Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Going to extremes: propositions on the social response to severe climate change

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The growing literature on potentially-dangerous climate change is examined and research on human response to natural hazards is analyzed to develop propositions on social response pathways likely to emerge in the face of increasingly severe climate change. A typology of climate change severity is proposed and the potential for mal-adaptive responses examined. Elements of a warning system for severe climate change are briefly considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger WN, Agrawala S, Mirza MMQ et al (2007) Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP et al (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 717–743

    Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Dessai S, Goulden M et al (2008) Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Clim Change 93:335–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnell N, Tompkins E, Adger N et al (2005) Vulnerability to abrupt climate change in Europe. Technical Report 34. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Norwich

  • Babbitt B (2005) Cities in the wilderness: a new vision of land use in America. Island, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker EJ, McPhee JG (1975) Land use management and regulation in hazardous areas: a research assessment. Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Basher R (2006) Global early warning systems for natural hazards: systematic and people-centred. Phil Trans R Soc 364:2167–2182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bow B, Bomar G, Cotton WR et al (2004) The weather modification association’s response to the national research council’s report titled, ‘Critical issues in weather modification research’. Weather Modification Association, Fresno. Available http://weathermodification.org/wma_response.htm

  • Bowden M, Kates R, Kay P et al (1981) The effect of climate fluctuations on human populations: Two hypotheses. In: Farmer M, Ingram M, Wigley T (eds) Climate and history. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 479–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Burby R (2006) Hurricane Katrina and the paradoxes of government disaster policy: bringing about wise governmental decisions for hazardous areas. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 604:171–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton I (1996) The growth of adaptation capacity: practice and policy. In: Smith JB, Bhatti N, Menzhulin G et al (eds) Adapting to climate change. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton I, Kates RW, White GF (1968) The environment as hazard. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter TR, Jones RN, Lu X et al (2007) New assessment methods and the characterisation of future conditions. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP et al (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 133–171

    Google Scholar 

  • CCSP (2008a) Abrupt climate change. A report by the US Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research [Clark PU, Weaver AJ (coordinating lead authors). In: Brook E, Cook ER, Delworth TL et al (eds) (chapter lead authors)]. US Geological Survey, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  • CCSP (2008b) Weather and climate extremes in a changing climate. In: Karl TR, Meehl GA, Miller CD et al (eds) Regions of focus: North America, Hawaii, Caribbean, and US Pacific Islands. A report by the US Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research. Department of Commerce, NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Abrupt Climate Change (2002) Abrupt climate change: inevitable surprises. National Research Council, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton WR, Pielke RA Sr (1995) Human impacts on weather and climate. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter S (2001) American hazardscapes: the regionalization of hazards and disasters. Joseph Henry Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen PJ (2006) Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: a contribution to resolve a policy dilemma? Clim Change 77:211–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dessai S, Adger WN, Hulme M et al (2004) Defining and experiencing dangerous climate change. Clim Change 64:11–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond J (2005) Collapse: how societies choose to fail or succeed. Penguin Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gertner J (2007) The future is drying up. NY Times Mag 21:68–77, 104, 154–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen JE (2007) Scientific reticence and sea level rise. Environ Res Lett 2:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme M (2006) Chaotic world of climate truth. BBC News, November 4. Available http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6115644.stm

  • Hurricane Katrina External Review Panel (2007) The New Orleans hurricane protection system: What went wrong? American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston. Available www.asce.org/files/pdf/ERPreport.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Insurance Information Institute (2005) The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). New York. Available http://www.iii.org/media/hottopics/insurance/nfip/

  • Insurance Information Institute (2007) Catastrophes: insurance issues. New York. Available http://www.iii.org/media/hottopics/

  • IPCC (2007) Summary for policymakers of the synthesis report of the IPCC fourth assessment report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Available http://195.70.10.65/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr_spm.pdf

  • Jamieson D (1996) Ethics and intentional climate change. Clim Change 33:323–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates RW, Ausubel JH, Berberian M (1985) Climate impact assessment. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Kates RW, Colten CE, Laska S et al (2006) Reconstruction of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina: a research perspective. P Natl A Sci 103:14653–14660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg WW, Schneider SH (1974) Climate stabilization: for better or worse? Science 186:1163–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr RA (2007) Pushing the scary side of global warming. Science 316:1412–1415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther H (2006) Disaster mitigation and insurance: learning from Katrina. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 604:208–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther H, Michel-Kerjan E (2007) Climate change, insurability, and liability. U Penn Law Rev 155:1795–1842

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiserowitz A (2007) Communicating the risks of global warming: American risk perceptions, affective images and interpretive communities. In: Moser S, Dilling L (eds) Creating a climate for change: communicating climate change and facilitating social change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 44–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Liverman D (2008) Assessing impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: reflections on the working group II report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Global Environ Chang 18:4–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meehl GA, Hu A (2006) Megadroughts in the Indian Monsoon region and Southwest North America and a mechanism for associated multidecadal Pacific sea surface temperature anomalies. J Climate 19:1605–1621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meehl GA, Stocker TF, Collins WD, Friedlingstein P, Gaye AT, Gregory JM, Kitoh A, Knutti R, Murphy JM, Noda A, Raper SCB, Watterson IG, Weaver AJ, Zhao ZC (2007) Global climate projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 747–845

    Google Scholar 

  • Mileti D (1999) Disasters by design: a reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Joseph Henry Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney C (2007) Storm world: hurricanes, politics and the battle over global warming. Harcourt, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison D, Chapman CR, Steel D et al (2004) Impacts and the public: communicating the nature of the impact hazard In: Belton MJS, Morgan TH, Samarasinha NH et al (eds) Mitigation of hazardous comets and asteroids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • NAS (1992) Policy implications of greenhouse warming: mitigation, adaptation, and the science base. Panel on Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 433–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls RJ, Tol RSJ (2006) Impacts and responses to sea-level rise: a global analysis of the SRES scenarios over the 21st century. Philos Trans R Soc A 361:1073–1095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NRC (2003) Critical issues in weather modification research. Committee on the Status and Future Directions in US Weather Modification Research and Operations. National Research Council, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer M, O’Neill BC, Webster M et al (2007) The limits of consensus. Science 317:1505–1506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palm R (1981) Real estate agents and special studies zones disclosure: the response of California home buyers to earthquake hazards information. Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, Monograph No. 32, Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry M (2001) Climate change: where should our research priorities be? Global Environ Chang 11:257–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry ML, Arnell N, McMichael T et al (2001) Millions at risk: defining critical climate change threats and targets. Global Environ Chang 11:181–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry ML, Lowe J, Hanson C (2009) Overshoort, adapt, and recover. Nature 458:1102–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penning-Rowsell E, Johnson C, Tunstall S (2006) ‘Signals’ from pre-crisis discourse: lessons from UK flooding for global environmental policy change? Global Environ Chang 16:323–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pielke RA Jr (2007) Future economic damage from tropical cyclones: sensitivities to societal and climate changes. Philos Trans R Soc A 365:2717–2729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pielke RA Jr, Gratz J, Landsea CW et al (2008) Normalized hurricane damages in the United States: 1900–2005. Nat Hazards Rev 9:29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platt RH (1999) Disasters and democracy: the politics of extreme natural events. Island, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt RH (2007) Comments on the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) evaluation final report. Natutal Hazards Observer November:11–12

  • Posner R (2006) Catastrophe: risk and response. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyne SJ (1997) Fire in America: a cultural history of wildland and rural fire. University of Washington Press, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  • Riebsame WE, Changnon SA, Karl TR (1991) Drought and natural resources management in the United States. Westview, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Risbey JS (2008) The new climate discourse: alarmist or alarming? Global Environ Chang 18:26–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robock A (2008) 20 reasons why geoengineering may be a bad idea. Bull Atomic Scientists 64(2):14–18, 59. doi:10.2968/064002006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe GH, Baker MB (2007) Why is climate sensitivity so unpredictable? Science 318:629–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schar C, Vidale PL, Luthi D et al (2004) The role of increasing temperature variability in European summer heatwaves. Nature 427:332–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schellnhuber HJ, Cramer W, Nakicenovic N et al (2006) Avoiding dangerous climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider SH (2001) Earth system engineering and management. Nature 409:417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider SH (2004) Abrupt non-linear climate change, irreversibility and surprise. Global Environ Chang 14:245–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider SH, Lane J (2006) An overview of ‘dangerous’ climate change. In: Schellnhuber HJ, Cramer W, Nakicenovic N et al (eds) Avoiding dangerous climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 7–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider SH, Kuntz-Duriseti K, Azar C (2000) Costing non-linearities, surprises, and irreversible events. Pac Asian J Energy 10:81–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider SH, Semenov S, Patwardhan A et al (2007) Assessing key vulnerabilities and the risk from climate change. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP et al (eds) Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 779–810

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider SH (2009) The worst-case scenario. Nature 458:1104–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seager R, Ting MF, Held IM et al (2007) Model projections of an imminent transition to a more arid climate in southwestern North America. Science 316:1181–1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen C, Wang WC, Zhixin Hao Z et al (2007) Exceptional drought events over eastern China during the last five centuries. Clim Change 85:453–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smil V (2008) Global catastrophes and trends: the next fifty years. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JB, Schellnhuber HJ, Mirza MMQ (2001) Vulnerability to climate change and reasons for concern: a synthesis. In: McCarthy JJ, Canziana OF, Leary NA et al (eds) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 914–967

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JB, Schneider SH, Oppenheimer M et al (2009) Assessing dangerous climate change through an update of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC) ‘reasons for concern.’ P Natl A Sci 106:4133–4137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen JH (2000) Hazard warning systems: review of 20 years of progress. Nat Hazards Rev 1: 119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorkin AL (1982) Economic aspects of natural hazards. Lexington Books, Lexington

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg T (2000) Acts of God: the unnatural history of natural disaster in America. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern PC, Easterling WE (1999) Making climate forecasts matter. National Academy Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Stott PA, Stone DA, Allen MR (2004) Human contribution to the European heatwave of 2003. Nature 432:610–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tebaldi C, Hayhow K, Arblaster JM et al (2006) Going to extremes: An intercomparison of model-simulated historical and future changes in extreme events. Clim Change 79:185–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Heerden I, Bryan M (2006) The storm: what went wrong and why during Hurricane Katrina. Viking, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren R (2006) The impacts of global climate change at different annual mean global temperature increases. In: Schellnhuber HJ, Cramer W, Nakicenovic N et al (eds) Avoiding dangerous climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 93–131

    Google Scholar 

  • White GF (1945) Human adjustment to floods: a geographical approach to the flood problems of the United States. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • White GF, Haas JE (1975) Assessment of research on natural hazards. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigley TML (2006) A combined mitigation/geoengineering approach to climate stabilization. Science 314:452–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willoughby HE, Rappaport EN, Marks FD (2007) Hurricane forecasting: the state of the art. Nat Hazards Rev 7:45–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamin F, Smith JB, Burton I (2006) Perspectives on ‘dangerous anthropogenic interference.’ Or how to operationalize Article 2 of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. In: Schellnhuber HJ, Cramer W, Nakicenovic N et al (eds) Avoiding dangerous climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 81–91

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William R. Travis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Travis, W.R. Going to extremes: propositions on the social response to severe climate change. Climatic Change 98, 1–19 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9661-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9661-8

Keywords

Navigation