Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of ethanol and water as the liquid phase in the direct formation of H2O2 from H2 and O2 over a palladium catalyst

  • Published:
Catalysis Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Ethanol and water have been compared as the media in which hydrogen peroxide is produced from the reaction of H2 and O2 over a palladium catalyst. There are significant differences between the reaction in the two media with respect to the net rate of H2O2 formation, the state of the active Pd and the mechanism of the reaction. The reactions were carried out at atmospheric pressure and at 10 °C, with O2 and H2 being introduced in a 4/1 ratio through a glass frit. In ethanol, using 50 mg of 5 wt % Pd/SiO2, 1.8 wt% H2O2 was attained in 7 h; whereas, about half this amount was attained in water. In addition, the net formation rate did not remain constant in water. Both systems were 0.17 N in HCl, which facilitated the formation of colloidal Pd in water but not in ethanol. The loss of activity in water is attributed to the instability of the colloid, which has been shown previously to be the active state of Pd. By contrast, these results show that supported Pd is the active state of the metal in the ethanol system. The mechanism for the formation of the nonselective product, water, also is affected by the media in which the reaction is carried out. In ethanol, water is formed by the direct reaction of H2 and O2, while in the aqueous phase, water appears to be formed both by the direct pathway and by the reduction of H2O2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • W.T.Hess, in:Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, J.I. Kroschwitz and M. Howe-Grant (eds), Vol. 13, 4th ed., (Wiley, New York, 1995)961.

  • V.V. Krishnan A.G. Dokoutchaev M.E. Thompson (2000) J. Catal. 196 366

    Google Scholar 

  • T.A. Pospelova N.I. Kobozev E.N. Ermin (1961) Rus. J. Phys. Chem. (Trans) 35 143

    Google Scholar 

  • D.P. Dissanayake J.H. Lunsford (2002) J. Catal. 206 173

    Google Scholar 

  • D.P. Dissanayake J.H. Lunsford (2003) J. Catal. 214 113

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Chinta J.H. Lunsford (2004) J. Catal. 225 249

    Google Scholar 

  • M.G. Clerici G. Bellussi V. Romano (1991) J. Catal. 129 159

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Machon A.W. Pacek A.W. Nienow (1997) Trans. IChemE. 75 339

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Fajula R.G. Anthony J.H. Lunsford (1982) J. Catal. 73 237

    Google Scholar 

  • J.F. Moulder, W.F. Stickle, P.E. Sobol, K.D. Bomben in: Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, J. Chastain and C. King Jr. (eds), (Physical Electronics, Inc, 1995) ISBN:0-9648124–1-X.

  • A.G. Gaikwad S.D. Sansare V.R. Choudhary (2002) J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 181 143

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Onishi (1999) “Photometric Determination of Trace of Metals.” Wiley New York

    Google Scholar 

  • L.W. Gosser (DuPont), US patent 4, 889, 705, 1989.

  • R. Burch P.R. Ellis (2003) Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 42 203

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jack H. Lunsford.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Han, YF., Lunsford, J.H. A comparison of ethanol and water as the liquid phase in the direct formation of H2O2 from H2 and O2 over a palladium catalyst. Catal Lett 99, 13–19 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-004-0769-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-004-0769-1

Keywords

Navigation