Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Energy and CO2 analysis of wood substitution in construction

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Comparative analysis of the energy and carbon balances of wood vs. non-wood products is a complex issue. In this paper we discuss the definition of an appropriate functional unit and the establishment of effective system boundaries in terms of activity, time and space, with an emphasis on the comparison of buildings. The functional unit can be defined at the level of building component, complete building, or services provided by the built environment. Energy use or carbon emissions per unit of mass or volume of material is inadequate as a functional unit because equal masses or volumes of different materials do not fulfil the same function. Activity-based system boundaries include life cycle processes such as material production, product operation, and post-use material management. If the products compared are functionally equivalent, such that the impacts occurring during the operation phase are equal, we suggest that this phase may be dropped from the analysis allowing a focus on material flows. The use of wood co-products as biofuel can be analytically treated through system expansion, and compared to an alternative of providing the same energy service with fossil fuels. The assumed production of electricity used for material processing is another important energy-related issue, and we suggest that using marginal production data is more appropriate than average production. Temporal system boundaries include such aspects of the wood life cycle as the dynamics of forest growth including regeneration and saturation, the availability of residue biofuels at different times, and the duration of carbon storage in products. The establishment of spatial boundaries can be problematic, because using wood-based materials instead of non-wood materials requires more land area to capture solar energy and accumulate biomass. We discuss several possible approaches to meet this challenge, including the intensification of land use to increase the time rate of biomass production. Finally, we discuss issues related to scaling up an analysis of wood substitution from the micro-level to the macro-level of national, regional or global.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adalberth K (2000) Energy use and environmental impact of new residential buildings. PhD dissertation, Department of Building Physics, Lund University of Technology, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Björklund T, Tillman A-M (1997) LCA of building frame structures: environmental impact over the life cycle of wooden and concrete frames. Technical Environmental Planning Report 1997:2, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden

  • Börjesson P, Gustavsson L (2000) Greenhouse gas balances in building construction: wood versus concrete from lifecycle and forest land-use perspectives. Energy Policy 28(9):575–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd CW, Koch P, McKean HB, Morschauser CR, Preston SB (1976) Wood for structural and architectural purposes: panel II report, committee on renewable resources for industrial materials. Wood Fiber Sci 8(1):3–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan AH, Honey BG (1994) Energy and carbon dioxide implications of building construction. Energy Build 20(3):205–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan AH, Levine SB (1999) Wood-based building materials and atmospheric carbon emissions. Environ Sci Policy 2(6):427–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole RJ, Kernan PC (1996) Life-cycle energy use in office buildings. Build Environ 31(4):307–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodoo A, Gustavsson L, Sathre R (2009) Carbon implications of end-of-life management of building materials. Resour Conserv Recycl 53(5):276–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson L, Gustavsson L (2010) Comparative analysis of wood chips and bundles: costs, carbon dioxide emissions, dry-matter losses and allergic reactions. Biomass Bioenergy 34(1):82–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson E, Gillespie A, Gustavsson L, Langvall O, Olsson M, Sathre R, Stendahl J (2007) Integrated carbon analysis of forest management practices and wood substitution. Can J For Res 37(3):671–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fossdal S (1995) Energi- og Miljøregnskap for bygg (Energy and environmental accounts of building construction). Report 173, The Norwegian Institute of Building Research, Oslo (in Norwegian)

  • Franklin Associates (2004) An analysis of the methods used to address the carbon cycle in wood and paper product CLA studies. Report No. 04-03, National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, 63 pp

  • Gajda J, Miller FM (2000) Concrete as a sink for atmospheric CO2: a literature review and estimation of CO2 absorption by Portland cement concrete. R&D Serial no 2255, Portland Cement Association, Skokie

  • Gartner E (2004) Industrially interesting approaches to “low-CO2” cements. Cem Concr Res 34(9):1489–1498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson L, Sathre R (2004) Embodied energy and CO2 emission of wood- and concrete-framed buildings in Sweden. In: Proceedings of the 2nd world conference on biomass for energy, industry and climate protection, 10–14 May, Rome, Italy

  • Gustavsson L, Karlsson Å (2006) CO2 mitigation: on methods and parameters for comparison of fossil-fuel and biofuel systems. Mitig Adapt Strategies Glob Chang 11(5–6):935–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson L, Sathre R (2006) Variability in energy and carbon dioxide balances of wood and concrete building materials. Build Environ 41(7):940–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson L, Joelsson A (2008) Life cycle primary energy analysis of residential buildings. In: Joelsson A (ed) Primary energy efficiency and CO2 mitigation in residential buildings. PhD dissertation, Ecotechnology and Environmental Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Östersund

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson L, Madlener R, Hoen H-F, Jungmeier G, Karjalainen T, Klöhn S, Mahapatra K, Pohjola J, Solberg B, Spelter H (2006a) The role of wood material for greenhouse gas mitigation. Mitig Adapt Strategies Glob Chang 11(5–6):1097–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson L, Pingoud K, Sathre R (2006b) Carbon dioxide balance of wood substitution: comparing concrete- and wood-framed buildings. Mitig Adapt Strategies Glob Chang 11(3):667–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmgren K, Eriksson E, Olsson O, Olsson M, Hillring B, Parikka M (2007) Biofuels and climate neutrality: system analysis of production and utilisation. Elforsk Report 07:35

    Google Scholar 

  • IFIAS (International Federation of Institutes for Advanced Study) (1974) Energy analysis. Report No 6 on Energy Analysis Workshop on Methodology and Conventions, 25–30 August, Guldsmedshyttan, Sweden

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007) Climate change 2007: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report. Available online: http://www.ipcc.ch/. Accessed 25 November 2008

  • Johnson LR, Lippke B, Marshall JD, Comnick J (2005) Life-cycle impacts of forest resource activities in the Pacific Northwest and Southeast United States. Wood Fiber Sci 37:30–46 (CORRIM Special Issue)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungmeier G, Werner F, Jarnehammar A, Hohenthal C, Richter K (2002) Allocation in LCA of wood-based products: experiences of COST Action E9—Part I, methodology. Int J LCA 7(5):290–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kibert CJ (2003) Deconstruction: the start of a sustainable materials strategy for the built environment. UNEP Indust Environ 26(2–3):84–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch P (1992) Wood versus nonwood materials in US residential construction: some energy-related global implications. For Prod J 42(5):31–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotaji S, Schuurmans A, Edwards S (2003) Life-cycle assessment in building and construction: a state-of-the-art report. SETAC, Pensacola

    Google Scholar 

  • Künniger T, Richter K (1995) Life cycle analysis of utility poles: a Swiss case study. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international wood preservation symposium, 6–7 February, Cannes-Mandelieu, France, 10 pp

  • Kurz WA, Beukema SJ, Apps MJ (1998) Carbon budget implications of the transition from natural to managed disturbance regimes in forest landscapes. Mitig Adapt Strategies Glob Chang 2(4):405–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2005) Forest soils and carbon sequestration. For Ecol Manag 220(1–3):242–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippke B, Edmonds L (2006) Environmental performance improvement in residential construction: the impact of products, biofuels, and processes. For Prod J 56(10):58–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippke B, Wilson J, Perez-Garcia J, Boyer J, Meil J (2004) CORRIM: life-cycle environmental performance of renewable building materials. For Prod J 54(6):8–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippke B, Comnick J, Johnson LR (2005) Environmental performance index for the forest. Wood Fiber Sci 37:149–155 (CORRIM Special Issue)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marland G (2008) Uncertainties in accounting for CO2 from fossil fuels. J Ind Ecol 12(2):136–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meil J, Wilson J, O’Connor J, Dangerfield J (2007) An assessment of wood product processing technology advancements between the CORRIM I and II studies. For Prod J 57(7–8):83–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Garcia J, Lippke B, Briggs D, Wilson JB, Boyer J, Meil J (2005a) The environmental performance of renewable building materials in the context of residential construction. Wood Fiber Sci 37:3–17 (CORRIM Special Issue)

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Garcia J, Lippke B, Comnick J, Manriquez C (2005b) An assessment of carbon pools, storage, and wood products market substitution using life-cycle analysis results. Wood Fiber Sci 37:140–148 (CORRIM Special Issue)

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen AK, Solberg B (2002) Greenhouse gas emissions, life-cycle inventory and cost-efficiency of using laminated wood instead of steel construction. Case: beams at Gardermoen airport. Environ Sci Policy 5(2):169–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen AK, Solberg B (2003) Substitution between floor constructions in wood and natural stone: comparison of energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, and costs over the life cycle. Can J For Res 33(6):1061–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen AK, Solberg B (2004) Greenhouse gas emissions and costs over the life cycle of wood and alternative flooring materials. Clim Change 64(1–2):143–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pingoud K, Perälä A-L (2000) Studies on greenhouse impacts of wood construction. 1. Scenario analysis of potential wood utilisation in Finnish new construction in 1990 and 1994. 2. Inventory of carbon stock of wood products in the Finnish building stock in 1980, 1990 and 1995. Publication 840, Technical Research Centre of Finland, VTT Julkaisuja, Espoo (in Finnish, summary in English)

  • Pingoud K, Pohjola J, Valsta L (2010) Assessing the integrated climatic impacts of forestry and wood products. Silva Fenn 44(1):155–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Puettmann ME, Wilson JB (2005) Life-cycle analysis of wood products: cradle-to-gate LCI of residential wood building materials. Wood Fiber Sci 37:18–29 (CORRIM Special Issue)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reijnders L (2006) Conditions for the sustainability of biomass based fuel use. Energy Policy 34(7):863–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sathre R (2007) Life-cycle energy and carbon implications of wood-based materials and construction. PhD dissertation, Ecotechnology and Environmental Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Östersund

    Google Scholar 

  • Sathre R, Gustavsson L (2006) Energy and carbon balances of wood cascade chains. Resour Conserv Recycl 47(4):332–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sathre R, Gustavsson L (2007) Effects of energy and carbon taxes on building material competitiveness. Energy Build 39(4):488–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sathre R, O’Connor J (2008) A synthesis of research on wood products and greenhouse gas impacts. Technical Report TR-19, FPInnovations, Forintek Division, Vancouver, BC, Canada

  • Sathre R, O’Connor J (2010) Meta-analysis of greenhouse gas displacement factors of wood product substitution. Environ Sci Policy 13(2):104–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharai-Rad M, Welling J (2002) Environmental and energy balances of wood products and substitutes. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Available online: http://www.fao.org/. Accessed 29 August 2007

  • Schlamadinger B, Marland G (1996) The role of forest and bioenergy strategies in the global carbon cycle. Biomass Bioenergy 10(5–6):275–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlamadinger B, Apps M, Bohlin F, Gustavsson L, Jungmeier G, Marland G, Pingoud K, Savolainen I (1997) Towards a standard methodology for greenhouse gas balances of bioenergy systems in comparison with fossil energy systems. Biomass Bioenergy 13(6):359–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjödin J, Grönkvist S (2004) Emissions accounting for use and supply of electricity in the Nordic market. Energy Policy 32(13):1555–1564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan G (1998) Evaluation of land use in life cycle assessment. Report 1998:2, Centre for Environmental Assessment of Product and Material Systems, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden

  • UNECE/FAO (2000) Temperate and boreal forest resources assessment. Available online: http://www.unece.org/trade/timber/fra/welcome.htm. Accessed 25 September 2007

  • Upton B, Miner R, Spinney M, Heath LS (2008) The greenhouse gas and energy impacts of using wood instead of alternatives in residential construction in the United States. Biomass Bioenergy 32(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weidema B, Wenzel H, Petersen C, Hansen K (2004) The product, functional unit and reference flows in LCA. Environmental News, No 70, Danish Ministry of the Environment

  • Werner F, Taverna R, Hofer P, Richter K (2005) Carbon pool and substitution effects of an increased use of wood in buildings in Switzerland: first estimates. Ann For Sci 62(8):889–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner F, Althaus H-J, Richter K, Scholz RW (2007) Post-consumer waste wood in attributive product LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(3):160–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winistorfer P, Chen Z, Lippke B, Stevens N (2005) Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions related to the use, maintenance, and disposal of a residential structure. Wood Fiber Sci 37:128–139 (CORRIM Special Issue)

    Google Scholar 

  • Worrell E, van Heijningen RJJ, de Castro JFM, Hazewinkel JHO, de Beer JG, Faau APC, Vringer K (1994) New gross energy requirement figures for material production. Energy 19(6):627–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaro B (1997) Life-cycle thinking for wood and paper products. In: Wood in our future: the role of life-cycle analysis: proceedings of a symposium. National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC, pp 11–16

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ecotechnology, Mid Sweden University, 831 25, Östersund, Sweden

    Leif Gustavsson & Roger Sathre

  2. Linnaeus University, 35 195, Växjö, Sweden

    Leif Gustavsson

Authors
  1. Leif Gustavsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roger Sathre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leif Gustavsson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gustavsson, L., Sathre, R. Energy and CO2 analysis of wood substitution in construction. Climatic Change 105, 129–153 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9876-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9876-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation