Abstract
An increasing number of species are becoming threatened by habitat loss and fragmentation. Therefore, solid estimates of the species’ abundance in the remaining populations are required to develop suitable conservation measures and to monitor their effectiveness. The capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus L.) has experienced a dramatic decline in central Europe and has disappeared from large areas of its former natural range. In Switzerland, the species’ distribution, habitat requirements and demographic status were studied and evaluated in an attempt to support appropriate management decisions to conserve the species. National surveys of the capercaillie in Switzerland have traditionally been obtained from male counts at leks. However, individual attendance to the lek is sex- and age-specific. Thus, male counts at leks may provide a biased estimate of local population sizes. In the present study, we compared two alternative indirect methods to estimate the sizes of local populations at eight study sites situated in the Alps and Prealps of Switzerland. We first assessed the sizes of local populations from the observed density and distribution of direct and indirect evidence of the species’ presence during field surveys. Feather and faeces samples collected during field surveys were genotyped at twelve nuclear microsatellite loci and a sex-specific nuclear gene fragment. Individual genotypes were used as genetic tags to estimate the sizes of the eight local populations using an urn model developed for small populations. The index of local population sizes assessed from field surveys was lower than the number of unique genotypes at each study site, which itself underestimated the abundances of populations in most cases. Based on our results, the genetic tagging method appeared to be less biased than the field survey method. However, an alternative faeces sampling scheme, resulting in 2–3 genotypings per individual, could further improve the accuracy of the size estimates of local populations. Our study confirms that genetic tagging methods are a valuable tool to estimate the sizes of local populations and to monitor the response of rare and elusive species to management actions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allendorf FW, Luikart G (2007) Conservation and the genetics of populations. Blackwell, Malden
Banks SC, Hoyle SD, Horsup A, Sunnucks P, Taylor AC (2003) Demographic monitoring of an entire species (the northern hairy-nosed wombat, Lasiorhinus krefftii) by genetic analysis of non-invasively collected material. Anim Conserv 6:101–107. doi:10.1017/S1367943003003135
Bantock TM, Prys-Jones RP, Lee PLM (2008) New and improved molecular sexing methods for museum bird specimens. Mol Ecol Res 8:519–528. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01999.x
Bellemain E, Swenson JE, Tallmon O, Brunberg S, Taberlet P (2005) Estimating population size of elusive animals with DNA from hunter-collected feces: four methods for brown bears. Conserv Biol 19:150–161. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00549.x
Bollmann K, Graf RF (2008) Wie beeinflussen Lebensraumangebot und -fragmentierung die Verbreitung von Lokalpopulationen beim Auerhun. Ornithol Beob 105:45–52
Bollmann K, Weibel P, Graf RF (2005) An analysis of central Alpine capercaillie spring habitat at the forest stand scale. For Ecol Manage 215:307–318. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.05.019
Bollmann K, Jenni L, Perrin N, Suter W (2008) Naturschutzforschung am Auerhuhn in der Schweiz: eine Übersicht. Ornithol Beob 105:5–17
Bradley BJ, Vigilant L (2002) False alleles derived from microbial DNA pose a potential source of error in microsatellite genotyping of DNA from faeces. Mol Ecol Notes 2:602–605. doi:10.1046/j.1471-8286.2002.00302.x
Bromaghin JF (2007) The genetic mark–recapture likelihood function of capwire. Mol Ecol 16:4883–4884. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03518.x
Darwall WRT, Dulvy NK (1996) An evaluation of the suitability of non-specialist volunteer researchers for coral reef fish surveys. Mafia Islands, Tanzania—a case study. Biol Conserv 78:223–231. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(95)00147-6
Davison A, Chiba S (2003) Laboratory temperature variation is a previously unrecognized source of genotyping error during capillary electrophoresis. Mol Ecol Notes 3:321–323. doi:10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00418.x
Eggert LS, Eggert JA, Woodruff DS (2003) Estimating population size for elusive animals: the forest elephant of Kakum National Park, Ghana. Mol Ecol 12:1389–1402. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01822.x
Fisher DO, Hoyle SD, Blomberg SP (2000) Population dynamics and survival of an endangered wallaby: a comparison of four methods. Ecol Appl 10:901–910. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0901:PDASOA]2.0.CO;2
Foster-Smith J, Evans SM (2003) The value of marine ecological data collected by volunteers. Biol Conserv 113:199–213. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00373-7
Frantz AC, Schaul M, Pope LC, Fack F, Schley L, Muller CP, Roper TJ (2004) Estimating population size by genotyping remotely plucked hair: the Eurasian badger. J Appl Ecol 41:985–995. doi:10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00951.x
Frantzen MAJ, Silk JB, Ferguson JWH, Wayne RK, Kohn MH (1998) Empirical evaluation of preservation methods for faecal DNA. Mol Ecol 7:1423–1428. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00449.x
Franzreb KE (1997) Success of intensive management of a critically imperiled population of Red-cockaded Woodpeckers in South Carolina. J Field Ornithol 68:458–470
Fujiwara M, Caswell H (2001) Demography of the endangered North Atlantic right whale. Nature 414:537–541. doi:10.1038/35107054
Gagneux P, Boesch C, Woodruff DS (1997) Microsatellite scoring errors associated with noninvasive genotyping based on nuclear DNA amplified from shed hair. Mol Ecol 6:861–868. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.1997.tb00140.x
Gerloff U, Schlötterer C, Rassmann K, Rambold I, Hohmann G, Fruth B, Tautz D (1995) Amplification of hypervariable simple sequence repeats (microsatellites) from excremental DNA of wild living Bonobos (Pan paniscus). Mol Ecol 4:515–518. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.1995.tb00247.x
Gjerde I, Wegge P (1989) Spacing pattern, habitat use and survival of capercaillie, Tetrao urogallus L., during winter in a fragmented boreal forest. Ornis Scand 20:219–225. doi:10.2307/3676916
Glutz von Blotzheim UN, Bauer KM, Bezzel E (1973) Tetrao urogallus. In: Glutz von Blotzheim UN (ed) Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas, vol 5: Galliformes und Gruiformes. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Wiesbaden, pp 172–225
Goossens B, Chikhi L, Utami SS, de Ruiter J, Brudford MW (2000) A multi-samples, multi-extracts approach for microsatellite analysis of faecal samples in an arboreal ape. Conserv Genet 1:157–162. doi:10.1023/A:1026535006318
Graf RF, Bollmann K, Suter W, Bugmann H (2004) Using a multi-scale model for identifying priority areas in capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) conservation. In: Smithers R (ed) Proceedings of the 12th annual IALE (UK) conference “Landscape ecology of trees and forests”. Cirencester, pp 84–90
Graf RF, Bollmann K, Suter W, Bugmann H (2005) The importance of spatial scale in habitats model: capercaillie in the Swiss Alps. Landscape Ecol 20:703–717. doi:10.1007/s10980-005-0063-7
Graf RF, Bollmann K, Suter W, Bugmann H (2006) On the generality of habitat suitability models: a case study of the capercaillie in three Swiss regions. Ecography 29:319–328. doi:10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04328.x
Griffiths R, Double MC, Orr K, Dawson RJG (1998) A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol Ecol 7:1071–1075. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00389.x
Hansen H, Ben-David M, McDonald DB (2008) Effects of genotyping protocols on success and errors in identifying individual river otters (Lontra canadensis) from their faeces. Mol Ecol Res 8:282–289. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01992.x
Helle P, Helle T, Lindén H (1994) Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) lekking sites in fragmented Finnish forest landscape. Scand J For Res 9:386–396. doi:10.1080/02827589409382856
Horvath MB, Martinez-Cruz B, Negro JJ, Kalmar L, Godoy JA (2005) An overlooked DNA source for non-invasive genetic analysis in birds. J Avian Biol 36:84–88. doi:10.1111/j.0908-8857.2005.03370.x
Hung CM, Li SH, Lee LL (2004) Faecal DNA typing to determine the abundance and spatial organisation of otters (Lutra lutra) along two stream systems in Kinmen. Anim Conserv 7:301–311. doi:10.1017/S1367943004001453
Kéry M (2002) Inferring the absence of a species: a case study of snakes. J Wildl Manage 66:330–338. doi:10.2307/3803165
Klaus S, Andreev AV, Bergmann H-H, Müller F, Porkert J, Wiesner J (1989) Die Auerhühner. Westarp Wissenschaften, Magdeburg Die Neue Brehm-Bucherei (ed)
Kohn MH, York EC, Kamradt DA, Haugt G, Sauvajot RM, Wayne RK (1999) Estimating population size by genotyping faeces. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 266:657–663. doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0686
Lukacs PM, Burnham KP (2005a) Estimating population size from DNA-based closed capture–recapture data incorporating genotyping error. J Wildl Manage 69:396–403. doi:10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069<0396:EPSFDC>2.0.CO;2
Lukacs PM, Burnham KP (2005b) Review of capture–recapture methods applicable to noninvasive genetic sampling. Mol Ecol 14:3909–3919. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02717.x
Marti C (1986) Verbreitung und Bestand des Auerhuhns Tetrao urogallus in der Schweiz. Ornithol Beob 83:67–70
Maschinski J, Frye R, Rutman S (1997) Demography and population viability of an endangered plant species before and after protection from trampling. Conserv Biol 11:990–999. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96159.x
Miller CR, Joyce P, Waits LP (2005) A new method for estimating the size of small populations from genetic mark–recapture data. Mol Ecol 14:1991–2005. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02577.x
Miller CR, Joyce P, Waits LP (2007) Ordered vs, unordered samples: response to Bromaghin. Mol Ecol 16:4885. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03583.x
Mills LS, Citta JJ, Lair KP, Schwartz MK, Tallmon DA (2000) Estimating animal abundance using noninvasive DNA sampling: promise and pitfalls. Ecol Appl 10:283–294. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0283:EAAUND]2.0.CO;2
Mollet P, Badilatti B, Bollmann K, Graf RF, Hess R, Jenny H, Mulhauser B, Perrenoud A, Rudmann F, Sachot S, Studer J (2003) Verbreitung und Bestand des Auerhuhns (Tetrao urogallus) in der Schweiz 2001 und ihre Veränderung im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert Ornithol Beob 100:67–86
Mollet P, Stadler B, Bollmann K (2008) Aktionsplan Auerhuhn Schweiz. Bundesamt für Umwelt (BAFU), Schweizerische Vogelwarte und Schweizer Vogelschutz SVS/BirdLife Schweiz, Bern
Morin PA, Wallis J, Moore JJ, Chakraborty R, Woodruff DS (1993) Noninvasive sampling and DNA amplification for paternity exclusion, community structure, and phylogeography in wild chimpanzees. Primates 34:347–356. doi:10.1007/BF02382630
Murphy MA, Waits LP, Kendall KC, Wasser SK JAH, Bogden R (2002) An evaluation of long term preservation methods for brown bear (Ursus arctos) faecal DNA samples. Conserv Genet 3:435–440. doi:10.1023/A:1020503330767
Navidi W, Arnheim N, Waterman M (1992) A multiple-tubes approach for accurate genotyping of very small DNA samples using PCR: statistical considerations. Am J Hum Genet 50:347–359
Nsubuga AM, Robbins MM, Roeder AD, Morin PA, Boesch C, Vigilant L (2004) Factors affecting the amount of genomic DNA extracted from ape faeces and the identification of an improved sample storage method. Mol Ecol 13:2089–2094. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02207.x
Paetkau D, Strobeck C (1994) Microsatellite analysis of genetic variation in black bear populations. Mol Ecol 3:489–495. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.1994.tb00127.x
Piertney SB, Höglund J (2001) Polymorphic microsatellite DNA markers in black grouse (Tetrao tetrix). Mol Ecol Notes 1:303–304. doi:10.1046/j.1471-8278.2001.00118.x
Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249
Regnaut S, Lucas FS, Fumagalli L (2005) DNA degradation in avian faecal samples and feasibility of non-invasive genetic studies of threatened capercaillie populations. Conserv Genet 7:449–453. doi:10.1007/s10592-005-9023-7
Royle JA, Nichols JD, Kéry M (2005) Modelling occurence and abundance of species when detection is imperfect. Oikos 110:353–359. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13534.x
Schwartz MK, Luikart G, Waples RS (2006) Genetic monitoring as a promising tool for conservation and management. Trends Ecol Evol 22:25–33. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.08.009
Schwarz CJ, Seber GAF (1999) Estimating animal abundance. Stat Sci 14:427–456. doi:10.1214/ss/1009212521 Review III
Segelbacher G (2002) Noninvasive genetic analysis in birds: testing the reliability of feather samples. Mol Ecol Notes 2:367–369. doi:10.1046/j.1471-8286.2002.00180.x
Segelbacher G, Paxton RJ, Steinbrück G, Trontelj P, Storch I (2000) Characterization of microsatellites in capercaillie Tetrao urogallus. Mol Ecol 9:1934–1935. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.0090111934.x
Storch I (1997) Male territoriality, female range use, and spatial organisation of capercaillie Tetrao urogallus leks. Wildl Biol 3:149–161
Storch I (2000) Grouse Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan 2000–2004 (ed. Group WBSGS). IUCN/The World Pheasant Association, Gland, Cambridge/Reading, 112 pp
Storch I (2001) Tetrao urogallus Capercaillie. BWP Update 3:1–24
Taberlet P, Luikart G (1999) Non-invasive genetic sampling and individual identification. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 68:41–55. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1999.tb01157.x
Taberlet P, Griffin S, Goosens B, Questiau S, Manceau V, Escaravage N, Waits LP, Bouvet J (1996) Reliable genotyping of samples with very low DNA quantity using PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 24:3189–3194. doi:10.1093/nar/24.16.3189
Valière N (2002) GIMLET: a computer program for analysing genetic individual identification data. Mol Ecol Notes 2:377–379. doi:10.1046/j.1471-8286.2002.00228.x
Vigilant L (2002) Technical challenges in the microsatellite genotyping of a wild chimpanzee population using faeces. Evol Anthropol S1:162–165. doi:10.1002/evan.10082
Waits LP, Luikart G, Taberlet P (2001) Estimating the probability of identity among genotypes in natural populations: cautions and guidelines. Mol Ecol 10:249–256. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2001.01185.x
Wegge P, Rolstad J (1986) Size and spacing of capercaillie leks in relation to social behavior and habitat. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:401–408. doi:10.1007/BF00300542
Wegge P, Kvalsgard T, Hjeljord O, Sivkov AV (2003) Spring spacing behaviour of capercaillie Tetrao urogallus males does not limit numbers at leks. Wildl Biol 9:283–289
Wilson GJ, Frantz AC, Pope LC, Roper TJ, Burke TA, Cheeseman CL, Delahay RJ (2003) Estimation of badger abundance using faecal DNA typing. J Appl Ecol 40:658–666. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.2003.00835.x
Zhan XJ, Li M, Zhang ZJ, Goossens B, Chen YP, Wang HJ, Bruford MW, Wei FW (2006) Molecular censusing doubles giant panda population estimate in a key nature reserve. Curr Biol 16:R451–R452. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.05.042
Acknowledgments
Discussions with N. Valière and comments from the associate editor and anonymous reviewers contributed to improve the scope of this manuscript. G. Jacob was financed by the MAVA foundation, and additional funding (R. Debrunner) was obtained from the canton of St Gallen (Amt für Jagd und Fischerei). K. Bollmann was financed by the Federal Office for the Environment FOEN and by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 3100–0655199).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 3.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jacob, G., Debrunner, R., Gugerli, F. et al. Field surveys of capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) in the Swiss Alps underestimated local abundance of the species as revealed by genetic analyses of non-invasive samples. Conserv Genet 11, 33–44 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-008-9794-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-008-9794-8