Skip to main content
Log in

Selling the Farm Silver? Understanding Water Sales to the Australian Government

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 2007–2008 the Australian federal government committed $3.1 billion over 10 years to purchase water from irrigators in the Murray-Darling Basin and to deliver this water to key environmental assets. Given that water entitlements often represent one of the most valuable assets owned by irrigators, this study investigates irrigators’ willingness to sell water, and their actual water sales, to the government. It uses 1,570 surveys from 2008–2009 and 2010–2011 in the southern Murray-Darling Basin. Water sales can be classified as either last resort or strategic. Overall, the results suggest that farmers who do not hold strong traditional farming attitudes, and have higher debt, lower farm income, larger high security water entitlements, lower water allocations over the past 5 years, and those who have been net sellers of water allocations are more likely to have sold water or are thinking of selling water to the government. A dynamic comparison of how water sale preferences change, and an estimate of the total amount of water entitlements irrigators are willing to sell, indicates that it is probable that there will be enough water offered to the program in the future, at least to meet initial minimum environmental water targets. However, other concerns indicate that a potential restructure of the program may be required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

MDB:

Murray-Darling Basin

MDBA:

Murray-Darling Basin Authority

GMID:

Goulburn-Murray Irrigation District

RtB:

Restoring the Balance

SA:

South Australia

NSW:

New South Wales

VIC:

Victoria

References

  • ACCC (2011) Water monitoring report 2009–2010. Available at http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/985068

  • Bjornlund H (2004) Formal and informal water markets—drivers of sustainable rural communities?. Water Resour Res 40: W09S07

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C (2009) Factors influencing participation of ‘top-down but voluntary’ fishery management—empirical evidence from Taiwan. Mar Policy 34: 150–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crase L, O’Keefe S (2009) The paradox of national water savings: a critique of ‘Water for the Future’. Agenda 16: 45–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Crase L, O’Keefe S, Dollery B (2011) Presumptions of linearity and faith in the power of centralised decision-marking: two challenges to the efficient management of environmental water in Australia. In: Western economic association international’s Pacific rim conference, QUT, Brisbane, April 26–29, 2011

  • DEWHA (2008) Review of the 2007–2008 water entitlement purchases. Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, September 24, 2008

  • DSEWPC (2011) Progress of water recovery under the restoring the balance in the Murray-Darling Basin program. Available online: http://www.environment.gov.au/water/policy-programs/entitlement-purchasing/2008-09.html. Last Accessed 28 June 2011

  • Edwards J, Cheers B, Bjornlund H (2008) Social economic and community impacts of water markets in Australia’s Murray-Darling Basin region. Int J Interdiscipl Soc Sci 2: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenton M (2006) The social implications of permanent water trading in the Loddon-Campaspe irrigation region of Northern Victoria. Report Prepared for North Central Catchment Management Authority, May, 2006

  • GMW (2008) 2007/2008 Goulburn-Murray water annual report. Available online: http://www.g-mwater.com.au/downloads/Annual_Reports/G_MW_2007_08_Annual_Report_LR.pdf. Last Accessed 20 June 2010

  • Grafton RQ (2011) Economic costs and benefits of the proposed basin plan. In: Connell D, Grafton RQ (eds) Basin futures: water reform in the Murray-Darling Basin. Griffin Press, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene W (2008) Econometric analysis. Pearson Education Inc, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair J, Anderson R, Tatham R, Black W (1998) Multivariate data analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Ise S, Sunding D (1998) Reallocating water from agriculture to the environment under a voluntary purchase program. Rev Agri Econ 20: 214–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Knetsch J, Thaler R (1990) Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase Theorem. J Polit Econ 98: 1325–1348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser H (1974) An index of factor simplicity. Psychometrika 39:31–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitts A, Thunberg E, Robertson J (2001) Willingness to participate and bids in a fishing vessel buyout program: a case study of New England Groundfish. Mar Resour Econ 15: 221–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuehne G, Bjornlund H, Loch A (2010) Why do farmers make Non-profit decisions— investigating decisions made during drought. RIRDC Publication No 10/075. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Canberra

  • Maybery D, Crase L, Gullifer C (2005) Categorising farming values as economic, conservation and lifestyle. J Econ Psychol 26: 59–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • (2010) Guide to the proposed basin plan, volume 1: overview. Murray–Darling Basin Authority, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison M, Durante G, Greig J, Ward J, Oczkowski E (2011) Segmenting landholders for improving the targeting of natural resource management expenditures. J Environ Plann Man (forthcoming)

  • (2011) Australian water markets: trends and drivers 2007–2008 to 2009–2010. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Raftery A (1996) Bayesian model selection in social research. In: Marsden PV (ed) Sociological methodology, vol 26. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 111–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens J (2002) Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences, 4th edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Thampapillai V (2009a) Limits of market-based water governance for environmental flows in the Murray Darling Basin—part 1. Environ Policy Law 39: 247–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Thampapillai V (2009b) Limits of market-based water governance for environmental flows in the Murray Darling basin—part 2. Environ Policy Law 39: 317–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson G (1951) The factorial analysis of human ability. University of London Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Walpole S, Enders G, Roe M (2010) The living Murray NSW market purchase measure: a survey of participants in permanent water trading for the environment. Contributed paper to the Australian agricultural & resource economics society’s 54th annual conference, Adelaide, February 10–12, 2010

  • Wheeler S, Bjornlund H, Shanahan M, Zuo A (2009) Who trades water allocations? Evidence of the characteristics of early adopters in the Goulburn-Murray Irrigation District, Australia 1998–1999. Agri Econ 40: 631–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler S, Bjornlund H, Zuo A, Shanahan M (2010) The changing profile of water traders in the Goulburn-Murray Irrigation District, Australia. Agr Water Manage 97: 1333–1343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler S, Garrick D, Loch A, Bjornlund H (2011) Incorporating temporary trade with the buy-back of water entitlements in Australia. Centre for Water Economics, Environment & Policy, ANU, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead J, Pattanayak S, Van Houtven G, Gelso B (2008) Combining revealed and stated preference data to estimate the nonmarket value of ecological services: an assessment of the state of the science. J Econ Surveys 22: 872–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson A (1976) Multivariate analysis: data reduction and treatment evaluation. Brit J Psychiat 128: 404–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Wheeler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wheeler, S., Zuo, A., Bjornlund, H. et al. Selling the Farm Silver? Understanding Water Sales to the Australian Government. Environ Resource Econ 52, 133–154 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9523-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9523-5

Keywords

Navigation