Abstract
Water pollution from non-point sources is a global environmental concern. Economists propose tradable permit systems as a solution, but they are difficult to implement due to the nature of non-point sources. We present a pollution offset system for trading non-point source water pollution permits. Conventional pollution offset systems suffer from thin markets and transaction costs. In this paper, we show how to overcome these problems with a centrally managed common-pool market. We define permits as allowable nitrate loading to a groundwater aquifer. This trading system utilizes estimates of potential nitrate leaching from land uses, a set of transport coefficients generated from a simulation of nitrate transport in groundwater, an online trading system, and a linear program to clear the market. We illustrate the concept using a hypothetical case study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Coase RH (1960) The problem of social cost. J Law Econ 3(1): 1–44
Dales JH (1968) Land, water and ownership. Can J Econ 1(4): 791–804
Eheart JW, Brill ED, Lence BJ, Kilgore JD, Uber JG (1987) Cost efficiency of time-varying discharge permit programs for water quality management. Water Resour Res 23(2): 245–251
Environment Waikato (2008) Nitrate contamination of groundwater. Retrieved 26 December 2008, from http://www.ew.govt.nz/Environmental-information/groundwater/Monitoring-groundwater-quality/Nitrate-contamination-of-groundwater/
Ermoliev Y, Michalevich M, Nentjes A (2000) Markets for tradable emission and ambient permits: a dynamic approach. Environ Resour Econ 15(1): 39–56
Harbaugh BAW, Banta ER, Hill MC, McDonald MG (2000) MODFLOW-2000: The U.S. Geological Survey Modular Groundwater Model. U.S. Geological Survey
Hogan WW, Read EG, Ring BJ (1996) Using mathematical programming for electricity spot pricing. Int Trans Oper Res 3: 243–253
Horan RD, Shortle JS, Abler DG (2002) Point-nonpoint nutrient trading in the susquehanna river Basin. Water Resour Res 38(5):8:1–8:12
Hung MF, Shaw D (2005) A trading-ratio system for trading water pollution discharge permits. J Environ Econ Manage 49(1): 83–102
Kerr S, Rutherford K, Lock K (2007) Nutrient trading in Lake Rotorua: goals and trading caps. Motu Economic and Public Policy Research
King DM, Kuch PJ (2003) Will Nutrient Credit Trading Ever Work? An assessment of supply and demand problems and institutional obstacles. Environmental Law Reporter. News and Analysis, 5-2003
Krupnick A, Oates W, Verg EVD (1983) On marketable air pollution permits: the case for a system of pollution offset. J Environ Econ Manage 10: 233–247
Leston D (1992) Simulation of a two-pollutant, two-season pollution offset system for the Colorado river of Texas below Austin. Water Resour Res 28(5): 1311–1318
Lock K, Kerr S (2007) Nutrient trading in Lake Rotorua: where are we now. Motu Economic and Public Policy Research
Martin KC, Joskow PL, Ellerman AD (2007) Time and location differentiated NOx control in competitive electricity markets using cap-and-trade mechanisms. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research
McGartland A (1988) A comparison of two marketable discharge permit systems. J Environ Econ Manage 15: 35–44
McGartlend AM, Oates WE (1985) Marketable permits for prevention of environmental deterioration. J Environ Econ Manage 12: 207–228
Montero JP (2008) A simple auction mechanism for the optimal allocation of the commons. Am Econ Rev 98(1): 496–518
Montgomery WD (1972) Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs. J Econ Theory 5(3): 395–418
Morgan DS, Everett R (2005) Application of simulation-optimization methods for management of nitrate loading to groundwater from decentralized wastewater treatment systems near La Pine, Oregon. US Geological Survey Oregon Water Science Centre
Morgan CL, Coggins JS, Eidman VR (2000) Tradable permits for controlling nitrates in groundwater at the farm level: a conceptual model. J Agric Appl Econ 32(2): 249–258
Neil WO, David M, Moore C, Joeres E (1983) Transferable discharge permits and economic efficiency: the Fox River. J Environ Econ Manage 10(4): 346–355
O’Shea L (2002) An economic approach to reducing water pollution: point and diffuse sources. Sci Total Environ 282(283): 49–63
Revenga C, Mock G (2000) Dirty water: pollution problems persist. World Resources Institute
U.S. Geological Survey (1999) The quality of our nation’s waters: nutrients and pesticides. U.S. Geological Survey
U.S. Geological Survey (2006) Data input instructions for groundwater transport process (GWT). Reston, Virginia
Weber ML (2001) Markets for water rights under environmental constraints. J Environ Econ Manage 42: 53–64
Zheng C (1990) MT3D—a modular three-dimensional transport model for simulation of advection, dispersion and chemical reaction of contaminants in groundwater systems. The United States Environmental Protection Agency-Robert S. Kerr Enivronmental Research Laboratory, Ada, Oklahoma
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prabodanie, R.A.R., Raffensperger, J.F. & Milke, M.W. A Pollution Offset System for Trading Non-Point Source Water Pollution Permits. Environ Resource Econ 45, 499–515 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9325-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9325-1