Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modelling probability of rainfall-induced shallow landslides in a changing climate, Otta, Central Norway

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analyse slope stability conditions for shallow landslides under an extreme precipitation regime with regard to present and future scenarios, in order to first study the effect of changes in precipitation on stability conditions, considering uncertainty in the model parameters, and second to evaluate which factors contribute the most to model output and uncertainty. We used a coupled hydrological-stability model to study the hydrological control on shallow landslides in different precipitation regimes, with reference to the case study of Otta, located in central east Norway. We included a wide range of climatic settings, taking intensity, duration of the extreme events and two different antecedent precipitation conditions into account. Eleven future scenarios were determined using results of down-scaled meteorological models. Considering the uncertainty in the soil parameters, we used the Monte Carlo approach and probability of failure resulting from 5,000 trials was calculated for each precipitation scenario. In unstable areas the probabilities of failure at present and future conditions were compared using a bootstrapping method. Sensitivity analysis was carried out to understand how variations in input parameters influence the output of the selected model. The results show changes in the modelled stability conditions only if the effect of antecedent precipitation is not taken into account. The uncertainties in the predicted extreme precipitation events, soil parameters, and antecedent precipitation conditions do not allow any accurate estimation of changes in stability conditions for shallow landslides.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexandersson H, Førland EJ, Helminen J, Sjöblom N, Tveito OE (2001) Extreme value analysis in the Nordic countries. Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Olso, Norway. Report 13/01 Klima

  • Baecher GB, Christian JT (2003) Reliability and statistics in geotechnical engineering. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bathurst JC, Moretti G, El-Hames A, Moaven-Hashemi A, Burton A (2005) Scenario modelling of basin-scale, shallow landslide sediment yield, Valsassina, Italian Southern Alps. Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 5:189–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven KJ, Kirkby MJ (1979) A physically base, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrolog Sci Bull 24(1):43–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borga M, Fontana GD, Cazorzi F (2002) Analysis of topographic and climatic control on rainfall-triggered shallow landsliding using a quasi-dynamic wetness index. J Hydrol 268(1–4):56–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell RH (1974) Debris flows originating from soil slip during rainstorms in Southern California. Q J Eng Geol Hydrol 7(4):339–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrara A, Crosta G, Frattini P (2008) Comparing models of debris-flow susceptibility in the alpine environment. Geomorphology 94(3–4):353–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casadei M, Dietrich WE, Miller NL (2003) Testing a model for prediction of the timing and location for shallow landslide initiation in soul-mantled landscape. Earth Surf Process Landforms 28:925–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung CF, Fabbri AG (1999) Probabilistic prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 65(12):1389–1399

    Google Scholar 

  • Collison A, Wade S, Griffiths J, Dehn M (2000) Modelling the impact of predicted climate change on landslide frequency and magnitude in SE England. Eng Geol 55:205–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosta GB (1998) Regionalization of rainfall thresholds: an aid to landslide hazard evaluation. Environ Geol 35(2–3):131–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosta GB, Frattini P (2001) Rainfall thresholds for triggering soil slips and debris flow. In: Proceedings of EGS 2nd Plinius Conference 2000, Mediterranean Storms, Siena: 463–488

  • Crosta GB, Frattini P (2008) Rainfall-induced landslides and debris flows. Hydrolog Process 22:473–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslides types and processes. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides: investigation and mitigation. Transportation Research Board Special Report 247. National Academy Press, WA, 36–75

  • Davison A, Hinkley D (1997) Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehn M (1999) Application of an analog downscaling technique to the assessment of future landslide activity—a case study in the Italian Alps. Clim Res 13(2):103–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehn M, Buma J (1999) Modelling future landslide activity based on general circulation models. Geomorphology 30:175–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehn M, Burger G, Buma J, Gasparetto P (2000) Impact of climate change on slope stability using expanded downscaling. Eng Geol 55:193–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dikau R, Schrott L (1999) The temporal stability and activity of landslides in Europe with respect to climatic change (TESLEC): main objectives and results. Geomorphology 30:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon N, Brook E (2007) Impact of predicted climate change on landslide reactivation: case study of Mam Tor, UK. Landslides 4:137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Odorico P, Fagherazzi S (2003) A probabilistic model of rainfall-triggered shallow landslides in hollow: a long-term analysis. Water Resour Res 39(9):1262–1275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Odorico P, Fagherazzi S, Rigon R (2005) Potential for landsliding: dependence on hyetograph characteristics. J Geophys Res 110(F1):F01007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flageollet JC, Maquaire O, Martin B, Weber D (1999) Landslides and climatic conditions in the Barcelonnette and Vars basins (Southern French Alps, France). Geomorphology 30:65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Førland EJ (1987) Beregning av ekstrem nedbør (Estimation of extreme precipitation). Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway. DNMI report 23/87 Klima. In Norwegian

  • Førland EJ, Kristoffersen D (1989) Estimation of extreme precipitation in Norway. Nord Hydrol 20:257–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Frattini P, Crosta G, Sosio R (2009) Approaches for defining thresholds and return periods for rainfall-triggered shallow landslides. Hydrolog Process 23(10):1444–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey HC, Patil SR (2002) Identification and review of sensitivity analysis methods. Risk Anal 22(3):553–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glade T (2000) Modelling landslide-triggering rainfalls in different regions in New Zealand—the soil water status mode. Z Geomorphol 122:63–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Godt JW, Baum RL, Savage WZ, Salciarini D, Schulz WH, Harp EL (2008) Transient deterministic shallow landslide modeling: requirements for susceptibility and hazard assessments in a GIS framework. Eng Geol 102(3–4):214–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Peruccacci S, Rossi M, Stark CP (2007) Rainfall thresholds for the initiation of landslides in central and southern Europe. Meteorol Atmos Phys 98(3–4):239–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris C (1977) Engineering properties, groundwater conditions, and the nature of soil movement on a solifluction slope in North Norway. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 10:27–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho DYF, Fredlund DG (1982) A multi-stage triaxial test for unsaturated soils. Geotech Test J 5:18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homma T, Saltelli A (1996) Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis for nonlinear models. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 52:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iman RL, Helton JC, Campbell JE (1981) An approach to sensitivity analysis of computer models, Part 1. Introduction, input variable selection and preliminary variable assessment. J Qual Technol 13(3):174–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Iverson RM (2000) Landslide triggering by rain infiltration. Water Resour Res 36:1897–1910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacques J, Lavergne C, Devictor N (2006) Sensitivity analysis in presence of model uncertainty and correlated input. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91(10–11):1126–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaedicke C, Solheim A, Blikra LH, Stalsberg K, Sorteberg A, Aaheim A, Kronholm K, Vikhamar-Schuler D, Isaksen K, Sletten K, Kristensen K, Barstad I, Melchiorre C, Høydal ØA, Mestl H (2008) Spatial and temporal variations of Norwegian geohazards in a changing climate, the GeoExtreme project. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 8:893–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jomelli V, Pech VP, Chochillon C, Brunstein D (2004) Geomorphic variations of debris flows and recent climatic change in the French Alps. Clim Chang 64:77–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jomelli V, Brunstein D, Grancher D, Pech P (2007) Is the response of hill slope debris flows to recent climate change univocal? A case study in the Massif des Ecrins (French Alps). Clim Chang 85:119–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jomelli V, Brunstein D, Déqué M, Vrac M, Grancher D (2009) Impacts of future climatic change (2070–2099) on the potential occurrence of debris flows: a case study in the Massif des Ecrins (French Alps). Clim Chang 97:171–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay MD, Conover WJ, Beckman RJ (1979) Comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21:239–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DR, Dietrich WE (1994) A physically based model for the topographic control on shallow landsliding. Water Resour Res 30:1153–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakicenovic N, Alcamo J, Davis G, de Vries B, Fenhann J, Gaffin S, Gregory K, Grübler A, Jung TY, Kram T, Lebre La Rovere E, Michaelis L, Mori S, Morita T, Pepper W, Pitcher H, Price L, Riahi K, Roehrl A, Rogner H, Sankovski A, Schlesinger M, Shukla P, Smith S, Swart R, van Rooijen S, Victor N, Dadi Z (2000) Special report on emission scenario: a special report of working group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • NERC (1975) Flood studies report, vol. II. Meteorological studies. National Environment Research Council, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Phoon KK, Kulhawy FH (1999) Characterization of geotechnical variability. Can Geotech J 36:612–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plate T, Bert J, Band P (2000) Visualizing the function computed by a feed-forward neural network. Neural Comput 12(6):1337–1354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls WJ, Brakensiek DL, Miller N (1983) Green-Amp infiltration parameters from soil data. J Hydraul Eng 109:62–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebetez M, Lugon R, Baeriswyl PA (1997) Climatic change and debris flows in high mountain regions: the case of the Ritigraben torrent (Swiss Alps). Clim Change 36:371–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosso R, Rulli MC, Vannucchi G (2006) A physically based model for the hydrologic control on shallow landsliding. Water Resour Res 42:W06410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli A (2002) Sensitivity analysis for importance assessment. Risk Anal 22(3):579–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandersen F, Bakkehøi S, Hesten E, Lied K (1996) The influence of meteorological factors on the initiation of debris-flows, rockfalls, rockslides and rockmass stability. Landslide. Proceeding of the seventh international symposium on landslides, June 1996, Trondheim. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam

  • Schmidt J, Dikau R (2004) Modeling historical climate variability and slope stability. Geomorphology 60:433–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt M, Glade T (2003) Linking global circulation model outputs to regional geomorphic models: a case study of landslide activity in New Zealand. Clim Res 25(2):135–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simoni S, Fabrizio Z, Giacomo B, Riccardo R (2008) Modelling the probability of occurrence of shallow landslides and channelized debris flows using GEOtop-FS. Hydrolog Process 22(4):532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skempton AW, De Lory FA (1957) Stability of natural slopes in London Clay. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering 2, London

  • Sletten K, Blikra LH (2007) Holocene colluvial (debris-flow and water-flow) processes in eastern Norway: stratigraphy, chronology and palaeoenvironmental implications. J Quaternary Sci 22:619–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobol IM (1993) Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models. Math Model Comput Exp 1:407–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorteberg A, Andersen MS (2008) Regional precipitation and temperature changes for Norway 2011 and 2026. Results from 11 simulations using 8 European regional models. Report Series of the Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research. BCCR Report No 28

  • Stoffel M, Bollschweiler M, Beniston M (2011) Rainfall characteristics for periglacial debris flows in the Swiss Alps: past incidences–potential future evolutions. Clim Change 105(1–2):263–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarboton DG (1997) A new method for the determination of flow direction and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models. Water Resour Res 33:309–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terlien MTJ (1998) The determination of statistical and deterministic hydrological landslide-triggering thresholds. Environ Geol 35(2–3):124–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Beek R (2002) Assessment of the influence of changes in land use and climate on landslide activity in a Mediterranean environment. Netherlands Geographical Studies 294, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • van Beek LPH, van Asch TWJ (2004) Regional assessment of the effects of land-use change on landslide hazard by means of physically based modelling. Nat Hazards 31(1):289–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieczorek GF, Glade T (2005) Climatic factors influencing occurrence of debris-flows. In: Jacob M, Hungr O (eds) Debris-flow hazard and related phenomena. Springer, Berling, pp 325–362

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson PL, Anderson MG, Lloyd D (2002) An integrated hydrological model for rain-induced landslide prediction. Earth Surf Proc Land 27:1285–1297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RC, Wieczorek GF (1995) Rainfall thresholds for the initiation of debris flows at La Honda, California. Environ Eng Geosci 1(1):11–27

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was realised within a post-doc scholarship, financially supported by the Norwegian Geological Survey (NGU) and the International Centre for Geohazards (ICG). We would like to thank Lars Harald Blikra, Kari Sletten, Knut Stalsberg and Asgeir Sorteberg for providing data and helpful suggestions. We are grateful to Giovanni B. Crosta for useful discussions about the analyses and the results. We would like to thank the three anonymous reviewers for the careful reading of the manuscript. Their comments have significantly improved the manuscript and the discussion. We really appreciate the help of Iain Henderson in reviewing the language.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caterina Melchiorre.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Melchiorre, C., Frattini, P. Modelling probability of rainfall-induced shallow landslides in a changing climate, Otta, Central Norway. Climatic Change 113, 413–436 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0325-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0325-0

Keywords

Navigation