Skip to main content
Log in

Introduction to normative multiagent systems

  • Published:
Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article introduces the research issues related to and definition of normative multiagent systems. It also describes the papers selected from NorMAS05 that are part of this double special issue and relates the papers to each other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Luck M, McBurney P, Shehory, O, Willmott, S (eds) (2005) Agent echnology: computing as interaction—a roadmap for agent-based computing.http://www.agentlink.org/roadmap/

  • Alchourròn CE, Bulygin E (1971) Normative systems. Springer

  • Alexander JC, Giesen B, Münch R, Smelser NJ (eds.) (1987) The micro-macro Link. University of California Press

  • Boella G, van der Torre L (2006a) A Game Theoretic Approach to Contracts in Multiagent Systems. IEEE Trans. SMC, Part C

  • Boella G, van der Torre L (2006b) Security Policies for Sharing Knowledge in Virtual Communities. IEEE Trans. SMC, Part A

  • Bond AH, Gasser L (1988) An Analysis of Problems and Research in DAI. In: Bond AH, Gasser L (eds) Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, pp 3–35

  • Broersen J, Dastani M, Hulstijn J, van der Torre L (2002) Goal generation in the BOID architecture. Cogn Sci Quarterly 2(3–4):428–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Conte R, Falcone R, Sartor G (1999) Introduction: Agents and norms: How to fill the gap? Artif Intell Law 1–15

  • Conte R, Gilbert N (1995) Computer Simulation for Social Theory. In: Conte R, Gilbert N (eds) Artificial societies: The computer simulation of social life, Chapter Computer Simulation for Social Theory, UCL Press, pp 1–18.

  • Gibbs JP (1965) Norms: The problem of definition and classification. The Am J Soci 70(5):586–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones A, Carmo J (2001) Deontic Logic and Contrary-to-Duties. In: Gabbay D (ed) Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Kluwer, pp 203–279

  • Makinson D, van der Torre L (2000) Input-output logics. J Philo Logic 29:383–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makinson D, van der Torre L (2001) Constraints for input-output logics.J Philo Logic 30(2):155–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makinson D, van der Torre L (2003) Permissions from an input\output perspective. J Philo Logic 32(4):391–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster OnLine (2005) The language center. http://www.m-w.com/

  • Meyer J-J, Wieringa R (eds.) (1993) Deontic Logic in Computer Science: Normative system specification. Wiley

  • Ossowski S (1999) Co-ordination in Artificial Agent Societies. Springer

  • Searle JR (1995) The Construction of Social Reality. The Free Press

  • Shoham Y, Tennenholtz M (1992) On the synthesis of useful social laws for artificial agent societies (Preliminary Report). In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. San Jose, CA, pp 276–281

  • Therborn G (2002) Back to Norms! On the Scope and Dynamics of Norms and Normative Action. Current Sociology 50(6):863–880

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Torre L (2003) Contextual Deontic Logic: Normative agents, violations and independence. Ann Math Artifi Intelli 37(1\slash2):33–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Torre L, Tan Y (1999) Contrary-to-duty Reasoning with Preference-based Dyadic Obligations. Ann Math Artif Intelli 27:49–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhagen H (2000) Norm Autonomous Agents. Ph.D. thesis, Department of System and Computer Sciences, The Royal Institute of Technology and Stockholm University, Sweden

  • Verhagen H, Smit R (1996) Modelling Social Agents in a Multiagent World. In: Vande Velde W, Perram JW (eds) Position Papers MAAMAW 1996, Technical Report 96–1. Vrije Universiteit Brussel—Artificial Intelligence Laboratory

  • von Wright G (1951) Deontic logic 60:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge M (2002) An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems. Wiley

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harko Verhagen.

Additional information

Guido Boella received the PhD degree at the University of Torino in 2000.He is currently professor at the Department of Computer Science of the University of Torino. His research interests include multi-agent systems, in particular, normative systems, institutions and roles using qualitative decision theory.He is the co-chair of the firstworkshops on normative multi-agent systems (NorMas05), on coordination and organization (CoOrg05), and the AAAI Fall Symposium on roles (Roles05).

Leendert van der Torre received the Ph.D. degree in computer science fromErasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands, in 1997. He is currently a Full Professor at the University of Luxembourg. He has developed the so-called input/output logics and the BOID agent architecture. His current research interests include deontic logic, qualitative game theory, and security and coordination in normative multiagent systems.

Harko Verhagen received his Ph.D. degree in computer and systems sciences from Stockholm University (Sweden) in 2000 and is currently an associate professor at the department. His research has focussed on simulation of organizational behaviour, simulation as a scientific method, the use of sociological theories in multiagent systems research and more in particular theories on norms and autonomy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boella, G., van der Torre, L. & Verhagen, H. Introduction to normative multiagent systems. Comput Math Organiz Theor 12, 71–79 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-006-9537-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-006-9537-7

Keywords

Navigation