Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is it Beneficial to be Included in a Sustainability Stock Index? A Panel Data Study for European Firms

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper empirically examines the effect of inclusion in the Dow Jones Sustainability World Index (DJSI World) on corporate financial performance. On the basis of panel data for European firms that were included in the Dow Jones Stoxx 600 Index over time, our micro-econometric analysis with fixed and random effects models implies positive impacts on return on assets for continental European countries, but insignificant effects for Anglo-Saxon European countries (i.e., the United Kingdom and Ireland). Furthermore, the impacts on alternative indicators of corporate financial performance such as Tobin’s Q are generally insignificant. The weak or neutral effect of inclusion in the DJSI World on corporate financial performance can be explained by several mutually confounding factors. Furthermore, the composition of this sustainability stock index is influenced by factors that need not necessarily be directly connected to corporate environmental or social activities, so that potential positive and negative effects of corporate sustainability performance on financial performance can be weakened. Methodologically, this study again supports the strong relevance of unobserved firm heterogeneity since the application of misspecified pooled regression models leads to obviously biased estimation results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arellano M, Bond SR (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58: 277–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett ML, Salomon RM (2006) Beyond dichotomy: the curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strateg Manag J 27: 1101–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17: 99–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer R, Koedijk K, Otten R (2005) International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style. J Bank Finance 29: 1751–1767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becchetti L, Di Giacomo S, Pinnacchio D (2008) Corporate social responsibility and corporate performance: evidence from a panel of US listed companies. Appl Econ 40: 541–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond SR (2002) Dynamic panel data models: a guide to micro data methods and practice. Portugese Econ J 1: 141–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cañón-de-Francia J, Garcés-Ayerbe C (2009) ISO 14001 environmental certification: a sign valued by the market?. Environ Resour Econ 44: 245–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung KH, Pruitt SW (1994) A simple approximation of Tobin’s Q. Financ Manag 23: 70–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran MM, Moran D (2007) Impact of the FTSE4Good index on firm price: an event study. J Environ Manag 82: 529–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta S, Laplante B, Nlandu M (2001) Pollution and capital markets in developing countries. J Environ Econ Manag 42: 310–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derwall J, Guenster N, Bauer R, Koedijk K (2005) The eco-efficiency premium puzzle. Financ Anal J 61: 51–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsayed K, Paton D (2005) The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: static and dynamic panel data evidence. Struct Change Econ Dyn 16: 395–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filbeck G, Gorman RF (2004) The relationship between the environmental and financial performance of public utilities. Environ Resour Econ 29: 137–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 13 Sept 1970

  • Guenster N, Bauer R, Derwall J, Koedijk K (2011) The economic value of corporate eco-efficiency. Eur Financ Manag (forthcoming)

  • Gupta S, Goldar B (2005) Do stock markets penalize environment-unfriendly behaviour? Evidence from India. Ecol Econ 52: 81–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart SL, Ahuja G (1996) Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Bus Strateg Environ 5: 30–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heal G (2005) Corporate social responsibility: an economic and financial framework. Geneva Pap 30: 387–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch BT, Seaks TG (1993) Functional form in regression models of Tobin’s Q. Rev Econ Stat 75: 381–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempf A, Osthoff P (2007) The effect of socially responsible investing on portfolio performance. Eur Financ Manag 13: 908–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna M, Quimo WR, Bojilova D (1998) Toxics release information: a policy tool for environmental protection. J Environ Econ Manag 36: 243–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King A, Lenox M (2001) Does it really pay to be green?. J Ind Ecol 5: 105–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King A, Lenox M (2002) Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Manag Sci 48: 289–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koellner T, Suh S, Weber O, Moser C, Scholz RW (2007) Environmental impacts of conventional and sustainable investment funds compared using input–output life-cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 11: 41–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konar S, Cohen MA (1997) Information as regulation: the effect of community right to know laws on toxic emissions. J Environ Econ Manag 32: 109–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konar S, Cohen MA (2001) Does the market value environmental performance. Rev Econ Stat 83: 281–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg E, Ross S (1981) Tobin’s Q ratio and industrial organization. J Bus 54: 1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams A, Siegel D (2000) Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification?. Strateg Manag J 21: 603–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams A, Siegel D (2001) Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. Acad Manag Rev 26: 117–127

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams A, Siegel D, Wright PM (2006) Corporate social responsibility: strategic implications. J Manag Stud 43: 1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky M (2001) Does firm size confound the relationship between corporate social performance and firm performance. J Bus Ethics 33: 167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posnikoff JF (1997) Disinvestment from South Africa: they did well by doing good. Contemp Econ Policy 15: 76–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renneboog L, Horst JT, Zhang C (2008) Socially responsible investments: institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior. J Bank Finance 32: 1723–1742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo MV, Fouts PA (1997) A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Acad Manag J 40: 534–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder M (2007) Is there a difference? The performance characteristics of SRI equity indices. J Bus Finance Acc 34: 331–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1997) A survey of corporate governance. J Finance 52: 737–783

    Google Scholar 

  • Telle K (2006) “It pays to be green”—a premature conclusion?. Environ Resour Econ 35: 195–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirole J (2006) The theory of corporate finance. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock S, Graves SB (1997) The corporate social performance—financial performance link. Strateg Manag J 18: 303–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler A, Schröder M (2010) What determines the inclusion in a sustainability stock index? A panel data analysis for European companies. Ecol Econ 29: 848–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler A, Schröder M, Rennings K (2007) The effect of environmental and social performance on the stock performance of European corporations. Environ Resour Econ 37: 661–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, University of Kassel, Nora-Platiel-Str. 5, 34109, Kassel, Germany

    Andreas Ziegler

  2. Center for Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability, University of Zurich, Künstlergasse 15a, 8001, Zurich, Switzerland

    Andreas Ziegler

Authors
  1. Andreas Ziegler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Ziegler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ziegler, A. Is it Beneficial to be Included in a Sustainability Stock Index? A Panel Data Study for European Firms. Environ Resource Econ 52, 301–325 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9529-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9529-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation