Abstract
This paper studies the effects of absentee ownership of immobile factors on environmental policy of a jurisdiction in a federation. An increase in emissions in a jurisdiction increases factor incomes, but part of the increased factor incomes goes to absentee owners while only the residents of the jurisdiction bear the full disutility. In addition, the increase in emissions in a jurisdiction attracts capital and decreases capital in other jurisdictions, reducing the incomes that the residents of the jurisdiction earn from owning immobile factors in other jurisdictions. Absentee ownership thus reduces the marginal benefit of an increase in emissions while it leaves the marginal cost unaffected from the jurisdiction’s perspective. As a consequence, absentee ownership makes environmental policy of a jurisdiction too stringent relative to the efficient level. The paper also considers the effects of absentee ownership on environmental policy when goods trade is allowed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. N. Bhagwati R. A. Brecher (1980) ArticleTitle‘National Welfare in an Open Economy in the Presence of Foreign-Owned Factors of Production’ Journal of International Economics 10 103–115 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-1996(80)90034-3
Copeland, B. R. and M. S. Taylor (2001), ‘Free Trade and Global Warming: A Trade Theory View of the Kyoto Proctocol’, NBER Working Paper 7657
J. H. Cumberland (1981) ArticleTitle‘Efficiency and Equality in Interregional Environmental Management’ Review of Regional Studies 2 1–9
H. Folmer I. Musu (1992) ArticleTitle‘Transboundary Pollution Problems, Environmental Policy and International Cooperation: An introduction’ Environmental and Resource Economics 2 107–116
A. R. Ghosh (1992) ArticleTitle‘Fiscal Policy, the Terms of Trade, and the External Balance’ Journal of International Economics 33 105–125 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-1996(92)90052-L
M. Hoel (1997) ArticleTitle‘Coordination of Environmental Policy for Transboundary Environmental Problems?’ Journal of Public Economics 66 199–224 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0047-2727(97)00042-X
H. Huizinga S. B. Nielsen (1997) ArticleTitle‘Capital Income and Profit Taxation with Foreign Ownership of Firms’ Journal of International Economics 42 149–165 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0022-1996(96)01449-3
N. V. Long H. Siebert (1991) ArticleTitle‘Institutional Competition versus Ex-ante Harmonization: The Case of Environmental Policy’ Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 147 296–311
W. E. Oates R. M. Schwab (1988) ArticleTitle‘Economic Competition among Jurisdictions: Efficiency Enhancing or Distortion Inducing?’ Journal of Public Economics 35 333–354 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0047-2727(88)90036-9
Rauscher, M. (1994), ‘Environmental Policy and International Capital Movements’, in K. G. Maler, ed., International Environmental Problems: An Economic Perspective. Amsterdam: Kluwer
R. L. Revesz (1992) ArticleTitle‘Rehabilitating Interstate Competition: Rethinking the ‘Race-to-the-Bottom’ Rationale for Federal Environmental Regulation’ New York University Law Review 67 1210–1254
A. G. Schweinberger H. J. Vosgerau (1997) ArticleTitle‘Foreign Factor Ownership and Optimal Tariffs’ Review of International Economics 5 IssueID1 1–19 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-9396.00035
H.-W. Sinn (2003) The New Systems Competition Blackwell Publishing Malden
D. E. Wildasin (2000) ArticleTitle‘Factor Mobility and Fiscal Policy in the EU: Policy Issues and Analytical Approaches’ Economic Policy 15 337–368
D. Willenbockel (1999) ArticleTitle‘Dynamic Applied General Equilibrium Trade Policy Analysis in the Presence of Foreign Asset Cross-Ownership’ Economic Modelling 16 371–388
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, K. Absentee Ownership of Immobile Factors and Environmental Policies in a Federation. Environ Resource Econ 32, 407–417 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-6904-7
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-6904-7