Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does Democracy Lead to a Better Environment? Deforestation and the Democratic Transition Peak

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between democracy and environment is subject to controversy. Some scientists find that democracy has a positive impact in reducing environmental disruption. Other scholars claim that democracy tends to accelerate environmental degradation. By using deforestation rates as a proxy for environmental disruption, we suggest that both sides might be right. Our quantitative analysis has three important outcomes. First, there is evidence of an inverted U-shaped relationship between deforestation and democracy. Second, countries in democratic transition experience the highest deforestation rates, compared to non-democracies and mature democracies. Third, in explaining deforestation rates democracy has larger explanatory power than income. This last result implies that in reducing deforestation rates the emphasis should not only be on economic development but even more on democratization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson JA, Yared P (2008) Income and democracy. Am Econ Rev 98(3): 808–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen MS (2002) Ecological modernization or subversion? The effect of europeanization on eastern Europe. Am Behav Sci 45(9): 1394–1416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett S, Graddy K (2000) Freedom, growth, and the environment. Environ Dev Econ 5(4): 433–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattarai M, Hammig M (2001) Institutions and the Environmental Kuznets Curve for deforestation: a cross-country analysis for Latin America, Africa, and Asia. World Dev 29(6): 995–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropper M, Griffiths C (1994) The interaction of population growth and environmental quality. Am Econ Rev 84(2): 250–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl RA (1998) On democracy. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Didia DO (1997) Democracy, political instability and tropical deforestation. Glob Environ Chang 7(1): 63–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doucouliagos H, Ulubaşoğlu MA (2008) Democracy and economic growth: a meta-analysis. Am J Pol Sci 52(1): 61–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J (eds) (1998) Deliberative democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Farzin YH, Bond CA (2006) Democracy and environmental quality. J Dev Econ 81(1): 213–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agricultural Organization (2001) State of the world’s forests. Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome. http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/Y0900E/y0900e14.htm. Cited 13 October 2005

  • Freedom House (2000) Annual surveys of freedom country ratings 1972–1973 to 1999–2000. Freedom House, New York. http://www.freedomhouse.org/ratings/index.htm. Cited 15 October 2005

  • Freedom House (1999) Democracy’s century: a survey of global political change in the 20th century. Freedom House, New York. http://www.freedomhouse.org/reports/century.html. Cited 15 October 2005

  • Fredriksson PG, Svensson J (2003) Political instability, corruption and policy formation: the case of environmental policy. J Public Econ 87(7–8): 1383–1405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garson GD (2006) Statnotes: an introduction to multivariate analysis. Statistics Solutions, Inc, Clearwater. http://www.statisticssolutions.com. Cited 15 October 2008

  • Huntington SP (1991) The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Q, Reuveny R (2006) Democracy and environmental degradation. Int Stud Quart 50: 935–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall MG, Jaggers K (2002) Polity IV project: political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2002. University of Maryland. http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/polity/index.htm. Cited 20 September 2005

  • Martinez KE, Crenshaw EM, Jenkins JC (2002) Deforestation and the Environmental Kuznets Curve: a cross-national investigation of intervening mechanisms. Soc Sci Quart 83(1): 226–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer AL, van Kooten GC, Wang S (2003) Institutional, social and economic roots of deforestation: further evidence of an environmental Kuznets relation?. Int Forest Rev 5: 29–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midlarsky M (1998) Democracy and the environment: an empirical assessment. J Peace Res 35(3): 341–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munck GL, Verkuilen J (2002) Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: evaluating alternative indices. Comp Polit Stud 35(1): 5–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer E (2002) Do democracies exhibit stronger international environmental commitment? A cross-country analysis. J Peace Res 39(2): 139–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panayotou T (1993) Empirical test and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development. Working paper WP 238, Technology and Environment Programme, International Labour Organisation (ILO), Geneva

  • Payne RA (1995) Freedom and the environment. J Democr 6(3): 41–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini L, Gerlagh R (2006) Corruption, democracy, and environmental policy: an empirical contribution to the debate. J Environ Dev 15(3): 332–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts JT, Parks BC (2007) A climate of injustice global inequality, North-South politics, and climate policy. MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass)

    Google Scholar 

  • Scruggs LA (1998) Political and economic inequality and the environment. Ecol Econ 26(3): 259–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shandra JM (2007) The world polity and deforestation: a quantitative, cross-national analysis. Int J Comp Sociol 48(1): 5–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank (2005) World Development Indicators. The World Bank, Washington DC. http://www.worldbank.org/data/wdi2005. Cited 25 September 2005

  • Torras M, Boyce JK (1998) Income, inequality, and pollution: a reassessment of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Ecol Econ 25(2): 147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanhanen T (2005) Measures of democracy 1810–2004. Finnish Social Science Data Archive, Tampere. http://www.fsd.uta.fi/english/data/catalogue/FSD1289/. Cited 5 September 2005

  • Weidner H (2002) Capacity building for ecological modernization: lessons from cross-national research. Am Behav Sci 45(9): 1340–1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsch H (2004) Corruption, growth, and the environment: a cross-country analysis. Environ Dev Econ 9: 663–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meilanie Buitenzorgy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buitenzorgy, M., P. J. Mol, A. Does Democracy Lead to a Better Environment? Deforestation and the Democratic Transition Peak. Environ Resource Econ 48, 59–70 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9397-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9397-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation