Abstract
Recent studies predict that projected climate change will lead to significant reductions in summer streamflow in the mountainous regions of the Western US. Hydrologic modeling directed at quantifying these potential changes has focused on the magnitude and timing of spring snowmelt as the key control on the spatial–temporal pattern of summer streamflow. We illustrate how spatial differences in groundwater dynamics can also play a significant role in determining streamflow responses to warming. We examine two contrasting watersheds, one located in the Western Cascades and the other in the High Cascades mountains of Oregon. We use both empirical analysis of streamflow data and physically based, spatially distributed modeling to disentangle the relative importance of multiple and interacting controls. In particular, we explore the extent to which differences in snow accumulation and melt and drainage characteristics (deep ground water vs. shallow subsurface) mediate the effect of climate change. Results show that within the Cascade Range, local variations in bedrock geology and concomitant differences in volume and seasonal fluxes of subsurface water will likely result in significant spatial variability in responses to climate forcing. Specifically, watersheds dominated by High Cascade geology will show greater absolute reductions in summer streamflow with predicted temperature increases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bachelet D, Neilson RP, Hickler T, Drapek RJ, Lenihan JM, Sykes MT, Smith B, Sitch S, Thonicke K (2003) Simulating past and future dynamics of natural ecosystems in the United States. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 17(2):14-1–14-21
Band LE, Tague CL, Brun SE, Tenenbaum DE, Fernandes DA (2000) Modelling watersheds as spatial object hierarchies: structure and dynamics. Trans GIS 4:181–196
Baron JS, Hartmann MD, Band LE, Lammers RB (2000) Sensitivity of a high-elevation Rocky Mountain watershed to altered climate and CO2. Water Resour Res 36(1):89–99
Beebee R, Manga M (2004) Variation in the relationship between snowmelt runoff in Oregon and ENSO and PDO. J Am Water Resour Assoc 40:1011–1024
Beven K, Freer J (2001) Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modeling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology. J Hydrol 249:11–29
Choate JS (2004) Modeling low streamflow response to climate variability and clearcutting in snowpack and rain-dominated forested watersheds in the Western Oregon Cascades, M.S. Thesis, SDSU, San Diego, pp 98
Choate J, Tague C (2003) Modeling forest recovery sensitivity to carbon allocation strategies in the Western Oregon Cascades. Ca. Geog. Soc. conference
Coughlan JC, Running SW (1997) Regional ecosystem simulation: a general model for simulating snow accumulation and melt in mountainous terrain. Landsc Ecol 12:119–136
Daly C, Neilson RP, Phillips DL (1994) A statistical–topographic model for mapping climatological precipitation over mountainous terrain. J Appl Meteorol 33:140–158
Gannett MW, Manga M, Lite KE (2003) Groundwater hydrology of the upper Deschtues Basin and its influence on streamflow. In: O’Connor JE, Grant GE (eds) A Peculiar River -- Geology, geomorphology, and hydrology of the Deschutes River, Oregon: American Geophysical Union Water Science and Application 7, pp 31–49
Gooseff MN, Wondzell SM, Haggerty R, Anderson J (2003) Comparing transient storage modeling and residence time distribution (RTD) analysis in geomorphically varied reaches in the Lookout Creek basin, Oregon, USA. Adv Water Resour 26:925–937
Grant GE (1997) A geomorphic basis for interpreting the hydrologic behavior of large river basins. In: Laenan A (ed) River quality: dynamics and restoration. CRC Lewis Publ., pp 105–116
Grant GE, Harr RD, Leavesley G (1990) Effects of forest land use on watershed hydrology: a modeling approach. Northwest Environ J 6:414–415
Green WH, Ampt GA (1911) Studies on soil physics, 1: the flow of air and water through soils. J Agric Sci 4(1):1–24
Harr RD (1977) Water flux in soil and subsoil on a steep forested slope. J Hydrol 33:37–58
Hayhoe K, Cayan D, Field C, Frumhoff P, Maurer E, Miller N, Moser S, Schneider S, Cahill K, Cleland E, Dale L, Drapek R, Hanemann RM, Kalkstein L, Lenihan J, Lunch C, Neilson R, Sheridan S, Verville J (2004) Emissions pathways, climate change, and impacts on California. Proc Natl Acad Sci (PNAS) 101(34):12422–12427
Jager HI, Van Winkle W, Holcomb BD (1999) Would hydrologic climate changes in Sierra Nevada streams influence trout persistence? Trans Am Fish Soc 128:222–240
Jones JA, Grant GE (1996) Peak flow responses to clear-cutting and roads in small and large basins, Western Cascades, Oregon. Water Resour Res 32(4):959–974
Knowles N, Cayan D (2002) Potential effects of global warming on the Sacramento/San Joaquin watershed and the San Francisco estuary. Geophys Res Lett 29(18):1891, doi: 10.1029/2001GL014339
Landrum LL, Baron JS, Tague CL (2002) Effects of projected climate change on ecosystem and hydrologic properties in the Big Thompson Watershed, Colorado: model results from the Regional HydroEcological Simulation System (RHESSys). In: Proceedings American Geophysical Union, San Francisco
Lenihan JM, Drapek RJ, Bachelet D, Neilson RP (2003) Climate change effects on vegetation distribution, carbon, and fire in California. Ecol Appl 13:1667–1681
Leung LR, Qian Y, Bian X, Washington WM, Han J, Roads JO (2004) Mid-century ensemble regional climate change scenarios for the Western United States. Clim Change 62:75–113
Mackay DS, Samanta S, Nemani RR, Band LE (2003) Multi-objective parameter estimation for simulating canopy transpiration in forested watersheds. J Hydrol 277(3–4):230–247
Manga M (1996) Hydrology of spring-dominated streams in the Oregon Cascades. Water Resour Res 32:2435–2439
Manga M (1997) Transmissivity and recharge of Quaternary volcanics in the Oregon Cascades. Water Resour Res 33:1813–1822
Manga M (1999) On the timescales characterizing groundwater discharge at springs. J Hydrol 219:56–69
Maurer EP, Duffy PB (2005) Uncertainty in projections of streamflow changes due to climate change in California. Geophys Res Lett 32(3):L03704 doi: 10.1029/2004GL021462 (PDF version)
Mote PW et al (1999) Impacts of climate variability and change, Pacific Northwest. Report of the JISAO/SMA Climate Impacts Group, University of Washington, Seattle
Mote PW, Parson EA, Hamlet AF, Ideker KN, Keeton WS, Lettenmaier DP, Mantua NJ, Miles EL, Peterson DW, Peterson DL, Slaughter R, Snover AK (2003) Preparing for climate change: the water, salmon, and forests of the Pacific Northwest. Clim Change 61:45–88
Nash J, Sutcliffe J (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models: part 1 – a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290
Neilson RP, Pitelka LF, Solomon AM, Nathan R, Midgley GF, Fragoso JMV, Lischke H, Thompson K (2005) Forecasting regional to global plant migration in response to climate change. BioScience 55(9):749–759
Nijssen B, Lettenmaier DP, Liang X, Wetzel SW, Wood EF (1997) Streamflow simulation for continental-scale river basins. Water Resour Res 33(4):711–724
Parson EA, Mote PW, Hamlet A, Mantua N, Snover A, Keeton W, Miles E, Canning D, Ideker KG (2001) Potential consequence of climate variability and change for the Pacific Northwest. In: The potential consequences of climate variability and change: foundation report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Payne JT, Wood AW, Hamlet AF, Palmer RN, Lettenmaier DP (2004) Mitigating the effects of climate change on the water resources of the Columbia River basin. Clim Change 62(1–3):233–256
Schruben PG, Arndt RE, Baweic WJ (1998) Geology of the conterminous United States at 1:2,500,000 scale – a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map. US Geological Survey Digital Data Series 11, Release 2 http://pubs.usgs.gov/dds/dds11/kb.html last accessed 8/23/06
Service R (2004) As the West goes dry. Science 303:1124–1127
Sherrod DR, Smith JG (1989) Preliminary map of upper Eocene to Holocene volcanic and related rocks of the Cascade Range, Oregon. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 89–14
Sherrod DR, Taylor EM et al (2004) Geologic map of the bend 30- × 60-minute quadrangle, Central Oregon. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington
Sinokrot BA, Stefan HG (1993) Stream temperature dynamics: measurement and modeling. Water Resour Res 29:2299–2312
Sinokrot BA, Stefan HG, McCormick JH, Eaton JG (1995) Modeling of climate change effects on stream temperatures and fish habitats below dams and near groundwater inputs. Clim Change 30:181–200
Swanson FJ, James ME (1975) Geomorphic history of the lower Blue River-Lookout Creek area, Western Cascades, Oregon. Northwest Science 49(1):1–11
Tague CL, Band LE (2001a) Simulating the impact of road construction and forest harvesting on hydrologic response. Earth Surf Processes Landf 26:135–151
Tague CL, Band LE (2001b) Evaluating explicit and implicit routing for catchment scale models of forest hydrology. Hydrologic Processes 15:1415–1439
Tague C, Band LE (2004) RHESSys: regional hydro-ecologic simulation system: an object-oriented approach to spatially distributed modeling of carbon, water and nutrient cycling. Earth Interact 8(19):1–42
Tague CL, Grant G (2004) A geological framework for interpreting the low flow regimes of Cascade streams, Willamette River Basin, Oregon. Water Resour Res 40:W04303, doi: 10.1029/2003WR002629
Walker GW, MacLeod NS (1991) Geologic map of Oregon; U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, 2 sheets, Scale = 1:500,000
Wigmosta M, Vail L, Lettenmaier D (1994) Distributed hydrology-vegetation model for complex terrain. Water Resour Res 30(6):1665–1679
Wood AW, Leung LR, Sridhar V, Lettenmaier DP (2004) Hydrologic implications of dynamical and statistical approaches to downscaling climate model outputs. Clim Change 62(1–3):189–216
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tague, C., Grant, G., Farrell, M. et al. Deep groundwater mediates streamflow response to climate warming in the Oregon Cascades. Climatic Change 86, 189–210 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9294-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9294-8