Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Institutional Adaptation of Water Resource Infrastructures to Climate Change in Eastern Ontario

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Institutional barriers and bridges to local climate change impacts adaptation affecting small rural municipalities and Conservation Authorities (CAs are watershed agencies) in Eastern Ontario (Canada) are examined, and elements of a community-based adaptation strategy related to water infrastructures are proposed as a case-study in community adaptation to climate change. No general water scarcity is expected for the region even under unusually dry weather scenarios. Localized quantity and quality problems are likely to occur especially in groundwater recharge areas. Some existing institutions can be relied on by municipalities to build an effective adaptation strategy based on a watershed/region perspective, on their credibility, and on their expertise. Windows of opportunity or framing issues are offered at the provincial level, the most relevant one in a federal state, by municipal emergency plan requirements and pending watershed source water protection legislation. Voluntary and soon to be mandated climate change mitigation programs at the federal level are other ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abel, T. D. and M. Stephan: 2004, ‘The Limits of Civic Environmentalism,’ American Behavioral Scientist 44, 614–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adamowski, K., J. Bougadis and G. G. Patry: 2004, Influence of Trend on Short Duration Design Storms; Influence of Trend on Intensity-Duration-Frequency Relationships, unpubl. mnss

  • Adamowski, K. J. and J. Bougadis: 2003, ‘Detection Trends in Annual Extreme Rainfall,’ Hydrological Process 17, 3547–3560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J.:1995. Risk, University College London Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adger, W. N., Kelly, P. M. and Ninh, N. H.: 2001, Living with Environmental Change; Social Vulnerability, Adaptation and Resilience in Vietnam, Routledge, New-York.

  • Adger, W. N. and O'iordan, T.: 2000, ‘Population, Adaptation and Resilience’ in O'iordan, T., Environmental Science for Environmental Management, 2nd ed., Routledge, New-York, pp. 149–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adger, W. N. and Kelly, P. M.: 1999, ‘Social Vulnerability to Climate Change and the Architecture of Entitlements,’ Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 4, 253–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beierle, T. C. and. Konisky, D. M.: 2001, ‘What Are We Gaining from Stakeholder Involvement? Observations from Environmental Planning in the Great Lakes.,’ Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 19(4), 515–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benest, F.:1998, ‘The Bottom Line.,’ Public Management 80(4),10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, J., Burton, I., Egner, I. D. M., and Thelen, J.:1999, Municipal Risk Assessment: Investigation of the Potential Municipal Impacts and Adaptation Measures Envisioned as a Result of Climate Change, Global Change Strategies International, Ottawa.

  • Byron, I. and Curtis, A.: 2002,‘Maintaining Volunteer Commitment to Local Watershed Initiatives,’ Environmental Management 30(1), 59–67.

  • Carpenter, S. R., Brock, W. and Hanson, P.: 1999, ‘Ecological and Social Dynamics in Simple Models of Ecosystem Management,’ Conservation Ecology. 13(2), p.4, http://www.consecol.org/vol13/iss2/art4

  • CERES: 2002, Value at Risk: Climate Change and the Future of Governance, Sustainable Governance Project Report prepared by Innovest Strategic Value Advisors, http://www.ceres.org/pub/

  • CERES: 2003, Corporate Governance and Climate Change, Sustainable Governance Project Report, prepared by Cogan., D.G., http://www.ceres.org/pub/

  • CH2M HILL: 2001, Final Report. Eastern Ontario Water Resources Management Study (EOWRMS): United Counties of Prescott & Russell, Stormont, Dundas, Glengarry, City of Ottawa, Waterloo (Canada)

  • Crabbé, P. and M. Robin: 2004, Final Report: Adaptation of Water Resource Infrastructure–related Institutions to Climate Change in Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, unpubl.

  • De Loe, R. C., S. E. di Giantomasso and R. D. Kreutzwiser: 2002, ‘Local Capacity for Groundwater protection in Ontario,’ Environmental Management 29(2), 217–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T. and Stern, P. C.: 2002. New Tools for Environmental Protection; Education, Information and Voluntary Measures, National Research Council, Washington, D.C

  • Eastern Ontario Health Unit (EOHU): 2000, Statistical Report on Health, http://www.eohu.on.ca/index_english.htm

  • Eastern Ontario Health Unit (EOHU): 2001, Annual Report, http://www.eohu.on.ca/EN/publications/annualreport_2001_e.pdf

  • Eythórson, E.: 2003, ‘Stakeholders, Courts, and Communities: Individual Transferable Quotas in Icelandinc Fisheries, 1991–2001,’ in N. Dolak and E. Ostrom, (eds), The Commons in the New Millenium, Challenges and Adaptation, MIT Press, 129–68

  • FCM (Federation of Canadian Municipalities):2001a, Further Analysis on Water, Transportation and Housing Investment Needs, FCM report submitted to the Federal Government, October 17, Ottawa.

  • FCM (Federation of Canadian Municipalities): 2001b, Early Warning: Will Canadian Cities Compete?, Report prepared for the National Roundtable on the Environment and the Economy, May, Ottawa.

  • FCM (Federation of Canadian Municipalities): 2002, Local Action Plans, http://www.fcm.ca/scep/case_studies/action_plans/action_plan_index.htm

  • Frewer, L.: 1999, ‘Risk Perception, Social Trust, and Public Participation in Strategic Decision Making: Implications for Emerging Technologies., Ambio 28(6), 569–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Canada: 2002, Climate Change Plan for Canada, http://www.climatechange.gc.ca/plan_for_canada/plan/index.html

  • Government of Ontario: 2003, Protecting Ontari' Drinking Water: Toward a Watershed-Based Source Protection Planning Framework, Toronto: Queenapos; Printer. Greenway, N.: 2005, Heat Wave Divides Canadians, The Ottawa Citizen, July 30

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): 2001, Third Assessment Report, Working Group II, Adaptation, Impacts and Vulnerability, Summary for Policy-Makers, Cambridge University Press, New-York, and http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg2/010.htm.

  • Kane, S. M. and Shogren, J. F.: 2000, ‘Linking Adaptation and Mitigation in Climate Change Policy,’ in Kane, S. M. and Yohe, G. W.(eds), Societal Adaptation to Climate Variability and Change, Kluwer (repr. from Climate Change 45(1), 75–102.

  • Kasperson, R, J. X. Kapserson, and K. Dow: 2001, Vulnerability, Equity and Global Environmental Change, in J. X. Kasperson. and R. E. Kasperson, ed., Global Environmental Risk, Earthscan.

  • Kellogg, W. A.: 1999, ‘Community-based Organizations and Neighbourhood Environmental Problem Solving: A Framework for Adoption of Information Technologies,’ Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 42(4), 445–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O. and E. Ostrom, (eds): 1995, Local Commons and Global Interdependence, Heterogeneity and Cooperation in Two Domains, Sage Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchen, H.: 2003, Municipal Revenue and Expenditure Issues in Canada, Canadian Tax Foundation, no 107, Ottawa.

  • Lawrence, P. L., Nelson, J. G. and Peach, G.: 1993. ‘Great Lakes Shoreline Management Plan for the Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority,’ The Operational Geographer 11(2), 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margerum, R. D. :1999. ‘Integrated Environmental Management: the Foundations for Successful Practice,’ Environmental Management 24(2), 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDuff, M. D.: 2001. ‘Building the Capacity of Grassroots Conservation Organizations to Conduct Participatory Evaluation,’ Environmental Management 27(5), 715–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mc Kibbin, W. J. and Wilcoxen, P. J.: 2002, ‘The Role of Economics in Climate Change Policy,’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 16(2), 107–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meffe, G. et al.: 2002, Ecosystem Management : Adaptive Community-based Conservation. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn, R.: 2001, Global Warming and the American Economy: A Regional Analysis, Elgar, Northampton (MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikalsen, K. H. and S. Jentoft: 2001, From User-groups to Stakeholders? The Public Interest in Fisheries Management,’ Marine Policy 25, 281–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (OMMAH): 1999, Local Services Realignment: A Userapos; Guide, Queenapos; Printer of Ontario, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Public Infrastructure Renewal (OMPIR): 2005, Watertight: the Case for Change in the Water and Wastewater Sector, Publications Ontario, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R. and Wood, D.J.: 1997, ‘Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts,’ The Acad. Management Rev. 22(4), 853–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naess, L.O., Bang, G., Eriksen, S. and Vevatne, J.:2005, ‘Understanding Institutional Adaptation to Climate Change: Flood Response at the Municipal Level in Norway. Global Environmental Change 15(2): pp.125–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, R.D.: 2001, The Informed Opinion of Municipal Officials: Infrastructure Administration, Planning and Management in Eastern Ontario, Federation of Canadian Municipalities, Ottawa, unpul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, R.D.: 2003, Climate Change, Barriers to Learning within the Rural Municipal, Administrative- Managerial Domain, Presentation at the SLRIES 10th Conference, Cornwall (ON).

  • O'onnor, D.R.O.: 2002, Report of the Walkerton Inquiry A Strategy for Safe Drinking Water. Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General. Queenapos; Printer for Ontario, Toronto, Part 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • OMMAH (Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing):1999, Local Services Realignment: A Userapos; Guide, Queenapos; Printer of Ontario, Toronto.

  • O'eill, J.: 2001, ‘Representing People, Representing Nature, Representing the World.’ Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 19(4).

  • O'eill J. and Spash, C. L.: 2000,‘Conceptions of Value in Environmental Decision-Making,’ Environmental Values 9, 521–536.

  • O'iordan, T., Cooper, C. L., Jordan, A., Rayner, S., Richards, K. R., Runci, P and Yoffe, S. :1998, ‘Institutional Framework for Political Action,’ in Rayner, S. and Malone, E. L. (eds), Human Choice & Climate Change, vol. 1, Battelle Press, Columbus (OH), pp. 345–439.

  • Pelling, M.:1998, ‘Participation, Social Capital and Vulnerability to Urban Flooding in Guyana,’ Journal of International Development 10, 469–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philippi, N.: 1997, Flood Plain Management: Ecological and Economic Perspectives. Austin, Texas: Environmental Intelligence Unit, R. G. Landes Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, J, Tubiello, F., McCarl, B., Abler, D., Darwin, R., Fuglie, K., Hollinger, S., Izauralde, C., Jagtap, S., Jones, J., Mearns, L., Ojima, D., Paul, E., Paustian, K., Riha, S., Rosenberg, N. and Rozenzweig, C.: 2003, ‘U.S. Agriculture and Climate Change: New Results,’ Climatic Change 57, 43–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit, B.: 2003, Impact and Adaptation Research Methodologies, C-CIARN Technical Workshop, Montreal., May 12.

  • Smit, B., Burton, I., Klein, R. J. T., and Street, R.: 1999, ‘The Science of Adaptation: A Framework for Assessment,’ Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 4, 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. R.:1998, ‘Are We Leaving the Community Out of Rural Community Sustainability? An Examination of Approaches to Development and Implementation of Indicators of Rural Community Sustainability and Related Public Participation,’ Int. J. Sustainable Develop. World Ecol. 5(2), 82–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South Nation Conservation: 1997. Annual Report, Berwick (ON)

  • Sweeney, M. W.: 2001, ‘Broadening Democracy in Environmental Policy Processes,’ Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 19, 475–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tindall, C. R. and Tindall, S. N.: 2000, Local Government in Canada, 5th ed., Thomson Nelson, Scarborough (Canada).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whipple, W. Jr.: 2001, ‘Coordination Between Water Resources Development and Environmental Needs,’ Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management (January/February):1–3.

  • Weber, M. and G. Hauer: 2003, ‘A Regional Analysis of Climate Change Impacts on Canadian Agriculture,’ Canadian Public Policy. 29(2), June, pp.163–179.

  • Yohe and Toth, F. L.: 2000, ‘Adaptation and the Guardrail Approach to Tolerable Climate Change, in Kane, S. M. and Yohe, G. W. (eds), Societal Adaptation to Climate Variability and Change, Kluwer (repr. from Climate Change 45(1), 2000, 103–128.

  • Yohe, G. and Tol, R. S. J.: 2002, ‘Indicators for Social and Economic Coping Capacity – Moving Toward a Working Definition of Adaptive Capacity,’ Global Environmental Change 12, 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R.: 2002, The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change, MIT Press, Canmbridge (MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Hood, W. D. and Mekis, E.: 2001, ‘Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of Heavy Precipitation Events over Canada,’ Journal of Climate 14, 1923–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Crabbé.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crabbé, P., Robin, M. Institutional Adaptation of Water Resource Infrastructures to Climate Change in Eastern Ontario. Climatic Change 78, 103–133 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9087-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9087-5

Keywords

Navigation