Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cross-Country Polarisation in CO2 Emissions Per Capita in the European Union: Changes and Explanatory Factors

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analyse the degree of polarisation in the international distribution of CO2 emissions per capita in the European Union. It is analytically relevant to examine the degree of instability inherent to a distribution and, in the analysed case, the likelihood that the distribution and its evolution will increase or decrease the chances of reaching an agreement on climate policy. Two approaches were used to measure polarisation: the endogenous approach, in which countries are grouped according to their similarity in terms of emissions, and the exogenous approach, in which countries are grouped geographically. Our findings indicate a clear decrease in polarisation since the mid-1990s, which can essentially be explained by the fact that the different groups have converged (i.e. antagonism among the CO2 emitters has decreased) as the contribution of energy intensity to between-group differences has decreased. This lower degree of polarisation in CO2 distribution suggests a situation more conducive to the possibility of reaching EU-wide agreements on the mitigation of CO2 emissions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bianchi M (1997) Testing for convergence: evidence from non-parametric multimodality tests. J Appl Econom 12: 393–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowell F (1995) Measuring inequality. 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies J, Shorrocks A (1989) Optimal grouping of income and wealth data. J Econom 42: 97–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duro JA (2005) Another look to income polarization across countries. J Policy Model 27: 1001–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duro JA (2010) Decomposing international polarization of per capita CO2 emissions. Energy Policy 38: 6529–6533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duro JA, Padilla E (2006) International inequalities in per capita CO2 emissions: a decomposition methodology by kaya factors. Energy Econ 28: 170–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duro JA, Padilla E (2008) Analysis of the international distribution of per capita CO2 emissions using the polarization concept. Energy Policy 36: 456–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esteban J, Ray D (1994) On the measurement of polarization. Econometrica 62: 819–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esteban J, Gradín C, Ray D (2007) An extension of a measure of polarization, with an application to the income distribution of five OECD countries. J Econ Inequal 5: 1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezcurra R (2007) Is there cross-country convergence in carbon dioxide emissions?. Energy Policy 35: 1363–1372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezcurra R, Pascual P, Rapún M (2007) Spatial disparities in the European Union: an analysis of regional polarization. Ann Reg Sci 41: 401–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedenus F, Azar C (2005) Estimates of trends in global income and resource inequalities. Ecol Econ 55: 351–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heil MT, Wodon QT (1997) Inequality in CO2 emissions between poor and rich countries. J Environ Dev 6: 426–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (IEA): (2010a) CO2 emissions from fuel combustion. IEA, OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (IEA): (2010b) Energy balances of OECD countries. IEA, OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (IEA): (2010c) Energy balances of non-OECD countries. IEA, OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaya Y (1989) Impact of carbon dioxide emission control on GNP growth: interpretation of proposed scenarios. Paper presented to the Energy and Industry Subgroup, Response Strategies Working Group, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Paris, France

  • Padilla E, Duro JA (2011) Explanatory factors of CO2 per capita emission inequality in the European Union, mimeo

  • Padilla E, Serrano A (2006) Inequality in CO2 emissions across countries and its relationship with income inequality: a distributive approach. Energy Policy 34(14): 1762–1772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips P, Sul D (2007) Transition modeling and econometric convergence tests. Econometrica 75(6): 1771–1855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah D (1997) Empirics for growth and distribution: stratification, polarization and convergence clubs. J Econ Growth 2: 27–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks A (1980) The class of additively decomposable inequality measures. Econometrica 48: 613–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks A (1984) Inequality decomposition by population subgroups. Econometrica 52: 1369–1386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman BW (1986) Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. In: Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability. vol 26. Chapman and Hall, London

  • Wang YQ, Tsui KY (2000) Polarization orderings and new classes of polarization indices. J Public Econ Theory 2: 349–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfson M (1994) When inequalities diverge. Am Econ Rev P&P 94: 353–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfson M (1997) Divergent inequalities: theory and empirical results. Rev Income Wealth 43: 401–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Kanbur R (2001) What difference do polarization measures make? An application to China. J Dev Stud 37: 85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emilio Padilla.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duro, J.A., Padilla, E. Cross-Country Polarisation in CO2 Emissions Per Capita in the European Union: Changes and Explanatory Factors. Environ Resource Econ 54, 571–591 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9607-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9607-x

Keywords

Navigation