Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
Erschienen in: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 3/2011

01.06.2011

Agile Project Management: A Case Study of a Virtual Research Environment Development Project

verfasst von: Rob Procter, Mark Rouncefield, Meik Poschen, Yuwei Lin, Alex Voss

Erschienen in: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) | Ausgabe 3/2011

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this paper we use a case study of a project to create a Web 2.0-based, Virtual Research Environment (VRE) for researchers to share digital resources in order to reflect on the principles and practices for embedding eResearch applications within user communities. In particular, we focus on the software development methodologies and project management techniques adopted by the project team in order to ensure that the project remained responsive to changing user requirements without compromising their capacity to keep the project ‘on track’, i.e. meeting the goals declared in the project proposal within budget and on time. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork, we describe how the project team, whose members are distributed across multiple sites (and often mobile), exploit a repertoire of coordination mechanisms, communication modes and tools, artefacts and structuring devices as they seek to establish the orderly running of the project while following an agile, user-centred development approach.
Vorheriger Artikel Bridging the Disciplinary Divide: Co-Creating Research Ideas in eScience Teams

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
The UK Office of Science and Technology e-Infrastructure Working Group defines a VRE as “a set of online tools, systems and processes interoperating to facilitate or enhance the research process within and without institutional boundaries.” See Borda et al. (2006).
 
3
A scientific workflow is a digital artefact that enables the composition of multiple, individual steps in a research process into a single computational entity. In this form, research processes can be automated and, just as importantly, easily shared with and re-used by others.
 
7
The myGrid project is home to a range of individual projects, including myExperiment and Taverna, that share a focus of developing tools to “help e-Scientists get on with science and get on with scientists.” See http://​wiki.​myexperiment.​org/​index.​php/​Main_​Pageww.​mygrid.​org.​uk/​
 
8
CVS (Concurrent Versioning System) is a tool that allows software project teams to keep track of changes in program files.
 
9
The term ‘hackfest’ refers to an intensive, collaborative coding session, designed to accelerate development. The myExperiment hackfests take place every month, last between 2 and 3 days, and focus on getting key requirements translated into code.
 
10
A perception voiced by many developers of e-Research applications is that grid technical standards are too complex and difficult to use (see, e.g. Chin and Coveney 2004).
 
Literatur
Abrahamsson, P., Warsta, J., Siponen, M. and Ronkainen, J. (2003). New directions on agile methods: A comparative analysis. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, Portland, May. IEEE.
Beck, K. (2000). Extreme programming explained: Embracing change. Addison Wesley.
Boehm, B. W. (1988). A spiral model of software development and enhancement. IEEE Computer, 21, 61–72.
Borda, A., Careless, J., Dimitrova, M., Fraser, M., Frey, J., Hubbard, P., et al. (2006). Report of the Working Group on Virtual Research Communities for the OST e-Infrastructure Steering Group. London, UK: Office of Science and Technology.
Button, G., & Sharrock, W. (1994). Occasioned practices in the work of software engineers. In M. Jirotka & J. Goguen (Eds.), Requirements engineering: Social and technical issues. London: Academic.
Button, G., & Sharrock, W. (1996). Project work: The organisation of collaborative design and development in software engineering. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing, 5, 369–386.CrossRef
Crabtree, A., Nichols, D., O’Brien, J., Rouncefield, M., & Twidale, M. (2000). Ethnomethodologically informed ethnography and information system design. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(7), 666–682.CrossRef
De Roure, D., & Goble, C. (2008). Six principles of software design to empower scientists. IEEE Software, 26(1), 88–95.CrossRef
De Roure, D., Goble, C. and Stevens, R. (2007). Designing the myExperiment virtual research environment for the social sharing of workflows. In: Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Conference on e-Science and Grid Computing (pp. 603–610), Bangalore, India, 10–13 December.
Dyba, T., & Dingsoyr, T. (2008). Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review. Information and Software Technology, 50(9–10), 833–859.CrossRef
Gil, Y., Deelman, E., Ellisman, M., Fahringer, T., Fox, G., Gannon, D., et al. (2007). Examining the challenges of scientific workflows. IEEE Computer, 40(12), 24–32.
Glaser B. and Strauss, A. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory. strategies for qualitative research. Sociology Press.
Hey, T and Trefethen, A. (2003). The data deluge: An e-Science perspective. In: Berman. F., Fox. G. and Hey, A. (Eds.), Grid computing—making the global infrastructure a reality. Wiley.
Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. Sage.
Hochschild, A. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialisation of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hole, S., & Moe, N. B. (2008). A case study of coordination in distributed agile software development. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 16(5), 189–200.CrossRef
Hughes, J. A., King, V., Rodden, T. and Andersen, H. (1994). Moving out from the control room: Ethnography in system design, In: Proceedings of CSCW’94. Chapel Hill: ACM.
Mackenzie, A. and Rouncefield, M. (2002). How ‘hacking’ hides a project: from software engineering to open source and back again. Appendix C. Dependability Issues in Open Source Software DIRC Project Activity 5 Final Report. University of Newcastle on Tyne.
Procter, R., Williams, R., Stewart, J., Poschen, M., Snee, H., Voss, A., et al. (2010). Adoption and use of Web 2.0 in scholarly communications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, special issue on e-Science, 368(1926), 4039–4056.CrossRef
Ramesh, B., Cao, L., Mohan, K., & Xu, P. (2006). Can distributed software development be agile? Communications of the ACM, 49(10), 41–46.CrossRef
Randall, D., Harper, R. and Rouncefield, M. (2007). Fieldwork for Design: Theory and practice. Kluwer.
Royce, W.W. (1987 [1970]). Managing the development of large software systems: Concepts and techniques. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Software Engineering (pp. 328–338). Monterey, CA.
Russo, N. L., & Stolterman, E. (2000). Exploring the assumptions underlying information systems methodologies: Their impact on past, present and future ISM research. Information Technology & People, 13(4), 313–327.CrossRef
Schwaber, K., & Beedle, M. (2002). Agile software development with scrum. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Segal, J. (2005). Two principles of end-user software engineering research. In: Proceedings of the first workshop on end-user software engineering. St Louis: ACM.
Sharp, H., Robinson, H., & Petre, M. (2009). The role of physical artefacts in agile software development: Two complementary perspectives. Interacting with Computers, 21(1–2), 108–116.CrossRef
Sharrock, W., & Anderson, B. (1993). Working towards agreement. In G. Button (Ed.), Technology in working order (pp. 149–161). London: Routledge.
Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), 129–138.CrossRef
Simon, H. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge: MIT.
Sommerville, I. (2001). Software engineering (6th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education & Addison Wesley.
Suchman, L. (1994). Working relations of technology production and use. Computer Supported Cooperative Work Journal, 2(1–2), 21–39.CrossRef
Suchman, L. (1995). Making work visible. Communications of the ACM, 38(9), 33–35.CrossRef
Voss, A., & Procter, R. (2009). Virtual research environments in scholarly work and communications. Special issue on Virtual Research Environments. Library Hi Tech Journal, 27(2), 174–190.CrossRef
Wastell, D. G. (1996). The fetish of technique: Methodology as a social defence. Information Systems Journal, 6, 25–40.CrossRef
Woolgar, S. (1991). Configuring the user: The case of usability trials. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters. Essays on power technology and domination (pp. 58–100). London: Routledge.
Metadaten
Titel
Agile Project Management: A Case Study of a Virtual Research Environment Development Project
verfasst von
Rob Procter
Mark Rouncefield
Meik Poschen
Yuwei Lin
Alex Voss
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2011
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) / Ausgabe 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0925-9724
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7551
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-011-9137-z