Skip to main content
Log in

Conceptualizing needs in the context of consumer politics

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Consumer Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main aim of this paper is clarification of the concept of need in the context of current thinking on consumption and development, the links between the provision for basic needs, and the observance of human rights. It offers philosophical analysis of the concept of basic needs in relation to others more prominent in consumption theory such as desires, wants, preferences, relating its discussion to controversies between universalist and relativist positions in the theory of need. Drawing on a distinction between basic needs and the culturally specific modes in which these are gratified, it proceeds to offer some critical reflections on the intersection between human rights and market rights and on the global interconnections between more or less affluent forms of basic need satisfaction. It argues overall that basic need satisfaction for all, now and in the future, requires a new politics of consumption in the wealthier nations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alkire, S. (2005). Needs and capabilities. In S. Reader (Ed.). The philosophy of need (pp. 222–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, P. (2002). Resisting the merger and acquisition of human rights by trade law: A reply to Petersmann. European Journal of International Law, 13, 815–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M. (1987). The philosophy of happiness. New York: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1928). Metaphysics. In: D. Ross (Trans. & Ed.), The works of Aristotle (2nd ed., Vol. VIII). Oxford: Clarendon.

  • Bauman, Z. (1988). Freedom. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, S. (1992). Situating the self: Gender, community, and postmodernism in contemporary ethics. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib S., Cornell D. (Eds.) (1990). Feminism as critique. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, C. (1994). The idea of luxury. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A. (1998). Justice and the environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson A. (Ed.), (1999). Fairness and futurity: Essays on sustainability and justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (1991). A theory of human need. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drover G., & Kerans P. (Eds.) (1993). New approaches to welfare theory. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durning, A. T. (1992). How much is enough? London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. Economic Journal, 111, 465–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, R. (1977). The ambiguity and rhetoric of need. In R. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Human needs and politics (pp. 195–212). Rushcutters Bay: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1989). Unruly practices: Power, discourse and gender in contemporary social theory. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness and economics: How the economy and institutions affect human well being. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirth, A. (1987). Private philanthropy and positive rights. In: P. E. Frankel, F. D. Miller Jr., J. Ahrens (Eds.), Beneficence, philanthropy and the public good: Social, philosophy and policy (Issue 2) (Vol. 4, pp. 55–78). Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1942). Philosophy of right (T. M. Knox, Trans.). Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, A. (1980). Can “true” and “false” needs be posited? In: K. Lederer (Ed.), Human needs (pp. 213–227). Cambridge: Oelgeschlager, Gunn and Hain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howse, R. (2002). Human rights in the WTO: Whose rights? Whose humanity? Comment on Petersmann. European Journal for International Law, 13, 651–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., & Klingemann, H.-D. (2000). Genes, culture, democracy and happiness. In E. Diener, & E. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 165–183). Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. (1993). Feminism and enlightenment. Radical Philosophy, 63(3), 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N. (2000). No logo. London: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layard, R. (2004). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiss, W. (1978). The limits to satisfaction: An essay on the problems of needs and commodities. London: Marion Boyars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levett, R. (2003). A better choice of choice: Quality of life, consumption and economic growth. London: Fabian Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Alier, J. (1995). Political ecology, distributional conflicts and economic incommensurability. New Left Review, 9(3), 295–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • McInnes, N. (1977). The politics of need and who needs politics. In R. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Human needs and politics (pp. 228–245). Rushcutters Bay: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micheletti, M. (2003). Political virtue and shopping. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micheletti, M., & Peretti, J. (2003). The Nike sweatshop email: Political consumerism, Internet and cultural jamming. In M. Micheletti, D. Stolle, & A. Follesdal (Eds.), Politics, products and markets: Exploring political consumerism past and present (pp. 127–144). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1998). Social justice and environmental goods. In A. Dobson (Ed.), Fairness and futurity (pp. 151–172). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson L. (Ed.). (1995). Feminist contentions. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (1992). Human functioning and social justice. Public Theory, 2(2), 202–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrotta, C. (2004). Consumption as an investment: The fear of goods from Hesiod to Adam Smith (J. McMullin, Trans.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersmann, E. U. (2002). Time for a United Nations “global compact” for integrating human rights into the law of worldwide organizations: Lessons from European integration. European Journal for International Law, 13, 621–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plant, R. (1993). Free lunches don’t nourish: Reflections on entitlements and citizenship. In: G. Drover, P. Kerans (Eds.), New approaches to welfare theory (pp. 33–48). Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purdy, D. (2005). Human happiness and the stationary state. Soundings, 31(November), 133–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, M. (1992). Human needs and the market. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, M. (1997). What’s wrong with liberalism?. Leicester: Leicester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reader S. (Ed.). (2005). The philosophy of need. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redclift, M. (1996). Wasted: Counting the costs of global consumption. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redclift, M. (2005). Sustainable development (1987–2005). An oxymoron comes of age. Sustainable Development, 13, 212–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1985). Commodities and capabilities. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1987). In: G. Hawthorn (Eds.), The standard of living: The Tanner lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Sen, A. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, D. (1997). Consumer culture and modernity. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soper, K. (1981). On human needs: Open and closed theories in a Marxist perspective. Hassocks: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soper, K. (1993). To each according to their need? New Left Review, 197(January–February), 113–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soper, K. (2001). Feminism, liberalism, enlightenment. In: M. Evans (Ed.), The Edinburgh companion to contemporary liberalism (pp. 197–207). Edinburgh :University Press Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogler, J. (2000). The global commons: Environmental and technological governance (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, A., Goodin, R. (1990). Needs and welfare. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weale, A. (1983). Political theory and social policy. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, D. (1998). Needs, values, truth (3rd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Bronwen Morgan and Frank Trentmann for help with the preparation of this article and ESRC/AHRC Award No. RES-154-24-005.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kate Soper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soper, K. Conceptualizing needs in the context of consumer politics. J Consum Policy 29, 355–372 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-006-9017-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-006-9017-y

Keywords

Navigation