. P. (2000). An examination of the “sustainable competitive advantage” concept: Past, present and future. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 20, 1–25. Hoffman, N. P. (2000). An examination of the “sustainable competitive advantage” concept: Past, present and future. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 20, 1–25.
Zurück zum Zitat Huy, Q. N. (1999). Emotional capability, emotional intelligence, and radical change. Academy of Management Review, 24, 325–345. Huy, Q. N. (1999). Emotional capability, emotional intelligence, and radical change. Academy of Management Review, 24, 325–345.
Zurück zum Zitat Jarzabkowski, P., & Sillince, J. A. A. (2007). A rhetoric-in-context approach to shaping commitment to multiple strategic goals. Organization Studies, 28(10), 1639–1665.CrossRef Jarzabkowski, P., & Sillince, J. A. A. (2007). A rhetoric-in-context approach to shaping commitment to multiple strategic goals. Organization Studies, 28(10), 1639–1665.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jennings, P. D., & Zandbergen, P. A. (1995). Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 1015–1052. Jennings, P. D., & Zandbergen, P. A. (1995). Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 1015–1052.
Zurück zum Zitat Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Tarba, S. T., & Weber, Y. (2015). The role of strategic agility in acquisitions. British Journal of Management, 26, 596–616.CrossRef Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Tarba, S. T., & Weber, Y. (2015). The role of strategic agility in acquisitions. British Journal of Management, 26, 596–616.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jüttner, U., Peck, H., & Christopher, M. (2003). Supply chain risk management: Outlining and agenda for future research. International Journal of Logistics: Research & Applications, 6(4), 197–210.CrossRef Jüttner, U., Peck, H., & Christopher, M. (2003). Supply chain risk management: Outlining and agenda for future research. International Journal of Logistics: Research & Applications, 6(4), 197–210.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Knight, E. R. W., & Paroutis, S. (2017). Becoming salient: The TMT leader’s role in shaping the interpretive context of paradoxical tensions. Organization Studies, 38(3–4), 403–432.CrossRef Knight, E. R. W., & Paroutis, S. (2017). Becoming salient: The TMT leader’s role in shaping the interpretive context of paradoxical tensions. Organization Studies, 38(3–4), 403–432.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kraaijenbrink, J., Spender, J., & Groen, A. J. (2010). The resource-based view: A review and assessment of its critiques. Journal of Management, 36(1), 349–372.CrossRef Kraaijenbrink, J., Spender, J., & Groen, A. J. (2010). The resource-based view: A review and assessment of its critiques. Journal of Management, 36(1), 349–372.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lawson, M. B. (2001). In praise of slack: Time is of the essence. Academy of Management Executive, 15(3), 125–135.CrossRef Lawson, M. B. (2001). In praise of slack: Time is of the essence. Academy of Management Executive, 15(3), 125–135.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lengnick-Hall, C. A., & Beck, T. E. (2009). Resilience capacity and strategic agility: Prerequisites for thriving in a dynamic environment. Working paper, The University of San Antonio College of Business. Lengnick-Hall, C. A., & Beck, T. E. (2009). Resilience capacity and strategic agility: Prerequisites for thriving in a dynamic environment. Working paper, The University of San Antonio College of Business.
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25, 760–776. Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25, 760–776.
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis, M. W., Andriopoulos, C., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Paradoxical leadership to enable strategic agility. California Management Review, 56(3), 58–77.CrossRef Lewis, M. W., Andriopoulos, C., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Paradoxical leadership to enable strategic agility. California Management Review, 56(3), 58–77.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Luscher, L. S., & Lewis, M. W. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 221–240.CrossRef Luscher, L. S., & Lewis, M. W. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 221–240.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat MacDonald, C., & Norman, W. (2007). Rescuing the baby from the triple bottom line bathwather: A reply to Pava. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(1), 111–114.CrossRef MacDonald, C., & Norman, W. (2007). Rescuing the baby from the triple bottom line bathwather: A reply to Pava. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(1), 111–114.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305.CrossRef Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McCann, J. (2004). Organizational effectiveness: Changing concepts for changing environments. Human Resource Planning, 27(1), 42–50. McCann, J. (2004). Organizational effectiveness: Changing concepts for changing environments. Human Resource Planning, 27(1), 42–50.
Zurück zum Zitat Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Zurück zum Zitat Moyer, K. (1996). Scenario planning at british airways—A case study. Long Range Planning, 29(2), 172–181.CrossRef Moyer, K. (1996). Scenario planning at british airways—A case study. Long Range Planning, 29(2), 172–181.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Murray, A., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. (2017). The circular economy: An interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 369–380.CrossRef Murray, A., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. (2017). The circular economy: An interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 369–380.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Negandhi, A. R., & Reimann, B. C. (1973). Correlates of decentralization: Closed and open systems perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 16(4), 570–582.CrossRef Negandhi, A. R., & Reimann, B. C. (1973). Correlates of decentralization: Closed and open systems perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 16(4), 570–582.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Neugebauer, F., Figge, F., & Hahn, T. (2016). Planned or Emergent strategy making? Exploring the formation of corporate sustainability strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(5), 323–336.CrossRef Neugebauer, F., Figge, F., & Hahn, T. (2016). Planned or Emergent strategy making? Exploring the formation of corporate sustainability strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(5), 323–336.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. (1997). What is the optimum amount of organizational slack? A study of the relationship between slack and innovation in multinational firms. European Management Journal, 15, 603–611.CrossRef Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. (1997). What is the optimum amount of organizational slack? A study of the relationship between slack and innovation in multinational firms. European Management Journal, 15, 603–611.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Norman, W., & MacDonald, C. (2004). Getting to the bottom of ‘triple bottom line’. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 243–262.CrossRef Norman, W., & MacDonald, C. (2004). Getting to the bottom of ‘triple bottom line’. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 243–262.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Olcott, G., & Oliver, N. (2014). Social capital, sensemaking, and recovery: Japanese companies and the 2011 earthquake. California Management Review, 56(2), 5–22.CrossRef Olcott, G., & Oliver, N. (2014). Social capital, sensemaking, and recovery: Japanese companies and the 2011 earthquake. California Management Review, 56(2), 5–22.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pascale, R. T., Millemann, M., & Gioja, L. (2000). Surfing the edge of chaos: The laws of nature and the new laws of business. New York: Crown Business. Pascale, R. T., Millemann, M., & Gioja, L. (2000). Surfing the edge of chaos: The laws of nature and the new laws of business. New York: Crown Business.
Zurück zum Zitat Pfeffer, J. (1985). Organizational demography: Implications for management. California Management Review, 28(1), 67–81.CrossRef Pfeffer, J. (1985). Organizational demography: Implications for management. California Management Review, 28(1), 67–81.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pfeffer, J. (2010). Building sustainable organizations: The human factor. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(1), 34–44.CrossRef Pfeffer, J. (2010). Building sustainable organizations: The human factor. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(1), 34–44.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Poole, M. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 25, 735–752. Poole, M. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 25, 735–752.
Zurück zum Zitat Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120–134. Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120–134.
Zurück zum Zitat Reeves, M., Levin, S., & Ueda, D. (2016). The biology of corporate survival. Harvard Business Review, 94, 46–55. Reeves, M., Levin, S., & Ueda, D. (2016). The biology of corporate survival. Harvard Business Review, 94, 46–55.
Zurück zum Zitat Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influence. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887–910. Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influence. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887–910.
Zurück zum Zitat Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson. Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.
Zurück zum Zitat Searcy, C. (2012). Corporate sustainability performance measurement systems: A review and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 239–253.CrossRef Searcy, C. (2012). Corporate sustainability performance measurement systems: A review and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 239–253.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shah, K. U., & Arjoon, S. (2015). Through thick and thin? How self-determination drives the corporate sustainability initiatives of multinational subsidiaries. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24, 565–582.CrossRef Shah, K. U., & Arjoon, S. (2015). Through thick and thin? How self-determination drives the corporate sustainability initiatives of multinational subsidiaries. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24, 565–582.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Simola, S. (2012). Exploring “embodied care” in relation to social sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 473–484.CrossRef Simola, S. (2012). Exploring “embodied care” in relation to social sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 473–484.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, W. K. (2014). Dynamic decision-making: A model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1592–1623.CrossRef Smith, W. K. (2014). Dynamic decision-making: A model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1592–1623.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, W. K., Binns, A., & Tushman, M. L. (2010). Complex business models: Managing strategic paradox simultaneously. Long Range Planning, 43, 448–461.CrossRef Smith, W. K., Binns, A., & Tushman, M. L. (2010). Complex business models: Managing strategic paradox simultaneously. Long Range Planning, 43, 448–461.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36, 381–403. Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36, 381–403.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16, 522–536.CrossRef Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16, 522–536.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stacey, R. (1993). Strategic management and organisational dynamics. London: Pitman. Stacey, R. (1993). Strategic management and organisational dynamics. London: Pitman.
Zurück zum Zitat Sundaramurthy, C., & Lewis, M. (2003). Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Academy of Management Review, 28, 397–415. Sundaramurthy, C., & Lewis, M. (2003). Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Academy of Management Review, 28, 397–415.
Zurück zum Zitat Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509–533.CrossRef Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509–533.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tushman, M., & Romanelli, E. (1985). Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 171–222. Tushman, M., & Romanelli, E. (1985). Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 171–222.
Zurück zum Zitat UNWCED. (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press. UNWCED. (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Van der Byl, C. A., & Slawinski, N. (2015). Embracing tensions in corporate sustainability: A review of research from win-wins and trade-offs to paradoxes and beyond. Organization and Environment, 28(1), 54–79.CrossRef Van der Byl, C. A., & Slawinski, N. (2015). Embracing tensions in corporate sustainability: A review of research from win-wins and trade-offs to paradoxes and beyond. Organization and Environment, 28(1), 54–79.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Weber, Y., & Tarba, S. Y. (2014). Strategic agility: A state of the art. California Management Review, 56(3), 5–12.CrossRef Weber, Y., & Tarba, S. Y. (2014). Strategic agility: A state of the art. California Management Review, 56(3), 5–12.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Werbach, A. (2009). Strategy for sustainability. MA: Harvard Business School Publishing. Werbach, A. (2009). Strategy for sustainability. MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
Zurück zum Zitat Wernerfelt, B. (1984). The resource based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–180.CrossRef Wernerfelt, B. (1984). The resource based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–180.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Whiteman, G., & Cooper, W.H. (2011). Ecological sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1265–1282.CrossRef Whiteman, G., & Cooper, W.H. (2011). Ecological sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1265–1282.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Whiteman, G., Walker, B., & Perego, P. (2013). Planetary boundaries: Economic foundations for corporate sustainability. Journal of Management Studies, 50(2), 307–336.CrossRef Whiteman, G., Walker, B., & Perego, P. (2013). Planetary boundaries: Economic foundations for corporate sustainability. Journal of Management Studies, 50(2), 307–336.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson, K., & Doz, Y. (2011). Agile innovation. California Management Review, 53, 6–26.CrossRef Wilson, K., & Doz, Y. (2011). Agile innovation. California Management Review, 53, 6–26.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wolf, J. (2014). The relationship between sustainable supply chain management, stakeholder pressure and corporate sustainability performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 119, 317–328.CrossRef Wolf, J. (2014). The relationship between sustainable supply chain management, stakeholder pressure and corporate sustainability performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 119, 317–328.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Managing Corporate Sustainability with a Paradoxical Lens: Lessons from Strategic Agility
verfasst von
Sarah Birrell Ivory
Simon Bentley Brooks
Publikationsdatum
29.05.2017
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3583-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

Journal of Business Ethics 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe