Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploratory spatial analysis of crimes against property in Turkey

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Turkey, a rapidly developing country, is a junction point between Asia and Europe in terms of its social and economic structure. Turkey is both the most advanced economy in the Turkish-speaking world and the largest economy in the Muslim world. In the last few years, with the development of Turkey’s economic and social structure, the level of criminality in the country has attracted attention. Consequently, we aimed to explore potential spatial associations of crimes against property rates across the 81 provinces of Turkey (NUTS3) from 1997 to 2009. Geographical information systems and explorative methods of spatial data analysis were employed in the analyses of crime rates. Since crime is a phenomenon that arises from the interaction between social, economic, psychological circumstances and, especially, geographical factors, this study attempts to rectify the possible deficiencies of traditional statistical analyses of geography. Because of the very different population sizes in each province, comparing the volume of crimes makes a major impact on the stability of the crime rates; therefore in this study an empirical Bayes smoothing method was used to interpret the crime rates correctly. Global spatial autocorrelation indices were used to test the spatial dependence of the distribution of the crime rates. Besides the excess risk rates, local spatial autocorrelation methods were used to detect and interpret the clustering of crime rates. In order to model the crime rates, a set of socioeconomic parameters (migration rates by province, gross national product according to purchasing power parity by province, registered number of touristic facilities and number of rooms by province, electricity consumption statistics, provincial unemployment rates and urbanisation index values were handled with geographically weighted regression. According to the results, criminal activities were non-random in terms of time and space. Property crime, except for smuggling, is densely clustered in the west and south-west of Turkey. The present study demonstrates the utility of spatial analysis and geographically weighted regression to detect some important geographical dimensions and crucial geographical aspects of property crimes in Turkey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mostafa A. (2003). Crime mapping and spatial analysis. Ms Thesis, ITC, Netherland

  2. Messner, S. F., Anselin, L., Baller, R. D., Hawkins, D. F., Deane, G., & Tolnay, S. E. (1999). The spatial patterning of county homicide rates: an application of exploratory spatial data analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15(4), 423–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Murray, T. A., McGuffog, I., Western, S. J., & Mullins, P. (2001). Exploratory spatial data analysis techniques for examining urban crime. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 309–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ackerman, W. V., & Murray, A. T. (2004). Assessing spatial patterns of crime in Lima. Ohio Cities, 21(5), 423–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lima, M. L. C., Ximenesa, C., Souzab, E. R., Lunac, C. F., Fátima, M., & Albuquerquec, P. M. (2005). Spatial analysis of socioeconomic determinants of homicide in Brazil. Rev Saude Publica, 39(2), 176–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yirmibesoglu, F., & Ergun, N. (2007). Property and personal crime in Istanbul. European Planning Studies, 15(3), 339–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Marselli, R., & Vannini, M. (1997). Estimating a crime equation in the presence of organized crime: evidence from Italy. International Review of Law and Economics, 17, 89–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cezay, A. K., Braithwaite, J., & Chapman, B. (1998). Unemployment and crime: toward resolving the paradox. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14(3), 215–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hojman, D. E. (2004). Inequality, unemployment and crime in Latin American cities. Crime, Law and Social Change, 41(1), 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cracolici, M. F., Uberti, T. E. (2008). Geographical Distribution of Crime in Italian Provinces: A Spatial Econometric Analysis. Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection 30pp http://ssrn.com/abstract=1105082

  11. Pridemore, W. A. (2003). Measuring homicide in Russia: a comparison of estimates from the crime and vital statistics reporting systems. Social Science & Medicine, 57, 1343–1354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Neapolitan, J. L. (1998). Coss-national variation in homicides: is race a factor? Criminology, 36(1), 139–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ceccato, V., & Haining, R. P. (2001). Crime in border regions: the Scandinavian case of Oresund 1998–2001. Annals, Association of American Geographers, 94(4), 807–826.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Messner, S. (1980). Income inequality and murder rates: some cross-national findings. Comparative Social Research, 3, 185–198.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Messner, S., Raffalovich, L., & Shrock, P. (2002). Reassessing the cross-national relationship between income inequality and homicide rates: implications of data quality control in the measurement of income distribution. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 377–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hanci, I. H. (1995). Gecekondulasma ve Cocuk Suclulugu. Adli Tip Dergisi, 11, 55–62 (in Turkish).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hanci, I. H., Akcicek, E., Aktas, E. O., Batuk, G., Coskunol, H., & Erol, A. (1996). Çocuk Suçluluğuna Ekolojik Bir Yaklasim: Çoçukların Oturdukları Şehir Bölgeleri. Egitim Dergisi, Ege Universitesi Edebiyat Fakultesi, 1, 185–190 (in Turkish).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Giritlioğlu, C., Ergun, N., Yirmibesoglu, F. (1994). Social change and crime in the city center of Istanbul. Paperpresented at the Edinburgh College of Art/Herriot-Watt University, two-day conference.

  19. Ergun, N., Yirmibesoglu, F. (2003). Istanbul’da Fiziksel ve Demografik Karakteristiklerin Suc ile Iliskisi, Prof. Dr Yucel Unal’a Armagan, Sehir ve Bolge Planlaması Bolumu, 124–131.

  20. Sargın, S., & Temurçin, K. (2010). Crime and crime dispersion in urban areas in Turkey. Bulten of Geography, Socio-Economic Series, 13, 59–76. Torun, Polonya.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sargın Sevil, Temurçin, K. (2010). Spatial dispersion and analysis of urban crimes of security committed against property in Turkey, 4th International Congress of the Islamic World Geographers (ICIWG2010), 14–16 April 2010, Zahedan, Iran.

  22. Erdogan, S., Dereli, M. A., Yalçın, M. “Spatial analysis of five crime statistics in Turkey” FIG Working Week 2011, Marrakech, Morocco, May 18–22, 2011.

  23. Anselin, L., Lozano, L., & Koschinsky, J. (2006). Rate transformations and smoothing (p. 85). Urbana-Champaign: Spatial Analysis Laboratory Department of Geography University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Waller, L. A., & Gotway, C. A. (2004). Applied spatial statistics for public health data. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Getis, A., & Ord, J. K. (1992). The analysis of spatial association by Use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis, 24, 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Andresen, M. A. (2006). A spatial analysis of crime in Vancouver, British Columbia: a synthesis of social disorganization and routine activity theory. Canadian Geographer, 50(4), 487–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ackerman, V. W. (1998). Socioeconomic correlates of increasing crime rates in smaller communities. Professional Geographer, 50(3), 372–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Foody, G. M. (2003). Geographical weighting as a further refinement to regression modelling: an example focused on the NDVI–rainfall relationship. Remote Sensing of Environment, 88, 283–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Carlisle, B. H. (2005). Modelling the spatial distribution of DEM error. Transactions in GIS, 9(4), 521–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C., & Charlton, M. (2002). Geographically weighted regression: the analysi, s of spatially varying relationships. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Propastin, P., Kappas, M., & Erasmi, S. (2008). Investigate the impact of scale on prediction uncertainty by modelling relationship between vegetation and climate. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 3, 73–94.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Koenker, R. (1981). A note on studentizing a test for heteroscedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 17, 107–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Longley, P. A., & Tobo’n, C. (2004). Spatial dependence and heterogeneity in patterns of hardship: an intra-urban Analysis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(3), 503–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geomatics, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey

    Saffet Erdogan, Mustafa Yalçin & Mehmet Ali Dereli

Authors
  1. Saffet Erdogan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mustafa Yalçin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mehmet Ali Dereli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saffet Erdogan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Erdogan, S., Yalçin, M. & Dereli, M.A. Exploratory spatial analysis of crimes against property in Turkey. Crime Law Soc Change 59, 63–78 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-012-9398-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-012-9398-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation