Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Mixed Logit Approach to Study Preferences for Safety on Alpine Roads

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a mixed logit approach to the valuation of reductions in mortality risk on Alpine roads. In addition to common road accidents, users of these roads face risks from natural hazards such as avalanches and rockfalls. Moreover, the individual risk of road users varies with the frequency of their exposure. Drawing on choice experimental data of frequently exposed respondents from a mountainous region and less frequently exposed respondents from a city in Switzerland, we are able to estimate the value of statistical life (VSL). Furthermore, we explore how respondents differ in their individual willingness-to-pay depending on exposure and other individual characteristics. Our estimates of the VSL in the context of fatal accidents on Alpine roads are in the range of CHF 6.0–7.8 million (€3.9–5.1 million). We find the VSL to be dependent on socio-economic and perceptional factors but to be not significantly altered by the type of hazard. These findings imply that the VSL might be adjusted to account for heterogonous risk preferences of different societal groups, but there is no evidence of a ‘dread’ premium for natural hazards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberini A, Tonin S, Turvani M et al (2007) Paying for permanence: public preferences for contaminated site cleanup. J Risk Uncertain 34: 155–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K, Solow R, Portney P et al (1993) Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Fed Regist 58: 4601–4614

    Google Scholar 

  • Baranzini A, Ferro Luzzi G (2001) The economic value of risks to life: evidence from the Swiss labour market. Swiss J Econ Stat 137: 149–170

    Google Scholar 

  • BFS (2009) Swiss statistical encyclopedia. Published by the Swiss Federal Statistical Office (BFS). http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/en/index/infothek/lexikon.html. Last accessed on: 08/08/2010

  • Bierlaire M (2003) BIOGEME: A free package for the estimation of discrete choice models. In: Paper presented at the proceedings of the 3rd Swiss transportation research conference. Ascona, Switzerland

  • Brouwer R, Bateman IJ (2005) Temporal stability and transferability of models of willingness to pay for flood control and wetland conservation. Water Resour Res 41: W03017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell D, Hutchinson WG, Scarpa R (2008) Incorporating discontinuous preferences into the analysis of discrete choice experiments. Environ Resour Econ 41: 401–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chilton S, Jones-Lee M, Kiraly F et al (2006) Dread risks. J Risk Uncertain 33: 165–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corso PS, Hammitt JK, Graham JD (2001) Valuing mortality-risk reduction: using visual aids to improve the validity of contingent valuation. J Risk Uncertain 23: 165–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson DJ, Freudenburg WR (1996) Gender and environmental concerns: a review and analysis of available research. Environ Behav 28: 302–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Blaeij A, Florax RJGM, Rietveld P et al (2003) The value of statistical life in road safety: a meta-analysis. Accid Anal Prev 35: 973–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhoudt LR, Hammitt JK (2001) Background risks and the value of a statistical life. J Risk Uncertain 23: 261–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrini S, Scarpa R (2007) Designs with a priori information for nonmarket valuation with choice experiments: A Monte Carlo study. J Environ Econ Manag 53: 342–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green DP, Jacowitz KE, Kahneman D et al (1998) Referendum contingent valuation, anchoring, and willingness to pay for public goods. Resour Energ Econ 20: 85–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammitt JK (2000) Valuing mortality risk: theory and practice. Environ Sci Technol 34: 1396–1400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammitt JK, Treich N (2007) Statistical vs. identified lives in benefit-cost analysis. J Risk Uncertain 35: 45–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heberlein TA, Wilson MA, Bishop RC et al (2005) Rethinking the scope test as a criterion for validity in contingent valuation. J Environ Econ Manag 50: 1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itaoka K, Saito A, Krupnick A et al (2006) The effect of risk characteristics on the willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions from electric power generation. Environ Resour Econ 33: 371–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson PO (2002) On the definition and age dependency of the value of a statistical life. J Risk Uncertain 25: 251–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Lee MW (1991) Altruism and the value of other people’s safety. J Risk Uncertain 4: 213–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplow L (2005) The value of a statistical life and the coefficient of relative risk aversion. J Risk Uncertain 31: 23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knetsch JL (2010) Values of gains and losses: reference states and choice of measure. Environ Resour Econ 46: 179–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochi I, Hubbell B, Kramer R (2006) An empirical Bayes approach to combining and comparing estimates of the value of a statistical life for environmental policy analysis. Environ Resour Econ 34: 385–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiter AM, Pruckner GJ (2009) Proportionality of willingness to pay to small changes in risk: the impact of attitudinal factors in scope tests. Environ Resour Econ 42: 169–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD (2000) Stated choice methods: analysis and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden D (2001) Economic choices. Am Econ Rev 91: 351–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PLANAT (2005) Strategie Naturgefahren Schweiz. Technical report, published on behalf of the Swiss National Platform for Natural Hazards (PLANAT). http://www.planat.ch. Last accessed on:12/12/2009

  • Pratt JW, Zeckhauser RJ (1996) Willingness to pay and the distribution of risk and wealth. J Polit Econ 104: 747–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revelt D, Train K (1998) Mixed logit with repeated choices: households’ choices of appliance efficiency level. Rev Econ Stat 80: 647–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schläpfer F (2008) Contingent valuation: a new perspective. Ecol Econ 64: 729–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S (2000) Facts and fears: understanding perceived risk. In: Slovic P (eds) The perception of risk. Earthscan, London, pp 137–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein CR (2004) Valuing life: a plea for disaggregation. Duke Law J 54: 385–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Tengs TO, Adams ME, Pliskin JS et al (1995) 500 Lifesaving interventions and their cost-effectiveness. Risk Anal 15: 369–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiene M, Scarpa R (2009) Deriving and testing efficient estimates of WTP distributions in destination choice models. Environ Resour Econ 44: 379–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Train KE (2003) Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi WK, Aldy JE (2003) The value of a statistical life: a critical review of market estimates throughout the world. J Risk Uncertain 27: 5–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi WK, Magat WA, Forrest A (1988) Altruistic and private valuations of risk reduction. J Policy Anal Manag 7: 227–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai GF, Ikeda S (2006) Flood risk acceptability and economic value of evacuation. Risk Anal 26: 683–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. LERNA, Toulouse School of Economics, Manufacture des Tabacs, 21 Allée de Brienne, 31000, Toulouse, France

    Christoph M. Rheinberger

  2. WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research, Flüelastrasse 11, 7260, Davos, Switzerland

    Christoph M. Rheinberger

Authors
  1. Christoph M. Rheinberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph M. Rheinberger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rheinberger, C.M. A Mixed Logit Approach to Study Preferences for Safety on Alpine Roads. Environ Resource Econ 49, 121–146 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9427-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9427-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation