nach oben

Journal of Business Ethics

Erschienen in:

27.04.2019 | Original Paper

The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review

verfasst von: Samuel Drempetic, Christian Klein, Bernhard Zwergel

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 2/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The concept of sustainable and responsible (SR) investments expresses that every investment should be based on the SR investor’s code of ethics. To a large extent the allocation of SR investments to more sustainable companies and ethical practices is based on the environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) scores provided by rating agencies. However, a thorough investigation of ESG scores is a neglected topic in the literature. This paper uses Thomson Reuters ASSET4 ESG ratings to analyze the influence of firm size, a company’s available resources for providing ESG data, and the availability of a company’s ESG data on the company’s sustainability performance. We find a significant positive correlation between the stated variables, which can be explained by organizational legitimacy. The results raise the question of whether the way the ESG score measures corporate sustainability gives an advantage to larger firms with more resources while not providing SR investors with the information needed to make decisions based on their beliefs. Due to our results, SR investors and scholars should reopen the discussion about: what sustainability rating agencies measure with ESG scores, what exactly needs to be measured, and if the sustainable finance community can reach their self-imposed objectives with this measurement.

Vorheriger Artikel Circularity Brokers: Digital Platform Organizations and Waste Recovery in Food Supply Chains

Nächster Artikel Decoupling from Moral Responsibility for CSR: Employees' Visionary Procrastination at a SME

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

For the development and the growing attention, it is irrelevant that some of the political initiatives are not really ‘sustainable finance’, because the focus is often only on the environment and so it should actually be considered green finance.

Obviously, there are many more possible variables that could be used in this respect, but it is beyond the scope of this paper to look at them.

Some authors combine the institutional and legitimacy theories and comment that they “tend to overlap and cannot be considered mutually exclusive” (Baldini et al. 2016, p. 2). Suchman (1995, p. 571) views “organizational legitimacy” as the core concept of the “intellectual transformation” of the institutional theory. But it is also used in other theories (Reast et al. 2013; Meyer and Rowan 1977). This paper sees (organizational) legitimacy and legitimacy ‘theory’ as a part of the neo-institutional theory like Schaltegger and Hörisch (2017).

Sustainable development is mostly defined as a “development which meets the needs of current generations without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” (Brundtland and Khalid 1987).

30% of all instruments apply to large listed companies, 40% to all company sizes and around 20% to specific industry sectors (Bartels et al. 2016).

Sustainability ratings paid for by companies are rather unusual but getting more attention with the growing green bond market (Eurosif 2018) and second party opinions, paid by the issuer of the bond (Schneeweiß 2016).

In the number of rated companies, ASSET4 is comparable with the MSCI ESG Rating (Klug and Sailer 2017).

The table with the distributions over the years is available on request.

ASSET4 screened the database for strategic KPI. After this process, they decided to inactivate some indicators. In total, they identified strategic KPI that they nowadays employ for their ratings (active KPIs). The rest were deactivated after 2014, yet they are still available in its database. We only concentrated on the active KPIs. The database includes 184 indicators scored over all four pillars. Removing the indicators of the economic pillar leaves 157 active indicators. Now there is a new calculation resulting from the old data points.

This is comparable to the disclosure index of Bloomberg used by Fatemi et al. (2017).

Scope 1: “A reporting organization’s direct GHG emissions”; scope 2: “A reporting organization’s emissions associated with the generation of electricity, heating/cooling, or steam purchased for own consumption”; scope 3: “A reporting organization’s indirect emissions other than those covered in scope 2” (World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) and World Resources Institute (WRI) 2004, p. 103).

With respect to the discussion about the Partial Least Square Path Model (PLS-PM) and the co-variance based Structural Equation Model (SEM) (Sarstedt et al. 2016; Reinartz et al. 2009; Rönkkö et al. 2015; Edwards 2011), we decided also in accordance to Hair et al. (2011) for the co-variance based SEM.

For further information on differences between formative and reflective specifications of the latent variables see Jarvis et al. (2003).

A discussion of the overall score is missing. But it exists approaches for subscores. For example, Schultze and Trommer (2012) discuss the measurement of environmental performance.

Adams, C. A., Hill, W.-Y., & Roberts, C. B. (1998). Corporate social reporting practices in western Europe: Legitimating corporate behaviour? The British Accounting Review, 30(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1006/bare.1997.0060.CrossRef

Al-Shaer, H., & Zaman, M. (2017). CEO compensation and sustainability reporting assurance: Evidence from the UK. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(1), 268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3735-8.CrossRef

Aouadi, A., & Marsat, S. (2016). Do ESG controversies matter for firm value?Evidence from International data. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3213-8.CrossRef

Avetisyan, E., & Hockerts, K. (2017). The consolidation of the ESG rating industry as an enactment of institutional retrogression. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 316–330. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1919.CrossRef

Bacon, S., & Ossen, A. (2015). Smart ESG integration: Factoring in sustainability. Zurich. Retrieved January 23, 2019. Accessed 23 January 2019.

Baird, P. L., Geylani, P. C., & Roberts, J. A. (2012). Corporate social and financial performance re-examined: Industry Effects in a linear mixed model analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(3), 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1135-z.CrossRef

Baldini, M., Dal Maso, L., Liberatore, G., Mazzi, F., & Terzani, S. (2016). Role of country- and firm-level determinants in environmental, social, and governance disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3139-1.CrossRef

Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0496-z.CrossRef

Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.CrossRef

Bartels, W., Fogelberg, T., Hoballah, A., & van der Lugt, Cornelius T. (2016). Carrots & Sticks: Global trends in sustainability reporting regulation and policy. 2016 edition. Retrieved December 16, 2018 from www.carrotsandsticks.net. Accessed 16 December 2018.

Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.CrossRef

Bauckloh, T., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2017). Sustainable and conventional mutual funds: Do they really differ? Corporate Finance, (3–4), 89–93.

Baumann-Pauly, D., Wickert, C., Spence, L. J., & Scherer, A. G. (2013). Organizing corporate social responsibility in small and large firms: Size matters. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(4), 693–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1827-7.CrossRef

Benlemlih, M., Shaukat, A., Qiu, Y., & Trojanowski, G. (2016). Environmental and social disclosures and firm risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(9), 928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3285-5.CrossRef

Blombäck, A., & Wigren, C. (2009). Challenging the importance of size as determinant for CSR activities. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 20(3), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777830910950658.CrossRef

Boatright, J. R. (2014). Ethics in finance (3rd ed.). Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

Bolker, B. M., Brooks, M. E., Clark, C. J., Geange, S. W., Poulsen, J. R., Stevens, M. H. H., et al. (2009). Generalized linear mixed models: A practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(3), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008.CrossRef

Boone, T., Ganeshan, R., & Jayaraman, V. (2012a). Carbon Foot Print of Products: Supply Chain Approach. In T. Boone, V. Jayaraman, & R. Ganeshan (Eds.), Sustainable supply chains: Models, methods, and public policy implications (pp. 175–191, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Vol. 174). New York, NY: Springer New York.

Boone, T., Jayaraman, V., & Ganeshan, R. (Eds.) (2012b). Sustainable supply chains: Models, methods, and public policy implications (International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Vol. 174). New York, NY: Springer New York.

Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2006). Firm size, organizational visibility and corporate philanthropy: An empirical analysis. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00424.x.CrossRef

Brundtland, G. H., & Khalid, M. (1987). Our common future. Retrieved July 26, 2018 from http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2018.

Busch, T., Bauer, R., & Orlitzky, M. (2016). Sustainable development and financial markets: Old paths and new avenues. Business & Society, 55(3), 303–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315570701.CrossRef

Busch, T., Johnson, M., Pioch, T., & Kopp, M. (2018). Consistency of Corporate Carbon Emission Data. Hamburg. Retrieved September 29, 2018. Accessed 29 September 2018.

Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (Multivariate applications book series). Mahwah NJ u.a.: Erlbaum.

Capelle-Blancard, G., & Petit, A. (2017a). Every little helps?: ESG news and stock market reaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(11), 129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3667-3.CrossRef

Capelle-Blancard, G., & Petit, A. (2017b). The weighting of CSR dimensions: One size does not fit all. Business & Society, 56(6), 919–943. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315620118.CrossRef

Chatterji, A., Durand, R., Levine, D., & Touboul, S. (2014). Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for strategy research (IRLE WORKING PAPER).

Chatterji, A., Levine, D. I., & Toffel, M. W. (2009). How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(1), 125–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2009.00210.x.CrossRef

Chauhan, S. (2014). A relational study of firm’s characteristics and CSR expenditure. Procedia Economics and Finance, 11, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00172-5.CrossRef

Chen, R. C. Y., Hung, S.-W., & Lee, C.-H. (2017). Does corporate value affect the relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and stock returns? Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 7(2), 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2016.1272947.CrossRef

Cho, S. Y., Lee, C., & Pfeiffer, R. J. (2013). Corporate social responsibility performance and information asymmetry. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2012.10.005.CrossRef

Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4–5), 303–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003.CrossRef

Clarkson, P. M., Overell, M. B., & Chapple, L. (2011). Environmental reporting and its relation to corporate environmental performance. Abacus, 47(1), 27–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2011.00330.x.CrossRef

Croissant, Y., & Millo, G. (2008). Panel Data Econometrics in R: The plm Package.

Cui, J., Jo, H., & Na, H. (2016). Does corporate social responsibility affect information asymmetry? Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-3003-8.CrossRef

Dando, N. (2003). Transparency and assurance minding the credibility gap. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2), 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023351816790.CrossRef

Darnall, N., Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (2010). Adopting proactive environmental strategy: The influence of stakeholders and firm size. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1072–1094. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00873.x.CrossRef

Dawkins, C., & Fraas, J. W. (2011). Coming clean: The impact of environmental performance and visibility on corporate climate change disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(2), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0681-0.CrossRef

Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures—a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435852.CrossRef

Delmas, M., & Blass, V. D. (2010). Measuring corporate environmental performance: The trade-offs of sustainability ratings. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(4), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.676.CrossRef

Depoers, F., Jeanjean, T., & Jérôme, T. (2016). Voluntary disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions: Contrasting the carbon disclosure project and corporate reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(3), 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2432-0.CrossRef

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRef

Dion, P. A. (2008). Interpreting structural equation modeling results: A reply to Martin and Cullen. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 365–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9634-7.CrossRef

Doda, B., Gennaioli, C., Gouldson, A., Grover, D., & Sullivan, R. (2016). Are corporate carbon management practices reducing corporate carbon emissions? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(5), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1369.CrossRef

Döpfner, C. (2016). Wie nützlich sind Nachhaltigkeitsratings für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung von Unternehmen?: Umsetzung—Möglichkeiten - Grenzen. In H. E. Kopp (Ed.), CSR und Finanzratings: Nachhaltige Finanzwirtschaft: Rating statt Raten! (pp. 55–63, Management-Reihe Corporate Social Responsibility). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Gabler.

Dubbink, W., Graafland, J., & van Liedekerke, L. (2008). CSR, transparency and the role of intermediate organisations. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9893-y.CrossRef

Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.323.CrossRef

Edwards, J. R. (2011). The fallacy of formative measurement. Organizational Research Methods, 14(2), 370–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428110378369.CrossRef

Erragragui, E., & Lagoarde-Segot, T. (2016). Solving the SRI puzzle? A note on the mainstreaming of ethical investment. Finance Research Letters, 18, 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2016.03.018.CrossRef

Esteban-Sanchez, P., La Cuesta-Gonzalez, M., & Paredes-Gazquez, J. D. (2017). Corporate Social Performance and its relation with Corporate Financial Performance: International evidence in the banking industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 1102–1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.127.CrossRef

European Commission. (2018). Action Plan: Financing Sustainable Growth. Brussels. Retrieved July 18, 2018. Accessed 18 July 2018.

European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (2014). Amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups: Directive 2014/95/EU.

Eurosif. (2018). European SRI Study 2018. Retrieved January 04, 2019 from http://www.eurosif.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/European-SRI-2018-Study-LR.pdf. Accessed 4 January 2019.

Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2017). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001.CrossRef

Feldman, R. (2017). Using ESG as a factor to improve your risk/return profile. Zurich. Retrieved January 23, 2019. Accessed 23 January 2019.

Fowler, S. J., & Hope, C. (2007). A critical review of sustainable business indices and their impact. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(3), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9590-2.CrossRef

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.

Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917.CrossRef

G20 Green Finance Study Group. (2017). G20 Green Finance Synthesis Report 2017. Retrieved October 02, 2018. Accessed 2 October 2018.

Gallo, P. J., & Christensen, L. J. (2011). Firm size matters: An empirical investigation of organizational size and ownership on sustainability-related behaviors. Business & Society, 50(2), 315–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650311398784.CrossRef

Gamerschlag, R., Möller, K., & Verbeeten, F. (2011). Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: Empirical evidence from Germany. Review of Managerial Science, 5(2–3), 233–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-010-0052-3.CrossRef

Gangi, F., & D’Angelo, E. (2016). The virtuous circle of corporate social performance and corporate social disclosure. Modern Economy, 07(12), 1396–1418. https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2016.712129.CrossRef

Gao, S. S., Heravi, S., & Xiao, J. Z. (2005). Determinants of corporate social and environmental reporting in Hong Kong: A research note. Accounting Forum, 29(2), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2005.01.002.CrossRef

Gardberg, N. A., & Fombrun, C. J. (2006). Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible assets across institutional environments. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 329–346.CrossRef

Gavana, G., Gottardo, P., & Moisello, A. M. (2017). The effect of equity and bond issues on sustainability disclosure. Family vs non-family Italian firms. Social Responsibility Journal, 13(1), 126–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-05-2016-0066.CrossRef

Global Sustainable Investment Alliance (GSIA). (2017). Global Sustainable Investment Review 2016. Retrieved April 04, 2017 from http://www.gsi-alliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/GSIR_Review2016.F.pdf. Accessed 4 April 2017.

Gold, S., & Heikkurinen, P. (2017). Transparency fallacy: Unintended Consequences of stakeholder claims on responsibility in supply chain. Auditing & Accountability Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2015-2088.CrossRef

Gonenc, H., & Scholtens, B. (2017). Environmental and financial performance of fossil fuel firms: A closer inspection of their interaction. Ecological Economics, 132, 307–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.10.004.CrossRef

Graafland, J., van de Ven, B., & Stoffele, N. (2003). Strategies and instruments for organising CSR by small and large businesses in the Netherlands. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026240912016.CrossRef

Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 78–101. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579510086812.CrossRef

Hahn, T. (2005). Gesellschaftliches Engagement von Unternehmen: Reziproke Stakeholder, ökonomische Anreize, strategische Gestaltungsoptionen. Dissertation. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.

Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.005.CrossRef

Haigh, M. (2012). Publishing and defining sustainable finance and investment. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 2(2), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2012.688797.CrossRef

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202.CrossRef

Hartzmark, S. M., & Sussman, A. B. (2018). Do Investors Value Sustainability?: A Natural Experiment Examining Ranking and Fund Flows (SSRN). Retrieved December 06, 2018. Accessed 6 December 2018.

Hasse, R., & Krücken, G. (2009). Neo-institutionalistische Theorie. In G. Kneer & M. Schroer (Eds.), Handbuch Soziologische Theorien (1st ed., pp. 237–251). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.CrossRef

Hawn, O., & Ioannou, I. (2016). Mind the gap: The interplay between external and internal actions in the case of corporate social responsibility. Strategic Management Journal, 37(13), 2569–2588. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2464.CrossRef

Hedesström, M., Lundqvist, U., & Biel, A. (2011). Investigating consistency of judgement across sustainability analyst organizations. Sustainable Development, 19(2), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.511.CrossRef

High-Level Expert Group on Sustainable Finance. (2018). Final Report 2018: Financing a sustainable European economy. Secretariat provided by the European Commission. Retrieved July 18, 2018. Accessed 18 July 2018.

Hlavac, M. (2015). stargazer: Well-Formatted Regression and Summary Statistics Tables. R package version 5.2. Retrieved February 28, 2017 from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=stargazer.

Hoepner, A. G. F., McMillan, D., & Fraser, M. (2016). Is responsible investment proportionally under-researched? In T. Hebb, J. P. Hawley, & A. G. F. Hoepner (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of responsible investment (pp. 34–50, Routledge companions in business, management and accounting).

Hörisch, J., Johnson, M., & Schaltegger, S. (2015). Implementation of sustainability management and company size. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(8), 765–779. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1844.CrossRef

Hou, J., & Reber, B. H. (2011). Dimensions of disclosures: Corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting by media companies. Public Relations Review, 37(2), 166–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.01.005.CrossRef

Hughey, C. J., & Sulkoski, A. J. (2012). More disclosure = Better CSR reputation?: An examination of CSR reputation leaders and laggards in the global oil & gas industry. Journal of Academy of Business & Economics, 12(2), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1109/9780470545454.ch1.CrossRef

Hutton, J. G., Goodman, M. B., Alexander, J. B., & Genest, C. M. (2001). Reputation management: The new face of corporate public relations? Public Relations Review, 27, 247–261.CrossRef

Jarvis, C. B., Mackenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199–218.CrossRef

Jenkins, H. (2006). Small business champions for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9182-6.CrossRef

Jung, J., Herbohn, K., & Clarkson, P. (2018). Carbon risk, carbon risk awareness and the cost of debt financing. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(4), 1151–1171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3207-6.CrossRef

King, A., & Bartels, W. (2015). Currents of change: The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2015. Retrieved February 09, 2017 from https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2015/11/kpmg-international-survey-of-corporate-responsibility-reporting-2015.pdf. Accessed 9 February 2017.

Klug, A., & Sailer, D. R. (2017). MSCI: Materialität bei der Bewertung von ESG Risiken. Absolut|impact (1), 46–51.

Kopp, H. E. (2016). Nachhaltigkeitsratings: Zur „Vermessung“ von Nachhaltigkeit im Finanzbereich. In H. E. Kopp (Ed.), CSR und Finanzratings: Nachhaltige Finanzwirtschaft: Rating statt Raten! (pp. 1–28, Management-Reihe Corporate Social Responsibility). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Gabler.

Lewis, S. (2003). Reputation and corporate responsibility. Journal of Communication Management, 7(4), 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632540310807494.CrossRef

Li, S., Fetscherin, M., Alon, I., Lattemann, C., & Yeh, K. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in emerging markets: The importance of the governance environment. Management International Review (MIR), 50(5), 635–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-010-0049-9.CrossRef

Lobe, S., & Walkshäusl, C. (2016). Vice versus virtue investing around the world. Review of Managerial Science, 10(2), 303–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-014-0147-3.CrossRef

Long, B. S., & Driscoll, C. (2007). Codes of ethics and the pursuit of organizational legitimacy: Theoretical and empirical contributions. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(2), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9307-y.CrossRef

Luke, S. G. (2017). Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R. Behavior Research Methods, 49(4), 1494–1502. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0809-y.CrossRef

Mackenzie, C., Rees, W., & Rodionova, T. (2013). Do responsible investment indices improve corporate social responsibility? FTSE4Good’s impact on environmental management. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(5), 495–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12039.CrossRef

Maignan, I., & Ralston, D. A. (2002). Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and the US: Insights from businesses’ self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 497–514.CrossRef

Malik, F. (2005). Gefährliche Managementwörter und warum man sie vermeiden sollte (3rd ed.). Frankfurt am Main: Frankfurter Allg. Buch im FAZ-Inst.

Mena, S., & Palazzo, G. (2012). Input and output legitimacy of multi-stakeholder initiatives. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(03), 527–556. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201222333.CrossRef

Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550.CrossRef

Naser, K., Al-Hussaini, A., Al-Kwari, D., & Nuseibeh, R. (2006). Determinants of corporate social disclosure in developing countries: The case of Qatar. Advances in International Accounting, 19, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0897-3660(06)19001-7.CrossRef

novethic research. (2013). Overview of ESG rating agencies. Retrieved November 14, 2016 from http://www.novethic.com/fileadmin/user_upload/tx_ausynovethicetudes/pdf_complets/2013_overview_ESG_rating_agencies.pdf. Accessed 14 November 2016.

O’Rourke, A. (2003). The message and methods of ethical investment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(6), 683–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00105-1.CrossRef

Oh, W.-Y., Cha, J., & Chang, Y. K. (2017). Does ownership structure matter? The effects of insider and institutional ownership on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(1), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2914-8.CrossRef

Orlitzky, M. (2001). Does firm size confound the relationship between corporate social performance and firm financial performance? Journal of Business Ethics, 33, 167–180.CrossRef

Parguel, B., Benoît-Moreau, F., & Larceneux, F. (2011). How sustainability ratings might deter ‘greenwashing’: A closer look at ethical corporate communication. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0901-2.CrossRef

Pérez, A. (2015). Corporate reputation and CSR reporting to stakeholders. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20(1), 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-01-2014-0003.CrossRef

Perez, F., & Sanchez, L. E. (2009). Assessing the evolution of sustainability reporting in the mining sector. Environmental Management, 43(6), 949–961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9269-1.CrossRef

Prado-Lorenzo, J.-M., & Garcia-Sanchez, I.-M. (2010). The role of the board of directors in disseminating relevant information on greenhouse gases. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(3), 391–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0515-0.CrossRef

Qian, W., & Schaltegger, S. (2017). Revisiting carbon disclosure and performance: Legitimacy and management views. The British Accounting Review, 49(4), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.05.005.CrossRef

R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

Rahdari, A. H., & Anvary Rostamy, A. A. (2015). Designing a general set of sustainability indicators at the corporate level. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 757–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.108.CrossRef

Reast, J., Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., & Vanhamme, J. (2013). Legitimacy-seeking organizational strategies in controversial industries: A case study analysis and a bidimensional model. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1571-4.CrossRef

Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., & Henseler, J. (2009). An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(4), 332–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2009.08.001.CrossRef

Revelli, C. (2017). Socially responsible investing (SRI): From mainstream to margin? Research in International Business and Finance, 39, 711–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2015.11.003.CrossRef

Rizzi, F., Pellegrini, C., & Battaglia, M. (2018). The structuring of social finance: Emerging approaches for supporting environmentally and socially impactful projects. Journal of Cleaner Production., 170, 805–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.167.CrossRef

Rodriguez-Fernandez, M. (2016). Social responsibility and financial performance: The role of good corporate governance. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2015.08.001.CrossRef

Rönkkö, M., McIntosh, C. N., & Antonakis, J. (2015). On the adoption of partial least squares in psychological research: Caveat emptor. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.019.CrossRef

Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118170229.ch1.CrossRef

Russo, A., & Perrini, F. (2010). Investigating stakeholder theory and social capital: CSR in large firms and SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0079-z.CrossRef

Sanchez, G. (2013). PLS Path Modeling with R. Berkley. Retrieved November 18, 2016 from http://gastonsanchez.com/PLS_Path_Modeling_with_R.pdf. Accessed 18 November 2016.

Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Thiele, K. O., & Gudergan, S. P. (2016). Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies! Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 3998–4010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.06.007.CrossRef

Schadewitz, H., & Niskala, M. (2010). Communication via responsibility reporting and its effect on firm value in Finland. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(2), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.234.CrossRef

Schäfer, H. (2005). International corporate social responsibility rating systems. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2005(20), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2005.wi.00012.CrossRef

Schäfer, H. (2011). Transparenz von Unternehmensverantwortung mittels Ratings und Regulierungen sowie die Rolle des globalen Finanzsystems. In G. Ulshöfer & B. Feuchte (Eds.), Finanzmarktakteure und Corporate Social Responsibility: Ordnungspolitik, Transparenz, Anlagestrategien (1st ed., pp. 177–192). Wiesbaden: VS Verl. für Sozialwiss.CrossRef

Schäfer, H., Hauser-Ditz, A., & Preller, E.-C. (2004). Transparenzstudie: zur Beschreibung ausgewählter international verbreiteter Rating-Systeme zur Erfassung von Corporate Social Responsibility. Retrieved February 16, 2017. Accessed 16 February 2017.

Schaltegger, S., & Hörisch, J. (2017). In search of the dominant rationale in sustainability management: Legitimacy- or profit-seeking? Journal of Business Ethics, 145(2), 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2854-3.CrossRef

Schneeweiß, A. (2016). Green Bonds: Black Box mit grünem Etikett?. Bonn. Retrieved January 10, 2018. Accessed 10 January 2018.

Schreck, P., & Raithel, S. (2015). Corporate social performance, firm size, and organizational visibility: Distinct and joint effects on voluntary sustainability reporting. Business & Society., 5, 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315613120.CrossRef

Schultze, W., & Trommer, R. (2012). The concept of environmental performance and its measurement in empirical studies. Journal of Management Control, 22(4), 375–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-011-0146-3.CrossRef

Schwaiger, M., Eberhardt, J., & Mahr, S. (2016). Corporate Reputation als optimale Steuerungsgröße für die Unternehmenskommunikation. In F.-R. Esch, T. Langner, & M. Bruhn (Eds.), Handbuch Controlling der Kommunikation: Grundlagen - Innovative Ansätze - Praktische Umsetzungen (2nd ed., pp. 53–77, Springer Reference Wirtschaft). Wiesbaden, s.l.: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.

Searcy, C., & Elkhawas, D. (2012). Corporate sustainability ratings: An investigation into how corporations use the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Journal of Cleaner Production, 35, 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.022.CrossRef

Singh, J. V., Tucker, D. J., & House, R. J. (1986). Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(2), 171–193.CrossRef

Snelson-Powell, A., Grosvold, J., & Millington, A. (2016). Business school legitimacy and the challenge of sustainability: A fuzzy set analysis of institutional decoupling. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 15(4), 703–723. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2015.0307.CrossRef

Soppe, A. (2004). Sustainable corporate finance. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1/2), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039410.18373.12.CrossRef

Sparkes, R., & Cowton, C. J. (2004). The maturing of socially responsible investment: A review of the developing link with corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033106.43260.99.CrossRef

Stellner, C., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and Eurozone corporate bonds: The moderating role of country sustainability. Journal of Banking & Finance, 59, 538–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.04.032.CrossRef

Steyer, R., Wolf, A., Funke, F., & Partchev, I. (2009). Strukturgleichungsmodelle. In H. Holling & N. Birbaumer (Eds.), Grundlagen und statistische Methoden der Evaluationsforschung (Vol. 1, pp. 393–448, Enzyklopädie der Psychologie Methodologie und Methoden Evaluation, Bd. 1). Göttingen: Hogrefe Verl. für Psychologie.

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1995.9508080331.CrossRef

Sulaiman, M., Abdullah, N., & Fatima, A. H. (2014). Determinants of environmental reporting quality in Malaysia. International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 22(1), 63–90.

SustainAbility, & GlobeScan Inc. (2013). Polling the Experts: The 2013 Ratings Survey. A part of Rate the Raters. Retrieved August 30, 2016 from http://www.sustainability.com/library/the-2013-ratings-survey-polling-the-experts#.V8VUVq1M2Q8. Accessed 30 August 2016.

Tarmuji, I., Maelah, R., & Tarmuji, N. H. (2016). The impact of environmental, social and governance practices (ESG) on economic performance: Evidence from ESG score. International Journal of Trade, Economics and FInance, 7(3), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijtef.2016.7.3.501.CrossRef

Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. (2017). Recommendations of the task force on climate-related financial disclosures. Retrieved October 09, 2018. Accessed 9 October 2018.

Thogersen, J., & Ölander, F. (2002). Human values and the emergence of a sustainable consumption pattern: A panel study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 605–630.CrossRef

Tuppura, A., Armin, H., Pätäri, S., & Jantunen, A. (2016). Corporate social and financial performance in different industry contexts: The chicken or the egg? Social Responsibility Journal, 12(4), 672–686. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-12-2015-0181.CrossRef

Udayasankar, K. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and firm size. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9609-8.CrossRef

Veronica Siregar, S., & Bachtiar, Y. (2010). Corporate social reporting: Empirical evidence from Indonesia Stock Exchange. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 3(3), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538391011072435.CrossRef

Verrecchia, R. E. (2001). Essays on disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32, 97–180.CrossRef

Vormedal, I., & Ruud, A. (2009). Sustainability reporting in Norway—an assessment of performance in the context of legal demands and socio-political drivers. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(4), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.560.CrossRef

Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.CrossRef

Wagner, M., van Phu, N., Azomahou, T., & Wehrmeyer, W. (2002). The relationship between the environmental and economic performance of firms: An empirical analysis of the European paper industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9(3), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.22.CrossRef

Wang, Q., Dou, J., & Jia, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance. Business & Society, 55(8), 1083–1121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315584317.CrossRef

Wickham, H. (2009). ggplot2. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRef

Windolph, S. E. (2011). Assessing corporate sustainability through ratings: Challenges and their causes. Journal of Environmental Sustainability, 1(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.14448/jes.01.0005.CrossRef

World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), & World Resources Institute (WRI). (2004). The greenhouse gas protocol: A corporate accounting and reporting standard. Washington, DC, Conches-Geneva: World Resources Institute; World Business Council for Sustainable Development.

World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), & World Resources Institute (WRI). (2013). Technical guidance for calculating scope 3 emissions: version 1.0. Supplement to the Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3). Retrieved October 09, 2018. Accessed 9 October 2018.

Yu, Y., & Choi, Y. (2016). Stakeholder pressure and CSR adoption: The mediating role of organizational culture for Chinese companies. The Social Science Journal, 53(2), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2014.07.006.CrossRef

Titel: The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review
verfasst von: Samuel Drempetic
Christian Klein
Bernhard Zwergel
Publikationsdatum: 27.04.2019
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04164-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2020

Selfish Sharing? The Impact of the Sharing Economy on Tax Reporting Honesty

Thematic Symposium: The Impact of Technology on Ethics, Professionalism and Judgement in Accounting

Echoes of Corporate Social Responsibility: How and When Does CSR Influence Employees’ Promotive and Prohibitive Voices?

The Ethical Implications of Using Artificial Intelligence in Auditing

Are Individuals More Willing to Lie to a Computer or a Human? Evidence from a Tax Compliance Setting

Decoupling from Moral Responsibility for CSR: Employees' Visionary Procrastination at a SME